Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

NI Census 2021

Options
191012141522

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    This is getting tiresome. I never suggested anything like ethnic cleansing, and if Arlene wants to stay or leave, that is entirely her decision.

    Of course all Unionists, Loyalists, Nationalists, Republicans, and those others that do not fit into any of these categories, are most welcome into a UI.

    Moreover, it is hoped that they contribute and benefit from a UI, as most certainly will.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You are the poster who has shouted down every single piece of evidence about the costs of a united Ireland, and now you bemoan the absence of a plan???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    At risk of repeating myself, the web of lies that you weave around the words of other posters destroys discussion and debate.

    I never said that I was smarter than anyone else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Need to make the New Ireland attractive to all so. Compromise all round required.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,319 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You spotted 'square brackets' that two civil services and 2 leaders didn't recognise the import of and organised a press/photo op to hail a deal to resume the Executive only for the DUP to walk away again.

    I said 'you were smarter' than them, I never claimed you said it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    That is why Varadkar was putting federal solutions on the table at the weekend. That he was booed by the United Irelanders for doing so shows the long road we have to travel, another few decades, before a sensible proposal can be put on the table.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,319 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Having corrected you on what actually happened (his contribution was applauded, and he was booed by a small number when making a different point to the federal one) this has to be seen as willful lying about what happened.

    P.S. Leo was there as a 'United Irelander' BTW.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You can watch it online, it was in response to him reaching out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,319 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady



    He did NOT get booed because he suggested a federal solution which is what you said here:

    That is why Varadkar was putting federal solutions on the table at the weekend. That he was booed by the United Irelanders for doing so shows the long road we have to travel, another few decades, before a sensible proposal can be put on the table.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,643 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Interesting piece from unionist commentator, Newton Emerson, in the Irish Times on Thursday. Article was titled 'Vision of unity still at the fantasy stage - paradise without the pain'. I thought this was a useful point on the federalism debate:

    'Northern Ireland could not endure as a polity, which is what Stormont's survival would mean, should nationalism win a border poll.


    'It would be irrational under the two-communities model of the agreement for unionism to become the smaller community and still trap a nationalist majority behind a border.


    'The emerging three-communities model of unionist, nationalist and other introduces a complication. When a fifth of the population have a Northern Ireland-only identity, it becomes theoretically possible for a vote against the union to not be a vote against partition. However, there would be no way to gauge this under the binary poll required by the agreement and, in any case, it would be an unworkable outcome. Nationalists might withdraw from Stormont, understandably, and that would be the end of it.


    'The logical continuance of the Belfast Agreement into a united Ireland would be to adopt some of its powersharing protections in Dublin, such as weighted voting in the Dail or mandatory offers of Cabinet seats, preferably without the vetoes that have caused deadlock at Stormont.'

    I agree with the general thrust of this. A federal option is impractical. Stormont has been down 40% of its entire history and as Emerson points out, it could only continue as a powersharing executive if the nationalist parties want it to. It could even be a big can of worms if, say, Sinn Fein were to collapse a northern assembly and then you had the Dublin assembly - possibly also led by SF - then taking decisions that affect loyalist areas in the North. Then you'd have loyalists complaining that they were promised two assemblies only to be left with one. They'd say they were hoodwinked, conned, etc.

    Far better imo to have one executive for the island, and to provide safeguards for the unionists through that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Nope. I was there and the booing came from just behind me (maybe 4 or 5 people). The reason he was booed was because Leo was advocating a solution which would suit FG politics without any discussion. No other speaker went that route of saying what it should be. All were advocating that discussion/assemblies was needed. Indeed, I can't remember who actually said that the politicians need to get out of the discussion for now, and let civil society sort it.

    Leo was not reaching out. He came across as very arrogant deciding the solution. I can understand why people there were annoyed with him. All he was advocating was to just change the sovereignty from London to Dublin. He knows that FG's days are numbered in a UI - FG will never be in power again (unless with a coalition with some of the unionist parties).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The only one who presented anything other than a single unitary state was booed, that says it all about the ability of exclusionary nationalism to compromise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Leo was the only one making a statement as to what type of State he wanted. Leo was proposing a single unitary state with sovereignty from Dublin and Stormont to continue as is. Way too early to be proposing something like this without any consultation with any of the main stakeholders. His plan was totally FG, top down self interest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,319 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    He wasn't the ONLY one, Jim O'Callaghan also spoke of a federal solution. And other speakers stressed that the solution and way we wanted to be governed had to be open to discussion.

    Varadkar was applauded for his contribution like everyone else was.

    But of course blanch will present 3 to 4 people booing for a short period as a house full of 'exclusionary nationalists'.

    Agenda's and all that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,319 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Speaking of 'exclusionary'.

    I’m working for Reuters news agency & LBC News today. #DUP @duponline

    press officer John Robinson has said I won’t be allowed into the conference because I was at the Ireland’s Future conference. I was at the conference as a journalist, a paid interviewer.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie


    Varadkar and Coveney saying the protocol is too strict must be a slap in the face for those who like to blame everything on UK intransigence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,319 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Everybody (well, almost everyone) knew there were checks and balances and flexibilities built into sort unforseen issues. They'll be what will now be used to reach an agreement between the EU and UK.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    You are telling us 3 or 4 people could be heard booing 😂😂😂 I thought there was a claim that the massive publicity had managed to achieve about one third of the seats were occupied in the arena. If 3 or 4 people could create such a noise then I smell a rat



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 623 ✭✭✭Speedline


    There's another one in Belfast on the 12th of October. You can go to it and openly sneer at them instead of doing it on here behind a keyboard.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,319 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Bryson and his allies are already threatening trouble at that one.

    Unionism, banning journalists, on governance strike, trying to ferment violence is on the backfoot bigtime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,643 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Weighted voting, cabinet seats as mentioned in the article would be a start. I'd imagine also a ministry role for East-West relations would be an option too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,495 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    What do you mean by weighted voting? And who would the cabinet seats be for?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,768 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Look, if there was a UI, then the population of those not born on the island of Ireland would be close to, or exceed, those who vote Unionist in NI.

    15% of the population of Ireland were not born in Ireland - British, Poles, Africans, EU26, plus many more.

    The Unionists should get the same rights as any citizen of Ireland if there was unification.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Glad to see that federal solutions are now becoming mainstream. It is only a few months since I posted about it and was shouted down on here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    The census also tells us that 0.2% use Irish as their preferred language. Would you say that group is getting a wee bit of preferential treatment above what their numbers would require. So why not other minorities in a ‘new Ireland’?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,424 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Do you have a link to “Bryson threatening trouble” at the Belfast pantomime?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie


    Looks like it but the great and good across boards(disgruntled republicans and anti British brigade)don't like it as it doesn't fit into their version of things.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,319 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    If they had a strategic brain, there was always a case to use the built-in flexibility. They decided to double down on their Brexit backing and drove themselves into the cul-de-sac they now find themselves in.



Advertisement
Advertisement