Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1167168170172173257

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭TheChrisD


    I just think that having the terminus also be at the Point Village would be more convenient for drivers on break in terms of amenities, as well as being a more obvious focal point for passengers.

    Change things around once Spencer Dock rail station is actually built and operational.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The drivers don’t take their breaks in Docklands.

    On the N4 they change at DCU and drive to/from Harristown using staff cars.

    On the G Spine they will change at Eden Quay so they can use the company canteen at Earl Place.

    Incidentally there is a SPAR shop right beside the new G-Spine terminus if drivers want to get anything while laying over between trips.

    You have to remember that with the frequency that both operate at, the N4 and G-Spine need space for anything up to 4 or 5 buses each at the terminus at any time - combining that (up to 9 or 10 buses) isn’t going to be possible in one street nor is it desirable.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,834 ✭✭✭thomasj




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Which translates to what has been posted already - last stop is on Castleforbes Road and first stop on New Wapping Street.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,761 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Which is about 300m more than is recommended for major trip generators.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Again, you have to be practical about this.

    I have explained why you can’t have all of the buses on North Wall Avenue.

    I admire your vision, but you also have to be practical about it.

    A traffic generator that isn’t generating each day, has limited hours, and which causes major traffic congestion.

    Personally I think that the G-Spine is terminating in the right place. Close to the 3Arena but far enough away for crowds to dissipate a little.

    And if someone can’t walk to the bus, then surely they can take the LUAS?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    I was at a concert in the 3 Arena there recently have to say the Luas was a total sh*tshow there was a 20 minute wait for a Luas after the concert so I ended up walking from there to D'Olier Street to catch my bus.

    Good to see more transport options in that area always thought it was a bit of a public transport wasteland down that part of town bar the Luas.



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭A2000


    Locals protested about the removal of 79/79a and the frequency of the 60 outside the nta offices today. The issues are to be looked by head of ntawith a response on 12th from nta followed by a public meeting on 14th. At least 2 people enquired about the extra term time departures on the 60 on dB twitter page. Db again say they hold no information on same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Seems there's a spate of anti-social issues along balgaddy road in Lucan, which is affecting the L53 and L54.

    *That should say Foxborough Road, not Foxedene Ave.

    See below for routing (red=existing, green=detour):

    According to the comments, drivers have mentioned that the change might be made permanent if the issues continue.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    They just seem incapable of engaging with communities and then getting the information right. That’s basic stuff. A timetable is a full list of buses. Unreal.

    I suspect that they’re going to get a big pushback against the service reduction in Lower Ballyfermot and from the longer journeys via Mount Brown.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Awful that drivers and passengers are targeted like that still. Predictable though. The same places again and again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭Daith


    Yep. Same in Finglas and St Helena's Road (mostly). Almost wish the 40 just went down Wellmount Road and skipped that part. And the Luas will be going through it. Wish something could be done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 259 ✭✭DaBluBoi


    Yeah no, that area has been notoriously crap since I moved here. I'm surprised these issues have only been highlighted now and not within like the first month of those routes though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    The thing is really the problems only really occur after 6 or 7 in the evening. During the day most of the routes are fairly peaceful bar the odd junkie.



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭A2000


    Far too late in the morning to be term time departures. Looks like the 60 is being set up to fail.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭A2000


    There's also a public meeting in leixlip tonight about the deterioration in service since bus connects https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02zPeGjqYBbvkNaA3jenHjpXJWkYAazqdgAwanLc82dfh7DSYQHs9Z95gmCU6d2V9kl&id=100058280641286

    Post edited by A2000 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The problem is that there is a confluence of problems that people are blaming on BusConnects.

    Buses not showing up and real time information not working isn’t a BusConnects issue. They’re happening across the entire network and are down to the ongoing staffing issues and IT problems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Is the plan still to roll out virtually all of the bus connects routed next year? Do we have the drivers and buses to do that?

    On infrastructure presumably the clongriffin corridor is due to get planning permission by the end of Q1 2023. Haven't seen any tendering or asked consultation on it though. Lots of work go be done. It seems to me that the whole project is becoming a little bit dated already, as the rest of Europe moves towards low car-zero car design we're widening roads and retaining turning lanes, and even multi lane through roads in parts at the expense of footpaths, or bus and cycle segregation. I hope that we don't end up with in 10 years time with all the city's arterial roads freshly rebuilt to a design that's out of kilter with current best practice.


    The clontarf to city scheme currently under construction is a good example of what I mean. Designed to standards a decade or more ago, it incorporates 6 lane roads and miniscule footpaths with no additional greenspace and no deterrent to the current park-where-you-like set up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    BusConnects network has two more years to roll out per the plan, until December 2024.

    You’re asking an impossible question about the availability of staff - who knows?

    As it stands GAI was still cancelling services yesterday, and so have been Dublin Bus.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    I have applied a number of times to Dublin Bus in the last while and they keep rejecting me in no uncertain terms have a bus licence and a bit of experience and all.

    It all seems a bit rich considering there's an industry wide shortage of drivers. Compared to operators in the UK who it appears will take anyone and everyone once there's an arse to sit in the drivers seat and can drive to a reasonably competent standard they're happy.

    It seems DB are looking for something more and I'm not the only one I know some who've worked as bus drivers in other countries and still get fobbed off by DB. For example a chap I know worked for Arriva London and was rejected by DB.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    I don't know if that's reasonable to say, but I think DB and especially GAI prefer unexperienced drivers who then can be trained and supported in getting a D licence as operators can pay them a lower starting wage. It's easier to make less experienced drivers to commit and stick around for longer rather than get a year of experience and leave. I don't think it's very feasible to desperately get anyone knowing that they will leave soon...

    I also could guess that operators might possibly have issues moneywise? The NTA provide funding, but diesel prices jumped drastically within a 12 months' time. I wonder, how often the NTA review and adjust a funding? Can't it be that the operators better off cancelling services rather than paying higher wages to attract more drivers? I would be very difficult to increase the salaries to new drivers but avoid increasing to current drivers... That's a huge number of employees and an amount of money to spare from the budget... It seems to me the whole driver shortage thing is being dealt ineffectively. That shows it's either being done deliberately or simply a huge mismanagement, or a bit of both.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Things must be fairly desperate with DB saw an inspector driving the 16 yesterday wearing the peaked cap and all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,540 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    I have been looking at the comments section of that post by the Social Democrats about their survey being completed on the C-Spine routes in Leixlip.

    While reading them; there is a comment from one lady there who has a friend who uses multiple bus routes while travelling from Tallaght to UCD to be there at 9am.

    The solution to that problem on paper is that the young person's friend will have to take the S6 from to Tallaght to Blackrock Dart Station via UCD.

    However; we still do not have a start date for the Southern Orbitals to commence for BusConnects Dublin posted here on boards yet which is the phase after the G-Spine. The G-Spine will begin to run services, which are the G1, G2 & 60, from this Sunday.

    What is the story here? Is there any news for the Southern Orbitals to start soon.

    Also would the issues with driver shortages at Go Ahead Ireland, who will run the S6 route, be sorted out by the time these new routes get rolled out to their passengers?

    Post edited by dublinman1990 on


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Last I heard, S2, S4, S6, S8, L25 and 74 were all supposed to launch on December 4th. That's from over two months ago now. That could still be the case but I'm still trying to find out what the latest is. Works are starting now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well at least some reality is setting in.

    The uplift in frequency is significant with these services, and if the operators cannot staff the current services, there wouldn’t be a hope of covering these too.

    Hopefully the staff can be found and retained in the meantime.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    Not surprised. Hopefully they can get it sorted by then.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    @LXFlyer can you link or share a map of the city centre routes which avoid college green?

    Have BC officially decided to avoid college green or not? Only the older map is available on BC site



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The map was in the report on submissions to the 2019 consultation. Page 26.

    While described as indicative, I think that you can be pretty sure that this will be implemented based on everything we are hearing.

    Buses (A, E and F Spines) and trams will still pass along the eastern side of College Green to/from Grafton Street.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Thanks yeah. I was just thinking about the Rathmines buses. They'll be returning to their older routes which were changed during Luas cross city works I think?

    From my perspective on the Northside, it is super handy that the 14, 15 go down George's street. From the Southside perspective, I would personally prefer the route through George's street. It will be a huge change for people in Rathmines etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Well DB management are getting what they deserve due to the way they treat applicants. If they improved the recruitment process to something similar to what private operators they wouldn't have as much trouble getting drivers.

    GAI aren't like that from what I believe but they treat their staff like sh1t once they're already in so again they too are getting what they deserve. It's a pity for people trying to use the service but hey treat potential and serving staff like sh1t and that's what happens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It's not that big a change to be honest. I'm sure they'll cope! The Camden Street-Georges Street route is a nightmare in the evenings with taxis stopping here, there and everywhere.

    It will re-instate better connections with the CBD area from the southside which were lost when the buses were re-routed.

    I'd be far more concerned with the loss of connectivity between the Rathmines corridor and the Malahide Road corridor to be honest. It's a busy through route that will now require people to connect with buses from the D Spine at O'Connell Bridge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    With the best will in the world, it's not just having a licence that people are judged on to do the job. Perhaps there was something else that went against you.

    As a general comment, I would far prefer that the company were looking at the overall suitability of candidates, rather than just simply whether they held a licence or not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    I'm wondering if we're taking too many buses away from the core area? If you exclude the less frequent local routes (23, 24, 73), the core restaurant, bar and club center will be largely void of buses.

    Also Capel Street is terribly connected with PT and Bus Connects was designed before this street was pedestrianised. Note no buses go down Dorset and the Jervis Luas is not beside the Capel St junction.

    Removing cars from these core areas is obviously fantastic, but I've a feeling we're leaving them badly connected with PT...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Well how come someone I know who used to work as a London bus driver was also rejected. Generally in business when recruiting people if you have a load of people applying for a small amount of positions you can be choosy on who you select but if there's a high amount vacancies and few people applying then you can't afford that luxury. DB still think they have it.

    Licence + experience and still rejected as I say go to the UK and apply for a bus driving position with any of the large operators (Stagecoach, Go-Ahead, Arriva, Metroline, First Group etc.) and you'll nearly be hired there and then from what he was telling me as they're all desperate for drivers. Some of them don't even do a driving assessment.

    What's the difference between Ireland and the UK absolutely nothing apart from a few subtle differences and bus operators that take a far more business like approach to recruitment and selection.

    I get the sense though that DB is still seen as a job for life whereas in the UK drivers are seen as just numbers.

    Post edited by mikeybhoy on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    The DB interview process can be a bit random, like she's doing you a favour by interviewing you. I know people who did perfect driving assessments, but didn't get in until their third or fourth attempt at applying. If you want to drive for DB, it can help hugely if you go to GAI first. As a long-term option, the pay isn't as good, and their shift patterns don't suit everyone (in my opinion, that's a far bigger problem than pay), but I wouldn't have said they treat their staff badly. It's one of those places where staff seem to either last for 4 years or 4 months. Loads of newbies and loads of long-termers and very few in between.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,540 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    If people are applying bus driver roles with the operator because of new routes starting up due to BusConnects and get rejected because of their connections with CIE etc. Is this not a major indicator that BusConnects is being set up to fail on purpose?

    The recruitment process culture within DB must be very demoralising at present. I do think there is an overwhelming sense of irony coming from within the company in that if they are not able to recruit more new drivers as hoped to help them operate these new routes for the new incoming bus system. They would really find it to be a real struggle if they cannot be able to recruit the level of new bus drivers needed to operate the new services.

    Are they are going to have further problems down the line with recruitment of drivers for the Southern Orbitals phase of the project?

    DB are becoming the bigger loser here in trying to operate all of these new routes in the near future. They currently have about 90% of the routes given to them by the NTA to operate the PSO contract.

    What If 2024 comes along and Dublin Bus have come across more issues with retention of staff becoming worse within the next 2 years when they are trying to renew that crucial contract for bus routes within the GDA. What happens then; could they lose a larger amount of routes then expected by having them awarded to GAI as a way to some how to address clearing up their staff retention issues?

    Post edited by dublinman1990 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    There can be any number of reasons why an employer won’t hire someone.

    Ability, competence, qualifications, personality, attitude, suitability, etc.

    None of us can say why someone wasn’t hired - that’s down to the interviewers.

    But I certainly do not think that the company should just hire anyone and everyone that walks in for an interview. That’s just asking for trouble. You want people that are suited to the role, and who are likely to stay with the company.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer



    Well in reality where do you expect the routes to go? Unfortunately there aren't many options available.

    Once the decision was taken regarding the pedestrianisation of College Green, then the only options that avoid massive doglegs are the ones on that map, and which also avoid turns at O'Connell Bridge, which is to try and facilitate longer pedestrian crossings there.

    I don't think that the majority of passengers would thank you for imposing a dogleg from Georges Street, along Dame Street, Lord Edward Street, Christchurch Place, Winetavern Street and then back east along the Quays onto their journeys. Remember that it is likely that Parliament Street is going to be pedestrianised too.

    The Spines do need to intersect around O'Connell Bridge in order to facilitate connections.

    The 73 will likely use Winetavern Street to and from High Street as it will have to get to the Quays.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Yeah I understand this. If the main objective is bus connections near O'Connell Bridge, and you also want to eliminate turning on O'Connell Bridge, then indeed, you are very limited.

    The original plans for College Green assumed buses would use Dame St as a destination with a turning loop on the street. The current plans are very different and I've seen no public discussion about it.

    This huge portion of core city centre will be almost entirely void of Public Transport. I am not suggesting major overhaul of the wider plan but surely this is worthy of discussion?



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    @LXFlyer I'm going to move my point to the other Bus Connects thread in the infrastructure forum.

    Most discussions here are about roll out of actual services, operational issues etc.

    https://www.boards.ie/categories/infrastructure



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I think the plans for pedestrianising College Green have certainly been discussed at length to date.

    The detail has yet to go to planning, but movement was reported on this yesterday in the media.

    That original DCC plan which you refer to wasn’t worth the paper it was written on, and was rejected by ABP for not properly planning the bus diversions.

    Furthermore, the Dame St terminus wasn’t large enough for the routes planned to use it, and it had a massive number of routes using Parliament Street, which residents there vociferously complained about. We have long moved on from that plan, as that was prior to BusConnects network being published.

    The objective right now is to provide a solution which keeps the buses moving through the city centre while not sending them on massive diversions, and then allowing the Spines to connect at O’Connell Bridge.

    I think that at this stage the momentum is certainly behind the pedestrianisation. It was deferred once already due to there being no proper plan for the bus routes. I can’t see this changing any further if I’m honest at this stage. But I’m sure there will be some consultation when the detail is published.

    The B, C, D and G Spines all serve the Quays which aren’t that far away, let’s be honest.

    The A and F Spines will serve Cuffe Street and then with the B Spine will serve Dawson St/Kildare Street and Westmoreland St / D’Olier St., which again skirt the edges of the area.

    Potentially a radial could be re-routed but it would appear that the 71 & 72 will do the long dog leg from George’s St to the Quays via Winetavern Street (assuming Parliament St isn’t available). Routing more radials like that would be painful to be honest for most people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Don’t get me wrong, personally I agreed with the view that some routes should stay on Dame St/College Green, but I think that we have moved on at this stage, and this is the best possible compromise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    I responded in the other thread.

    Just to clarify here - I'm 110% supportive of College Green pedestrianisation

    🚶🧍🏃🤸🧑‍🦽🧑‍🦼🧑‍🦯🚴



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    This is about the network, not the infrastructure, and the revised routings so this is the correct thread for the discussion.

    I don’t really see how you can improve on the draft plan that the NTA have without massive doglegs across to Winetavern Street and back, assuming Parliament Street is out of the equation as it appears to be destined for pedestrianisation too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭TheChrisD


    You say that like the routing around SSG for both the A and F spines isn't also a massive dogleg. I just question why it's considered necessary for all (non-H) spines to route by O'Connell Bridge for interchange, when routing a couple via Fr. Matthew Bridge still allows for interchange with almost all other spines while offering reliable service to the Church Street and Bolton Street areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    For one the route via St. Stephen’s Green reinstates an original connection that was removed some time ago during LUAS construction, and I suspect that it’s a lot more free flowing than the alternative via Winetavern Street.

    By removing Spines from around O’Connell Bridge I think you would get a very large pushback. A basic concept of the plan was based on the Spines connecting together at one place.

    You can do it with radials such as the 23 & 24 or 71 & 72 and indeed the 80 which have that freedom to be added on top of the Spine network and divert.

    The 71 & 72 will dogleg via Winetavern St every 15 mins.

    Church Street will have a bus every 10 minutes via the 23 & 24 - that’s not exactly infrequent and is more than it has now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    I think we need to have the spines connect at one central area, as per the plan. And we also need to reclaim the city streets from vehicles as best possible. Everyone who uses the train to Tara St or Pearse is well outside this core area and people using them have no problem with the walk to or from the stations to travel on a reliable service. Not every route has to be within a few inches of the bottom of Grafton St.

    For once we are looking towards a decent PT service for Dublin City while also having a city to enjoy when we are there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    In theory, if the F-spine diverted through Winetavern and Church Street, you would serve that whole side of the city centre which will otherwise be underserved. The F-spine connects directly with every single Spine at various / multiple locations except the H-spine. This wouldn't fundamentally break the aim of Bus Connects.

    I'm not suggesting every bus needs to pass George's St / SSG, but I'm pointing out the fact that ZERO buses pass George's St. Some of the local routes will (23, 24 etc. ), but the fact that the Spines entirely excluded the busiest parts of the city centre is not great.

    At best here, I'd like to see a broader acknowledgement of this point. The core city centre will be grossly underserved in preference for easier bus connections.

    The plan isn't going to fundamentally change. But that doesn't mean we can't have a conversation about minimizing the impact...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,921 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Let’s be clear here, the buses serving George’s Street are NOT local routes, nor are they infrequent.

    They are radial routes which are designed to supplement the Spines with frequent additional services. They are core to the network redesign.

    The 23 & 24 will operate at a combined frequency of every 10 minutes.

    The 71 & 72 will operate at a combined frequency of every 15 minutes.

    The 80 will operate every 10-15 minutes.

    That’s up to 16 buses an hour in each direction, which is a lot more than ZERO buses as your post states.

    Incidentally a recent Dublin Bus newsletter listed the 10 busiest stops on the network. Guess what, with the exception of Dublin Airport and the southside 13/40/49 stop on College Green, they weren’t on George’s Street, or Dame Street, but were all on O’Connell Street or around O’Connell Bridge.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement