Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1194819491951195319543690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,045 ✭✭✭jmreire


    The message needs to be loud, clear and unambiguous. Mr Putin, you were the one who introduced the possible use of nuclear weapons, and that was at the very beginning of the war, so be advised the subject is open for discussion on all sides, including ( and especially) the ramifications / response to a first strike. Ball is in your court Mr. Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,185 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Kuwait has never been in NATO.

    "Worth noting: The U.S. also has troops stationed in 10 non-NATO countries for peacekeeping and other cooperation missions.

    • They include Kosovo (800), Cyprus (100) and the potential future NATO members of Sweden (10) and Finland (5)."

    So, I don't agree with you and it was always a possibility. Did you know the US has been trainng and exercising with Ukrainian pilots for years? Nothing would have been simpler than for the US to put troops in Ukraine for 'friendly joint exercise' it's happened many times previosly.

    US Marines withdrew tanks and weapons from storage caves in secret locations in Norway and brought them to southern Finland last month. Once there, they fired tank guns and other weaponry alongside the Finnish army as part of an annual training exercise called Arrow 18.

    The drills took place from May 7 to May 18 and involved around 150 armoured vehicles and 300 other military vehicles. Only 30 marines took part, but they were joined by thousands of personnel from Finland and Norway.

    https://www.helsinkitimes.fi/finland/finland-news/domestic/15579-us-marines-move-tanks-from-secret-caves-in-norway-to-finland.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,162 ✭✭✭✭briany


    China has argued that Tibet, the Uyghurs, Hong Kong and Taiwan are internal matters, and China are never going to realistically do anything on India beyond border skirmishes, given they both possess nukes. I know the Taiwan thing is highly contentious - most other countries don't recognise the claim - but China has not yet acted on their threats, despite their posturing.

    However, the point was that China did not become a power through threats against other countries, even if it hasn't been without sin in that regard. It became a power through putting its head down and transforming its economy into a powerful machine and becoming sort of indispensable to the West, given how much of what we use is now made there. If Russia wants to occupy the place on the world stage it thinks it does, that's the kind of thing it should do, rather than this militaristic nonsense. It's a dead end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,843 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Although unlikely, I think it would be best if Russia disintegrated, depriving the indifferent Muscovites of their source of wealth from the east. There would be the safeguarding of the nukes question. But leaving them in place in the various republics can't work out any worse than what happened the last time when they were repatriated to Russia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,759 ✭✭✭weisses




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Might be busy calling for thread locks and fake news in other threads🤣🤣🤣🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,045 ✭✭✭jmreire


    And rightly so!!! It's the ambiguity which is causing the problems. Crystal clear, black and white no nonsense statements are what's needed. Putin and his advisors need to be left in no doubt whatsoever what happens if they launch a nuclear / biological weapons strike.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    I still think it would have been incredibly risky to put US troops into Ukraine (as opposed to actual NATO member states) and I don't recall seeing any US or international commentators suggesting it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    totally agree, they are dooming themselves to being a larger version of North Korea, if they are not already there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,185 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I would say the madman in question is likely to be Putin or one of his ex-KGB entourage. The apartment bombings in Moscow, theater hostage taking and Beslan school massacre were all most likely false flag operations by the KGB/FSB. This is almost certainly the same.

    Look how evil people who oppose mobilisation are - you don't want to be on their side, do you?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,586 ✭✭✭rogber


    Yes that's awful, no matter where it happens. There are plenty of idiots on this thread who think the only good Russian is a dead Russian, but whoever's behind this no kids deserve to experience that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    What will be instructive to see is just who and even if, what other independent states recognise the status of these 'referendums'.

    There'll be a great degree of wariness I think, even China and India will likely baulk at it. North Korea probably will and some of the 'Stans' possibly.

    But otherwise they'll be meaningless. We may as well have a referendum now in the Republic and lay claim to the Six Counties and then demand them. International law doesn't work like that and all will know that these 'referendums' are merely a tool of war & Russian propaganda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    It's unlikely that NATO would put support troops on the ground in Ukraine, the Ukrainian army seems capable enough. But NATO could deliver devastating destruction to Russian military resources using electronic warfare, airpower and seapower.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    Of course they are meaninglessness, only an idiot would think otherwise but i don't think it matters a jot to Putin as he's living in his own little altered reality bubble of delusion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,185 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    But if Putin responds by using another nuclear weapon, “you take off the gloves the second time around” and perhaps destroy Russia’s military forces in Ukraine, which the United States could readily do with conventional weapons. Perry realizes that these escalations would be approaching the kind of Dr. Strangelove scenarios that Herman Kahn wrote about. But if we end up fighting a war with Russia, that would be Putin’s choice, not ours.

    There are no low risk scenarios or responses to this conflict. Macron tried that and got slapped in the face and was made to look like a fool for his efforts, as Putin made a lie of almost everything Macron said about those exchanges. We are closer to nuclear weapons being used than at any time since the Cuban missile crisis. Putin has never responded favourably to pacifism or weakness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Yes...as long as they are Ukrainians manning said resources, which have been donated to Ukraine.

    I presume you are not advocating actual NATO forces attacking Russia directly. Because that would be crazy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11



    Missile strike at Chulakivka of Kherson region

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,489 ✭✭✭zv2


    ...

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    A nuclear scenario would be completely different.

    Just to be clear, my comments are in the context of the current conventional warfare scenario.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    But yet for the last 8 years there has been US and Nato troops regularly in Ukraine, whether it be in training/advisor roles of for joint forces exercises right up until the invasion



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    I highly doubt the Americans will nuke Russia if Putin resorts to use a WMD in the Ukraine. I would expect it would be more likely that they unleash their airforce to destroy all Russian forces on Ukrainian territory.

    Again you are deflecting from a country that HAS broken international law, whose forces ARE carrying out war crimes on a mass scale. These days given communications options available their population are aware of what is happening in their name. They are guilty by silence and association.

    Imho they are scum the only form of life lower than them are those living in the west making excuses/deflecting for them.

    Post edited by gandalf on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,790 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    Important Aviation News:

    Apologies in advance. This is a long one, but of extreme interest.

    We are witnessing an extraordinary mobilisation of NATO air assets across Europe at the moment. From Belfast, right over and up to Finland, everything from f-16's to Turkish Airforce SIGNIT 737's are currently airborne. To break it down, Here is an overview of ONLY military aircraft ( and just the ones with transponders switched on) airborne over Europe right now:

    Screenshot_20220926-121714_Chrome.jpg

    Let's have a quick look at some of the assets:

    Screenshot_20220926-121643_Chrome.jpg

    Above: 2 x Canadian C-130j's are leaving Belfast.

    Screenshot_20220926-121529_Chrome.jpg

    Above: A flight of F-16's, probably outfitted for SEAD, is leaving UK airspace.

    Screenshot_20220926-121517_Chrome.jpg

    Above: one of many KC-135 on fueling operations.

    Screenshot_20220926-121504_Chrome.jpg

    Above: A second flight of F-16s currently airborne.

    Screenshot_20220926-121454_Chrome.jpg

    Above, here you can see a cluster of Kc-135's airborne over Europe.

    Screenshot_20220926-121121_Chrome.jpg

    Above, one of many USAF C-17's currently on the move.

    Screenshot_20220926-121236_Chrome.jpg

    Above: Almost every ELINT and SIGNIT ( intelligence-gathering) platform in the NATO arsenal is now airborne over Europe. That alone is extraordinary. From Swedish AF Gulfstream monitoring Kaliningrad to a Turkish AF ELINT 737 up near the Baltic Sea.

    Screenshot_20220926-121357_Chrome.jpg

    Above, here we see a very rare Turkish AF Early Warning aircraft on its way towards Kaliningrad.

    I would highly recommend watching the skies over Europe over the next day or so and listening in to the various LiveATC streams covering the airspace over and around Polish Airspace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,509 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    @greenpilot


    What you think is up so?

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    No official nato exercises due this week ,

    Something to watch



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    Really doesn't feel good tbh. Just get the vibe Europe is on the brink of something unthinkable only a few short months ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @greenpilot Here another one in from brize

    Screenshot_20220926-132240_Chrome.jpg

    This is odd

    Screenshot_20220926-132332_Chrome.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    Tbh we crossed that brink on the 24th of February when Russia illegally invaded Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    Oddly enough, I think this sort of action helps to mitigate; NATO can't sit on its hands while the Russians **** around.

    They need to know that the first sniff NATO gets of any WMD movement, they are going to get lit up like a Christmas tree.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,790 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    I think NATO has decided to move the chess pieces. Notice that:

    1. Air-refuelling asset operations have increased exponentially. Which means they are supporting an equal amount of fighter jets who have their transponders off. You can equate the position of a KC-135 to a flight of fighters or other similar assets.

    2. AWAC flights and SIGNIT flights, all with transponders active, have increased, and is a clear sign to Putin, especially after Bidens remarks, that all eyes are on Russia's movements and that NATO means business.

    3. There is an increase in Dutch, German and British Airbus A320 series aircraft. Equate this to mean troop and cargo movements.

    It's all designed to speak a certain language to Putin. The language of "we're ready".

    My thoughts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,185 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Looks like Twitter has responded to Chinese pressure and has deleted Jennifer Zeng's account. She broke the story alleging that Xi Jinping had been arrested.

    No wonder: https://www.indiatoday.in/news-analysis/story/someone-out-there-doesnt-like-twitter-accounts-critical-of-china-1720221-2020-09-09



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement