Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1191419151917191919203690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    You keep using that phrase but those Ukrainians are the ones doing the fighting and they want to continue to do so. Pretending that this is being driven by the west as absolute hogwash and suggests stupidity or dare I say, some bad faith.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,568 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    I dont see a situation of NATO not deploying into Ukraine if there is a tactical or nuclear detonation of some description.

    There was a lad talking on Radio One at about 13.45 today, stating that the sham vote is a game changer and could have very devastating consequences. Was an interesting but chilling conversation.

    Although my belief is that Russian military command would rather execute their leadership than follow a nuke order as they would believe its game over for themselves.

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,819 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    Again, you need to brush up on your history. It's futile to compare the War on Terror to the current theatre. As anyone who has been East of the Jordan will tell you, there wasn't a clear enemy and guerrilla insurgency was a challenge to deal with.

    However, a conventional war with Russia is a wet dream for the US and NATO and, believe me, the brass in NATO, the US, the UK and, might I add, Poland, are salivating at the prospect of taking Russia to Chruch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,460 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Good points. So was Vietnam by and large, with the occasional mass battle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,764 ✭✭✭storker




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭weisses




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,765 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Thanks for confirming my suspicions - no far right attrocities of any scale to warrant any more than calling the police.



  • Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    NATO will only respond conventional if attacked by Russia,and respond nuclear if Russia uses nuclear weapons first.

    But NATO have an edge over russia when it comes to intelligence gathering and presicion guided missiles,so i suspect Russian missiles silos, mobile launchers,airfields and nuclear storage to be targeted first to reduce their nuclear capabilities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 702 ✭✭✭Housefree


    It could end in a prolonged war with far more dead and the same outcome. The US won't care about Ukrainian dead as long as it weakens Russia, this is pure geopolitics at play. It's already went from a special operation to full mobilization because of NATOs involvement.



  • Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Didn’t putin essentially call us all nazis yesterday via his UN puppet ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,460 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Why do you think so? What makes next week special in your view? It's been a game of chicken since February.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    You are right in that belief that is why i think we will see a chemical attack not nuclear. Nuclear is a line Putin's henchmen will not cross imo.

    One way or another these are absolutely crazy dangerous times we live in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,395 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Yea, but the west will not be getting involved.

    This war isn't ending anytime soon. If Zelensky is going to stick to his stated goal of forcing Russians out of Crimea and Donbass, we could be here for years. Look at the battles around Kherson and Donbass, absolute carnage for months now, both sides taking huge casualties, losing lots of equipment, but yet the frontline barely moves. I am surprised people here are so non-plussed about mobilization, with some even thinking it'll be good for Ukraine.

    If someone said to me this war will still be going on in some form in 10 years time, I wouldn't be surprised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 702 ✭✭✭Housefree




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,764 ✭✭✭storker


    Bingo. I think that's all the information we need to complete an assessment of where you're coming from. Thank you comrade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,675 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    You don't really believe what you wrote in that second paragraph, do you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,764 ✭✭✭storker




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,843 ✭✭✭weisses


    We got 12 weeks of basic training.. combined with field training, but it took us so much more training in order to become an effective fighting unit... We spend so much time in getting into sync with infantry in font of us and the m109 's providing support from the rear.

    3 weeks gives you just enough time to figure out how to hit the meatgrinder arse first



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 478 ✭✭Run Forest Run


    Democracies can also look weak (and act weak) when threatened by dictators from within. Which they frequently are - just look at all the pressure groups that scream and stomp their feet until someone appeases their BS demands.

    Democracies tend to have a very loose an less concrete command structure or chain of command, which can make them potentially very vulnerable. This is why militaries, for example, could never really operate effectively as a truly democratic institution. There needs to be a very clear chain of command in order to operate efficiently.

    Countries that don't trust democracies, tend to view them in this manner. Weak and easily manipulated by both individuals and groups. And highly inefficient.

    Really, the whole nature of a representative democracy, is that it promotes limited power. But where you get limited power, you also tend to get weak leaders. Because people with great leadership qualities tend to avoid positions where they have limited power. This is why you get the highly frustrating situation in western democracies, where the best and brightest leaders gravitate towards the business world rather than the political arena... because they can acquire much more power and scope to use their leadership skills in that world, rather than in politics.

    So we end up being led by weak people, with poor leadership qualities. Our political system, by it's very nature, actually promotes this outcome.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,909 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 702 ✭✭✭Housefree


    But Ukraine aren't in NATO, a nuclear attack in Ukraine might not necessarily be responded to militarily. Russia would probably end up a total outcast from the world.

    A lot of deluded posters think NATO is going to strike at all the Russian Silos/Nuclear subs etc and knock out their nuke capability. That's fantasy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,702 ✭✭✭rolling boh


    Definitely a worrying time ahead I think Putin appears capable of doing anything to what he sees as achieving his goals.He has no problem sending out men from the backwaters of Russia to be most likely killed in huge numbers none of these guys will be from the better off .Its such good a huge country they will come from well spread areas and will get little acknowledgement in the big cities .As for the rats getting out its only because they don't want to fight feck all to do with being against the invasion.Most of these rats will be proclaiming themselves as proud Russians first chance they get .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,568 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Difference for me (through my own dumb ass lens) is that it could go from 'Special Military Operations' to 'OMG, Ukraine is invading Russia, declare war, because of the sham elections.

    The whole world knows its BS what they are doing. But Russia will declare these occupied regions as Russian soil, and then state they are under attack from invading Ukrainian forces. This will allow them to deploy further measures.

    Ukrainians aint going to stop just because if these sham elections and they're right not too. They should keep fighting until every last orc is removed from they're land.

    The main reason I think the game of chicken has escalated is Putler may think this is his way out. A gamble and the West backs down. I hope to fcuk he's wrong and if he is stupid enough to deploy a nuke the hammer comes firmly down on him.

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,765 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    No they are not. You sound like Putin going on about Nazi's.

    The robbing has and is being done by Irish local councils and Irish politicians allowing commercial funds to buy residential properties and to compete against potential home buyers. Germany has banned this behaviour, Irish politicians encourage it with tax breaks.

    Ukrainian refugees are blameless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,395 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    These are not new recruits.

    This is a mobilization of reservists, people who had previously been conscripted and have had military experience.

    Russia held annual conscription of new recruits back in March by the way. They did not go into Ukraine at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,012 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    The countries bordering Russia that refuse to take in these fleeing Russia young men know well the psyche of this regime.

    There's an element of fear of these being "little green men" being put in Finland, the Baltics. Ready to act when orders are given.

    Putin doesn't play conventional. World knows that now. Plays to be superior and always thinking he's two steps ahead of the opposition. Russians under him get that kick that they're the same superior to the rest of the world.

    Viking warrior cunning or whatever they try to believe themselves.

    All bs now that it's they're own protected up to now in Western Russia could be called up and not the asiatics or ethnic Ukrainians exported to Eastern states.. 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    Again with agency denial of the Ukrainians. They were begging for these weapons and NATO as well as non-NATO countries have been slow to give them to them? You're giving away your assumption that Russia is just entitled to take the territory of its neighbours but as soon Ukraine's other neighbours help them out, they're the ones responsible for the killing. That's some twisted reasoning right there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,764 ✭✭✭storker


    It wouldn't be NATO declaring war on Russia, just a....hmmmm...let's see..."Special Operation" to remove Russian forces from Ukraine. Of course, Putin would still spin it as an existential threat to Russia itself but there's only a Rizla paper paper between that and what he's claiming at the moment anyway. It's a simple dilemma, you say fold, I say show cards, and as long as the Ukrainians are saying that too, I'll keep agreeing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,568 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Oh I agree. Putin must not be allowed keep one piece of occupied land. Not one inch.

    I wonder if the Chinese are looking at all this and considering keeping the status quo with Taiwan. I know Winnie The Pooh has dreams, but they're probably looking at Russia and thinking they dont wanna go down that route.

    Iran, surprisingly could be the one that turns all heads shortly.

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,460 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    More simply put, it's more members of the military being brought to bear on Ukraine during an illegal war. However they're being brought in, whatever happened in March, it really doesn't matter - their purpose is to abet the killing of Ukrainians in an illegal war and will only serve to prolong it.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement