Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Clontarf to City Centre Cycle & Bus Priority Project discussion (renamed)

13334363839131

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Can we not get distracted with this argument. I don't have a major issue with the pedestrian crossings. It was merely a statement that I feel the North Strand is not friendly to pedestrians.

    If you sit outside Cloud Cafe for lunch, you might get a sense of what I mean. You frequently see pedestrians running across the wide 4-lane road getting to the main row of shops there.

    But this is not what worth discussing as part of the permanent removal of bus stops which is my main issue.



  • Posts: 6,049 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Look, I'm willing to drop it, but you're the one who brought it up. You said it's "unsafe for pedestrians with it's lack of crossings".

    Watching lazy bastards running across the road because they're not arsed walking to the lights is besides the point and has no bearing on what you said previously. You can't use the garglers in Cusacks as any sort of yardstick for road infrastructure.

    Same with the post about speed limits. And your misunderstanding of distances between bus stops compounds all of this. The NS is well served by crossings AND by bus stops. Removing the two stops there will cause a minor* disturbance for a limited number of people and may improve the journey times for tens of thousands.

    *and it is minor.......before the removal a person had to travel X metres to the stop. Now, at most they have to travel an extra 300m or 3 mins walk to get to a stop. And that's at the most extreme end of things. For most, it will be even shorter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Your use of language such as lazy bastards to refer to the locals who drink in Cusacks says all it needs to say about your character and attitude to residents of this area.

    By your logic, we could just remove a third of the bus stops in Dublin. Sure then a a third have to walk "a little further" but sure 100s of thousands would benefit from quicker journeys.

    Anyway, I've raised this matter with a number of councillors and TDs and a number of them have already responded. Councillor Burke was strongly vocal of these plans at the time of planning, including removal of bus stops but was ignored. Another councillor has received numerous contacts today from concerned residents regarding the matter. So we'll wait and see what happens.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,070 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Cars, taxis and buses bomb it through through the North Strand at 60km/h. Speed limit reduces to 50km/h just at the start of North Strand but few adhere to this.

    I do not believe that you're correct on the start of the 50km/h limit. From memory, if you drive out of town, towards Howth, the first time the speed limit will increase from 50km/h is after you pass the Bull Island Causeway & Watermill Rd junction (several km from N. Strand). However, I'd agree that drivers speed along N. Strand.

    Anyhow, let's stay on topic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Yeah I would like to think it's changed in recent times, but it was always 60km/h along Fairview Strand reducing to 50km/h at the Fire Station. There is one of those flashing speed signs at the start of North Strand showing your speed.

    Drivers definitely speed through North Strand. The area, including Fairview, have never been treated a village which, in my opinion, have made them pedestrian unfriendly. They are dominated by heavy road traffic. Let's hope the cycleway will change that regardless of the bus stop locations.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,049 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I drink in Cusacks myself 😁, don't know what you're getting at there.

    I'm calling them lazy bastards not because they drink in Cusacks, but because they refuse to walk up the road to the traffic lights. You can't just keep banging lights in wherever people are too lazy to use the infrastructure already in place.

    By your logic, we could just remove a third of the bus stops in Dublin. Sure then a a third have to walk "a little further" but sure 100s of thousands would benefit from quicker journeys.

    That doesn't make any sense. By your logic we should have a stop every 100 metres because nobody can walk more than that. Also, pedestrian crossings every 50 metres in case anyone wants to cross the road, ffs.

    Another councillor has received numerous contacts today from concerned residents regarding the matter. So we'll wait and see what happens.

    That's just a made up load of bullsh1t. And with that, I'm out of here. Good luck with your extra 3 mins walk to the bus stop.



  • Posts: 5,121 [Deleted User]


    I actually do, and you’ll have seen that from my earlier posts. My point is that the distances are small and if someone can’t walk an extra 100 / 150 (being half the increase distance between stops) then God knows what they’re doing to do when they get into town!



  • Posts: 3,330 [Deleted User]


    What had London got to do with this?

    We don't have door to door transport in this country, so an extra couple of hundred metres between bus stops is minor when compared to the distance to be travelled at the other end of the journey.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    If you're standing where the bus stop "used to be" and new nearest one is 300m either side of you, then it's an extra 300m. Don't know where you're getting 100m.



  • Posts: 3,330 [Deleted User]


    His point is still valid, if 300m isn't feasible then what is that person going to do when they got off the bus at their destination?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,773 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Neither does London, but they do have a full set of best practice guidelines. Or do we just make up as we go along?



  • Posts: 3,330 [Deleted User]


    No we just don't throw a strop over having to walk an extra 200m. Or take a taxi.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    No I throw a strop when DCC remove bus stops in my area that go against best practice guidelines.

    Best practice guidelines are not just pulled out of someone's arse. They are based on actual research and studies on how humans interact with the world. Going against public transport best practice guidelines when we're trying to encourage out of cars is insane.

    AND IT'S THRRE HUNDRED GOD DAMN METRES NOT TWO.



  • Posts: 6,049 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The only people standing where the bus stop used to be are the people who live where the stop used to be. The stops aren't 300m either side, they're 300m apart, so roughly 150m either side of the old stop.

    That one person now has an extra 150m walk, everyone else has less of a walk. Simple. Even those in Ballybough walking down to the strand won't have to do the full 150 (or whatever it is).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    The proposed bus stops are 600m apart, 586m and 592m to be exact.

    Not 300m as you keep insisting. Can you read any of the docs please? Or simply look at the image I've very kindly marked up, just in case it's difficult for you to understand.

    IMG_20220901_130100.jpg




  • Posts: 6,049 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Apologies, I might have been confusing you with someone else who was confused about the distances.

    The point stands, however. An extra 300m is fcuk all in the grand scheme of things. At 3km/h it takes 6 mins, and that's nearly half the standard walking speed. For pretty much everyone else, it's under 4.



  • Posts: 3,330 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Yes yes it's very easy to trivialise 300m.

    Fact is though, the removal of this stop doubles the distance to the next nearest stop for a significant portion of residents in North Strand and the planned spacing between stops is 50% higher than the recommended 400m.

    I'm not sure why the residents of North Strand should be expected to accept this. If they are, then let's review the spacing of bus stops across the entirety of Dublin city and increase it to 600m.

    This will inconvenience a large minority of the city but sure 'who gives a toss', because the rest of the city benefits from faster service.



  • Posts: 3,330 [Deleted User]


    Absolutely agree, get rid of stupid small distances between bus stops where you can literally see the next one while standing waiting for your bus. If you can see the next stop then its walkable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    @LXFlyer let's inform the team at Bus Connects. The less stops the better.

    That'll encourage more people to get out or their cars and use public transport. It might even encourage the "lazy bastards" to walk a bit more and get some exercise when they're not drinking in the local.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 19,923 [Deleted User]


    It has been said multiple times and you've ignored it so I'll lay it out.

    Both stops are 600m odd from each other.

    If you are walking to one you are going to already be in that 600m distance.

    If you are 600m from a stop then you are 0m from a stop.

    If you are 500m from a stop you are 100m from a stop.

    If you are 400m from a stop you are 200m from a stop.

    If you are 300m from a stop you are 300m from a stop.

    Is 300m max a significant distance? It takes the average person 4 minutes to walk it. Let's say an elderly person takes twice that. Is an 8 minute walk outrageous?



  • Posts: 3,330 [Deleted User]


    Brian needs to go for a walk and clear his head. No more than 300 metres though. Anything more than that is not achievable for a human being.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,156 ✭✭✭Gloomtastic!


    Let’s all admit it. It’s so much easier to jump in your car outside your house than walk to a bus stop.

    €63million wasted! 😲🙄😋



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,070 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Given that most of the money Is apparently being spent on a water mains upgrade, how do you see it as €63m wasted?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Most people live 2-300m from the top of the street, so the max distance you might have to walk is over 600m. By your logic, an elderly person would take 16minutes to get to the bus.

    Look at a map and consider anyone living on Bayview, Charleville, Bessborough, Strandville Ave or Stoney Road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    In any case, I found plans which were published by the council in March this year and these plans clearly show the inclusion of the current bus stops. The sudden and unannounced removal of these bus stops does not have permission and no one was informed prior to yesterday.



  • Posts: 19,923 [Deleted User]


    By my incredibly slack logic that assumes (probably ageist) that it takes an elderly person twice the amount of time to walk somewhere as the average person. Where are these people getting the bus to and how many are there btw?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,393 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    He'll no doubt have his good buddy, angry little Mannix, on to rant and rave about all things cycling related.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Jaysus wait until he hears they are permanently removing 7x bus stops in the area.



Advertisement