Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Clontarf to City Centre Cycle & Bus Priority Project discussion (renamed)

13233353738131

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,968 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    How many drivers did you see with phones in their hands, on their laps, squeezed up to their ear?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,968 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Any news on your “by the end of the month” guarantee?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,723 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    this happened on bachelor's walk when they reoriented the bus lanes; IIRC the gardai basically stated it wasn't their job to police it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,451 ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    I cycled through Fairview this morning at around 7:30 and there were a lot more bikes there than normal. There were at least 10 stopped at the lights near the old Duggans jewellers inbound. Is it a case if build it and they will come? None were school kids



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,365 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Yes I was waiting for this too. Even mega celeb Ray Shah can't seem to stop the works.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭markpb




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Final straw for me driving the quays happened a few years ago. Loads of cars driving up the bus lane, and traffic was heavy. Asked Gardai in the car next to me if they could do something about it, and they told me it wasn't their job. I haven't driven that section of the quays since then. Too stressful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 776 ✭✭✭Sir Galahad


    Two. One a van driver and one a female in a newish car that would have bluetooth. It's a curse, when riding a motorcycle you can see them in "their" mirrors using the phone.



  • Posts: 3,330 [Deleted User]


    This usual nonsense argument. Do they have the ability to levitate and avoid walking when they get off the bus at the other end of their journey? Or do you think that elderly people only move a couple of hundred metres and then that's them done for the day?

    1 bus stop per half kilometre is more then enough and it will speed up buses (particularly if driver interaction is removed, and people learn to get off the bus via the middle doors) which in turn might encourage more passengers and reduce the number of cars on the road.



  • Posts: 15,802 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    1 bus stop per half kilometre is more then enough

    Respectfully I'd disagree. the more stops the better as it makes the service more convenient and accessible to more people.

    I mean drivers get to raise holy hell about not being able to park at the door of their destination but a 500 meter, 6 min walk, between stops is ok?

    In my experience, a gap of 250 meters or outside each estate, is optimal as it makes the service very convenient as you also have to take into account the walk inside the estate itself which can also be several hundred meters



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    It is not a nonsense argument. I have found numerous references online citing 400m as the ideal walking distance to public transport. Some reference 300m to a bus stop and 500m to a rapid transport stop such as metro or a dart.

    In this case, they're removing 2 stops in the heart of North Strand and doubling the distance to 600m (586m and 592m to be exact).

    I do not think that this is acceptable.

    IMG_20220901_130100.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    It depends on the old person. Some are limited in how much they can walk. Add that on at the start and they can often walk less at their destination.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,968 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,559 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    Why would anyone need to be walking from 1 stop to another though? If they're 500m apart, then the furthest you can be from any of them is 250m + the estate distance - which is what you said is optimal?

    As far as the "more stops the better as it makes the service more convenient" - more stopping and dwell time is less convenient for pretty much everyone on the route.



  • Posts: 5,121 [Deleted User]


    too many bus stops is such a wind up when we’re being encouraged to get public transport. 500m between stops is plenty



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,773 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Best practice (per TfL guidance) is a maximum of 400m between stops and shorter distances where demand dictates.

    600m between stops as per some of these gaps is not acceptable and frankly I’m amazed that these stop movements got approved.

    The bus service is a service for everyone, and the amount of side streets along this road would dictate a maximum 400m gap.

    The lack of joined up thinking here is woeful, with no stop in either direction close to the proposed new Connolly Station entrance location at Preston Street. They’ve actually moved the stops closer together either side of the Five Lamps and created a much longer gap.

    Inbound Howth Road buses won’t stop between just after the Five Lamps and until after the Store Street junction on Talbot Street. That’s a ludicrous distance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,773 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It’s 400m between stops - walking distance to the bus route could be longer depending on the size of estates etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    It's 600m for a start and you're assuming everyone lives at the top of the road. So, NO, it's not 250m of a walk. It's 6-700m walk depending where you live on the side streets.

    I guess they are also considering the orbital "O" route. The better solution here would have been to move stops closer to Five Lamps (Northside) and retain stops in middle of North Strand and the stops next to Preston Street.


    I'm emailing all local councillors this afternoon regarding North Strand. It's not acceptable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,773 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    So why does best practice guidance disagree with that view?

    The bus service is not just for you, it’s for everyone. That does mean stops at 400m or less, especially in the city centre.

    People do have to walk to the bus route on top of the gap between stops.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,773 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    I realize now on the plans for C2CC, that these bus stops are not included.

    For stop 617 (inbound, between Strandville and Xavier), the plans show 3 car parking spaces where the bus stop is currently located. I looked at this multiple times and assumed this was still a bus stop.

    How we can possibly contemplate replacing a bus stop with car parking spaces, so that people can park in front of their house while public transport users walk an additional 300m to get to their bus stop. Appalling.

    Screenshot_2022-09-01-14-26-11-41_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f.jpg




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,559 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    I never said it was a 250m walk. I said it was a "250m + estate distance" walk, so no I didn't assume everyone lived at the top of the road. I live on a side street off North Strand, so I'm well aware of how far a walk it is to the bus stop.

    I never said it was acceptable either, I was responding to the previous poster's statement about having to walk "500m" between the 2 stops - this doesn't happen. There is a clear design guideline of 400m that should be adhered to.



  • Posts: 3,330 [Deleted User]


    Person takes bus from Howth Road to city centre, and wants to go to Grafton St. Do you all want the bus to drive up Grafton St because its so ridiculous that said person has to walk a couple of hundred metres on the Howth Road to their nearest bus stop?

    That's what taxis are for. Being on a bus and it stopping too frequently every 400m or less is ridiculous, and makes the journey longer.

    People getting irate here about 200m is hilarious. If you can't walk that 200m then the bus really isn't the best option for you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    They are turning a 300m walk into a 600m walk, when the globally recommended distance between stops is 400m. This makes absolutely no sense when we are trying to encourage people out of their cars.

    And we're not talking about an estate in a Dublin suburb. This is a core city centre location. A huge benefit of living here is the proximity to public transport and the city centre.

    Avg walking speed is 1.4m per second, so that's a 7minute walk to a bus stop, versus the current 3.5minute walk.

    A 7 minute walk versus 3 minutes is a significant change.



  • Posts: 6,049 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The North Strand is already super unfriendly to pedestrian with a distinct lack of pedestrian crossings. 

    Whatever about the bus stops, the above is not something I've ever heard or perceived myself.

    Between Annesley Bridge and the five lamps there's 6 pedestrian crossings in about 1km. One averaging every 170m is hardly " a distinct lack of crossings". One could argue that it is Fairview which has a relative lack of crossings. Go 1km from Annesley Bridge in the opposite direction and you only get three crossings by the time you hit the Malahide Road.

    If you were to squeeze a few more in on the NS, where would you put them? It's only about 500m from the FB station to the flats. At most you're about 275m from the nearest stop. Hardly a herculean task for anyone already within range of the stops to be removed?



  • Posts: 5,121 [Deleted User]


    Is a 600m walk between stops, doesn’t mean you have to walk 600m. the most you have to walk is 300m (plus whatever else if you live far from the bus route, in which case you can probably take a more direct line to the bus stop)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    It is clear from your message you don't know North Strand. All the side streets are perpendicular to the main road, there is no "direct line" to the bus stop. It is a complicated warren of streets within North Strand and most people live 2-300metres away from the main road.

    I'm not sure what people are missing here. Recommended distance is 400m. Current distance is 300m. Planned new distance is 600m.

    You don't need to be a mathematician is see that 300 is closer to 400 than 600.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,773 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Cars, taxis and buses bomb it through through the North Strand at 60km/h. Speed limit reduces to 50km/h just at the start of North Strand but few adhere to this.

    Two of the pedestrian crossings are directly either side of the canal and do not offer much additional benefit. The pedestrian crossing at Springgarden is only on one side of this wide junction.

    An ideal position for a pedestrian crossing would have been between bus stops 4384 and 617 (Bayview to Strandville).



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,049 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    1. Speed limits have literally nothing to do with the topic of crossings. Zero. Not sure why you think that's relevant.
    2. Get rid of one of those crossings at the canal, then. Or count them as one and reduce the number to 5 crossings. Still leaves 5 in a 1km stretch. A crossing every 200m is not insignificant.
    3. A new crossing at that spot would leave a gap of less than 150m to the one at the post office, which (in your own words) offers little benefit when located relatively close together......and a 2 min walk is relatively close together. It also means that in the 450m distance between Leinster Avenue and Shamrock Place, which takes 6 mins to walk or less than 1 min to drive, traffic going into town (i.e. buses and cyclists) would now have to potentially stop a total of 5 times for pedestrians to cross. This is excessive. Calling that out as a "distinct lack of crossings" is just clearly not true.


Advertisement