Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Can Sinn Fein fix the housing crisis or is it beyond them or anybody else?

Options
17810121330

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 380 ✭✭letsbefair


    The other thing for certain is you need a strong profitable private sector to pay for socialism. If their high taxes drive out mobile capital we will end up broke.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,603 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,603 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    lol...thing is though . OTHER COUNTRIES manage that. why can't we ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 380 ✭✭letsbefair


    Does anyone think any of our politicians has the ability to run a major building project? Eoin O’Broin is a very nice affable guy but I don’t think he knows how to build houses without employing builders to do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    no a politicians job is not to build houses, or run a site etc

    Thats why as far as I’m concerned the government hiring professional companies to do the job is the quickest and cheapest way to get houses available.

    If we know anything about the Irish system once the government hires people, unions get involved etc and everything creaks to a standstill

    Plus the costs of government pensions for thousands of workers would cripple the system, plus they would have to pay more to hire the builders from the private companies and with that drive up the cost of housing more

    We have the right model, teh biggest way to reduce building costs is to stop the months/years the project get stuck in court with political parties plus locals making up non relevant excuses for stopping teh building



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,727 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    Hey bitches, I'm back. Did you miss me?

    Whilst I was away I have seen this thread dragged of topic. This thread is about wether SF or anybody else can fix the housing crisis. By anybody else I meant political parties that are not FF, FG or G and not and I repeat not County Councils who do not have enough sway as some people on here think they do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭Relax brah


    They can’t even run an effective government up north. What makes you think they can do literally anything in a much larger republic? lol



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    The thread is not off topic.

    Let me remind you that Sinn Fein ran a campaign, a successful one, to get the majority in DCC, after they got the majority Sinn Fein published on their website they would build houses in DCC. That was all SF. As I already posted that article was shared around a few times and suddenly got deleted by Sinn Fein

    Im also interested why you made an excuse in teh first post, trying to make out Sinn Fein if they got into government they wouldn’t be able to fix housing because of the current one, this has been fired out a lot recently by Sinn Fein supporters. Maybe you can explain why? Thank you 👍



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,511 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    You're dealing with the sort of people who think "pay politicians less" is the solution to every problem in the country



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,727 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    I didn't make an excuse I just asked can they or anybody else fix the housing crisis. I have no idea if they can fully fix it but I think they will do better than has been done in the last 11 years. But in saying doing better does not mean they will fix it. Fixing it means changes how we do things. No more looking after our mates and making sure everything is done by the book and built to close. I don't want a repeat of Mica or other building issues down the line do you?

    The thread was off topic when it mentioned SF and their tax policies. Hopefully we can remain on point and be civil too.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 78,544 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Actually no - you do not set the thread rules and I am ruling this thread is to discuss any party's approach to the crisis. And that extends to councils

    "Anybody else" extends to anybody else, not who you think it should extend to



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    They had the most seats of any single party for under 5 years. FF/FG had more combined and were in government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Youve a link for that that makes that comparison? Feel free not to answer.

    You've gone from saying DCC has no power to claiming there were less eviction under SF. Brilliant, truly.

    True, why vote in SF when FG/FF are giving away luxury D4 apartments to the same people.

    By the by, a lot of the arrears are from rents that should have been raised previously being back dated, not non-payment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    Local elections was 2014, the government was FG and Labour.

    The general election was 2016.

    "Grasping at straws" is apt

    So are you going to say FG and Labour as well???



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,809 ✭✭✭hometruths


    You are absolutely right re. landlords. There needs to be a way to incentivise smaller landlords to stay in the market. The sense I have is that the system is broken and part of that is legacy to the financial crisis (accidental landlords wanting to leave the market) but also low returns, but perhaps the balance of power has shifted too much towards the tenant?

    Yep I would definitely shift a few things back towards landlords favour. Do away with rent caps for a start. And give landlord some teeth to deal with problem/no paying tenants.

    Another thing I would propose is extend the rent a room relief tax free threshold to HAP tenancies and social housing leases.

    So you can charge 14k a year rent for an apartment/house tax free. Charge 14,001 and you are taxed at your full rate.

    This will help end the insane feedback loop that is HAP etc. Government pumps more money into HAP at market rates -> government setting higher floor for rents -> more people cannot afford rent as rents rise and require HAP assistance -> Government pumps more money into HAP at market rates.

    Meanwhile the build to rent crowd are signing 25 year leases with he government at these "market rents" in the full knowledge that if the government was not there to pay them, the market cannot bear them.

    It's total lunacy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    Would you prefer FG/FF not to give homes to people? is that what you are suggesting?

    What does it matter if it is a D4 apartment if it gets a family off the street?

    I never said anything about less evictions. I just pointed out it was one during the period from 2014...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,580 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Don't be asking FG/FF to take responsibility for anything Brucie, it's always somebody else's fault doncha know?



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You think the Government are responsible for the cost of buying a house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,603 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    FF and FG obv should share the brunt of the blame ...obviously. And yes there are many in society who don't want house prices to fall in fact most over the age of forty ..as they own houses. Catch 22.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    No seemingly it was the government fault for the poor performance of Sinn Fein in DCC, a government which hadn't even formed till 2016

    Sinn Fein also seemed to also sell off the stock that DCC had while not replacing it. while in control of DCC

    How many people wouldn't be homeless if Sinn fein led DCC didn't sell off their house?

    https://dublininquirer.com/2019/03/20/council-owns-1-300-fewer-social-homes-than-four-years-ago

    Look at the new build numbers, even with Covid after Sinn Fein got moved out

    Programmes 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total

    New Build – DCC 271 302 455 1,860 2,888



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,603 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    They are literally directly responsible for 40% of the price through taxation yes.



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Are the government responsible for the wage you receive, because you have to pay tax on it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,603 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,603 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,603 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    By the way they knocked down all the towers in ballymun, replaced them with modern high spec 3 storey apartments about 10 years ago.theres no easy solution, increase height limits for apartments ,20 storeys , tax credits for landlords, tax credits to turn old offices into rental units, nothing to do with wasters, the problem is supply versus demand, no of houses avaidable is maybe 10 per cent of demand.sinn fein cant do anything that fianna gael cant do.the problem, is inflation,supply chain issues, lack of resources, shortage of builders, maybe more funds for social housing.say it costs 300k to build a house, next year it,ll cost 370. it,s getting worse high rents in citys mean employers have to pay higher wages to attract workers.Companys are not opening offices here because theres not basic rental accomodation avaidable. its having negative effects on the whole economy. if sinn fein get into power it,ll be in a coalition with fine gael, they dont have the votes to form a government, its easy to make promises about building houses when you are not in power .

    Builders can only build whats allowed in the regulations re height insulation, energy effeciency .

    the government could provide more funding for self build charitys



  • Posts: 14,768 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Income tax is on income earned. You are taxed after you earn it, if tax rate falls, your gross does not fall. The Government is not responsible for what your employer pays you, unless of course you are a Government employee, but that is a different matter.

    There is no tax on the sale of a principal residence, and though taxation may play a part in the cost of building new homes, it is simplistic to say the Government is responsible for the price of a new home as it does not take into account all the other associated costs and market forces.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,603 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    But they impact greatly on your take home.


    Which impacts how much you spend which impacts the economy which impacts your wages.


    It impacts your overall wealth too.



Advertisement
Advertisement