Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Ukrainian refugees in Ireland - Megathread

1184185187189190452

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,899 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Absolutely- time to pull down the shutters on migration (illegal and economic) - there will always be some disaster, war or crisis somewhere - we or Europe just cannot solve the worlds problems, we have too many of our own



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,118 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Exactly, but I think the damage will be done before anyone will have a democratic say . The EU is fûcked btw it won’t exist in 50-60 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,899 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Even if the men can’t fight in the war- there’s so much they could be doing at home for THEIR OWN country- simply by just working especially if it is in a profession that could help their own. But alas no. Much easier rock up here for an indefinite free holiday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,899 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Europe in general has been in self destruct mode for the past two decades. Whether it be a whole range of policy failures (some intermingled) on energy, food security, uncontrolled migration- take your pick!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,118 ✭✭✭✭Strumms




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,899 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    I gather he was here already - an economic migrant presumably so once his visa is in order can stay here. It’s the newly arrived chancers (thousands of them) that have arrived since February I have a big problem with



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    I was in Kyiv in 2019. I thought it was really nice and safe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Obviously there will be men that will escape Ukraine and fail their duty to defend the motherland. But that's up to Ukraine to deal with their cowardice.

    They are people who are genuinely fleeing war though. Unlike there rests of the economic migrants. And a far higher amount of women and children, than any other group trying to obtain asylum in Ireland.

    Ukrainians are the least of our issues and should be welcomed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    I was musing to myself yesterday if MM would Wear a vest. Not wear a vest and make it obvious he's not. 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭MysticMe


    The payouts under temporary protection in Germany differ depending on the applicant's category. Social Welfare (FamilienKasse) pays €330 a month (with free accommodation), Jobcentre (for job seekers) pays €449 monthly. Child benefit in Germany is €219 per child. The social payments stop completely when earnings reach €14400 p.a (gross).

    This fictional family of one adult and 2 children in Germany will receive €330 + €219 child benefit x 2 = €768 monthly.

    Sweden: 1488 SEK + 625SEK x 2 (child benefit) = €255.92 monthly

    France: (€6,80 + €3.40 x 2) = €13.60 daily x 30 = €408 monthly

    Ireland: (€208 + €40 additional payment for a child x 2) x 52/ 12 + €140 x 2 (child benefit) = €1,528 monthly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,371 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    I'd love to know who the "we" is as well.

    We all have sympathy for the situation. We all agree that Russia and Putin are in the wrong here and we all agree that the resultant destruction and injury/death is completely wrong.

    But who are the "we" that stand with him and his idea of importing still more people? Who are the "we" that he thinks will be happy to put themselves and their families further down the waiting lists? Who are the "we" that are fine with another 3 billion of taxpayers money being diverted to this crusade while our essential services teeter on the edge of collapse and a global recession is looming?

    I'm deadly serious.. who does he think he's representing? It's certainly not anyone already struggling here and who is seeing their lives get harder as a result of his grandstanding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭ShamNNspace


    The trouble is you would be hard pressed to find a Td at this moment and time to echo your sentiments, but watch a few of them put their heads above the parapets in the coming months, when they gauge what way the wind is blowing over the summer break



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    Ah to be fair it was always bollix, women with children no problem. Single women are just as capable as any man of fighting age.

    Were told daily that men and women are the same, that equality is the aim, until something like this happens.

    Martins tweet is incredibly sexist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,143 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Excellent breakdown, I'm beginning to see why "Some" countries weren't to troubled financially about adhering to the EU directive and one (Ireland) didn't do their Sums....

    Ireland: (€208 + €40 additional payment for a child x 2) x 52/ 12 + €140 x 2 (child benefit) = €1,528 monthly

    + in most cases, Free accommodation

    + in most cases, Free Food

    + in many cases, Free Transportation

    + I presume back to school allowances

    + freely open bank accounts

    + circumvent normal rules with regards to car insurance.

    But even all of the above aside and I've no issue with "Reasonable" level of support, if normal SW rules as is an obligation of the EU directive, Ukrainian refugees would be on SWA and get Shelter, perhaps be entitled to a discretionary MC but would certainly not be getting all the "Add On's" and would not only be under constant review by DSP but infact be penalised by DSP if they we're essentially, getting additional monetary supports.

    Essentially there is one Rule for Ukrainian refugees and lots of Rules for everyone else, especially Non Ukrainian refugees.

    I also remind those in any doubts, the EU directive does not mention or indeed encourage, the waiving of any rules applicable to a member state adhering to the directive with regard to opening bank accounts, obtaining car insurance or dare I say ability to drive on public roads, amongst other things the Irish Government are either encouraging or turning a convenient blind eye towards normal rules applicable to Irish citizens or legally resident non nationals.

    I reiterate, this is Not Ukrainian refugees fault, it entirely the Irish Government to blame , they are So blinded and consumed by virtue signalling, they've lost all sense of reality whilst the rest of the country suffers, its simply extraordinary.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,855 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    Why do people expect every male to fight?

    I dont think it's gutless for men to follow their family.

    Whatever else and whatever annoys people I understand much if it but people complaining about others who might die in a war and leave family behind I don't get.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Subzero3


    Every soldier in combat is paid to 'defend'. Death in service is part of the gig. How many soldiers left family behind in any other wars. Its normal and since we will never have peace in this world it will continue.

    Maybe the men are anti Nazi/Bandera and don't want to die for zelinski and his ilk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,143 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I don't think people expect every male to stay and fight , they reasonably ask why so many relatively young fit men have arrived here and not as some would have us belive with family or children. Groups of young men arriving here for no apparent obvious reason is very concerning .

    Obviously Conscription does not apply to Non ukranian citizens and the EU directive covers anyone allegedly resident in Ukranian at the time the EU directive kicked in. The real problem remains, there's absolutely no way of verifying anything and essentially any chancer got entry and by all accounts, still are, it's disgraceful.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Posts: 16,208 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Every soldier in combat is paid to 'defend'. 

    Yeah, but most Ukrainian males are not soldiers. Conscription is an ugly tool to force normal people to fight. Zelinski called on the civilian population to fight as a militia, not as regular soldiers, so it's likely that most of them haven't received the training or supports that mainstream soldiers would have gained. They also would be treated differently from soldiers should they be captured by Russian forces... armies typically are harsher in how they treat civilian combatants.

    However, it comes back to the fact that most of Ukraine is not under threat of Russian aggression. There are heaps of safe areas, where people can continue their daily lives, head to the beach or whatever, while the battlefront remains far away. There was never any attempt to put all Ukrainian males into combat... it was a media/promotional piece to show that Ukraine was doing everything possible to fight their invaders... and I can remember the range of posts on boards praising the Ukrainians for doing so. Totally dismissing the ugly side of conscription, but then, it's always been people safe from war who are most gung-ho to send others to their deaths.

    It's posturing. The social conditioning that says that men should fight/die to defend their nation, while women should be saved. It's a traditional view that has never really been scrutinized... It's also incredibly sexist, but hey, sexism is fine when it suits people's own biases.

    The point few here are recognising is the influence of the Aid agencies, who have an interest in getting as many Ukrainians into Europe as refugees. Women and children would be the prime targets as they garner the most sympathy, but they'll encourage men to leave too. Why? Simple sales logic. The more refugees on their books, means more influence and funding coming from Western governments. I'm sure that Aid agencies have gone to men in Ukraine and suggested that they would serve their families best by leaving Ukraine with them... and that they aren't actually needed to fight the Russians (which they're not). Even after 5 months, considering the population of Ukraine, and the casualties reported by the Ukrainian government, they're not experiencing any shortage of manpower.

    Personally, I'm fine with Ukrainian men being here, just as much as I'm fine with Ukrainian women being here.. as refugees. Their sex shouldn't matter.

    Of course, Ukrainians are going to take advantage of what's being offered. You (boards in general) would likely do the same in that situation.. The true focus should not be on the Ukrainians, but on our government/State in how they've handled the situation. The Ukrainians are simply accepting what's being offered.. that's not a scam. It's not a trick of any kind.

    So, everyone, if you want this to change, stop getting side-tracked. Focus on our political elite because they're the muppets who are going to **** this country up... not the Ukrainians, regardless of whether they're male or female.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,118 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    this made me sit up and take note too… Citizens of Ukraine do not need a visa to travel to Ireland. You also do not need proof that you have a COVID-19 vaccine, and you do not need to take a COVID-19 test before you arrive.

    So you can have a potentially deadly virus, but we the politicians don’t care if you are vaccinated or even if you HAVE covid.

    the responsible thing.. “ before being admitted to the country you will be tested for covid and if you haven’t been vaccinated a vaccination will be offered. Failure to receive / accept the vaccination will prohibit you from entering the country.

    weve been lectured ad nauseam for years during covid about doing the right thing, being responsible, distancing, ventilation, vaccines, testing…all saving lives…… but, doesn’t apply to them…. Because…. The Ukraine, that’s why.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40 AnaB




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,268 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    They were offered a vaccine and told where they could get one on arrival



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭airy fairy


    And chances are, the majority of them haven't and won't, seeing as their vaccine uptake last year in their own country was pathetic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭MysticMe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,118 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    According to the latest CSO figures, 92% of our citizens here are fully vaccinated.

    vs

    35.7% for the Ukrainian people. That’s the lowest rate of vaccination in Europe.

    Yet here we’re are, deadly pandemic, arms open. According to the articles I’m reading it’s NOT vaccine availability, it’s simply vaccine hesitation / vaccine disinterest. Many don’t want it, don’t like it and are refusing it.

    they arrive here without proof of vaccine they should be offered it. If they refuse without tangible medical reason, deport / return them to their homeland via a period in detention here.. until suitable travel can be arranged..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,703 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    Britain is talking about another lockdown at the moment. It’s only a matter of time until it comes over here but the government raided that fund already and pretty much told healthcare staff to suck it up. You can’t exactly lockdown if you are crammed in emergency accommodation. It will be interesting to see if they try and keep them in there for a lockdown. A lack of vaccine uptake will see more in A&E too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭aziz


    Thought it was nice of Russia to hold off on their invasion until Ireland and most of the eu dropped their covid restrictions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,118 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    My fear is …You’ll end up seeing healthcare professionals saying ‘enough’…. off to do something else…After all they’ve been through having the population skyrocket by x%. ALL new arrivals with medical cards and who will be mad keen to get referrals, for everything and anything wrong with them, whether through a&e or GP referral.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40 AnaB


    I found this video on the news, I hope you could translate it. Quite interesting to see what s going in Europe, Czech Republic and Bulgaria

    https://youtu.be/FSxRmZYlsb8



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Find it interesting now that if you were not vaccinated you could not participate in society told to sit in your house. And now. Well things have changed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭MysticMe


    My opinion may not be popular in this thread, but I also think that helping displaced people from Ukraine is our collective humanitarian responsibility. There are genuine traumatised people who lost everything, and we can and should help them. However, there are also less affected people, and it is difficult to differentiate between highly and less affected.

    I don't see Ireland introducing an annual refugee admissions cap, this is unlikely to happen this year. None of the countries in Europe are introducing it and Ireland will follow the general trend.

    I do think that Ireland should reduce the rate of financial support ASAP, to make it in line with other European countries, for example, Germany. At the current rate, it sends a wrong message to certain groups of people who can exploit Ireland's generous welfare system.

    Bringing it down would allow us to help more people and would naturally make Ireland a less attractive destination.

    Post edited by MysticMe on


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement