Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Pushback against Leftism

14142444647129

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,232 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Nah. Its morally depraved to be delighted that a Muslim did it and use that to spread extremist hatred.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Delighted!?

    How could anyone possibly be "delighted" by that?

    If a right-wing extremist murdered those two homosexuals on the grounds that they were homosexuals, you would be on here saying how homophobic fascists were on the march in Ireland.

    When we learn that it was an Islamic extremist, you still focus your attention on the far-right rather than on the perpetrator and the circumstances under which he committed that depraved act. Why are you being totally inconsistent in your approach?

    If you are against homophobia, which I'm sure you are, you should at least be consistent in your position, rather than using these murders to piece together a false narrative that some people in society were somehow, bizarrely "delighted" by what happened.

    It's quite frankly an outrageous thing to say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,296 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    You didnt feel the smallest bit of irony or hypocrisy when putting together this rant which is you doing exactly what you claim the 'far left process' is? No engagement with any posts or points just attacking a strawman.

    You talk about safe spaces for the left while the right is losing it over children's story time that they dont agree with that no parent is forced to bring their child to. At the same time their latest man crush in Florida is banning math school books because they might teach empathy, banning teachers from having pictures of their spouses or wearing rainbow clothing, and demanding faculty fill out a survey on their beliefs, while other right wing run states are banning the use of the term slavery.

    No element of the spectrum have clean hands when it comes to debate - just like all sides get 'triggered' or have 'snowflakes'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,296 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I actually agree here, the majority of people with those sort of far right leanings are only in a few small corners of Ireland - unfortunately this site is one of the spots where they raise their anonymous heads usually to support actions in other countries.

    The idea of a 'pushback against leftism' in Ireland is just about as ridiculous, as can be seen by how the political parties with any clout nearly universally embrace the exact liberal ideologies that you see 'pushback' happening in other countries.

    No harm of being vigilant of the far right but Irish people are in general decent folk and for the most part have not been sucked in by it and usually more likely to just laugh at the characters involved for that backwards mindset



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 414 ✭✭dorothylives


    Yes they did. I was waiting in a shop the week after the murder and the male owner was chatting with his female staff about this incident and one of the women was telling him that men should cross the road when they see a woman so that they don't scare her, that they shouldn't make eye contact with a woman that they don't know for the same reason. There was wall to wall coverage across media every single day. Every single columnist had daily articles on toxic masculinity and how Irish men needed to change. There was endless talk about it and it painted every Irish male as a potential rapist/thug/wife beater.

    There was even one banging on about the Irish Mammy being a part of the problem. It was fecking relentless, it pissed a huge amount of people off and it stopped as soon as it was established that the man who murdered her was foreign and just a little bit tanned looking. Just like the coverage of the 2 gay men murdered stopped as soon as it turned out to be the privileged son of a wealthy Muslim couple who came here from a camp in Lebanon as part of a government scheme when he was 12 years old.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,096 ✭✭✭Mike Murdock


    How will NGOs get funding if there is no enemy to fight? Even though they are tilting at windmills, they do cause enough commotion to gain attention.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,191 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Don't be ridiculous.

    Its clearly true that the main conversation in all the papers and telly and radio and social media was about how we should be suspicious about non white people.

    You've no proof that it wasn't (I mean apart from all the evidence and proof and you know, memory of it happening) and if you say different then you hate non white people.

    Oh and a self proclaimed queer was battered with a baseball bat and stabbed multiple times in broad daylight on the busiest street in Dublin during pride month. Facts aren't needed for that because we all know that this happens all the time because of the fascist right.

    We will just all assume it's true and shout victim blaming if you don't accept it is totally true. Our side don't lie and haven't got extremists pushing an agenda.


    Am I doing it right progressives?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    Over in France, a country with actual left and right politics, the hard left and right are now two sides of the same coin, Putinite populists.

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 414 ✭✭dorothylives


    Nice attempt at deflection. That attitude was everywhere and it was well and truly exploited by the mainstream media and you know it. You could at least try honesty.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,191 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Prove it then. No cherrypicked anecdotes, actual proof.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's a bit rich to ask others for evidence when you have point blank not engaged with any points that other's have raised to you.

    Instead, it has only been snide, dismissive comments rather than actual engagement.



  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I wouldn't bother. I think it's been well proven at this stage and it's just the next step in the cycle.

    Deflect, derail, dishonest.



  • Posts: 16,208 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And there's zero expectation from any of us that any amount of evidence would matter even slightly.

    Anything that disagrees with that posters pov is dismissed. You could provide pages of evidence, and he'd merely disappear for a few pages, only to come back later with more accusations, aggressive claims, and such. Rinse and repeat. It's not as if that poster hasn't behaved this way on numerous other threads already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,296 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Maybe try starting with providing evidence that goes beyond what certain posters feel happened, backed up with an anecdote.

    Even if there was that 'attitude' as claimed, there is another huge leap here with the assumption of causation when those stories fell out of the news. That assumption is completely based on feelings and coincidentally appear to perfectly align with the poster's worldview while ignoring how every single story falls out of the news cycle, some never even making it there.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,191 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The standard cop out.

    If you want to spout baseless drivel, go for it. I've no problem calling it what it is and dismissing the pathetic right wing blogs and videos that sometimes get desperately dumped here in lieu of actual evidence.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    About 30 minutes ago, I said the following regarding the content of your posts:

    It's a bit rich to ask others for evidence when you have point blank not engaged with any points that other's have raised to you.

    Instead, it has only been snide, dismissive comments rather than actual engagement.

    Some things never change...

    If your arguments were strong, you'd wipe the floor with us with the confidence of the value of your posts.

    But by openly and now proudly "dismissing" other's posts in the way that you just have (and continue to do), the credibility of your posts carry very, very little value - much less than they already did.

    And trust me, that value hit rock bottom a long time ago.



  • Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    I think he has a point, because this

    "It is every man’s responsibility to step in or speak up when a woman may be in danger"

    does not mean the same thing as this

    "Your guys tried to turn those that poor girls tragic death into a two week media-backed campaign about how bad ALL men were and that ALL men were responsible and had to do more."

    And that article does say

    "The sense of entitlement some men have over women is illustrated every day in how women are spoken to, how they are seen, discredited and disrespected."



  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    his direct request was:

    "Prove it. Where did it say all men were responsible as was claimed?"

    I gave a quote from a published opinion piece which said:

    "It is every man’s responsibility to step in or speak up when a woman may be in danger"

    I don't think there's any argument there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,296 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    And if your arguments were 'strong' you'd be able to back it up with evidence and not feelings and anecdotes.

    Why should people have to accept a person's feelings about a situation and a demand that they aren't questioned and that they should be treated as facts in a discussion?

    Call it dismissive but I've found that it is a waste of time to have a discussion when someone who can't accept that their point of view is based on their feelings with no evidence to support it - which very much seems to be the case here.



  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "Why should people have to accept a person's feelings about a situation and a demand that they aren't questioned and that they should be treated as facts in a discussion?"


    So where do you stand on the Trans/gender debate?

    Lol. You're so close...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,296 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    So your only bit of evidence is an online oped in a college newspaper? 😅

    Even if that was 'main stream media', your comprehension skills need a hell of a lot of work if that sentence is supposed to be your proof.

    A person can have responsibility for an action but it doesn't mean they are responsible if it doesn't happen.

    For example, I can be responsible for cleaning the kitchen if I see it dirty but I am therefore not responsible if my brother comes home at 3am and makes a mess in it while I am asleep.

    It is basic primary school level stuff there



  • Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    "responsibility to step in or speak up" is not what you meant when you posted this "how bad ALL men were and that ALL men were responsible and had to do more."

    It is not the same thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,296 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I believe this is a perfect case of you just being caught red handed using the exact tactics you were just complaining about others doing a few minutes ago

    Deflect, derail, dishonest.

    Embarrassing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,556 ✭✭✭Sweetemotion



    I never really paid attention to any of his posts before this thread, his "murderous christian fascists" reply was like wtf.



  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There is a plethora of evidence. I've a feeling that anyone we go denies that there wasn't an immediate dog pile on men in the aftermath of the death, then they aren't arguing in good faith.

    I'm not trawling the rte archives or Twitter for you. There were an abundance of threads on here too. You were probably active on them.

    It's common knowledge that for the week or two after that poor girls death, there was an abundance of collective guilt laid on men, who were told they needed to do better on traditional media, social media and in the community.

    If that somehow passed you by, then I'm not going to jog your memory for you.

    The reason I gave the op-ed as a very quick example is because it was exactly what that poster asked for. An example of where someone said all men were responsible.

    Your example is not really applicable as it doesn't take into account the context and tone of the piece as a whole.



  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Why would that be embarrassing?

    "Why should people have to accept a person's feelings about a situation and a demand that they aren't questioned and that they should be treated as facts in a discussion?"

    That's an great question to pose. I agree with you.

    Unusual to hear a left leaning poster pose such a question though as it does make a mockery of gender theory/GRA



  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    image.png

    A quick browse through the thread finds few who understand what is left and right. A person on the bottom “right” quadrant would not in any world be a leftist but being open to immigration and trans rights to name but two issues would not be strange for those individuals. Someone on the top “left” quadrant would very much be a leftist, but also for immigration control and other restrictions on individual liberty.


    Examples, based on UK, where real world positions of various groups lie

    image.jpeg




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,975 ✭✭✭buried


    Liberals trying to convince themselves that something didn't happen, that actually did, or is actually currently happening, is par for the course at this stage

    Bullet The Blue Shirts



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement