Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

1899900902904905952

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,338 ✭✭✭Bit cynical


    It is probably a matter of distress for these people that Covid is now a comparitively mild disease for the majority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 88,249 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,044 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    Being interested in Covid deaths and how the two years 2020 and 2021 compare, particularly for healthy people, I queried the CSO on the matter. What I got back was a bit of a shock to me. I quote


    In 2021, there were 3,011 deaths were U071/U072 was the Underlying Cause of Death. Of these, 92 deaths had COVID-19 as the only narrative on the death certificate. The remaining 2,919 deaths had COVID-19 classified as the Underlying Cause of Death but also had only co-morbidities mentioned on the death certificate.


    In 2020, there were 1,672 deaths were U071/U072 was the Underlying Cause of Death. Of these, 61 deaths had COVID-19 as the only narrative on the death certificate. The remaining 1,611 deaths had COVID-19 classified as the Underlying Cause of Death but also had only co-morbidities mentioned on the death certificate. 

    (highlights by me)

    A total of 153 in 2 years with Covid as the only narrative!

    U071 = Covid-19, Virus identified

    U072 = Covid-19, Virus not identified

    You can see the graphic explaining those ID numbers here ...

    https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases/emergency-use-icd-codes-for-covid-19-disease-outbreak

    The death certs would reflect the health status and any underlying issues involved in the death. So death certs that do not include underlying issues imply an otherwise healthy person.

    These official CSO numbers of 61 and 92 highlight to me how non-deadly this virus was, and is, to otherwise healthy people.

    The figures were released early in June. It is a pity we did not have them much earlier, as I for one find them very comforting.

    This is the link to the CSO press release of 2nd June 2022, and at the bottom it has all the contact details needed to confirm what I quoted from the CSO above. In addition there are other pages on the site with details should someone wish to do their own calculations.

    https://www.cso.ie/en/csolatestnews/pressreleases/2022pressreleases/pressstatementvitalstatisticsquarter42021/

    Another aspect of those statements from the CSO is

    The remaining <different number each year> deaths had COVID-19 classified as the Underlying Cause of Death but also had only co-morbidities mentioned on the death certificate

    (highlight by me)

    Does this mean Covid is not listed along with co-morbidities on the death certificates?

    If that is the case then what are the implications? Does it mean Covid is not mentioned as a contributory factor on the death certificate, but the death is nonetheless classified as a Covid death? If so I wonder why this would happen in such a large number of cases.

    The 153 over two years is quite clear, but if anyone has a different interpretation of the second aspect of the above do please explain, thank you.

    Post edited by Johnboy1951 on


  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And that's why we have practically no excess deaths, because very few died that wouldn't have died anyways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,972 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    And that's the bottom line that matters. But, no, in this moralising crusade to becoming some sort of nanny state, it's all about "staying safe" and "protecting others" - from what; a few days in bed at worst?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,141 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    But lots of countries did have excess deaths because of covid.

    We didn't... because what else happened in Ireland in 2020?

    You know this yet pretend not to.

    The whole thing is built on a canard. If someone has high blood pressure or heart condition or diabetes and covid, the poster has presumed in every single instance that they died of something other than covid. This is utterly without foundation.

    Comorbidities, while they may raise the risk of severe disease, are not necessarily the cause of death. The virus itself can be the cause of otherwise preventable death among those who had manageable health conditions

    Completely debunked multiple times already;


    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What else happened to Ireland in 2020?

    We overreacted to an illness that killed 153 otherwise healthy people in 2 years.

    The lack of excess deaths shows us that most of those that died with COVID likely would have died without COVID.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,406 ✭✭✭Man Vs ManUre


    How come shaking hands is back to normal now?? And I mean normal as in totally over the top, eg every Tom, dick and Harry you meet in work wants to shake hands. Even the top politicians are shaking hands with everyone at any events they go to. Why are we so stupid??



  • Registered Users Posts: 154 ✭✭whatchagonnado




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,141 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    More attempts at deception in rewriting history.

    The lack of excess deaths was because of the reaction -> both the government ones and the voluntary changes in people's behaviour. It takes a very limited form of thinking to look at a safety measure and say we didn't need it because the worst case scenario didn't happen. Other countries had excess deaths in 2020 because of covid.

    In the US 50% of Covid deaths were under 80, and 15% of deaths were in under 80s without underlying conditions.

    Look at the ICU and hospitalisation admissions for covid. The ones who pulled through weren't people who were going to die without covid. They were people, in many cases 'active retired' age groups or with conditions with reasonable expectation of many years of life, who needed medical treatment. Medical treatment that would not have been there, or would have been severely curtailed \ limited \ triaged in the event of the cases overwhelming medical capacity.

    And not only people with covid, everyone in need of medical attention would have been facing the same difficulties in accessing hospital care.

    And there you have the reasons why country after country reacted as they did.

    Post edited by odyssey06 on

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,909 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    Didnt see an answer re the return to work if testing positive, i dont understand this tbh??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,331 ✭✭✭Azatadine


    Well, I started symptoms last Monday and 7 days isolation started then. I only started showing positive on antigen testing Wednesday but Day 0 is either onset of symptoms or first positive antigen test. I'm allowed back on site tomorrow now that I've completed my 7 say isolation and have 2 days symptom free (apart from no taste or smell), even though I'm still positive on antigen testing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Don't Chute!


    Because, despite the ongoing scaremongering most people have finally realized that this thing stopped being a “crisis” way back in early 2020 and now just want to get on with their lives. There was another fella on here recently who told us we need to start wearing masks again “until we stop acting the eejit”. No lads this is simply how real life was before The Great Social Media Pandemic (TM) and The New Normal. As I told that guy, you people have had your fun now it’s time to get out from underneath the bed put the big boy pants on and get on with life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,044 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    No matter what way you try to look at it, we had 153 deaths from Covid of people who had no underlying contributory factors.

    For all others 'classified' as Covid deaths, Covid was one contributory factor among other - sometimes multiple - contributory factors.

    No one can tell for definite 'what if' anything .... whether those people would have died in a short time or not.

    The fact remains, according to WHO classification and CSO stats, 153 healthy people died FROM Covid in the two years.

    Also we should remember that this was during a time when we received NO advice on how to help our immune systems deal with this respiratory infection.

    So 153 deaths during a time when there was no early treatment for the infection.

    Deadly? I think not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,141 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06



    Would you consider ebola or the plague to be deadly?

    How many deaths or hospitalisations did we have from them in Ireland in 2020 and 2021?

    How many people did covid put into ICU and hospital in the same period in Ireland?

    Covid's "deadliness" is in its infectiousness and the numbers of people it can hit with severe covid.

    And we have a lot of people in this country who fall into your 'non healthy' category.

    So which is more 'deadly' to the capacity of the health system to function?

    Post edited by odyssey06 on

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,019 ✭✭✭sporina


    of the people in hospital with Covid - anyone know how many were admitted because of Covid/how many got it in hospital when admitted with something else?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,573 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    it’s approx 50-60% are admitted with Covid not because of it. In the UK it’s 60% currently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Don't Chute!


    We were told there could be 120,000 deaths in Ireland from Covid by the “experts”. And if we have so many “non healthy” people in the country then why have the government NEVER told us that we need to be healthier instead of actually actively STOPPING people from getting healthier by closing gyms and enforcing utterly ludicrous 2km from home rules?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,141 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Because that'll work for in the short term for a 70 year in the midst of a highly infectious pandemic? Really?

    That was a scenario based on early data from China. That we didn't have more deaths from covid was because of such warnings, people changed their behaviour both voluntarily and as a result of government mandates. I don't know what the deaths would have been had we just carried on as "just the flu bro" / "dose of the sniffles" but it would have dwarfed the number that did die; because in short order we'd have had so many infected hospitals would be overwhelmed. This is why country after country saw the numbers in the hospitals and reacted as they did.

    I stand over all my points:

    Would you consider ebola or the plague to be deadly?

    How many deaths or hospitalisations did we have from them in Ireland in 2020 and 2021?

    How many people did covid put into ICU and hospital in the same period in Ireland?

    Covid's "deadliness" is in its infectiousness and the numbers of people it can hit with severe covid.

    And we have a lot of people in this country who fall into your 'non healthy' category.

    So which is more 'deadly' to the capacity of the health system to function?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,401 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Jeez, calm down. I can just imagine you jumping back 2 feet in horror everytime someone extends their hand to you. Probably in 2 masks also. Lol

    Hand shaking doesn't have any effect whatsoever on an airborne disease. Just wash your hands and don't touch your face or eat before doing so. Sorry but human beings aren't going to change their inbuilt social behaviour to keep you happy.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You'd have to compare us to a country that didn't lockdown to get an idea. Take Sweden for example.

    Their deaths must dwarf Ireland's? Id say it was a bloodbath over there? Surely over 50K deaths?


    Oh, they only have just over double our deaths with twice our population at least and an elder population at that.

    Europe's strictest lockdown Vs no lockdown = barely a noticeable difference in deaths..

    Not a great look for strict lockdowns.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,141 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Sweden had 10% excess deaths in 2020. That's not "barely noticeable".

    Ireland had none.

    And also, Sweden didn't just carry on as before as if it was "just the flu bro" / "dose of the sniffles" or whatever weasel words are in vogue with the covid deniers. There was a massive shift in behaviours e.g. working from home, economic activity dropped as much versus countries which did lockdown, detectable reductions in people's radius of travel. To a large extent they locked themselves down. And they still had noticeably higher deaths than Ireland and versus their peer Scandinavian countries in 2020.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Don't Chute!




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,141 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I see some people are incapable of envisaging scenarios other than what actually happened & only capable of thinking in binary. In the real world there are incremental and gradual effects.

    Define "worked", if you can.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Don't Chute!


    Also, “Covid deniers”? Could you point them out please?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,141 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Sure, look at anyone who calls it Covid a "dose of the sniffles", or "just the flu bro" although most of them are highlighted on page 1.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hilarious stuff.

    Sweden didnt do too badly because apparently they actually did lockdown. When we know they didn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,141 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    In the first instance, I should also mention that Sweden is a low population density country and was surrounded by countries which did lockdown. There was a massive reduction in international travel. So in multiple respects, Sweden didn't just carry on or live in a wider world that carried on as if it was "just the flu bro" / "a dose of the sniffles".

    In the second instance, this is what I wrote:

     There was a massive shift in behaviours e.g. working from home, economic activity dropped as much versus countries which did lockdown, detectable reductions in people's radius of travel. To a large extent they locked themselves down.

    This is what you wrote:

    apparently they actually did lockdown. When we know they didn't.

    Readers - It was clear from my post I was referring to voluntary changes in behaviour yet the poster deliberately ignores this \ is incapable of understanding the difference. You can draw your own conclusion as to whether it is someone unable or willing to comprehend the distinction or... a deliberate attempt to deceive.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,044 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    I will answer those questions when we suffer a pandemic of plague and ebola, and can access the CSO's reports of the number of deaths and who was most vulnerable to them.

    Any more nonsense questions you want to throw about?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,044 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    Another aspect of those statements from the CSO is

    The remaining <different number each year> deaths had COVID-19 classified as the Underlying Cause of Death but also had only co-morbidities mentioned on the death certificate

    (highlight by me)

    Does this mean Covid is not listed along with co-morbidities on the death certificates?

    If that is the case then what are the implications? Does it mean Covid is not mentioned as a contributory factor on the death certificate, but the death is nonetheless classified as a Covid death? If so I wonder why this would happen in such a large number of cases.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~ above quoted from previous post ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Are there any thoughts on this aspect?

    It intrigues me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,141 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Ah, so you are incapable \ unwilling to answer the questions, so you throw up this smokecreen \ attempt at deflection?

    You were the one who introduced the concept of whether covid was 'deadly'. So nope, it's not nonsense to assess its 'deadliness' in relation to other infectious diseases.

    I think I've shown up how faulty your basis for the statement was.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,044 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    Hahahaha

    The basis for my comments are the figures released by the CSO in the categories determined by the WHO.

    When similar figures are available from CSO for the pandemics you want to be remarked upon, then I will do so if asked. Prior to that your questions are ridiculous in the extreme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,141 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Your refusal to consider what 'deadly' means in relation to infectious diseases in general shows how ill informed your original comment was as it has no basis or context.

    Which disease is more deadly if we look at lives lost? Covid is \ was infecting and killing people here. Ebola hasn't killed anyone here. Covid is a more deadly disease in Ireland and the Western World.

    So laughing in response just further highlights how weak and glib your case was when subjected to scrutiny.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭rahmalec


    Sweden also has more people living alone, etc, compared to here (and places like Italy)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,019 ✭✭✭sporina




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,404 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Absolutely. People in their 40s and 50s with asthma , high blood pressure or diabetes would not be acutely at risk like they have been for the past 2 years plus requiring repeated vaccination to keep them out of hospital and ICU .

    @Johnboy1951 Misinformation with an attempt to dress it up as real facts .

    This has been the mantra from deniers and antivaxxers social media sites and is just too ignorant to discuss or even to requote your post .

    The famous Nurse John (the one with the phD )was called out by the BBC for attempting to justify this nonsense and by the Broadcasting Regulating Authority in UK for misinformation in the guise of science .

    He of course retracted saying that that was not what he meant to say at all , but with his credibility shot to bits , unfortunately.

    I think the number of patients he said that died in the UK was 17000 !

    Did you ever hear such a load of bs in your life ?

    Eh , maybe you have , but I prefer to get my information from people who know what they are talking about .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,573 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    MM today :


    “He said that there are currently 800 people in hospital with Covid-19, and while half of those were in hospital for other reasons”



  • Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭Ouch Chinese Byrne




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,404 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    My work , colleagues (qualified medical and nursing ) and HSPC statistics re around the country . Also verified research from reliable sources and not just anecdotal makey up claptrap.

    It's not just those in the elderly bracket that have been hospitalised and seriously ill with this .

    These same statistics and information have been posted on this forum as soon as they became available all along .

    Some of the reliable posters have been here all along and are plain to see.

    Some of the good people who did post statistics left because of persistent abuse from some posters who sought to deny that there was a pandemic and tried to twist statistics to suit their own narrative as above.

    Theres a bit of that hanging around the thread here still it seems .


    A good place to start , bearing in mind at present because this variant is so infectious and milder , 50% of cases are picked up on admission for other issues , the rest are sick because of Covid.

    https://covid19ireland-geohive.hub.arcgis.com/pages/hospitals-icu--testing



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Don't Chute!


    Reliable posters being posters that agree with you I take it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,044 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    @Johnboy1951 Misinformation with an attempt to dress it up as real facts .

    I quoted the information from the CSO. It is there on line should you wish to inform yourself.

    That you refer to the CSO figures as misinformation shows more about you than them or me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,141 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Isolated snippete of factual Information taken out of context is misinformation when dressed up with the spin you tried to put on it.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,573 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    A thread with some info on the current variants in circulation:




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,044 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    It is good to see that you recognise that I posted the facts.

    I placed it in context - otherwise healthy people dying of Covid.

    Some here appear to like throwing about that 'misinformation' term when they see facts that don't suit their views.

    I will state yet again, that according to the CSO, 153 people died of Covid who had no other co-morbidities listed on their death certificates, during the two years 2020 and 2021.

    Accept it or not that is the number.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,404 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    No... facts without context does not equal reliable information.

    Statistics being taken from CSO ?.. the CSO themselves would day that to use them without appropriate context is incorrect .

    You made up your own context and try to pass it off as true .

    What you said was only so many " died " of Covid alone .

    Are you a pathologist ? Are you qualified to make statements like that.?

    Only charlatans try to pass their statements off as more educated than the experts .

    Its rubbish that has been discredited before .

    No more to say to you .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,404 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Well if you are talking about people who try to claim that Covid is gone or that Covid was never anything to be worried about when the evidence is RELIABLY to the contrary , yea , won't be agreeing with people like that , no .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,044 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    Are you seriously calling into question what is written on death certificates?

    153 people died in Ireland, whose death certs had Covid alone - no other co-morbidities - mentioned on those certs. The WHO determined the categories - U07.1 and U07.2.

    If you have a problem with the categories, then I suggest you take the matter up with the WHO.

    I do not question the qualified people who filled those certs, nor do I question the statisticians at the Central Statistics Office who produced the numbers.

    You appear to believe you are qualified to do both.

    I will still believe the numbers produced by the CSO regardless your opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,404 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    You know I am not questioning either the WHO or the CSO for either their data or their categorisation , just YOU , for your ridiculous statements about how many died with " only Covid " .

    That is meaningless twaddle as you know , because so many people in the population have at least one comorbidity , when you are talking about common diseases like asthma for example ...

    You think asthma , hypertension , or even diabetes are death sentences these days for the majority of people ?


    Good night .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,091 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    My dad, 81, broke his hip and ended up in hospital and now has covid. Luckily no symptoms to this point. He's got three shots.

    I've still managed to avoid it somehow and my family.

    I was a close contact last week for the first time since this began.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,573 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Hope he gets well soon. I was a close contact myself a couple of weeks back. I was in a small kitchen with 3 other people. One was 80 and the other 2 late 70’s. I did notice one was coughing a bit. 2 days later the other 2 developed symptoms. I miraculously didn’t catch it. All fully recovered.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement