Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Tesla Supercharger network in Ireland

13637394142106

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,974 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,514 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Unkel is expressing the kW cost of SuC usage into minutes, bit of poetic licence to get the slow draw point across

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭jusmeig


    You might argue they are blocking the one to the left due to the fact they have "spilled over" into that stall. People who don't want their doors dinged getting out look away now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,620 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    Those bikes have small batteries (15.5kwh) wont be there long really, has fast charging so should be pulling more. Geesh lads learn to share your toys. Remember your lords mission is to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy. All these photos are like some kind of angry mental tetris you are playing so show how if the charger were full some humble tesla owner would be getting blocked from their birth right. They are not chill the beans.


    Unkle the chargers are not full...its revenue that tesla otherwise would not be getting. If you want to go down the maximize Tesla profits rabbit hole its a dark place.....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,974 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    They're not spilled over on any stall. The 500 is charging off the left stall and parked between the middle and left stall so as not to block anyone else.

    There's a Tesla charging on the right and the bike is far enough away that there's plenty of space between it and the Tesla.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,974 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    So they are actually paying the same or more then per KW than the Tesla?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,181 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    I'm all for the transition to electric driving and opening the SuC network to non-Teslas helps with this. So I'm all for it!


    Provided it brings Tesla extra profit AND it doesn't go at the cost of current and future Tesla owners though, that would be a commercial mistake.


    That's why I would propose some sort of a two-tier system. Make the plebs pay as much as they would pay at the competition (Ionity) per kWh rather than the cheap Tesla rates. Make them pay a monthly subscription, leave at least half or three quarters of the SuC stalls for Tesla only (depending on the number of stalls at the SuC), just spewing out some thoughts here.


    Not saying any of this because I currently own a Tesla. It is quite likely my next car will not be a Tesla and I will be down to being a pleb again myself 😂

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭jusmeig


    Ah sry I thought the 500 was not charging and over the line on the space to the left.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,546 ✭✭✭cannco253


    I haven’t seen any official comments from Tesla on the pilot scheme.

    Maybe we’ll hear something at this event.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,188 ✭✭✭innrain


    Did a pit stop at Birdhill this afternoon. 3 model 3s one not plugged and 2 ICEs parked. I think I paid 40c/kWh.The non Tesla chargers were both free when I arrived then an MG5 was connecting when I was leaving.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,110 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    Birdhill always seems to attract at least one arsehole in an ICE.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,496 ✭✭✭Damien360


    Location, location location. Quite a few if not all the chargers are very close to the door of the premises. Just like your local Tesco, those spaces close to the door attract the permanently lazy. The location was likely chosen for ease of connection to the large interconnector required for the power. The one on M9 close to Kilcullen is cursed with the lazy parking in the 3 spaces for chargers also. Has a McD just inside the door to attract more lazy parking.Tesla seem to always take space down the back of car parks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,110 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    The ones in Birdhill are furthest away from the door!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,110 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    Screenshot_2022-06-04-20-43-01-059_com.google.android.apps.maps.jpg

    Far away!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Laviski




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭Sabre Man


    Birdhill needs more parking spaces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,546 ✭✭✭cannco253


    First German Tesla supercharger opened up to all today.

    Limburg an der Lahn on the way to Frankfurt!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,406 ✭✭✭Fingleberries


    As a random thought, or does anyone form the UK have knowledge of this.

    I have a vague recollection that there's a law in the UK requiring fast chargers to offer Tap&Pay. Does that mean that when the Tesla SuC network officially opens over there (not the current pilot) that they will have to implement Tap&Pay too?

    OK. It will likely be at the non subscription rate, sure it might also not be as quick as plug and charge for Tesla drivers. But might get the non tesla charging session starting sooner, eh?

    This might, in turn, benefit us here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,201 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    That rule might only apply if the charger installer used state funding to help pay for the installation.. which isn't the case with currently installed Tesla chargers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,914 ✭✭✭wassie


    There is no such legislation yet. But legislation covering standardising the payment methods to make it easier to pay is scheduled this year (possibly may roll over into next year).

    It wont necessarily be simply requiring contactless payment as you have suggested. More than likely it will cover a range of payment methods including phone payments as well as unified apps under consideration.

    This is all part of the UK electric vehicle infrastructure strategy document published a couple of months ago. Essentially its the guiding document for drafting of new legislation and policy development relating to such.

    Too often, the charging network lets people down. To accelerate the transition to EVs, we must ensure that drivers across the country can have confidence and trust that public chargepoints will be easy to find, easy to use and fairly priced. One of our key priorities is to address issues with reliability, ease of payment and locating the right chargepoint for consumers’ needs.

    We expect to bring in new legislation this year which will improve drivers’ experiences using the public charging network. People will be able to compare the price of charging across networks quickly; they will be able to pay for their charge easily, without relying on multiple apps. They will also be able to rely on chargepoints being operational because of rigorous new legal obligations on chargepoint operators.

    Its a very comprehensive document and worth a read for anyone interested. It shows there is a very large gap between the policy reponse of our govt and the UK when it comes to a comprehensive EV charging infrastructure strategy.

    Suggest looking at page 40 titled "Electric vehicle charging will fit around people’s individual needs".

    Puts forward examples & solutions I had never even contemplated, such as the potential for residential owners to 'rent' out access to their private charger by arranging the charging and payment via a mobile app.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,406 ✭✭✭Fingleberries


    Thanks for the clarification - this is exactly the information what I was looking for (even though I might have muddled some details in my mind)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,309 ✭✭✭zg3409


    When Irish esb installed chargers in mainland UK they bolted on credit card readers to the outside of the 50kW chargers. Presumably this was a requirement in that case. All later installs in ROI never got such an option. Easygo do have touch to pay on most 50kW chargers.

    I expect the UK standard might just end up offering a more expensive roaming app option rather than physically fitting a reader to every charger. It gets relatively expensive. We may end up with different pricing depending on which app we use to pay, which is not ideal.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,514 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    With Tesla, it’s the Tesla App only

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,496 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I assume that was part of the specific tender that Ecars won, as opposed to legislation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,914 ✭✭✭wassie


    Correct.

    Here is exactly what the Government Response to the 2021 Consultation on the Consumer Experience at Public Chargepoints.

    Suggest Reading p17-20.

    It is more nuanced that 'a single payment method', because there are a range of different charging infrastructure as well as varied user requirements (eg consumer vs fleet).

    This is (in part) the requirement:

    We will require new public chargers above 7.1 kW to have a payment method available either per chargepoint or per site that is easy to use and familiar to as many people as possible. It must have an available physical, non-proprietary method of payment that does not require a payee’s mobile or internet connection. The payment method must also be compliant with the AFIR 2017 ad hoc requirement which ensures a consumer can use a chargepoint without having to enter into a pre-existing contract. This requirement will come into effect immediately after the legislation is laid.

    This in relation to the Tesla network.

    A proprietary network, a chargepoint network open only to specific car manufacturers,which opens their existing rapid chargepoints to be used by other EV consumers on a site-by-site basis must retrofit and provide the minimum payment standard within 12 months of the individual network site becoming public. Subsequent individual sites on the network will have 12 months from opening for public use.

    And this on 'Roaming'

    There is currently no payment solution which allows consumers to take advantage of different payment platforms and subscriptions across the majority of networks. This is particularly important for fleet vehicles who cannot rely solely on ad hoc payment. We want to see roaming solutions develop to support the electrification of fleets. Currently software fleet solutions for paying at chargepoints are fragmented and some chargepoint operators do not work together or with third party providers.

    To summarise - There is more to this that Im not going to summarise here.

    If you are interested in this, inform yourself by reading the pages I have noted above.

    Post edited by wassie on


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 6,521 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Haven't they triggered the 2017 AFIR legislation and will be required to provide some level of ad-hoc payment capability before 12 months have passed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,914 ✭✭✭wassie


    Quite possibly. I havent looked into it yet. I also stand to be corrected on anything written above as Im certainly no expert on this matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,201 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Athenry being commissioned today, painted tomorrow and hopefully open on Friday.

    only 4 units though due to power limitations at the site as well as damage to one of the cabinets….. which is awaiting parts…


    coming soon……

    F85C6F99-EE8C-443A-A022-1C1042BCD797.jpeg 42392B73-E999-415E-929F-FA6309E7F361.jpeg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,496 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    That post above would be pretty clear to me that Tesla need to fit a physical payment method at each site.

    This is (in part) the requirement:

    We will require new public chargers above 7.1 kW to have a payment method available either per chargepoint or per site that is easy to use and familiar to as many people as possible. It must have an available physical, non-proprietary method of payment that does not require a payee’s mobile or internet connection. The payment method must also be compliant with the AFIR 2017 ad hoc requirement which ensures a consumer can use a chargepoint without having to enter into a pre-existing contract. This requirement will come into effect immediately after the legislation is laid.

    This in relation to the Tesla network.

    A proprietary network, a chargepoint network open only to specific car manufacturers,which opens their existing rapid chargepoints to be used by other EV consumers on a site-by-site basis must retrofit and provide the minimum payment standard within 12 months of the individual network site becoming public. Subsequent individual sites on the network will have 12 months from opening for public use.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,914 ✭✭✭wassie


    Yes but doesnt solve the roaming issue for fleet operators.

    This is a big issue in the push to switch for electrication of commercial/company vehicles, as they ultimately provide vehicles for the second hand market through turnover.



Advertisement