Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1152015211523152515263690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 409 ✭✭dvega


    Been listening to Tom Clonan for quite some time now, he was one of few that said this war would turn into a war of attrition several weeks ago. He said it on national radio. A key statement he makes here is that the new wepons Ukraine are receiving is to stop Putin from taking the black sea coast entirely and that Putin will declare victory once Donbass is occupied and live to fight/rearm another day. Starting to feel that this is the off ramp many feel he needs to back off. It would certainly keep him in power



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Yet the bestest and bigliest President had his election cruelly stolen. It's not fair



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Putin doesn't need an off ramp. He controls the media in Russia, he can claim anything and people will believe it.

    What ever land Russia possesses when Putin declares victory will be short lived. The manpower and resources for Russia to hold on to that land indefinitely makes it an non runner, they would be under constant Ukrainian counter attacks. It's not like once Russia declares victory that all the sanctions will be lifted and Russia will be welcomed back into the civilized world. They are more likely to be declared a terrorist state at this stage!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,891 ✭✭✭✭briany


    How is Putin going to declare victory if Ukraine keeps attacking in the case that Russian forces can occupy the Donbas, or claim to? He'd look a bit foolish if Ukraine managed to launch counterattack which drove Russia back in this region.

    If Putin thinks he can just declare victory at some point where Russian forces ostensibly hold the Donbas and have that be accepted, then why not just declare victory now? If Russian people will largely believe or at least not question Putin, then that'd save hassle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,431 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Some people do believe that Putin will just announce 'victory' some day in the next couple of months and that Russian troops will stop fighting.

    But other analysts think he might favour a long drawn out war that lasts well into 2023 or even beyond it (perhaps in the hope that the West will lose interest and stop backing Ukraine). Anyone who thinks the former option and the "off ramp" are a dead cert is being very presumptuous....Putin might be mad enough to have a conflict that goes on for years and see where it takes him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1


    GW Bush did in Iraq. Russia has held Crimea for 8 years now and it held 1/5 of Georgia for nearly 15 years on the back of declaring victory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,181 ✭✭✭Field east


    If Putin avails of an off ramp from the war he has to at least make a statement to that effect especially for home consumption. But, no matter what off ramp strategy he uses - he might even declare a cease fire - if Ukr does not respond to the strategy he uses and not accepting the statements made by Putin eg the whole of The Donbas and Luhansk provinces are now under Russian control and we will be holding a referendum VERY SOON to consolidate its independence and THE UKRAINE army keeps fighting. . Well, IMHO, that means that Putin has to ‘ COME BACK OUT AND START FIGHTING AGAIN.

    And if there is a significant time gap between the OFF RAMP /BACK ON RAMP , it will give the Ukr to rearm - and especially with those long range artelliry pieces- subject to the US , mainly staying on board



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1


    I think even from the start Biden seemed to accept a certain amount of annexation. It’ll depend what the NATO define as Russian territory in the end, Is Crimea Russian territory for example.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭shivaz


    12 PzH 2000 will join the the war in about two weeks,18 crews have been in training since 11th may.HIMARS should also be joining the battle around the same time.July is going to be a new phase of the war with m777,Ceasars,Crab Howitzers joined by PZH 2000,HIMARS,Anti-ship weapons and fresh newly trained highly motivated troops.

    • Caliber: 155 mm
    • Barrel length: 52 calibers
    • Shooting range: up to 47 km (projectile with improved ballistics), 67 km (active-jet)
    • Speed ​​of fire: maximum on the range up to 12 shots per minute
    Dutch_Panzerhaubitz_fires_in_Afghanistan.jpg

    https://defence-ua.com/news/stalo_vidomo_koli_zavershitsja_navchannja_ukrajinskih_artileristiv_na_sau_pzh_2000_i_zsu_pustit_jih_na_peredovu-7647.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭shivaz


    Its much too early for any real speculation on that but you are free to guess away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,965 ✭✭✭rogber


    I know. But there's also Hussein, Gadaffi, Mubarak. These things are hard to predict. We'll see



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭shivaz


    Huge losses for Russia on the Izium front and reports that wagner group refused to go forward towards the Lyman/Sloviansk bridge.Wagner don't do cannon fodder,they leave that to others.

    "Thus, after unsuccessful actions in the Izyum direction, the enemy suffered significant losses in the 64th and 38th separate Guards motorized infantry brigades, which currently have less than 100 troops.The reason for the defeat was that the Russian command did not provide the necessary equipment to the units that fought in the woods and did not repair heavy artillery in time.For example, the enemy was not equipped with picks at all and had a limited number of BSL-110 sapper shovels and other means to create the necessary field fortifications."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1


    Is it it’s difficult to see Russia retreating back to its borders. Either Russia will be prevented advancing beyond the current front or they will gradually inch towards Odessa.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭shivaz


    It is difficult for Russia to see itself retreating back to its borders.It is not difficult for Ukraine to see Russia retreat.

    The same applies to Russian supporters and Ukraine supporters.

    Ukraine have not got into high gear yet.This must happen first and the borders will be clearer to see when the Ukraine offensive ends.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,891 ✭✭✭✭briany


    In each of those examples you give, there wasn't an active opposition from a conventional military force as victory was declared. Those had either been defeated, signed a ceasefire or never got involved in the first place.

    If Putin thinks he can declare victory at some arbitrary point, even while there is still heavy fighting going on, and have that be swallowed by his people, then it stands to reason that he could have declare victory at almost any point in this conflict and achieve the same result, and do so with much less expenditure of military resources.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1


    Putin wore a $10000 jacket at the rally in the soccer stadium before the war, he doesn’t care about soldiers, tanks or money it’s about what can he do to stay on for another few years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Curious_Case


    Without going into battlefield analysis, I think Putin is dice rolling at this stage.

    He'll be quick to "declare victory" and negotiate once he begins to see and process continuous loss of currently occupied territory (you don't buy while the price is dropping).

    Commentators say Putin may be contemplating a long war but surely that depends on the possibility of replenishment of equipment and munitions by a third party. Too much has been invested in Ukraine for the West to be content with letting the dog keep what's in its mouth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,303 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,440 ✭✭✭Rawr


    I get the impression that whole thing has just been a massive gamble for him.

    • He gambled that the threat of war would keep Ukraine neutral and maybe even get them to disarm. (They didn’t)
    • He gambled that just throwing his conscripts over from exercises in Belarus to actual war in Ukraine would work. (It didn’t)
    • He gambled on his invasion sapping Ukraine of resolve and make the capital surrender in 3 days. (It didn’t)
    • He gambled on this invasion being a replay of 2014 where the Russian speaking areas would somehow back him (They didn’t)
    • And he gambled on the west wringing their hands at all of this and doing nothing (But alas for him…they keep supplying arms and support)

    My guess is that he has no Plan B and is now locked into somehow trying to defeat Kyiv. But it’s been a grinding stalemate, and if for example Georgia were sly about this they’d take the opportunity to take back the Russian state-lets that take up a chunk of their territory. Possibly even a similar fate for Transnistria…but that one will have to be someone other than Moldovia (their army is tiny)

    All of that would likely finish him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,547 ✭✭✭Fiery mutant


    I hate this fucker. I'm a quiet man but this attitude makes me want to beat the **** out of someone.

    How dare he refer to rape and genocide as a 'mistake'.

    **** prick.

    We should defend our way of life to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed, so that any adversary will never make such an attempt in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭JoChervil


    It wasn't a gamble. It was a desperation. He and his cronies are like a big parasite on Russia and Russian people. They sucked all they could. The Russian economy was doing badly, so why not to jump on another well developing country, make their nation slaves and parasite even more. It was a survival for him. For long time Russia didn't produce anything worthwhile technologically. They are just eating up their own resources. With the world going green, even that will last for only 20-30 years and then what?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,440 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Oh yes, I’d agree there. It might also explain why he’s rather stupidly using up pretty much the entire Russian military on this. It might add reason as to why Finland and Sweden are taking this chance to join NATO. The Russians likely have few combat ready troops left available for a Northern offensive, especially not against a professional Western army.



  • Posts: 7,946 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 7,946 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Personally I love to see clips from Russia state TV, it reminds us why Russia cannot be allowed win.

    keep posting…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Agreed. He's shown his true nature. Lessons to be taken by smaller states in the EU, like Ireland for example.

    But will we take any learnings out of it, to use the current phrase? I doubt it.

    The hard unpalatable truth is that we are closer to Birmingham than either Boston or Berlin. And we don't like that message.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,891 ✭✭✭✭briany


    It's funny because he was perfectly on course to stay in control of Russia for pretty much as long as he wanted before this whole thing kicked off, so if it's all just about power, he could likely have maintained that without a single shot being fired. If anything, the austerity generated by a protracted war will only serve to undermine his power.

    Putin looks to China as a model, but part of what makes China a success is their subtle approach to foreign policy. China are not going into these types of costly foreign adventures. They're doing business and slowly getting their hooks into everything. It's very much a long game approach. Something Putin doesn't appear to have the patience for.



  • Posts: 7,946 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Geographically you are correct, but Birmingham is atypical of a UK city, never mind being similar to Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,003 ✭✭✭Dufflecoat Fanny


    A lot of political shifting going on and it's not all noble. Some opportunistic shizness happening.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement