Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Civil Service - Post Lockdown - Blended Working?

1293032343556

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Now that I would have taken to the Union, and I would have worked my regular hours only.

    I totally understand why you say the good will is running out - mine would too, if they had refused my time-in-lieu.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,812 ✭✭✭Addle


    Any reasonable manager would know and understand what’s going on and apply time in lieu.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    In my experience over the last two years in two different organisations, even where most people are or were WFH most of the time, those working in Facilities Management/Services areas, Service Officers, and those in ICT Units have had to have a presence in the office. If there's even a handful of people coming in, the building needs to be opened, heated, have someone on reception/security, someone to deliver, collect and frank the post, locked up, etc.

    I.T. staff were/are necessary on the ground to do everything from installing additional hardware, prepping laptops and phones to enable remote working, and for helpdesk work where something can't be fixed remotely, etc. Obviously I.T. staff working in development or programming areas can be fully remote.

    Why? Why not both? Flexi = flexible. As much as I might enjoy the ability to not start work until 10:00 a couple of mornings because I'm tired, or knock off at 4:00 some evening to beat the traffic, sometimes management need flexibility too, and they need me to work late because there's a deadline, or something urgent has cropped up unexpectedly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    121 responses to the blended working survey so far, including 11 from people working somewhere that has published a Blended Working Policy. I'll close the survey around 14:00ish and share the results later on today.

    https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1KNlYHF0Z7rtCElZoQ0ex34HyKltprjzzQPxtmVKyAzs/edit



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    The unofficial Civil Service/Public Service boards.ie Blended Working Survey, May 2022:

    125 responses gathered between 23rd May and 31st May. Boards doesn't like images so unfortunately I'm going to have post all of these questions/responses in multiple replies, where I include the charts from Google forms.

    Q1 Where are you working?

    • CSO - 3
    • CSSO - 2
    • D/Agriculture, Food and the Marine - 8
    • D/Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth - 4
    • D/Defence - 2
    • D/Education - 5
    • D/Enterprise, Trade and Employment - 6
    • D/Environment, Climate and Communications - 6
    • D/Finance - 1
    • D/Foreign Affairs - 1
    • D/Further and Higher Education, Research, Innovation and Science - 3
    • D/Health - 2
    • D/Housing, Local Government and Heritage - 5
    • D/Justice - 5
    • D/Public Expenditure and Reform - 4
    • D/Rural and Community Development - 1
    • D/Social Protection - 14
    • D/Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media - 3
    • D/Transport - 3
    • Local Authority - 10 (nobody specified which Local Authority they were working for)
    • Other civil service body with less than 500 staff - 11
      • CSSO - 2
      • Agency under D/ETE - 1
      • Agency under DOJ - 1
      • ISI - 1
      • OSI - 1
      • Unspecified - 5
    • Other civil service body with more than 500 staff - 12
      • AGS/Garda Civilian - 2
      • ATU - 1
      • NSSO - 2
      • OPW - 2
      • PRA - 1
      • Unspecified - 4
    • Revenue Commissioners - 15

    Q2 What is your organisation's official policy right now, on blended working for most staff (not counting public offices, facilities, ICT staff)?

    • Everyone back fulltime - 6
    • Four days in office, 1 WFH - 0
    • Three days in office, 2 WFH - 28
    • Two days in office, 3 WFH - 60
    • One day in office, 4 WFH - 10
    • WFH fulltime - 21

    Q3 What is your organisation's current working regime for staff in public offices/public counters, if applicable?

    • N/A - 46
    • Left to local management to organise and roster cover - 13
    • Back to office fulltime - 13
    • Four days in office, 1 WFH - 1
    • Three days in office, 2 WFH - 8
    • Two days in office, 3 WFH - 0
    • One day in office, 4 WFH - 0
    • Public office closed - 1
    • Don't know - 42

    And I must have left this one open to add in your own answers, as there was also:

    • Organisation is blended but local office AP refuses to allow WFH - 1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Part 2

    Q4 Does your line manager/local management strictly apply the official policy, or do they allow more flexibility?

    • Strictly apply the official policy - 22
    • Keep to the policy, occasional exceptions allowed - 48
    • Once the work is done, there is flexibility - 55

    Q5 Where blended working is available, how does that work in practice?

    • We generally have fixed days where we have to be in the office - 51
    • There is a roster that can vary from week to week (or fortnight, or month) - 14
    • It's left up to us to decide when to be in the office, no need to book a desk or a room - 45
    • It's left up to us decide when to be in, and we need to book a desk or a room - 15

    Q6 Has your employer surveyed staff since March 31 about their preferences for blended working?

    • Yes - 27
    • No - 96
    • Don't know - 2


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Part 3 - Blended Working Policy

    Q7 - Has your employer published a Blended Working Policy since March 31, when DPER released it's framework?

    • Yes - 12
    • No - 106
    • Don't know - 7

    The organisations that have published a policy (possibly!) are:

    • D/Enterprise
    • D/Foreign Affairs
    • D/Justice
    • D/Social Protection
    • Revenue Commissioners

    However! In most cases, it was only some of the staff in each organisation who knew that a policy has been published - so this one needs to be taken with a grain of salt! For info, the numbers saying yes, there is a published policy, compared to the total responses from that organisation were as follows:

    • D/Enterprise - 1 (out of 6)
    • D/Foreign Affairs - 1 (out of 1)
    • D/Justice - 2 (out of 5)
    • D/Social Protection - 6 (out of 14)
    • Revenue Commissioners - 2 (out of 15)

    I don't know what's causing the confusion in the likes of D/SP or Revenue - possibly it's only a draft policy, or not all staff have been made aware of the policy?

    Q8 When does it come into effect?

    Already up and running - 0

    Quarter 3 - 7 (D/Foreign Affairs, D/Justice, four of the six D/SP respondents)

    Quarter 4 - 3 (one of the D/SP respondents, and Revenue)

    Starting next year - 1 (D/Enterprise)

    Don't know - 1

    Q9 Has your employer indicated that the Policy is for a trial period or is it subject to review?

    • Yes - 10
    • Don't know - 2

    Seems to be for a trial period, wherever it's been introduced.

    Q10 What options are available under the policy? (all that were available could be ticked)

    • One day WFH, four in office - 6
    • Two days WFH, three in office - 8
    • Three days WFH, two in office - 7
    • Four days WFH, one in office - 6
    • Five days WFH - 1

    D/Enterprise is offering 2 days WFH.

    D/Foreign Affairs is offering 2 or 3 days WFH

    D/Justice is offering 1, 2 or 3 days WFH

    D/Social Protection - a variety of answers (possibly it's because some people may be working in public offices?): two people saying 4 days WFH is the only option; one saying 1 day WFH is the only option; the rest saying 1 to 4 days WFH are available, except for one who says 1 to 5 days WFH is available!

    Revenue is offering either 3 days WFH, or between 1 to 4 days WFH...

    Q11 Who decides on your application?

    • Not clear - 1
    • "HR", a blended working section, no named/identifiable person - 1
    • My line manager - 4
    • Head of business unit - 2
    • An AGS, Director or equivalent - 0

    Q12 If your application is refused, or you don't get the option you want, is there an appeal mechanism outlined?

    • Yes - 7
    • Don't know - 5

    Someone from each organisation with a policy did answer "Yes", so we can assume there is one!

    Q13 Does the Policy allow some flexibility to staff, or does it just allow for a "fixed" arrangement? (E.g., you could work 3 days in office/2 WFH normally but then vary that, if necessary, say for a project)?

    • Yes, there is that flexibility mentioned - 6
    • If you want to vary your pattern you need to reapply - 0
    • No, no mention of variance - 1
    • Don't know - 5

    No mention of variance was the answer from one of the Justice people, and other didn't know.

    Q14 Does the Policy allow some flexibility to management? (E.g., you might normally have 3 days in office, 2 WFH, but management could roster you into the office for 4 or 5 days to cover leave?)

    • Yes - 5
    • No - 2
    • Don't know - 5

    Again no mention of variance was the answer from one of the Justice people, and other didn't know. One Revenue person reckoned yes, management have flexibility, while the other reckoned no, they didn't. Social Protection's management have flexibility to vary arrangements, too.

    (That's all for now, time for dinner. The rest later!)



  • Registered Users Posts: 330 ✭✭rostalof


    DSP must be a real two tier department in that case, with those who are kept informed and the rest of us who aren't told anything. I speak to my AP daily about this as all of our team (IT Developers) have been working from home full time since March 2020 and as yet, there is no policy. It's being 'worked on', 'developed' and 'imminent' but there is no policy. There have been vague 'updates' broadly outlining that nobody will work for home entirely, but with very little detail other than that. That's not an official policy, so I'm really interested to find out where this policy has been published?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Part 4 - No Blended Working Policy

    Q15 When has your employer indicated that it will publish its Policy?

    • 113 responses
    • By end Q2 - 49
    • Q3 - 16
    • Q4 - 7
    • Next year - 0
    • Don't know - 41

    Q16 Although your employer hasn't published a Policy yet, are there rumours, hints or indications from senior management on what it will allow when it is published? (Tick all that apply)

    113 responses

    The "reasonably reliable indications", above, are "reasonably reliable indications, but only unofficial, e.g., line managers, union", and "reasonably reliable indications, officially, but are subject to change", respectively.

    Q17 Have your union reps and/or Partnership Committee had any involvement in negotiating the Blended Working Policy? (Tick all that apply)

    125 responses

    I think the surprising thing here is fully 70% of us don't actually know whether or not our union and/or partnership committee are involved in negotiating anything to do with blended working!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Part 5 - Flexi

    Q18 Did you have flexi, pre-COVID?

    • Yes - 101
    • No - 24

    Q19 What is your current situation with regard to flexi leave (i.e. building up time in order to take a half- or full day's leave)?

    • In the office 5 days/week & have flexi again - 9
    • In the office 5 days/week, flexi still suspended - 1
    • Blended working, have flexi again - 3
    • Blended working, don't have flexi - 90
    • N/A, didn't have flexi pre-COVID - 22

    Q20 What is your current situation with regard to flexi for start/finish times (i.e. can start earlier or later than 9:15, aren't restricted to 1 hour 15 minute lunchbreaks(!), can finish earlier or later than 17:45?

    • In the office 5 days/week & have flexi again - 9
    • In the office 5 days/week, flexi still suspended - 2
    • Blended working, have flexi again - 58
    • Blended working, don't have flexi - 38
    • N/A, didn't have flexi pre-COVID - 18

    Four people lost flexi between Q19 and Q20? It appears over half of us have flexi hours, anyway, even if we can't work up flexi-days.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Part 6 - Anything else?

    Q21 Do you have anything you'd like to add on the topic of blended working that was missed from the survey and should be included if there's another one?

    So the relevant comments received are below. Note, I didn't say in the survey I was going to post these, and probably should have, so I've left out or edited responses that might serve to identify anyone. If anyone recognises their comment and wants it removed, feel free to PM me.

    NB: I can only edit this post until approximately 10pm on 1st June.

    * Just wish it wasn’t implemented on the personal whims of senior management.

    * In DECC five days a week in the office will only be allowed in exceptional circumstances. I answered yes to question on Partnership Committee but its really Grade Forum reps for each grade, and there is a specifically set up cross grade Consultative Group comprising of grade reps from A/Sec down to CO.

    * I have answered the questions as "blended working" but our situation at the moment is work at home as we have been doing - there is no option for that scenario! If someone wants to work from the office the line manager should be told but you don't have to book a desk so far. Re when blended work is to come in it has been mooted for September (officially.unofficially) with one day a week the minimum.

    * DHLGH are taking a very rigid approach to blended working, despite the fact that the office cannot accommodate all staff at the same time due to increased numbers.

    * Yes, DFHERIS have 1 anchor day and 1 floating. No rosters required

    * The available answers for Flexi didn't quite fit for my department. Clock in whenever suits (before 10), take lunch whenever suits without clocking out (don't have to take 1.15) and clock out anytime from 4 on. Regardless of how many hours I work I will get 7.24 on the clock. This has been how we worked all during Covid - suits most. We can't build up time but we also can't lose time! The work gets done and I put in longer days when necessary and balance it out when not so busy. In no hurry to see Flexi restored as this system is working well and work gets done.

    * What is your preference now that you are back in the office a while post covid on blended working? I would still love fulltime remote working, only to attend the office for meeting/onsite training etc.

    * Our Department will publish the policy over the next few months but have indicated that there will be flexibility for AP/POs in each area with a minimum of only 4 days per month required in the office.

    * How it will all work in relation to recruitment into the future ie will there be separate competitions which will recruit for remote jobs only (I would like to see this), will it be embedded into job descriptions (I'm starting to see this).

    * If we have a bank holiday or day off these days are regarded as our remote working days so some weeks we have no remote working. Although we have normal working hours our remote days are changed on a whim for no reason, messing up childcare arrangements etc, regularly.

    * Some of the questions previously should have included the option to say we’re currently still WFH 5 days a week rather than blended (current situation for DSP policy staff until policy is published). Perhaps questions about how/if applications were made

    * My department sets number of days in office higher for Admin staff than professional staff even though we all work on delivering the same service. Concern is that locally approved blended arrangements will mirror pandemic with Admin staff required in office while professional staff WFH with process adapted to facilitate only professional staff.

    * DSP seem very flexible and progressive.

    * We didn't have official flex time but flexible work arrangements applied in most areas, e.g. flexible start/finish times

    * Perhaps bit more on communication from Management to staff on their thoughts, as in my own department staff have not been really consulted throughout the process.

    * Just a couple of notes - NSSO kept Flexi clocking throughout WFH, it was just Flexi leave that went. Also, officers can currently have Flexi leave back if they choose to return to 5 days in the office - but that was a fairly recent piece of news, and I haven't heard any detail on that (does it have to be a permanent return to 5 days? If so, can they still apply for blended later on, or do they have to return to 5 for a certain amount or time or anything? - thinking of the work pattern change process here. If not a commitment to permanent 5 days, how much can you chop and change it?)

    * Fully wfh but some of the questions re flexi didn’t give an option for wfh. Flexi accrual not allowed but can work between 8am- 7pm

    * Which flexi pilot is your dept planning to trial a, flexible for all working patterns regardless or b, flexi acrual allowed only when attending the office

    * Hope there won't be "family friendly " criteria as in my organisation worksharing has been restricted to staff with children under 18 and staff with medical reasons. Staff with elderly parents can only avail of carer's leave where relative requires care 24 hours a day. Blended working might allow caring without giving up job / losing income.

    * Add Garda Civilian to the list (otherwise some will include under Dept of Justice).

    * We don’t have any blended working policy, or official guidance on use of flexitime / flexileave apart from DPER policy on COVID-19. Flexi time always allowed when WFH, but no flexi leave.

    * Many colleagues continue to WFH if not public facing and their management haven’t rattled any cages.

    * ICT have a local policy to require 1 day onsite

    * Question mark of possibility for management to move staff to customer facing roles on a whim removing remote working options as it happened to me.

    * Maybe a question on who do we think is pushing for back to the office? Answer: the Sec Gen! Or something to capture the reality on the ground i.e. plenty of people in my dept seem essentially to be ignoring the edict, but I'm still on probation so don't feel that I can do that, much as I want to. Plenty of days I've gone in to an empty office, current situation is ridiculous IMO

    * Our AP had all staff in office despite official policy and point blank refuses WFH. If they hear of someone WFH they demand to know who authorised it & expect the employee to either be in the office the following day or to report sick.

    * Current policy is two days minimum in the office, but no maximum. I'm generally in the office 4 or 5 days a week, from personal preference.

    * You might ask additional questions about provision of desk, chair or costs to cover these.

    * The lack of engagement with AP Grade and down has been lacking in this process. The irony of the system where we all rattle out the set pieces at interview re engaging with stakeholders, communicate with stakeholders, lead and manage people, collaborate, bring people with you etc - why are we not applying those competencies in the most fundamental of policies impacting on civil service and public sector staff? I fear a policy will be brought in that both managers and staff will not agree with nor feel part of the decision and the result will be a disengaged workforce.

    * I have been so angry how staff have been treated by management (Sec. Gen, HR etc.) in my Dept. and also the Forsa rep in relation to the return to the office. I worked at home for 2 years and myself or my colleagues were not consulted at all on the return to the office. WFH is life changing for me and improves my quality of life. I feel workers are just puppets at the moment to fill spaces in properties/real estate and there is no care for staff wellbeing or what the majority of staff want. Yes, some staff want to attend the office and that's their choice but for myself and many others the commute, taking away the option to live further away from the office, the absolute distraction working in open plan offices and forced return to the office is a complete negative. I am looking for other employment, preferably remote work now as I am completely disillusioned with the Department I work in.

    Sin é. Some good comments/suggestions there, which I'll try to incorporate if I do this again.

    Post edited by TaurenDruid on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,651 ✭✭✭wench


    Thanks for doing this. Glad to see I'm not the only one working in a mushroom farm ;-)



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    fair play for all the effort really interesting



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    We received a DPER circular earlier this month regarding blended working policy within our department. It all sounded great - exalting the department's desire to embrace progress and a better work life balance for all employees. An application to apply for blended working is to be issued in June.

    Our manager told us today that he will only be offering 1 day WFH, where we have up till now been working 3/4 days from home. When asked why, he just shrugged his shoulders and said "that's just what I have decided" . This is before the applications are even issued. Office was like a morgue after he said it. People are NOT happy.

    Our productivity is up, calls & emails are being answered 100%, everything is working smoothly. It's just pure pig-headedness and unwillingness to move with the times as far as we can make out. One colleague has already decided to hand in her notice and I have applied for mobility. If I don't get mobility before Christmas, I'll be taking a job elsewhere.

    That's two employees with more than 20 years experience between them he'll definitely be losing and more are bound to follow. As far as I can make out, the blended working policy sounds great in principle, but in practice, is more or less totally reliant on having a manager who gives a toss about the people working for them. Ours clearly doesn't.

    One of the circulars we received gave an extensive outline of how they want to be progressive and attract more talent into the civil service. Managers like mine won't help at all in that regard.



  • Registered Users Posts: 259 ✭✭exitstageleft


    That's really amazing work @TaurenDruid, fair play to you!



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    *Hope there won't be "family friendly " criteria as in my organisation worksharing has been restricted to staff with children under 18 and staff with medical reasons.

    Woah.

    This jumped out at me. This is blatant discrimination on grounds of family status and whomever has implemented this restriction needs to be dragged in front of the WRC, asap.

    Still processing the rest of the information, but great job, @TaurenDruid !



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    One colleague has already decided to hand in her notice and I have applied for mobility. If I don't get mobility before Christmas, I'll be taking a job elsewhere.

    Is handing in notice not a little drastic as a first step? Would it not be an idea to either get the union involved, or all just contact HR and look for a transfer? CC'ing this guy's manager and outlining why you're all looking to move? Very hard to justify his position, given the circumstances, and more senior management might well tell him to cop on to himself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Yup, that one jumped out at me too. That's pretty much a textbook case of discrimination on the grounds of family status.

    Given some of the posts in the last couple of pages, I'm really wondering what the hell Fórsa and the AHCPS are doing these days apart from selling insurance!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,699 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Some managers are just petty. I have 6 staff working to me. We look out for eachother and ensure that we all get to WFH when we want. I have made in more than clear that as long as the work is getting done and they go to site when needs be that they can work where they want on the other days.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭gameoverdude




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Circular on Haddington Road hours reversal issued: https://www.gov.ie/en/circular/46f72-circular-142022-revision-of-working-hours-in-the-civil-service/

    In a nutshell: we're going to a 7-hour day.

    Not, for some reason, the actual pre-HRA hours of 6:57. I imagine Fórsa will send a strongly worded email, and the land-grabbing PO or AP who decided this will get a promotion for "saving" all of those 15-minute chunks.

    The core hours are weird and they retain the "we finish 15 minutes early on a Friday so ye can all rush to the train station to get a seat" and bizarre 1 hour 15 minute lunchbreak. And 9:12?!

    5. The normal attendance period for civil servants will be from 9.12am to 5.30pm Monday to Thursday, and 9.12am to 5.15pm on Friday with 1 hour and 15 minutes for lunch break.

    This was interesting, though:

    16. For those working in a blended pattern, it has been agreed that a pilot will be conducted, during the latter half of 2022, to test the operation of flexitime accrual in a blended working environment. Further details on the pilot for flexitime accrual will be available from local HR units.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,469 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Totally illegal.

    Every time I hear the guff about "the civil service aiming to be one of Ireland's leading employers etc. etc." my eyes nearly swivel right to the back of my head. It's bollocks. Start by consistently obeying employment law across the board, that is literally the very minimum any employer should be doing.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,469 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    * Just wish it wasn’t implemented on the personal whims of senior management.

    👍️

    * In DECC five days a week in the office will only be allowed in exceptional circumstances. I answered yes to question on Partnership Committee but its really Grade Forum reps for each grade, and there is a specifically set up cross grade Consultative Group comprising of grade reps from A/Sec down to CO.

    Partnership Committee, now there's a thing I haven't heard in 15 years or so.

    Seriously, they still exist?

    * If we have a bank holiday or day off these days are regarded as our remote working days so some weeks we have no remote working. Although we have normal working hours our remote days are changed on a whim for no reason, messing up childcare arrangements etc, regularly.

    Totally unfair and displays an amazing lack of cop on tbh. Anybody who would implement such a thing should not be managing people.

    * My department sets number of days in office higher for Admin staff than professional staff even though we all work on delivering the same service. Concern is that locally approved blended arrangements will mirror pandemic with Admin staff required in office while professional staff WFH with process adapted to facilitate only professional staff.

    As above.

    * DSP seem very flexible and progressive.

    LOL!

    * Perhaps bit more on communication from Management to staff on their thoughts, as in my own department staff have not been really consulted throughout the process.

    Zero consultation and zip from the union branch too.

    * Maybe a question on who do we think is pushing for back to the office? Answer: the Sec Gen! Or something to capture the reality on the ground i.e. plenty of people in my dept seem essentially to be ignoring the edict, but I'm still on probation so don't feel that I can do that, much as I want to. Plenty of days I've gone in to an empty office, current situation is ridiculous IMO

    👍️👍️

    * Our AP had all staff in office despite official policy and point blank refuses WFH. If they hear of someone WFH they demand to know who authorised it & expect the employee to either be in the office the following day or to report sick.

    Gobshite. Should be stuck in a white walled room on his own and told to read reports for the rest of his days.

    * You might ask additional questions about provision of desk, chair or costs to cover these.

    I brought home my fancy back chair, when we returned to the office regularly they eventually got me a second one for in the office. It's in their interest as the first chair saved them a fortune in sick leave. No desk provided and I haven't heard of anyone getting one in our Dept.

    * The lack of engagement with AP Grade and down has been lacking in this process. The irony of the system where we all rattle out the set pieces at interview re engaging with stakeholders, communicate with stakeholders, lead and manage people, collaborate, bring people with you etc - why are we not applying those competencies in the most fundamental of policies impacting on civil service and public sector staff? I fear a policy will be brought in that both managers and staff will not agree with nor feel part of the decision and the result will be a disengaged workforce.

    Hear hear 👍️👍️👍️ this is where all the airy-fairy management-speak BS hits reality, and so far it's not looking too pretty

    * I have been so angry how staff have been treated by management (Sec. Gen, HR etc.) in my Dept. and also the Forsa rep in relation to the return to the office. I worked at home for 2 years and myself or my colleagues were not consulted at all on the return to the office. WFH is life changing for me and improves my quality of life. I feel workers are just puppets at the moment to fill spaces in properties/real estate and there is no care for staff wellbeing or what the majority of staff want.

    👍️ and as for the union I couldn't even tell you who my Forsa rep is any more. The merger has, as predicted, been a complete disaster for everyone apart from the officials

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭JoeSexton


    I've tried to engage with our Fórsa rep to at least give us updates as to what stage the negotiations are at...Tumbleweed. I think at this point I may as well cancel my subscription.



  • Registered Users Posts: 279 ✭✭HartsHat


    My Dept has published the policy and had two townhalls with the SG which took questions on it post publication.

    Pre publication both the Fórsa and AHCPS branches shared the draft policy with the membership and took feedback/observations back to the Dept.

    Very strange that some others have had no Union interaction. If your branches aren't on the ball you should really aim to change the Committees representing you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17 happyWednesday


    @TaurenDruid thanks so much for this it's really insightful 👍. Is it possible to get a breakdown of the WFH amount per week per dept, to see who's best/worst?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid



    Do you mean for under current arrangements; or what's been proposed for published policies? I can pull this out all right but I'll have to do it mostly manually, I think, so it'll be this evening.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17 happyWednesday


    It would be from the results of this survey ie if Revenue people answers were WFH 3 days a week, Agriculture 1 WFH etc. Only if you can, once it's not too manual.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭adelcrowsmel


    We all want to see where we are going to look for a move to😀!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17 happyWednesday




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭Augme



    If people let managers get away with stuff like the above things will never change. That manager should be challenged on his decision through appropriate channels. I certainly wouldn't be letting him make that decision scot free.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    Oh, we plan to appeal as soon as we're offered the one day WFH. I spoke to our AP about the appeals process yesterday and he explained that we have to appeal to him and then ultimately the PO if that fails.

    To be honest, I've already mentally prepared myself to leave. Submitted 2 job applications today already ( both offering hybrid/WFH options). I simply don't want to work under anyone who mistrusts and undervalues his staff to such a degree. His loss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,447 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    I bet there is nothing in writing about that - while there are a lot of gobsh*te managers in the PS, they wouldn't be stupid enough to put the above in writing.

    They might say it in a phone call though which is where the ability to record calls is a useful skill.

    Employee: I see my request for work sharing has been rejected, why is that?

    Gobsh*te: it's because you don't have children under 18

    Employee: LOL, see you in court!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭Augme



    Wait, when you said the manager do you mean the HEO?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭Augme


    I wouldn't be paying any attention to what a HEO says



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,812 ✭✭✭Addle


    Minimum wfh opportunities in my place and HEO decides who is allowed wfh. No appeal of the actual decision is allowed.

    Between that and mobility seemingly at a standstill, I’m going to crazy while waiting for a change.

    Union are useless.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    HEO shouldn't have that discretion tbh



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 163 ✭✭Calmcookie84


    Does the revised working hours mean I can no longer work 8-4.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    I should caveat this (and in fact all the results!) by saying I'm assuming good faith on all the responses, that nobody was messing, that nobody submitted multiple forms, etc., and that nobody should base career choices off an anonymous survey published on boards!

    So, for Departments that have already published a Blended Working Policy:

    • D/Enterprise will allow 2 days WFH, from next year. This is worse than at present, where currently staff have 3 days WFH. (Based on 1 response)
    • D/Foreign Affairs will allow 2 days WFH, from Q3. This is worse than at present, where currently staff have 3 days WFH. (Based on 1 response)
    • D/Justice will allow 1, 2, or 3 days WFH (1 response) or 2 days WFH (1 response), from Q3. This is worse than at present, where currently staff have 3 days WFH.
    • D/Social Protection will allow... well, confusion. 6 responses, 4 different answers :-) So it'll either be 1 day WFH as the only option (unlikely, I feel - this was 1 person), 4 days WFH as the only option (2 people), choice of 1 to 4 days WFH (2 people), or choice of 1 to 5 days WFH (1 person). A majority saying this be introduced in Q3. The current situation is varied - ranging from WFH fulltime to "everyone is back in the office fulltime" - so presumably a public office. (Also, note another 8 people working in D/SP are under the impression that the Department has not published a blended working policy...)
    • Revenue Commissioners will allow 3 days WFH (1 response) or a choice of 1 to 4 days WFH (1 response), from Q4. This is worse than the current situation, where currently (most?) staff are WFH fulltime.

    Meanwhile, the current situation for Departments is as follows (note I excluded the "Organisation with more than/less than 500 staff" and the local authorities, cos it's a gorgeous evening...):

    • 3 days WFH, 2 in the office: CSO, Departments of Children, Defence, Education, Enterprise, Environment, Finance, Foreign Affairs, Further & Higher Ed, Health, Housing, Justice, Rural & Community Dev, Tourism
    • 2 days WFH, 3 in the office: DPER (though 1 of the 5 respondents has more WFH days), Departments of Agriculture, Transport

    Other:

    • D/Social Protection, as already noted, currently has a variety of work patterns. 14 respondents in total, one person says "everyone is back fulltime", but everyone else is WFH from 3, 4, or 5 days.
    • Revenue, as above, most people WFH fulltime with just one person back in the office fulltime, as a local manager won't allow WFH.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭Augme



    The blended framework says there should be an appeals process. Again, I wouldn't take that lying down.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    those hours are not the thing to focus on tbh nobody ever worked the set hours they are illustrative



  • Registered Users Posts: 288 ✭✭BhoyRayzor


    Going by some of the examples of managers from the comments above I wouldn't be surprised if some people will have to start at 9:12am, have to take 1:15 for lunch and can't leave until 5:30pm



  • Registered Users Posts: 5 AChanger


    Still no formal published blended working policy published by D/Enterprise, but I had been told by a senior manager who was involved in the formation of it that the plan is three days WFH, as it is currently, and to have the flexitime pilot where we can accrue time when WFH as well as WFO. I'm surprised to see someone else is saying they have heard it's only two days WFH.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 156 ✭✭mtb_sends


    Somewhat off topic, but can anyone tell me if the flexitime and flexi-leave system is applicable to all public sector orgainisations or is it just civil service departments.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No appeal allowed? Says who?

    See Appendix G (Application process) and Appendix H (Review Process) of the DPER Framework. (opens as PDF).

    There is always an appeal allowed. Do not be fobbed off with that nonsense.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Page 13: Section 4.4

    4.4 Employee Right to Review a Decision to Refuse Where an application for blended working is refused, the applicant may wish to request a review of the application process. Before seeking a formal review, applicants should have an informal discussion with their manager (the Recommender) in the first instance to discuss the reasons for refusal and to explore if there is an opportunity to resolve any issues identified. If the issues can be resolved, the manager can re-assess the application and may amend their decision. If the issues cannot be resolved, the applicant may seek a formal review. The review will be undertaken by a Review Officer, who will be appointed by the organisation. This Review Officer will not have been involved in the original decisionmaking process. The steps in the formal review process should generally include the following: 

    Step 1: The request for a formal review must be made, in writing, within 10 working days of the decision to refuse the application. The application for a review should set out the grounds of the review. The focus of the review will be to determine whether the application process was in line with the organisation’s Blended Working Policy. All records relating to the application and original decision should be made available to the Review Officer. In general, the review will be a review of the file only. The Review Officer will, determine the process for review and may give due consideration to any request for a meeting in a specific case, however their decision will be final on whether a meeting is necessary with the applicant, Recommender or Approver /HR. 

    Step 2: The decision of the Review Officer will be communicated in writing to the applicant, the Recommender and Approver, and HR. In general, this should occur within 10 working days of receipt of the formal review request. The decision should set out the reasons for the decision. The Review Officer may:

    • Affirm the decision to refuse the application, or
    • Recommend that the original decision be reconsidered by the Recommender and/ or Approver, taking into account any issues identified by the Review Officer,
    • Make other recommendations related to blended working, where appropriate.

    While the main purpose of the review is to assess the original decision-making process, the Review Officer has discretion to consider reviews of other cases where blended working arrangements are deemed inappropriate or unsuitable after a trial period, or as a result of a change of circumstances. For the avoidance of doubt, the decision of the Review Officer is final.




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    @Calmcookie84

    You can work 8 to 4 and take a full hour for lunch instead of a half hour.

    There is no change to core time bands (unless locally).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,812 ✭✭✭Addle


    As per your post, you can appeal the process, but not the decision.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement