Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

1131132134136137322

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,084 ✭✭✭kevthegaff




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,368 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Talking about regime change is dangerous given the paranoia of Putin.

    We don't want a world war. Obviously some Irish people seem to want that which I find startling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,986 ✭✭✭jmreire


    If I remember correctly when the 2nd Russian pipeline to Europe ( Germany) was being discussed, the US strongly advised Merkel that reliance on Russian Gas, Oil etc, was a big mistake ( and as we have seen,,,so it has) but she plowed on anyway, in the belief that good trade relations with Russia would prevent any war from happening. Anyway, as far as Putin and Russia is concerned, its a one trick pony,,,,Putin ( or anyone else either )will not get the same chance with the EU again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,498 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    So you think that Biden saying what everyone is thinking will result in Ireland becoming a target because of WW3? If Putin didn’t know already that most of the world would prefer a revenue change then he is the biggest fool on earth. So saying it is neither here nor there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,368 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    If it was neither here nor there, why did the White House immediately clarify the remarks and said regime change isn't the US policy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,498 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,368 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    The world is only concerned about further escalation.

    Not sure what you're getting at or if you're able to engage competently with the issues.



  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Can you link to a post that you have made in the threads about Yemen on here, because like your claim about posting before the invasion of Ukraine it is no where to be seen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,204 ✭✭✭amandstu



    Suppose Putin had the choice between Ukraine being part of Nato or Ukraine having survived an invasion from Russia.

    Supposing that,which would be the more advantageous situation from his pov?


    Being part of Nato might arguably keep Ukraine in check as Nato would prefer good relations with Moscow if possible.


    Outside Nato Ukraine's foreign policy is it's own (and Ukraine is possibly a far more committed and able adversary than it would otherwise have been )


    Should Putin have stuck with the "devil he knew"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,340 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    Oh I know, you have absolutely no idea about a lot of things. Doesn't seem to bother you though so wouldn't expect it to slow you down lad.

    By your own logic you have no interest the plight of anybody not mentioned in the post. Can you see the problem with that? Any flaw in the logic at all of judging people on what they post on an anonymous message board while knowing **** all about them?

    Course not, but hey, I am glad your here to "check" everyone 😂

    If you ever have something of substance in response let me know, if it's just more nonsense it won't be worth my time though, I'm sure you understand.

    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,986 ✭✭✭jmreire


    So, Ukraine survives Putins invasion ( by definition, this would mean defeating Putins army) and from a very strong position, can and does join not only NATO but the EU, Putins greatest fear... a democratic and successful Ukraine, with his Countrymen looking enviously across the borders. So what does Putin do? What can he do? Press the nuclear button? He is finished. So not a good outcome for him. Stuck with the devil he knew.....??? Another man would have done that, and made the best of it. ( but then again, another man would have taken his Country on different path) Putin is now hoist on his own Petard. He gambled and lost, even if the story is far from finished, it will only have one outcome eventually.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I think there's a debate about whether Ukraine would be able to join. It's not the only applicant in the list, while I get the impression there's deep "ascension fatigue" in the EU over new candidates - leaving aside the likelihood that Ukraine's internal economy and politics mightn't tick the boxes needed for acceptance into the Union. While NATO might just poke the bear too much.

    Maybe the middleground would be heavy economic and social investment in the county; arm it to the teeth while tying it further to the bloc through trade deals and rebuilding initiatives. IIRC, without googling, there's already soft unions between non EU nations in the area, maybe Ukraine can join that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,949 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Indeed it does say a lot about this thread, as you can see from the title of the thread it is about Ukraine which we are all happily discussing. As regards yemen being "sexy enough" unlike you I dont find the needless death of anyone sexy wherever they are from but again this thread is about Ukraine.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,599 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Apologies if this has been covered before.

    Supposing tomorrow morning Russia ceased all military operations in Ukraine and returned all troops to base.

    Would the sanctions against Russia remain in place?

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,361 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Of course They will not be removed - not for a long time.

    There has been a lot of lives lost and much destruction of infrastructure and homes. Massive economic damage done - not only to Ukraine but to the worldwide economy. Who pays for that?

    Also, will Russia withdraw from Crimea and Dunbas? Will Russia withdraw from the parts of Georgia the annexed?

    Will Putin be removed from power?

    It will take a generation at least to begin to rebuild the trust that Putin has flushed down the pan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭tooka


    100% they will

    we need their resources actually more than they need our money

    what few will tell you is that if the war continues long term and the sanctions remain in place we are looking at a very high chance of an economic crisis that will make 2008 look like a tea party

    don’t take my word for it, Google it

    germany France and the uk would hand putin the baltics and Ukraine tomorrow if it would end this madness of sanctioning Russia , the country who give us the natural resources to feed ourselves and the cheap gas needed to run our economies

    don’t let anyone tell you any different



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,864 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Look, I know it’s the middle of a war and President Zelenskyy has 44 million more important people and things to worry about but was his swipe at Ireland really necessary? Unless it was a mistake or oversight on his part? Ireland has backed Ukraine to the hilt, Irish people have opened their wallets, hearts and homes to Ukraine. We even take in and treat cancer Ukrainian patients because it is the right thing to do and despite whatever criticism I or others may level at this country we do have a strong moral compass ingrained in us.

    Far as I know we do support their accession to the EU or anything other national aspirations they chose to have. Was it our lack of direct military weapons he was referring to? Personally I think we should send all we can from the Curragh but in the context of our neutrality I appreciate that’s not a decision made so easily



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,864 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    I see he is addressing the Dáil on April 6th so I assume the President will clarify then if not before via the Embassy. It should be neutralised as it’s the kind of thing that gives the Russobots oxygen to use against Ukraine



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,369 ✭✭✭liamtech


    I suspect not, although some might be relaxed. This is the idea of an offramp. Too much has happened for everything to return to normal. But i wouldnt be surprised if certain things relaxed slightly

    Also it would depend on the circumstances of a Russian withdrawal. Needless to say id Russia withdrew due to Putin having 'an unfortunate accident' - that could lead to lots of sanction reductions

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    For a start, all the abducted Ukrainians would have to be returned and the damage made good.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭tooka


    The president of Ukraine will appear before the dail and will neither apologise or give us any respect

    why do I think this?

    he knows the Irish are not easily fooled and we will push the peace deal process

    this lunatic only wants his ‘moment’ to continue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,248 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    I hope putin unfortunately falls down a concrete stair case and is left lying until he starves. I met a young man from Lviv yesterday who was on his knees crying when he heard it had been bombed . It brought it very close to home and it was so so sad to see him in pain .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,369 ✭✭✭liamtech


    Why do you think this?

    Because your cognitive dissonance knows no bounds @tooka . And because you are a fool. Your desperate attempts to spin and distort this situation are struggling to make sense. You display a complete detachment from reality, with regards to the war, and your 'contributions' to this forum.

    This post for example. Another attempt to frame the Ukraine as 'adversarial' to Ireland - and you do so by insulting the leader of a free country, which is under attack by a monster. Just as you did yesterday when you attacked Irelands help for Ukrainian refugees.

    When it comes to playing the 'loud drunk at the bar, who knows a thing or two, about a thing or two', you are owning the role! I imagine you shaking your fists at a computer screen as you post each new vile statement. Im sure your detachment from reality is sufficient that you truly believe that your points are valid.

    Im going back to ignoring you now. It was a mistake to feed your ego by responding to you, and i apologize to everyone else for doing so

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 665 ✭✭✭goldenmick


    @pixelburp - Maybe the middleground would be heavy economic and social investment in the county; arm it to the teeth... 


    In an ideal world there would be no nuclear weapons at all. But we don't live in an ideal world, and never will. And there is absolutely zero chance of the nuclear powers ever relinquishing their arsenals.

    When you say "arm it to the teeth", regarding Ukraine, we have to remember that they have already given up nuclear weapons in return for assurances that were subsequently broken. Arming it to the teeth with modern conventional weapons will do nothing to act as a full deterrent to any future Russian incursions.

    The situation here is that Putin demands that the Ukraine - in their current status - disarm completely, which is quite frankly completely ludicrous when it is Russia who has nuclear warheads pointed at Ukraine (and every other part of the world). What right at all does Putin have to demand others lay down their current arms? Every country has a right to have a defensive army to protect itself. And Putin's actions have determined that right is more important now than ever.

    Irrespective of the risk of provoking Putin, Ukraine should seek to not only arm to the teeth in the future, as you say, but also re-establish it's full nuclear capability as a direct warning to Putin and any other future tyrants who may lead Russia... with the message to them that we are a sovereign country who will fight you with conventional forces if you attack us again, and reciprocate on an exchange of nukes if you ever follow through on your nuclear threats. If Russia wants Ukraine to not have nuclear weapons then that's fine, provided Russia decommissions all of its own warheads. Of course that will never happen as it's the ace up the poison dwarfs sleeve that he can blackmail the world with.

    It's a nasty, evil world we live in and I don't believe we'll ever see true global harmony. But Russia cannot be allowed to demand who can or cannot be armed or have nuclear weapons, whilst Russia do hold multiple keys to armageddon themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭tooka


    The only one of us getting angry and over emotional is you

    your post reads like someone struggling with his own life and are seeking some strange validation by attacking me

    look your in good company on this thread, a lot of who shot JR

    the war is good as over now anyway, Russia gets to keep its enclaves while Ukraine are free to join the EU and NATO

    just be careful what you wish for , Ukraine were never considered for the EU for the same reasons Turkey are not - mass state corruption and neither are democracies

    just remember that as you beat the drum



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,986 ✭✭✭jmreire


    My comment was based on the premise that Putin was defeated in Ukraine, completely and utterly. Which would make him irrelevant to what course Ukraine wished to take. I understand your comment about "EU ascension Fatigue", ( its a victim of its own success ) but circumstances alter cases, and if there ever was a case to make an exception, this would be it. Had Ukraine already been a member, I doubt that Vladimir would have invaded. Future EU and NATO membership would keep the EU borders safe and secure. In any case, it would have to meet the criteria for membership. But in the meantime as suggested in your lower paragraph, that would be a good alternative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭tooka


    The ongoing discussion of making Ukraine a EU and NATO member is why Russia actually invaded Ukraine

    this is very clear and there is no one doubting this as fact

    It was a huge mistake to let the baltics and Poland and Romania and Bulgaria join the EU, I have always argued by doing so we have all but declared war on Russia

    we need to stop the expansion and come to a new deal with Russia regards their former colonies



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,986 ✭✭✭jmreire


    And just why did these ex USSR Countrys seek NATO membership? Because NATO does not go around "forcing" it self on Countrys. The Countrys themselves have to seek membership., And just guess why so many ex USSR sought membership and protection from their firmer masters, Russia?? If you ever lived there you might understand it .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,734 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    In this country we should probably make a deal with the kinahan crime cartel and all the other various low life’s and give them everything they want so they won’t shoot us.

    Yes that’s how it works that’s how you live life in peace by your logic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭tooka




Advertisement