Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How can we integrate Unionism into a possible United Ireland?

14142444647128

Comments



  • "Head-in-the-sand pure rule by majority isn't synonymous with democracy, Francie. You lived close enough to NI during the bad days to see where that can lead. I don't know how you can advocate for just sticking the shoe on the other foot and telling those in a minority group to lump it.....let alone how you think that is going to convince anyone to vote for it."

    Hand on heart, the prospect of some kind of get-our-own-back backlash against the Unionist community is a fear even for me, a former unionist who now wants to see a UI. I can't speak for all but I suspect this would be a broadly held fear and one of the first things that needs addressed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,692 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    No disagreement from me there, Kaiden Happy Mouthpiece. Our individual analyses of why that fear might exist could well differ, but I fully accept that it is a real fear for many.

    I'm in full support of outreach beyond the bare minimum needed to get 50% +1 support and for protections in place for parts of Unionist culture akin to how I would've liked NI to have embraced support and protections in place for parts of Irish culture.

    I'd like to think that in the 21st century, the misrule that occurred in NI couldn't happen again in a modern Western democracy, but if I felt like the proposal for Unification was essentially just the abused becoming the abuser, it would lose my support.

    Given your background, I'd be very interested in your perspective on how you would propose that we address that concern?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 497 ✭✭Mr Bumble




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 497 ✭✭Mr Bumble


    "You guys left the family"

    This the heart of the delusion and the dishonesty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,116 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    'Escaped from their squalid basement' is a much more accurate analogy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,702 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    Your sectarian logic is Hilarious. You can be Irish if all of Ireland is in the UK but if part of Ireland or all of Ireland is not you can't be Irish?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,916 ✭✭✭eire4


    More like escaped from the clutches of a murderer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I’ll also avoid the comment on little old Ireland chugging along (you aren’t wearing rose tinted glasses by chance?)

    what happened in ni is not what concerns me as the is fairly universal agreement that many things were got wrong. What is more concerning is the blindspot (demonstrated again in your post) of the treatment of the minority in Roi for most of the 100 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Completely logical. We had Germans. Then we had East Germans and west Germans. Now we have just German’s again. (In general)

    it’s the same the world over. Your idea that two nations should refer to themselves as the same is actually the hilarious sectarianism that is out of kilter with everyone else in the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,692 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Relative to Brexit chaos across the UK, NI with a collapsed Executive (again), looking at social progress, upwards economic mobility and general economic health, I don't think, 'chugging along' is a rose-tinted overstating of how things are in Ireland, Downcow. Chugging along is hardly painting a Utopian Paradise type of picture, it's just that: chugging along. Certainly we have our problems like any country, but relative to the UK, and in particular NI, yup we're chugging along just fine.

    Your constant attempts to paint anything that happened in Ireland as comparable to the complete systemic disgrace that was NI has been debunked repeatedly on here, so I won't get drawn into that again. You've even ignored the point I made to try and weasel in that completely invalid, purely Ulster Unionist propaganda invented to assuage your community's guilt for what did happen in NI (you know, the bit you're apparently not concerned by).

    Rest assured though, no matter how much I disagree with you and no matter what false narrative you try to push to normalise what happened, I'll never support a United Ireland that would just represent the shoe on the other foot for your side of the NI population.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,702 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    Just to confirm then. If there is a UI out of the UK you will be Irish or is it only if there is a UI in the UK you will be Irish?


    Bad example with Germany. Germans are one nation and even when they were split into two jurisdictions they referred to themselves as Germans.


    Under your logic you are no longer European as the UK left the European Union? So despite being from the geographical continent of Europe you are no longer European? in the same way you are not Irish despite being from Ireland? You can't argue you are European because you are from a Europe despite not being a European citzen whilst also argue that you are not Irish because you are not an Irish citizen despite being from a geographical place called Ireland.


    You may have noticed last week the one Irish nation celebrated thier patron saint too.

    Post edited by ittakestwo on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    That was quite a spin on you original post. You were absolutely not talking about how Ireland is doing now. You were talking about 400 years ago. You were more than a little disingenuous in your reply

    this is what you said originally.

    “The only bit you're missing is little old Ireland chugging along before your lot showed up,”

    still just as rediculous that I don’t need to point out the issues 400 years ago



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    So much nonsense in this.

    1) if I recall I said they were referred to as west German (ie it’s how the rest of the world referred to them)

    2)last time I looked ‘Europe’ was a continent. There is no country called Europe (yet anyhow). If a country is created called Europe then you will find nations outside that will stop referring to themselves as European.

    3) the absolute arrogance of your last statement. I am not part of any Irish nation and I celebrate St Patrick. He is the patron saint of the island of Ireland (even though his biggest connection by far is to Northern Ireland) British, Irish and everyone else who regards him as their patron saint



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,692 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Ah no, fair enough Downcow I was mixing up points there. Where is the arbitrary 400 year cutoff point coming from though?

    To be clear, that point was in response to your one:

    we were all living in the Uk and on the island of Ireland

    My point was quite straightforward; you've picked a completely arbitrary point to say we were all living in the UK and on the island of Ireland, I was merely pointing out that before your lot showed up, we were chugging along. Your planters didn't create Ireland (no matter what nonsense revisionism you try to add). Before we were all living in the UK and on the island of Ireland, the Irish were already here living on the island of Ireland.

    A better description might have been, 'we were all Irish on the island of Ireland before our neighbouring country decided that they'd land over, attempt to demean and dehumanise the local population and claim what belonged to others as their own, and when that wasn't acceptable any more, that neighbouring country decided to carve off a bit of this island so they could continue to demean and dehumanise the native population.....but if you come back to the abusive relationship, sure we'll pretend it is all sunshine and rainbows, even though that neighbouring country still clearly doesn't even give the shiniest of turds about the populace they left over here'.

    Then again, if I'm not mistaken you previously tried to justify how the British Empire raped India by pointing out that they'd left a few railway lines behind (oblivious to the fact that the native populace paid for that and all), so I probably shouldn't expect any sort of realistic introspect.

    Apologies for not being clear in my rebuttal, it's a work day and I wasn't paying as much attention as I should've and thought we were discussing more modern affairs, mea culpa.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    “you previously tried to justify how the British Empire raped India by pointing out that they'd left a few railway lines behind”.

    that’s a pretty nasty accusation maybe you could give us a link?

    your general post is just more nonsense. Can you give us a wee list of significant countries that have never been invaded? Is there a point in time that we should wind all the borders back to?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,686 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The border has been rolled back, into the Irish Sea where it should be and will remain. 😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,692 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Cut those invaded by the British out and the list is an awful lot longer, Downcow.

    I can certainly go delving through all your posts if you're denying that you've tried to defend British actions in India on the basis of leaving the railways behind if you'll outright deny that you've made any comments of the sort or agree with the sentiment; as you can imagine, you've an awful lot of posts and I'm only willing to go through them if you're totally adamant you've never expressed anything like that. If you didn't say anything of the sort, on this or any of your previous boards identities, I'll happily withdraw the statement.

    No point that we should wind the borders back to. I support the GFA and I'm happy to wait until the majority of the population in the North decide to be part of a United Ireland......still doesn't answer why you picked an entirely arbitrary point to say, 'we were all part of the UK living in Ireland'. My purpose was entirely to point out that there was a whole heap of history on this island before you lot showed up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,686 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Charles and Camilla on a peaceful and welcoming trip in Waterford yesterday and our Minister of Foreign Affairs evacuated because of a threat in Belfast and it is us who have the integration problem?



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That bombing is coming with a while....days before the russian war kicked off,the uvf was talking about needing loud bangs in dublin over the protocol



    Given all come out about collusion over last 6 months,its an amazing coincidence british security forces yesterday down-graded threat from dissidents,

    And then today the uvf are planting bombs in a community centre opened over the holy cross dispute



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie


    It shows courage by Charles after those brave ira lads blowing up his near 80 year old uncle whilst on holiday back in in the day.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,686 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It shows there are those who haven't signed up to the GFA even though they want to hide behind it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,692 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    That would be probable paedophile, Lord Mountbatten you're sympathising with? Why would Charles hold an entire country responsible for what happened to him?

    I'm sure you'd be the first to complain about people hating all the English for the actions of their official state forces, yet here you are suggesting it would be understandable for Charles to hold the entire Irish nation responsible or in contempt for the actions of an illegal paramilitary group.

    Perhaps we'd all do better ascribing guilt just to responsible parties?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,686 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Given the biggest killer of royals are their own, the cratur must be a paranoid mess passing the Tower of London. 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie


    I never suggested the Irish nation are responsible for the actions of those brave lads of the ira but if Charles was slightly worried about his safety that would probably be reasonable.

    Regarding rumours about mountbatten,well,if we were to believe every rumour,De valera was a nazi sympathiser,McGuinness and Adams were British agents and Ireland refuelled U boats during the war..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,692 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Some rumours are more credible than others, Freddie. There's little doubt about Mountbatten's predilections among all but the most ardent of Royalists, the same sorts defending the latest family member who paid off all that money despite definitely doing nothing wrong. I'd wonder how many of your rumours are the subject of FBI files?

    If Charles had reason to be concerned for his safety, I'd imagine something would've happened in one of his many previous visits, particularly his visit pre-GFA in '95. Over 25 years, a conviction, a peace agreement and the disarmament of the group responsible later, it'd take someone of a particularly yellow nature to think of popping over to Waterford as particularly courageous.

    I wonder do you ascribe the same courage to the average Northern Irish person of a Nationalist background popping over to England for a visit? Some of us lost as many or more family members to their perfectly legal armed forces than Charles did to that illegal paramilitary group here......and they even manage to travel without a full armed security detail.


    And you can drop the insinuations with your, 'brave lads of the IRA' nonsense. You'll not find a single post in the years I've been posting here defending them or expressing any such sentiment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 514 ✭✭✭FraserburghFreddie


    If you check back on this thread you'd see I replied to franky's standard 'British/Unionists bad'slabber.

    I'm aware your views tend to be fairly balanced,as are your suggestions for a UI.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,686 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    'Belligerent Unionists' bad Freddie.

    Nothing wrong with ordinary decent Unionists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Your posts are deteriorating Fionn. I didn’t expect this from you.

    you said I ““previously tried to justify how the British Empire raped India by pointing out that they'd left a few railway lines behind”.” I certainly said or implied no such thing.

    do you want me to go back through the boards and find where you previously tried to justify how the ira raped their community by pointing out that they’d left some good stuff behind?

    …and if my challenge to you to provide a wee list of nations whose borders and peoples have not been affected by wars and battles is too difficult, then just admit nothing unusual happened in Ireland instead of turning back on the big bad brits



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,686 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    After bomb threats and stoking of divisions the question needs to be asked have belligerent Unionists integrated themselves in NI even ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,722 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Wishful thinking in the extreme. Northern Ireland remains a tribally divided society as evidenced by the parties they vote for up there and the absurd things they spend their time arguing about. UI is a neat idea for the future but I doubt whether if the Republic is ready and able to cope with the problems NI would bring at the moment.



Advertisement