Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

"Nice Guys"

1246

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Generally, it's the ones who blame women who are defined as such. Especially when women are talking about them.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    No, not a random double post unless it was also a double edit.

    Anyway: I think you were talking about someone else. Potential-Maonke, or whatever way it's spelt.

    Post edited by Princess Consuela Bananahammock on

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    It's probably worth making a distinction between an incel and a member of the incel movement. The former being a bit unfortunate, the latter being on a watchlist



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,054 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    That makes perfect sense to me and I am glad there is a female voice that I can hear that backs it up. I have never approached women with the view that there is a simple protocol to be done and then they owe me something in return. I have certainly seen this behavior when working in a bar. When the women rebuffs them they often get angry because "the did all the right things"

    It was always striking up a conversation relevant to that person and what was going on around us. After a short time you can tell if you are interested in each other. The problem for some this natural and others it is not so while it is fake and a person interacting sees it as fake the guy may simply not be skilled rather than a creep. Warning signs are there that it could be worse and he is a creep are there so I see that too and why bother finding out?

    I so think tactics as fun and games is fine but tactics of aggression/putting somebody down/plying with alcohol etc... is what some people think should be used.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,947 ✭✭✭✭Neyite


    @Ray Palmer Bar work or indeed any kind of hospitality work is brilliant for observational purposes on human nature all right isn't it? It's almost like an invisibility cloak.

    For sure there's a mating ritual /chat up of sorts that's gone on since the dawn of time. The method has changed but the objective of fancying someone and checking to see if they fancy you back will always remain unchanged. But I only ever saw any strategies as an icebreaker or an intro rather than any long term relationship formula or strategy to follow. While there was PUA knocking around in the 90's, 00's when I would have been on the dating scene, it was pretty rare. I only ever encountered it once and didn't know it existed until after the fact. And having encountered it once, I'd do a literal runner if I encountered again. It's a strategy that's almost single use really. It may work once or twice at most on a woman, and only if she'd never heard of PUA/incel tactics in the first place. Or she knows full well and is equally playing a fake game of her own.

    The anger is unsettling and well, if they are displaying that before they even get a first date, it's hardly indicative of a potentially successful relationship. But I suppose those men don't see any point in keeping up the pretence after the knock back - which goes to show, their niceness was only ever superficial and performative to begin with.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,332 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    You're pretty triggered yourself there by the sounds of it. All I did was call you out on your imagined "friend" complaining that you put them in the "friendzone". Nobody would do that. Simple solution for you if there was even a grain of truth in that imagined story - stop being friends with weirdos.

    PM was being used. Not sure why that affects you so much to have that stated. Maybe you did the same yourself back in the day? Maybe this imaginary friendzone complainer? I'm sure PM learned from it. As it appears to be a while back and he is older now, he can take comfort in the fact that statistically speaking, the power dynamic would have changed in his favour anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,332 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    I warned her he was nuts but told her he isn't bothered by looks so she had a good chance with him

    Always the charmer Ray

    🤣



  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I honestly think part of the misunderstanding of Incels is that the term is very similar to the term "terrorist cells". It conjures images of lone wolf in a sealed room plotting and planning a massacre in between writing Mein Kampf.


    In reality, the term Incel, for me, is like the term feminist, in that many people would qualify as one but few would self-identify as one themselves. I think people are taking the extreme fringe and concluding that it represents the majority. Which is a bit like saying all muslims hate the West because of the likes of Isis. I think we could all benefit from trying to honestly understand people's viewpoints without throwing rocks at strawmen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,054 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    I treat my friends the same. If a guy is a 5 going for a 10 i would give him the odds. I gave her a honest opinion and warning both were correct. Rather be perceptive than charming.



  • Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    A guy on Reddit said he asked one girl out when he was 19. She said no so he gave up. His life as regards chance of romance was over.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 823 ✭✭✭Liberty_Bear


    Emotionally stunted is the term to describe that



  • Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Lots of women use men when they are bored and want to pass the time when their bf is not around. Or while waiting to meet someone they like. A man i knew called such a relationship 'marking time'



  • Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It doesn't matter how early they make the move if she is not interested.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Maybe, but if you're interested in her, you're better off finding out early on.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That's true but your previous post gave the impression delay was the only reason for lack of success.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    No, I'm saying delay is the reason for winding up in the friendzone.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,332 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Yes. And avoids that person "wasting" months or years of their life waiting for something that isn't going to happen if that is what they want. During that time they will pass up other potential opportunities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,332 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Of course it can. Have you never gone out with someone who, at the start (before you really knew them) you thought they were great, but as time progressed you learned more about them and broke up, swearing never to get mixed up with someone similar again. Instead of "strike while the iron is hot" it might be more like "get in there early and get her invested before she figures out how much of a weirdo you are" 😉

    That's the extreme. Even before considering the compartmentalization of people by others. That is what this "friendzone" is. This "compartmentalization" can also happen due to other factors besides from the "unrequited love" cliche mentioned in other posts above. You might meet a nice fella or girl who is in a relationship. So nothing is ever on the table. You become friends. Had you both been single the first time you met then you might have hooked up. At that stage, would you not agree, that having been friends for maybe a few years, that it would be less likely that either one of the party would want to hook up with the other?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Not sure I agree, but again - it's not my point. My point is that moving fast will decrease your chances of winding up in the freindzone not that moving fast will increase your chances of her saying yes.

    The approach for a girl you've know for a while and are friends with needs to be different though as some women find long-term friends hitting on them a bit awkward.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,332 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Yeah, but Ray, when she asked you whether you thought she had a good chance with the fella you could have said "yeah, sure, I definitely think you would. Go for it" rather than explaining "well given he has extremely low standards you might actually be in with a chance for once ya munter" 🤣



  • Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It will decrease the chance of friendzone but it is no guarantee.



  • Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,332 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    I suppose it depends on what someone understands by "friendzone". I would have taken it to implicitly mean that the person does not want to be a friend. i.e. if you are an actual friend, then you are not "friendzoned". PCB, taken literally, would be correct. If you interpret "friendzone" to include anyone who is an actual friend, then taking it literally would mean that PCB taken literally is not correct.

    I did not understand PCBs posts to be taken literally. If a person is rejected and remains or becomes an actual friend, I wouldn't consider them to be "friendzoned".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    I genuinely have absolutely no idea where you got any of that from, or what pm even means. Either you're babbling and genuinely can't see how what you're saying is off the wall, or you're making a poor attempt to troll. Regardless, it's ridiculous and childish and completely proves my point, so for the sake of the mods and other posters, I'll no longer be engaging with whatever it is you're trying to do here.


    I would disagree it's due to the similarity. The incel movement is actually on a watchlist and being supervised, at least by US national security. There was only recently a short documentary about the amount of cover they needed to infiltrate the group.


    I do agree it's more like feminism (although I've no idea if there are similar security measures there). It started off well enough, but it got taken over by extremists and whilst someone may be an Incel based on the strictest definition of the word, they may not actually be part of that group or want to identify as one. I would say though that Incels (i.e. the people who do identify as such) are the extreme fringe.



  • Posts: 16,208 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I do agree it's more like feminism (although I've no idea if there are similar security measures there). It started off well enough, but it got taken over by extremists and whilst someone may be an Incel based on the strictest definition of the word, they may not actually be part of that group or want to identify as one. I would say though that Incels (i.e. the people who do identify as such) are the extreme fringe.

    Not taken over. It got represented by the extremists (similar to feminism), because the extremists tend to be those with the loudest, and most regular voices. The average person voices themselves a few times, and likely gets on with their lives, sliding into a background support group of like minded people. There's a general reluctance to deal with the extremists, and so, they get to "take over", and appear as if they're the majority.. which they rarely are.

    I'd say that Incels are people who are bitter over the experiences with the women in their lives. For some, it could be due to legitimate reasons, as there are a lot of truly bad/nasty people out there, and if you've had more than your fair share of encountering them, then your perception regarding the gender is likely to be skewed as a result. That might translate into a hatred of women, although I doubt it's that simple. My impression is that it's more of a distrust, and even, a fear of women, due to the betrayals or humiliations these guys have experienced.

    There will be the extremists, who love spouting off hate-filled nonsense, and it will be them who get to represent the overall group, because that's what the media and those critical of such movements will focus on,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    It WILL decrease them. For a start, the guy now can decide to move on.

    Just clarify one thing for me: you are aware of the fact that a guy and a girl, both heterosexual, can actually have a platonic friendship without sex?

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,332 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Regardless, it's ridiculous and childish and completely proves my point,

    Ok. The below was your original point which I've apparently now proven

    I have had, however, guys complain that I've friendzoned

    Don't ask me how the logic follows, but how and ever. If it works in your own head then QED.


    PM was Potential-Monke who posted that he was used by a girl. When I replied to his post, you, for some reason, latched onto it, as if I was making it up - the dude said it in his own post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 PipingProblems


    I'm no detective but I'd say that poster was picking up on the dig you made towards them, rather than the rest of the post. They're correct about the strangeness of your posts towards them. Do you personally know that poster?


    I do feel sorry for other men that don't seem to be able to find companionship in whatever form, for whatever reason. I have been in a position before where some drunken guy was going off on a girl at a pub because he had been following her around the place, giving her compliments when she was clearly uncomfortable. It was a small enough pub and he was being loud anyway, but she must have told him to back off when he started roaring about how he's been nothing but nice to her all evening. Myself and another fella, as well as the bar manager got him out the door and a few words about calling the Gardai settled him down so he left. So whilst I do feel sorry for them, I feel more sorry for the women on the receiving end of so-called nice guys.

    As a man, it seems a clear enough distinction between what makes a genuinely nice person and what makes an arse in nice clothing, but I guess by this thread it's not so clear for everyone.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,332 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    I made no dig to the poster. I merely questioned the fact that she appeared to claim that some of her friends had complained that she had "friendzoned" them. Her post appeared to imply that it had happened directly to her - "I have had ...". Who does that? Do you have any friends whom you think would actually do that? Go and moan to a girl because she doesn't want to ride them? Or even would moan to another person that some girl doesn't want to ride them? The poster was the one who decided to cast shade at me by saying she presumed I was a "nice guy" with the quotes. As if I'd give a sh1te about someone else's delusions.

    Ironically, jumping in yourself to her "defence" is actually "white knighting". Which I gather is actually a trait of these incel types. Of course it is not only those who do that so I'm not calling you one.

    And I cant see why you appear to be equating a drunk fella pestering a woman with the like of Potenital-Monke's story about a girl basically using him as a safety blanket. It's no harm for him to have done so. and she was entitled to do it. Happens to plenty of people. It also happens to women but in another form - plenty of fellas will string a girl along for sex and plenty of women will string a fella along for emotional or other material reasons. A fella is also entitled to sting along a girl for months or years on false promises because she is a convenient ride for him. That doesn't mean she has to be happy about it or that he was right to do so.



Advertisement