Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Fighter jets for the Air Corps?

1959698100101196

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,392 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    To free up manpower the air corps should maybe outsource basic flight training to the companys based in cork and waterford and full time rotary training to the us army



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,392 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I am sure we could send them to the usaf or canada for basic flight trainning as well. We only train a few year and it seams to tie up a lot of resources



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,942 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Dohvolle is right above.

    My question is though, free up manpower to do what?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,392 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    As per the article below to get enoght pilots trained up. Its not to long ago AC112 had to take fridays off and Lt Cols where flying due to shortages

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/irish-air-corps-pilots-are-training-in-alabama-with-us-military-1.4353859



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,942 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I think it's a lot more to do with turnover and a failure to attract people in in the first place that's causing the problem.

    Outsource training, insource it, export it to other militaries, it doesn't change the fundamental retention issue.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,950 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    With a decent fast jet program , and reasonable terms and conditions , would it be all that difficult to get trainee pilots in ? Get them in , basic flight training with a commitment of x years in the air corp, and x years in the reserve -

    Mightn't be as easy with technicians- but tweak the terms and conditions, and a career progression , or a way out x years after qualification ( plus time in reserve ) ,

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,942 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I don't disagree. And that sort of programme will have to be one of the first developed for the DF overhaul,if they are to genuinely change things.

    There must be holistic career options, education in exchange for minimum service. They should look again at housing for all personnel in service too, where they can put down some roots and start a family.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Have a cousin that was Captain got offered way more money to enter a private company on management level. He couldn't turn ot down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,392 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Thats the difference between government and private jobs. I know some of my former colleagues that give up salarys of over 100k in the construction sector to work for 48k for the council. They may have gone from building amasing civil projects to director of hedge cutting and pothole filling but they have there wages gaurnteed and no stress



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    There has got to be a reckoning in the West re: retention. If we're banking on high technology and high skill to defeat much larger but relatively 'dumber' enemies, then it also follows that your people are well paid and the lure of the private sector is negated. The only problem left should be boredom or the usual DF problems (up or out, politics, bullying, etc).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    That's kinda it loyalty has to work both ways the government has to start looking after people. At the end of the day we all have our life's to live and living cost a lot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,942 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    That will take decoupling Defence Forces pay from other general admin grades in the Public Service. And it will have to be faced up to.

    Simon Coveney is apparently preparing a policy memo for Cabinet in June to get the Defence spending increases approved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    just something I came by.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    If you are referring to Air Corps pilots going to the RAAF, you are completely Incorrect.


    AC pilots went to 32 Squadron which flies King Airs. No AC pilot went to Australia to fly C-130s or P-8s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,392 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Are more pilots been sent out or was that a once off?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,711 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    Obviously the world was a different place in the 25 years between 77-99 but what was the point of the Fouga Magisters?

    Who thought they were necessary for Ireland of the time?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,942 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    We had operated contemporary fighter and fighter/trainer aircraft continuously from 1938 until the Vampires were slated for retirement in 1975. The Fougas were a straight replacement, were they not?

    The more prudent question would be, why were the Fougas not properly replaced in 1999.

    The opportunity was there to address that gap somewhat in the post-911 environment and those great Statesmen, Michael Smith and John O'Donoghue thought otherwise.

    All those short-sighted dumbass White Papers and benign security assessments in that era were a disgrace. Many a useful idiot drawing massive pensions from those times of carnage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,356 ✭✭✭punchdrunk


    We really didn't though, our Seafires were bordering on obsolete by the time we got them in 1947 and the vampire was obsolete as a front line fighter when we got them in 1956...we've been lagging behind ever since.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1 Pitts


    It goes back even further than that. The single seat Seafires were never replaced by another single seat fighter in 1955.

    The Spitfire trainers were replaced by Vampire jet trainers and later Fouga Magister jet trainers.

    All the above were in number 1 Fighter Squadron at one time or another at Gormanston and later Baldonnel. No. 1 Fighter Squadron then became and did double duties as the advanced flight training school.

    All these aircraft were used for training purposes in the Air Corps, with the Army and Naval Service, they did aid to civil power duties occasionally and were used for ceremonial duties.

    They were purchased to give pilots the opportunity to fly military aircraft, learn formation, train in weapons and tactics etc. I don’t think anyone really thought they would be used in a real world conflict - the idea seemed to be to form a nucleus of military pilots who would have a foundation to build on if the government saw fit to purchase contemporary fighter aircraft (probably due to another world war scenario)

    No. 1 Fighter Squadron became Light Strike Squadron in 1980 during a reorganisation in the Air Corps probably because it wasn’t realistic to equip a fighter squadrons with subsonic training aircraft .

    The Fouga Magisters started to be gradually retired from 1996 to 1999. The reason they weren’t replaced at the time was due to the Price Waterhouse report which said the Fouga Magisters and Marchetti basic trainers should both be replaced by a single type of turboprop trainer.

    After the last Fouga was retired Light Strike Squadron just ceased to exist and advanced pilot training was carried on until 2004 on one King Air 200. Then the Pilates PC.9M turboprops arrived and combined the basic and advanced training requirements for the Air Corps with a secondary function of light strike.

    It’s fair to say Ireland has never had a real air defence system or ever operated contemporary military fighter aircraft.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Leonidas BL


    These Kfir NG seem to be good value. Id love to compare its intercept capability compared to Gripen.

    "It took us just three years to deliver an entire squadron for the Colombia Air Force, and at a third of the price of a fourth-generation single engine jet fighter. The upgraded Kfir provides just as good an answer as fourth-generation jets, and in some cases, even better,” IAI Lahav Division general manager Yosef Melamed told Globes."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Good idea. If it's cheap then that's the one for the air corps.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Leonidas BL


    Fair enough, but if it is basically a brand new build with new F414 engines and modern avionic systems, the what does it matter when it was designed? I mean F-16's are from the 70s and it does say they have a 40 year guarantee.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,942 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    While Dohvolle is exactly right about the Technology, the politics of if mean Israel wouldn't sell to Ireland anyway. And even if they did, we shouldn't buy them.

    It is economically, politically and morally appropriate that Ireland should source its military equipment in the EU and EEA if at all possible. Failing that, it should come from countries allied to the EU and EEA.

    Fortunately, that still gives us plenty of good options across the board.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,499 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Oh the Israelis would sell to us, they may not like our position on their activities but that’s not really stopped them before, but yes the question should be more should we buy from them? Like you said there are plenty of other options.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Leonidas BL


    They sold us drones so I wouldnt heed that a lot.

    Post edited by Leonidas BL on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    The spin that would come from the media if the government bought jets from Israel would be amazing to watch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,118 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Sending them to the US for a few months would be waving goodbye to a tonne of cash. Months of…

    accommodation, food, entertainment, rental cars, sundry expenses, whatever extra pay for being away

    plus…

    paying whoever is training them, fuel, insurance, time….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    This is the best idea anybody has come up with in ages. You can get a dozen of these for the price of 3 Gripens and they are in the air in 3 years (versus 10 as suggested by other posters for Gripen). That Mirage is/was a great plane and was evolved over many years by Dassault.

    Now the Israelis are offering one with all the desirable upgrades/modernisation carried out.

    We need planes in the air now...not years in the future. These would be a perfect stop gap and newer better can be bought ten years down the line. These could then be flogged off to some African country with still 30 years life in em.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 826 ✭✭✭newcavanman


    We have several options. New, rented Gripen, ex RAF Tranche One Typhoons, soon to be ex Finnish F-18s or probably most sensible, F-16MLUs from several different sources, Dutch, Danish, Norwegian. I've worked with them several times and F-16s are just so damn reliable. They never go tech



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Interesting point of view.



Advertisement