Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

18788798818838843690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 601 ✭✭✭Snails pace


    I second that. I have operated Chinese built machinery and it was awful and unsurprisingly, unreliable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,139 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Rather some people are prepared to accept it. Or they say they will accept it until what the reality of the sacrifice bites.

    We've seen this before, plenty of people talking a great game on climate and emissions but when push comes to shove, the third city break in a year and fast fashion wins out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,177 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The BBC news quoted China as saying they were only interested in actions that deescalate the conflict, when asked about supplying arms to Russia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,335 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Will be interesting in regards to China. At the end of the day the world wouldn't be able to function if massive sanctions were placed on Chinese companies if this was threatened to them if they did help Russia. Now I suppose it depends if China wants to take the gamble if they do and for arguments sake they risked this happening. Russia losing this war and been made to retreat back to Russia would be the worse outcome for China I believe as if that's the case Russia will be in its worse shape in decades and have lost a war for no gains. Would mean America would be able to fully focus on China and Taiwan and probably not have to worry about Russia for 10 to 20 years as will probably take them that long to get back off their knees from this. China supplying Russia with weapons would keep Russia up and running in the invasion front and have America spending more time and effort in Europe then in South East Asia and that will suit the Chinese down to the ground as they will get ever stronger there. They may say to the Americans well your supplying Ukraine with weapons why can't we supply Russia with weapons. The longer this war continues the better for them and the outcome they would want is Russia winning compared to Ukraine. The last thing they would like in Russia is putin removed and someone more friendly to the west then to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,907 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I think you're being unduly optimistic here. If the Russians manager to encircle Kiev completely they will likely just shell/starve the city into submission, however long it takes. No reason for friendly fire incidents if the troops stay at the perimeter until the resistance collapses.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Curious_Case


    RIP Valentina Pushich. a Ukrainian doctor killed in battle 5 days ago.

    Putin should swing for this alone.

    FB_IMG_1647215050449.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    I wonder how lushenko is feeling at the moment ,now putin is begging the Chinese for help ,he must be down to a 3star private now on Putins army



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 335 ✭✭AxleAddict


    I'm curious, let's assume for the sake of argument that Putin's forces either accidentally or deliberately targeted a NATO country - right now I'm thinking of the military targets near the Polish border - and triggered an Article 5 response, would NATO restrict any retaliatory action to targets within Ukraines borders only, or given that Russia is the aggressor here, would it be free to identify and target forces within Russia (or Belarus) itself?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It would be an act of war ,Nato could anilate Russian forces in Ukraine to protect nato borders and prevent further attacks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Curious_Case


    I have a feeling Kyiv won't fall.

    I'm hoping a decision has been made somewhere to save Kyiv at all costs, perhaps a "Western" entity can provide protection for UN air drops?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,029 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    So Russia, a military superpower, with a 10 to 1 material advantage, has asked for direct help from: Belarus, Chechnya, Syria, various mercenaries, Wagner paramilitary group, China

    The Ukrainians really putting up a hell of a fight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,907 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Would they though, or would they just do a limited retaliation on the scale of the Russian action and make it clear that was it if Russia didn't repeat the 'error'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,029 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Good piece here on how life is already getting more expensive in Russia




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    I think they will make a very make a very painful point ,

    This will be the test of Nato that either strengthens and cements the alliance or it could break it,if they don't responds in a manner that nobody else ever threatens a NATO state again



  • Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They'll be asking for aid from the charities next. The next Trocaire box will have a little picture of Putin's face on it: 'Help Vladimir to take Ukraine'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,852 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 111 ✭✭Botrys



    It's a bit more complex than that,

    but what seems to be the main problem is Vladimir Putin and not the Russian military capabilities.

    In my opinion he himself managed to humiliate the russian military and undermined the Russian Federation as the superpower we though of it to be.


    From what we've seen so far,

    His generals and the ministry of defense were caught off guard, the invasion was only planned in Putin's mind, so basically the army was unprepared,

    The invasion wasn't properly planned.

    The troops were lied to, they were told they were on an exercice right until the moment they got the order to cross the border, imagine what this does to morale.

    However their biggest screw up was the intelligence Putin was receiving,

    It was tailored to his own liking, this was shown very clearly during his security council meeting while he (Putin) forced Naryshkin to tell him exactly what he wanted to hear. All intelligence that Putin received pointed out that the Ukrainians will lay down their arms and surrender at the first sight of a russian soldier. -- this can also be proven after the news of the heads of his intelligence service placed in house arrest 'for telling him what he only wanted to hear'.

    Another thing that he did not expect, was the Americans and the west standing up to him the way they did, first with all the advanced weaponry they kept on sending to the Ukrainians, but also the unprecedented sanctions he got slapped with.

    I remember very well, Biden going on TV since last December telling the world multiple times that Putin is going to invade, 'we got the intel', 'we're declassifying some intel', He even once said something along the lines of 'Putin is planning a minor invasion to which there will be minimal response from the west, but a full scale invasion will be met with a very harsh response'

    To me this sounded like an invitation or a green light for Putin to invade, so he took the bite and fell in the trap. the west's response came in the moment his troops crossed the border and i think it is at that moment Putin switched from a minor 'small scale' operation to a full scale invasion and from there everything started going downhill.

    Yes the Russian military got humiliated, however i believe that their problem is Putin and only Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,809 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    I would say it’s more to do with the NGO,s who seem to have control over the government. But its what everyone wants regardless of the consequences or so one is lead to believe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,507 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    There was a report last week that even many people in the Russian military apparatus were caught unawares by the invasion. They assumed until the last moment that he might invade the Donbass region only, but nowhere else. Apparently, there was total dismay and bewilderment when they realised what the nut was up to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,703 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    I would be much more content that our economy suffers to push back against Putin that I was ever happy that our economy suffered over Covid restrictions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,507 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes, because a victorious Putin would be extremely dangerous for western Europe. Everyone would be asking "when does he invade the Baltic states, Moldova or Poland?". Even the NATO thing mightn't dissuade him in such a case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,703 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    Well maybe we should start thinking about not relying on China for tech, in the same way we should start thinking about not relying on Russia for energy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,177 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    There is no maybe about it - a very clear and present danger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    That push already started as a result of supply chain issues during COVID; I imagine the Ukraine invasion will further highlight the need to move manufacturing back to the West at least to some extent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,703 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    I don't see any path to a victorious Putin. He's dead in the water already.

    Somehow I think he wanted a disastrous end, for the record books. As if he fought the good War for the USSR (RIP)

    He will push this as far as he can, because this is a war with the West and not only Ukraine.

    We are very close to a NATO war with Russia. When that happens Putin is dead. I don't think that's far off tbh.

    I have complete confidence there will be no nuclear war with Russia.

    That whole nuclear war scenario is just a scare tactic. It's not gonna happen, rest assured.

    What we must do, is make sure that Putin knows that most every country in the world is against him, and that even if China gives support, he's still f*cked.



  • Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Garry Kasparov on CNN just now:

    'Ukraine has plenty of courage but not enough weapons. NATO has plenty of weapons but not enough courage. I don't know if they are afraid of Putin or their own shadow. They can't avoid this conflict, they either act now on their terms or later on Putin's terms.'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    where do you come to this assumption of no nuclear war? I am in awe at your confidence

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,507 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I watched the interview too. He said NATO should call Putin's bluff and establish a no fly zone immediately. He thinks Putin is a spoofer and a blackmailer (all mouth and no trousers essentially) and that NATO should face him down right now, rather than put the inevitable off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,177 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    And that is also what a former Russian foreign minister thinks and has been saying. Neither of these people are either stupid, naive or suicidal, so the west should act accordingly on what is good intel, rather than dither at the cost of several cities destroyed and millions of lives lost.



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement