Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

16626636656676683690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    Well, the western narrative is that Russia has no legitimate national interests or concerns that should be respected by it's neighbours, or indeed by the US. Any concerns it has are groundless. Any assertive foreign policy aims it has are malicious. And as you say, the western aim is to effect regime change in Russia as if it was Nicaragua or Libya.

    We can disagree with the aims of Putin, but let us not pretend that a Western backed leader parachuted in by Washington to rule Russia in the aftermath of the assassination of Putin would be no more legitimate than a puppet Ukrainian government installed by the Kremlin. The Russians do not want to see a new Yelstin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,285 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes, Crimea is an interesting one. It's very possible that the sanctions against Russia will never be lifted until they withdraw from there too - it's the same illegal invasion by the same dictator.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,388 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I don't think anyone on here on the the west would want to see a puppet government in Russia, they just would prefer a democratically elected one.

    Puppet governments are prone to revolutions and cause a resentment to those that installed them.

    It always seems dictators cause more wars/suffering than democratically elected governments.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,024 ✭✭✭StevenToast



    They aren't white enough for the likes of tubridy and his kind to make it "feel real"....

    What an absolute @%$%....

    "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining." - Fletcher



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,388 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Very hard for the west to drop all sanctions while Crimea is still illegally in control of Russia. It would be akin to the west accepting Russia's claim to it.

    High probability the people of Donbas & Luhansk won't want to be under Russian control either after this invasion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    TBH I don't think the Crimean's would be happy if the Russians withdrew. A lot Ukrainians probably left over the last 8 years, it's a Russian stronghold.

    Ukraine will probably have to concede Crimea and Luhansk. Donetsk is a different story. It's a mix of people in those areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    I don't think that follows. Putin has launched two aggressive wars. Georgia in 2008. Ukraine 2014-2022. Georgia was short and sharp. We'll see how Ukraine pans out. But they both have clear cut objectives to assert easily understood hard interests. How many wars has the democratic west waged in that time? Often for vague ideology, ill-defined and sometimes conflicting or naïve aims like securing female education in Afghanistan. "Forever wars".

    I made the point earlier that democratic countries are more..."emotional" in their dealings. Concessions to avoid the 2022 Ukrainian war were impossible not because it didn't make sense but because democratic nations could not abide the idea of conceding anything to Putin or Russia. They were evil, and you never concede to evil. So instead we prefer war to concessions.

    Authoritarian regimes can afford to be more cold blooded in their dealings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Prime-time b*llocks Sand.

    The Putinists had their crime syndicate petrostate on lock. Putin had the political system by the short and curlies and personal energy residuals and kickbacks flowing from his oligarch patrons.

    The mob bosses that hijacked Russia had it all their own way, but they f*cked it up by going full-Mussolini in Abyssinia.

    The difference being that Mussolini was prepared, and Putin is not. Then the League of Nations stood by and did nothing, but this time the West is dropping the financial equivalent of an A-bomb on Russia - and Ukrainians are armed with Javelins and Stingers to burn fascist war materiel.

    How does it feel being an online fluffer for a crime syndicate Sand? These people have been laughing at you and people like you from their yachts for years. If you were of any consequence and posed a theat to them, they'd send a hit squad your way make no mistake.

    You're spending your days trying to muster a defence for criminals conducting a criminal invasion. Have you ever considered what has become of your life?

    You don't care about the fate of Ukraine, the Russian economy or the fact that Russia is run by some of the most rapacious, ruthless and corrupt individuals on earth - you just want to see 'the West' and Western institutions get a black eye at any cost. And if that's at the expense of the Ukrainian state and Ukrainian civilians, that seems to be fine and dandy for you.

    Post edited by Yurt2 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,388 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I don't think any of that has any relation to my reply to your OP saying if Putin was to be replaced, that the west would prefer a democratically elected government over a puppet one.


    You mention conceding anything to Putin. A sovereign state should be under no obligation to concede any of their sovereignty to any other country (democratically elected or a dictator) I don't care what Russia's or Putin's concerns are, Ukraine as a sovereign country can do what she likes.

    It's not a matter of good vs evil, a sovereign state is a sovereign state, end off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,706 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It's been "Russian" since the 1700's when it was taken back from the Turks. The majority of people there identify as Russian. Russian is the official language. It's far more Russian than it ever was Ukrainian.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 685 ✭✭✭Dank Janniels




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Given the state or the Russian economy on paper, average income is only about €450 a month, the fact that all these luxury goods get consumed - the volume of Louis Vuitton stores etc in a couple of glitzy cities it would seem to be living way beyond its means and that probably just indicates a massive untaxed parallel economy and widespread corruption. Although, that’s hardly surprising.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,024 ✭✭✭StevenToast


    "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining." - Fletcher



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,768 ✭✭✭Homelander


    I don't see anything wrong with what he said or maybe how he said it; it effectively captures the mood.

    It is easier to overlook wars in "far flung" places, in other parts of the world, with radically different cultures, values, places that are hotbeds of uninterrupted conflict, broadly speaking.

    Regime change, civil war, conflict based on ideology, religion, whatever - we've come to accept this as a very, very unfortunate norm for certain parts of the world that are distant to us.

    Yes, ultimately we're all human, but to see a war come to continental Europe in 2022, is very disturbing because we thought we were far past that - and it is disturbing people, because contextually, there's the bigger question of how far it will spill.

    Context is important. Tubridy was only saying what a lot of people do genuinely feel and it has nothing, nothing whatsoever, to do with being white.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,388 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I'm sure you can interchange "Russian" with "English" and Crimea with Northern Ireland and it would be similar. let's see:

    It's been "British" since the ~1169 when it was taken from the Irish. The majority of people there identify as British. English the official language. It's far more English than it ever was Irish.

    An yet here we are in 2022 and the north is at peace and has an option to stay as they are or join a united Ireland. Doesn't seem to be any rush and neither Ireland nor the UK are threatening war for the north. Just letting the north choose what they want, when they want.

    Ti's a little different than invading Crimea and having a sham referendum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,016 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I don't think anyone in the West is unaware at this point that Russia is concerned with NATO being on its borders. The problem is that we cannot really begrudge the right of a sovereign country to choose its foreign policy. Is it the first time a country has been invaded in order to keep it out of a sphere of influence? No. Does that make it OK? Not really.

    Putin has completely f*cked it, here. He's ruined any goodwill Russian had with the people of Ukraine by blasting them out of it, first of all, and he's regarded as a fully rogue leader by the west. And the big fat cherry on the cake is that he has more countries looking at joining NATO and/or the EU.

    He should have stuck to his previous strategy of diplomacy with a dash of subterfuge, and keeps the thumb on Crime and Donbass. But he overreached, and now hes looking at a massive own goal and possibly even self inflict the regime change to which you refer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Total misread and misrepresentation of the invasion of Afghanistan.

    That country was a security black hole and a global terrorist and extremists playground. That invasion was essential for both regional and global security, and if you know anything about anything, countries like Russia and China were damn glad that the US took the lead on it. It had full UNSC backing.

    I'll double down and say that not only was that war necessary, they should still be there along with an international coalition.

    Afghanistan as a semi governed failed state will come back to haunt at some stage in the future. Mark my words.

    The US won't be going back in, but it might be the Russians get their hands burned there again. I wonder what you'd say then Sand?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,214 ✭✭✭wylo


    In fairness, if that was being actively carried out by a Western country there wouldn’t be a media blackout. Unlike Russia, we have free press, so the decisions whether to run with stories are based on public interest (for advertising reasons). Yemen has clearly failed to ignite the Wests public interest. :(

    I myself have lost count of the amount of times I scrolled passed those Facebook ads pleading for help/donations. Sad really, but if UK or America was doing it I think it would be different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Crimea only ended up Russian majority via ethnic cleansing of Tartars, Turks, Greeks, Jews, Bulgarians Germans etc.

    The place only became Russian majority in the fairly recent past (mid 20th century), Russians were a mere plurality before that as Crimea was an extremely cosmopolitan entropot peninsula.

    Russia's history in Crimea is not a proud one. It's more colonial prize and real estate opportunity than spiritual heartland of of the Russian soul.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If we’ve already committed an act of war we might as well send in the jets fighters and all the other stuff now since he didn’t use the nukes.

    The brutal dictator is also a hypocrite.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,523 ✭✭✭standardg60




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭Mike Murdock


    The UK wants these guys, and other despicable despots and oligarchs from around the world, to invest in their London Property Ponzi/Money Laundering scheme in the future.

    Can't have them freezing or stealing assets off these Russian gangsters. That would put off others from investing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,388 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    If (according to Russia) the west have committed an act of war, why haven't Russian attacked: EU/UK/USA/Australia/Switzerland/New Zealand/Singapore/Taiwan/Japan.

    Maybe those sovereign states can decide which countries they do business with and which countries they allow planes to fly over and land in etc....

    Just because you have a country in this world, doesn't mean you get to be treated the same as others. Especially not when you illegally wage a war on a peaceful neighbour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,113 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly



    The amount of military equipment the Russians are losing is unreal - they must have thought this would be a walkover and finding out Afghanistan has nothing on Ukrainians



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,113 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly



    Pure hyperbole - Russia knows they have no chance against the whole EU, hell they're struggling to even occupy Ukraine



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,706 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Nobodies history in the Crimea is a "proud one".



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Isnt that what the poster was saying? Russia had no legitimacy to invade Crimea like they did and we should have acted sooner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,706 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    "We" have been facilitating the current Russian situation for 20 years. Most recently with Trump's close association with Putin.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    He invaded under Biden. We, the west, believe in principles like freedom of speech and individuality. Do you believe that Putin had some right to invade Crimea because that’s what you seem to be getting at.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement