Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

15685695715735743690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    And yet most people wouldn’t have a clue about Putin beyond “he’s bad, He’s mad and probably hitler”, myself included. For some that’s as far as they want to go, which is fine.

    Is it that hard not to attack others with who want to discuss it further and may want to see if that narrative holds up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,965 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Once you move away from the big cities in Russia, and hit the rural areas, the differences between them are vast. But the whole Country is a tapestry of different ethnicities, religions, clans etc. You could ask "Will the real Russian please stand up?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Not really, I think you're labouring under the illusion that's there's some sort of credible solution out there that can be hashed out that will sate the man's appetite and won't radically undermine the safety and security of central and eastern Europe.

    A total redraw of the security map of Europe is tantamount to a redraw of the political map of Europe. You're asking central and Europe to chop the b*llocks off their own democracies and their own sovereignty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,978 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Russia has just invaded Ukraine (over false pretenses), other countries are now feeling threatened, e.g. Finland. Therefore they are considering joining NATO.

    You see the issue there?

    An aggressive Russia has always been the issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,011 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    He can barely attack a pretty backward nation on his doorstep with his military machine, he's not going to push to attack anywhere else, certainly not anywhere that's NATO. Sending in NATO troops and planes is the kind of moronic kneejerk response that escalates things way beyond what you hope. Very much like Putin sending in troops and planes into Ukraine. This is not a video game. There is no 'New Game' option. Hotheads start wars, cool heads stop them.

    TBH that may seem like a reasonable position to us but in reality what organisation a sovereign country joins is their own business and no-one else's.

    No, that's not reality, it's naive and wishful thinking. The reality is no sovereign nation is an island and they have to consider their actions in the minds of others. The ones that don't actually become islands like North Korea.

    I think the aim for the world now is to get the dangerous regime out of power in Russia, denazify Russia and demilitarised them up to ensure they no longer have nukes.

    And how is 'the world' going to do that exactly? Sounds fantastic, but just as naive. There is no way in hell they'll give up their nuclear weapons. Would America? China? France? the UK? No and I sure as hell wouldn't if I were them. Change will ultimately come from within. External forces will certainly play a huge part(back to no sovereign nation is an island), but it can only come from within in the end.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    No , I’m suggesting its wise to know and understand your enemy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,978 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Kherson down the south seems to have fully fallen to Russia, and Mariupol is in extreme trouble



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,011 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    If only Microsoft could disable every Windows install in Putinstan...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    On the contrary, the alarm bells were sounding for years that this was exactly who Putin was. Institutional Europe's faith in multilateralism and jaw jaw when this man was running wild in other conflicts has been repayed in kind with this war, but the political and diplomatic world were fully aware of who the man was. It was all a merry dance - the music has now stopped.

    Europe shouldn't play any more and it looks like they won't. Russia's relationship with the West is irreparable as long as Putin occupies the Kremlin.

    Maybe the scales haven't fallen from your eyes yet, but for the rest of Europe, they most certainly have.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,011 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Ah but you see, Ukraine is an unfortunate geo-political mistake, it's not a country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,429 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Or you know people are just seeing children being cluster bombed to bits by Putin and his death squads and after a week of witnessing constant sustained and escalating war crimes their empathy and horror at this moment in time supersedes your desire to change the narrative to "Yeah Putin is bad but.....".

    From what I can see the sustained world wide horror on all media channels has undoubtedly and fundamentally helped Ukraine.

    Your chance to parrot Russell Brands talking points will come, maybe leave it while though eh?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭zv2


    @Yurt! Alternatively, how would the Irish feel if the U.S. made Ireland a nuclear base and filled it with hydrogen bombs?

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet


    With respect, I don't think you get it. If Russia takes Ukraine, they then have NATO countries bordering them. So the idea of taking a non-NATO country out, just to end up bordering NATO countries is absurd. This is especially the case when Ukraine weren't anywhere near joining NATO.

    The NATO thing is a ruse for Russian expansionism. Putin is known to have admired the USSR and he feels (as many Russians do) that the USSR was 'unfairly' broken up and that the glory days should return. He doesn't think Ukraine is a real country. He thinks it belongs within Russia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 772 ✭✭✭Heraclius


    I'm concerned that if the Ukrainian war/ insurrection is still happening in 2025 President Trump will be off to Moscow to declare he's relaxing sanctions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Depends very much on how much resistance Russian forces are meeting, their moral and the attitude of much of the rest of world to genocide on the doorstep of Europe in 2022. They won't be able to declare victory in one part of Ukraine and just walk away without a counter offensive from unoccupied parts. Sanctions and other measures somewhat like Covid supports - needed emergency to bring them in but hard to withdraw. The ability of Russia to fund itself will be in question.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Just go talk to your mates in the Russian embassy here - you'll get a better hearing.

    But to answer your question - if our existence was threatened by an imperialist expansionist neighbour, we'd welcome NATO and any defensive support on offer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    US has nuclear assets in Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands and Italy (Nuclear armed subs in the case of Italy). Joining NATO does not mean hosting nuclear assets. And I can't for the life of me think why the US would insist.

    I'm not an advocate for Irish membership of NATO btw. Increased seriousness about our defence yes, full NATO membership no.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    What are you talking about “the scales haven’t fallen from my eyes”?


    seriously, get down off that soapbox and actually respond to what I’m writing instead of making subjective sweeping statements that have no base in what I’m saying or think but playing ti the Galery.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭zv2


    Yes I see the issue. Russia is evil. NATO are evil. They are both in danger of starting WW3. Demonizing one side is only half the truth. They must both leave Ukraine and stay out. De-escalation.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    You think there's something left to understand about Putin that we don't already know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    IKEA have now suspended operations. They have 15,000 employees in both countries. Their reasoning is supply chain and trading conditions but they have also donated €20m for humanitarian assistance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 AhFrayedKnot


    yeah seems to be a lot of propaganda coming out of ukraine ,9000 russians dead ? surely nobody with a brain beleives that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    17000 posts I’ve made in boards and I posted one link and now you think that defines my sentiments.

    Poor form boggles and again an example of how some of you can’t actually address what a poster is saying, you attack the poster.

    and to the poster earlier asking me for an example of how people lack the capacity to discuss this with respect and objectively , just look at their engagement with me. How hostile have I been while trying ti make my points and look at their responses and how they have gone off on self righteous speeches that has absolutely nothing ti do with what I’ve actually posted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    NATO isn't in Ukraine, it's not even a NATO applicant.

    I'm still mystified how people can try to place the blame 'on both sides' equally at this stage.

    NATO is a particularly large dagger, but it's been in it's sheath for decades when it comes to Russia. If it was taking lumps out of Russian terrioty for years you may have a point, but its not postured that way.

    In terms of headcount, it's been in decline for years. US troop numbers were slashed in the last couple of decades, defence spending in Europe in decline.

    NATO is a sideshown for Putin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    No, I think I want to understand him better and want to discuss it. Nobody in here is making any difference on a global scale. All I am doing is asking questions and trying to understand It better.


    Its horrible what’s going on , I don’t need to say that every post. Some of you just want to see updates and post all the bad things going on, that’s fine, I just want to understand it more.



    a



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    @gandalf wrote:

    I think the aim for the world now is to get the dangerous regime out of power in Russia, denazify Russia and demilitarised them up to ensure they no longer have nukes.

    A new policy of appeasement at this stage is merely storing up a new "crisis" further down the line. Agreeing to a scenario where Russia gets rewarded for invading another nation with redrawn borders or new autonomous puppet states is unacceptable.

    Russia needs to be pushed back to Russia and driven into the ground. The sanctions lift when Russia formally agrees that it recognises the sovereignty of every nation along its borders and cannot object to any of them seeking membership of NATO or the EU at any time.

    A lasting legacy of nuclear weapons that has come into stark focus here is that once a country has them, they basically have a blank cheque to violate other countries because the world does not want to spark a nuclear war.

    Arising out of this should come a general agreement between all nuclear nations to dismantle their stockpiles with ongoing independent oversight and auditing. The doctrine of MAD quite clearly doesn't keep the peace. Now it's a get out of jail free card allowing nuclear powers to do whatever the **** they want, safe in the knowledge that the only countries who can stop them, won't.

    While I am sure there is some tactical value in having nukes, limiting countries to (say) 20 weapons with a combined yield no greater than 50kT, is more than enough nuclear weapons to be able to wave your dick around without putting the existence of our species at risk.

    Any country that doesn't agree to it, gets sanctioned out of existence. One can dream...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,211 ✭✭✭Economics101


    You seem to have some inside information that NATO is in Ukraine, or maybe you have an over-active imagination. Stop posing self-evident rubbish.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,685 ✭✭✭Working class heroes


    Serious bang of Neville Chamberlain of ya Wibbs.......

    Racism is now hiding behind the cloak of Community activism.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement