Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Changes in the GAA - super thread

1969799101102109

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 909 ✭✭✭munsterdevil


    A lot more than can take 45s, that's for sure. Even if you're a bad penalty taker, you have a reasonable chance of scoring one. If you're a bad 45 taker then you'd be lucky to reach the 21!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 909 ✭✭✭munsterdevil


    Some very good points here, Tod, to be fair.

    Disagree with a few though, I don't think they are here to stay for a long time to come. This proposal is just the beginning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,534 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Theyre not dead and can be "fit for purpose" with a far better seasonal structure in place. Remove them and you get rid of plenty of counties only real chance of success in a year. if you have a proper tiered championship in place you can keep the 4 provincial titles as ways to keep local rivalries that otherwise wont happen or mightnt happen for years in a tiered competition



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,534 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Everyone able to take penalties no... lot more element of chance, opposition have a say with a goalie in penalties.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,534 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    There would be cameras at all these inter county games anyway. counties and even most decent clubs are videoing their games to code and assess themselves ....

    You could/should have all the officials micced up including umpires which has 6 extra sets of eyes who can communicate with ref straight away but you dont necessarily need video ref at all games



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,741 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    In what way is taking a penalty not a "core skill"? Not a core skill relative to what?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,100 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Not all matches have them, and even at that, if a team had one where someone on their team did something dodgy, they’d delete the video (ie this happened in a cork club match last year).

    Even at that, I mean for the GAA to be able to review their refs (similar to every single major sporting organisation)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,606 ✭✭✭shockframe


    Goalkeepers that can score. Someone get onto Chelsea FC!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Taking kicks from the ground is a common skill practiced in GAA football. From kickouts to 45s to some free takers taking them off the ground.

    Penalties are only taken when a player is fouled in the box.

    I'm only a casual GAA fan so I'm the type the GAA want to attract to matches but the game has become increasingly boring with all the hand passes. A team can lose the ball in their own half way line and the opposition 9 times out of 10 will just turn around and set their team and pass it back.

    Goalkeepers coming up to take frees and 45s. Says a lot that your forwards, who are supposed to be the most accurate shooters can't take a 45. A lot of the goalkeepers coming up even miss a fair chunk of the shots they take.

    The attacking mark is another disaster. Simply catching a ball leads to a free shot at goal.

    Everyone is an athlete nowadays. You can tell by how they run and solo the ball the lads who are not footballers. They're there to hand pass it, get up and down the pitch and get stuck in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    No it wasn't a superior proposal as was too flawed, even if it got voted in it wouldn't have lasted more than two years much like the so called super 8s.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 80 ✭✭Mattie500


    It is only an opinion but there is an opportunity to bring more GAA skills. 5 different players with varying lengths of distance to shoot from (hand or ground). Even something like hockey where they advance on the keeper would bring in more of the skills associated with GAA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,805 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Just a technical question on how the 8 league teams who get into the All-Ireland will be decided.

    Is finishing 7th in say Division 2 regarded as a higher ranking than finishing 2nd in Division 3? Or t'other way round? There's a case either way really as to which is fairer. I could see some teams being miffed if that ends up being the cut-off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 909 ✭✭✭munsterdevil


    Oh flawed, of course, it was. But Green proposal is seriously flawed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,115 ✭✭✭Boom__Boom



    The rankings are based on places after the league is over i.e a promoted team from Division 2 is ranked in a higher place than a relegated team from Division 1.

    Also if Team A finishes top in Division 2 but Team B who finishes second in Division 2 beats Team A in the Division 2 final, Team B is ranked higher for the group stages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,784 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Based on 2021 it would look like this (slightly imperfect due to the weird north/south leagues last year, but probably not a million miles away):

    • Dark Green = Senior AI based on Provinicals
    • Light Green = Senior AI based on league position
    • Blue = Tailteann Cup
    image.png


    I hope they give the Tailteann cup the coverage it deserves because most of those teams would fancy their chances of getting some silverware - could be a v.competitive competition if the teams bought into it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,163 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Why is this Green proposal"seriously flawed"

    I'm not going to argue that it's perfect but it's worth a good try.

    And you can't say that it's flawed because it retains the provincial championships, because after Proposal B's failure last year to get 60% dumping the provincial championships is off the cards, for a while at least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,115 ✭✭✭Boom__Boom




    I would expect that the Tailteann Cup will only get limited enough television coverage given how poorly the GAA have handled TV rights the last while.

    The only hope of any sort of half serious coverage is that TG4 try to convince the GAA to let them broadcast it.

    Even then having it on TG4 means it will effectively be hidden away from whole swathes of the country given how poor TG4's reach is.

    You would hope that GAA might stream these games on GAAGO but given the powers that be attitude to streaming games, I don't think it probably won't happen.

    In spite of the prospect of poor TV coverage, I think there is zero prospect of teams not buying in to it.

    Anyone who thinks it will be a Tommy Murphy Cup mark 2 is well wide of the mark I think.

    Managers and players of Division 3 and Division 4 teams have been calling out for an increased number of competitive games for a good few years and the format of the Tailteann Cup provides this. I reckon it won't be long before managers of Division 3 and Division 4 teams are not rushing players back from injury/start resting players in the provincial championships but instead focus more on getting players to peak for the Tailteann Cup group stages. The provincial championships have been poor enough hunting grounds for Division 3 and 4 teams for a good while now, whereas the Tailteann Cup looks like it will be a much more rewarding competition. When you compare the qualifier system to the Tailteann Cup structure, the Tailteann Cup is miles ahead.

    How much talk was there of teams/players not buying into the qualifiers?

    In the situation above the seedings for the Sam Maguire group stages would have been

    Top Seeds - Mayo, Dublin, Kerry, Tyrone

    2nd Seeds - Galway, Kildare, Cork, Monaghan

    3rd Seeds - Donegal, Armagh, Roscommon, Meath

    4th Seeds - Clare, Down, Derry, Offaly

    Also the winner of the Tailteann Cup this year will take the place of the 8th league qualifier next year (if they haven't qualified based on the provincial route or the league rankings route)

    Teams who have met in the provincial finals can't be drawn in the same group. i.e Mayo and Galway, Dublin and Kildare, Kerry and Cork and Tyrone and Monaghan must be kept apart. There is no other rules about keeping teams apart so Clare for instance who were beaten by Kerry in the Munster Championship could get drawn in the same group as them.

    Every team will have one home game, one away game and one neutral game. Given the situation in the Super 8s, it's probable Dublin will get to play both their home game and their neutral game at Croke Park. Also the provincial champions get their first game at home.

    After the group stage the top teams in each group go straight into the quarter-finals. The reward for topping the group is a home game and at least a week off while the four 2nd placed teams will have a home game against the 4 3rd placed teams. I'm not sure about the exact time-line but given the condensed season I think it will be 3 group games in 3 weeks and then the 2nd v 3rd play-off the following week with the winner of the 2nd v 3rd game playing the quarter-final the following weekend which is 5 games in 5 weekends. There may be some break weekend in there but given the compressed intercounty calendar I think there's a good chance there might not be.

    Topping the group gives a significant advantage over finishing 2nd which has an advantage over finishing 3rd.

    It will be interesting to see how teams who finish 1st in the group do versus the teams who finish 2nd and 3rd.

    I think it will be very rare that a team that finishes 3rd manages to get to a sem-final and that those that finish 2nd will more often than not fail to get to the semis.

    I'd have concerns about the provincial losers getting the 2nd seeds in the group stages.

    Over the years there have been a fair few very ordinary teams who have gotten a kind draw/met opposition who didn't turn up/hit a lucky patch in a game and ended up in a provincial final. On occasion you can get a weaker provincial winner which could also make for unbalance groups - given how Tipp and Cavan did in 2020 in their semi-finals, I can't help but wonder what would have happened them if they had 3 group stages to play as opposed to just one semi-final. Also getting to a provincial final could be a massive punishment for a Division 4 side. When London got to the Connacht final in 2013 they had one game against Cavan. If this new structure was in place they would have been 2nd seed and facing 3 games against very tough opposition [a provincial winner, a Division 1 and a Division 2 side] side who all would be looking to run up the score as much as possible. For any Division 4 side getting to a provincial final would look to be massively self-defeating.

    I think it would have made more sense to rank the provincial losers as the 3rd seeds [possibly even 4th seeds] with the 4 highest league finishers who didn't win a provincial as the 2nd seeds. If a provincal loser finished in one of the first 4 league places, they could use their league finishing position to move up to the 2nd seed as opposed to the provincial loser 3rd seed.

    I think it won't be long before you see some very unbalanced groups in terms of competiveness at the group stages, especially if a weak provincial loser and a Tailteann cup winner end up in the same group.

    In the situation above the seedings for the Talteann group stages would have been

    Top Seeds - Westmeath, Laois, Fermanagh, Cavan

    2nd Seeds - Longford, Limerick, Tipperary, Waterford

    3rd Seeds - Antrim, Louth, Sligo, Leitrim

    4th Seeds - Carlow, Waterford, Wexford, London

    Same as Sam - 3 games home, away and neutral with the top seeds getting home advantage in the first game.

    After the group stage the top teams in each group go straight into the Tailteann Cup quarter-finals. This is a home game

    The four 2nd placed teams will have a home game against 3 of the 3rd best teams and New York. The 2nd placed teams all get to play at home.

    The same situation as in the Sam groups will apply in terms of finishing 1st, 2nd, 3rd.

    There has been some talk from pundits about sides being desperate to avoid relegation and wanting to stay out of the Tailteann Cup.

    I do think sides will want to avoid relegation but that when relegated will secretly be not too displeased at all to be in the Tailtean Cup.

    In the example above for instance if there had been a prior year Tailteann Cup winner Offaly would have lost out as the lowest ranked league team.

    That would have meant that instead of being 4th seeds and playing three games against one each of (Dublin, Mayo, Kerry, Tyrone) (Kildare, Galway, Cork, Monaghan) and (Donegal, Armagh, Roscommon, Meath) they would three games against (Longford, Limerick, Tipperary, Waterford) (Antrim, Louth, Sligo, Leitrim) and (Carlow, Waterford, Wexford, London) and then most likely at least one more game and possibly four depending on how results went.

    If you were a manager which would be a better preparation for building momentum to prepare for trying to stay in Division 2 the next year. Also given they would be playing Division 2 football they would have a reasonable chance of getting into the Sam Maguire groups the following year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,805 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    That's a pretty fantastic piece of analysis. Especially the bit how how it would be better to have the 4 best placed league teams as second seeds rather than the provincial runners-up. I had to read it twice to 'get it' but now I understand it it would definitely be a good tweak.

    A quick question about home advantage for teams in the Last 12 and in the quarter-finals. Do you think this is a definite commitment or an aspiration to be cast aside if Westmeath v Mayo or Monaghan v Dublin become an L12 or L8 pairing. I fear we get the old 'all the players want to play in Croke Park when they get this far' or 'lets make sure as many fans as possible can see it' routines, and the home advantage becomes limited to just a few teams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    Its the other way round and the voting on both proposals backed that up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 909 ✭✭✭munsterdevil


    Your voting point would be relevant if those voting were players.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,115 ✭✭✭Boom__Boom



    I really can't see teams being forced to play in Croke Park given how much of an advantage playing at home is and the fact that it's central to the whole structure in terms of being the reward for finishing first in the group and finishing second over third.

    I reckon any county board who tried to get a team to do this would face a very real risk of a team downing tools/refusing to fulfill the fixture.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,784 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    And there is a precedent for this - #NewbridgeOrNowhere



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    IMO they should hang it on the coat tails of the AI. Have double headers for a lot of the games. Have a triple header on AI final day too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Does it matter what seed they'd be though?

    If London got to a provincial final, they'd be in the group with provincial winners, high league placed team.

    Whether they're seeded 2 or 4 doesn't make a difference as far as I can see?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,196 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    With this Ulster championship been so strong precedence is it a given the Tailteann Cup will be one by an Ulster team each time ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,805 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Doesn't make any difference for a Div4 team like London.

    It would have an effect if you look at it from the pov of say Tyrone being a provincial runner-up and also being in the Top 4 in the league. Whether they go into the 16 teams as a Provincial runner-up or as a team from the top tier of league teams has a wave effect on the composition of the groups. You still end up with the same 16 teams but sorted differently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,923 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    While largely welcoming the new structure, (anything is better than the current set up), it does give a greater chance for some Div 4 teams to qualify for the Sam #Groups by virtue of reaching a provincial final, eg the weaker team in Connacht where there is an open draw, you could have a situation where Leitrim/London/Sligo are on one side of the draw so one of them will get to play in the Sam group stages. The same 'easier' route is not open to the weaker teams in Leinster and Ulster. Not sure what the story is re open draw in Munster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 909 ✭✭✭munsterdevil


    I can see all provinces being seeded with the new championship structure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,516 ✭✭✭legendary.xix


    The GAA fully admit that the format voted in at the weekend will need a few tweaks here and there. The provincial winners being top seeds is perfect sense as is. Provincial winners should be rewarded with 2 home games. Seedings 2, 3 and 4 should be determined by league placing.

    Division 1 winners, Division 2 winners and the Tailteann Cup winners should also be rewarded with 2 home games. If the Division 3 winner also happens to qualify, they should be rewarded with 2 home games.

    Winners of Divisions 1, 2, 3 (if applicable) and Tailteann Cup should be placed in different groups. If their is a vacant spot for the reward of 2 home games, a Seed 2 team can take that by luck of the draw.

    The Preliminary quarter-finals are unnecessary bloating. The top 2 should go direct to the quarter-finals.

    Round 1: Team 1 at home versus Team [3 or 4] and Team 2 versus Team [3 or 4].

    Round 2: Round 1 winners against each other and Round 1 losers against each other. (Round 1 winners playing in Round 2 guarantees that the loser will have to win in Round 3.)

    Round 3: Both games throw in at the same time. At least one of the two games will not be a dead rubber and that can take all the media attention in the build up.

    The GAA have the framework of a good format. Let's enjoy the games! 🏐



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,196 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    The imbalance of the Munster and Leinster senior Hurling championships is irritating

    6 teams in Leinster with 2 of those been relatively weaker (Laois and Westmeath) but that still means more Championship games for the Leinster teams (5 games each) while the Munster Championship only has 5 teams (4 games) and is dog eat dog each weekend

    If Westmeath can go into Leinster, then why can't Kerry go into the Munster Championship giving both provincial Championships 6 teams



Advertisement