Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Changes in the GAA - super thread

194959799100109

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,536 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    You would assume that promoted teams would seed higher than relegated teams after that years league. Has this been confirmed?

    Winners of Division 2: 7th Seed

    Runner up of Division 2: 8th Seed

    Second from bottom division 1: 9th Seed

    Bottom of division 1: 10th Seed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,838 ✭✭✭Dr. Bre


    Laois manager wants penalties replaced with frees to decide games . I agree. I think 5 45s would be better than penalties



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,528 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Why? Players more tired, penalties allows more chance, goalie opportunity to save a shot as well as player potentially missing the shot.

    After extra time, players can often be running on empty so 45s that bit harder than penalties as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 909 ✭✭✭munsterdevil


    There’s also the fact that a very small minority of players can take 45s. Would be a ridiculous change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,160 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I don't think it's been clarified.

    But there are only 4 seeds in each group so you would not have ,7th seed, 8th seed etc.

    In the 2019 example Donegal and Meath came 1st and 2nd in Div 2.

    But they were seeded 1st and 2nd in their groups because one was a provincial champion and the other a provincial runner up.

    Mayo won the league but were a 3rd seed because they did not make a provincial final.

    In the 2019 example it was only at the bottom of Div 2 that you needed to ask the question, because the bottom of Div 1 and top of Div 2 had already got their seeding from the provincials.

    What I like about this is that it gives due recognition to Div 1 and Div 2 teams for being better teams than 3 and 4.

    A 3 or a 4 team can get into the Sam McGuire by getting to a provincial final, or by getting promoted and hoping that another Div 3 or 4 team does not make a provincial final the next year.

    I'm going to assume their will be some reward for winning the secondary competition also, like an automatic place in the last 16 of the Sam McGuire the next year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,419 ✭✭✭✭km79


    It’s a more bloated version of the awful super 8s?

    More games . More dead rubbers . More hammerings ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,784 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    Don't think there would be more dead rubbers - they are playing for the top 3 - I also wouldn't let the "dead rubber" tail wag the "better championship" dog



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,100 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Off topic post here, but does the Connacht GAA Air Dome have WiFi there? Bringing iPad today and would need it (alternative is phone’s hotspot)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,160 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Yes having 3 qualify from 4 leads to less dead rubbers instead of more.

    That third place will probably always be up for grabs.

    However in an article on the RTE website about it today they mentioned that that might be an subject of tweaking, as there is very little jeopardy when 3 of 4 can make it out of the group.

    It might end up with just the first two.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,565 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I think every round of a championship where possible should eliminate 50%. All we are getting with this new green option is a bloated super 8s with a confusing qualification process that will put people off. If they are mad to keep provincials just have them be the round robin like hurling



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,160 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    But you can't do to the football provincials what was done to the hurling ones.

    The hurling provincials and thus the hurling championship have already been reformed.

    They have already had their equivalent of Proposal A, B, Green and Red, and what we have now is the outcome of that.

    The Munster and Leinster championships are good and exciting and competitive, but that's only because Galway are in Leinster and the weakest counties in each (Kerry, Carlow etc) are excluded unless they win the secondary competition.

    And even then Kerry are moved into Leinster, rather than their geographical home of Munster.

    So the hurling championship has already made it's reforms to improve it, and fair play to them for doing so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Water breaks to be scrapped this week! Happy days! A joke of a thing to begin with. Copying it purely from the premier league because they restarted their league in the middle of summer when they don't usually play. That's why they brought in water breaks.

    Laughed at the time a manager on tv took a shwig out of a bottle and then threw it onto one of the players anyways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,528 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    It wasnt why they were brought in but good theyre gone now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    In the UK it was brought in due to higher temps the players wouldn't be used to after not being in action for so long.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,565 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It was because they were worried about fitness levels with the interupted training among other things.

    Glad it's gone though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,923 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    I dont think its a great system tbh but its pretty clear how it works, i fail to see where the confusion might arise?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,923 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    I thought it was due to covd regs so each player had their own personal water bottle etc? As opposed to just throwing them on to the pitch?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,565 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Linking it to the league will be confusing and unpopular with fans who aren't forum nerds like ourselves. Also stuff like Limerick (or whoever) are in TC unless they win Munster then they are in Sam and who the fk knows is in TC.

    Having 2 seeding paths is through a linked league is just stupid anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,923 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    Ah ok yeah, i thought you meant the confusion was around how teams would qualify from the actual groups



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,160 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Limerick (or whoever) are in the Sam McGuire Cup of they get to a Munster (or whatever) final, they don't have to win it.

    In two of the past three years Cork and Kerry have been drawn against each other in the Munster SF, thus making the path to the final easier for the others.

    Plus the teams that get to the Munster final get a bye into the semi final the next year.

    So if Limerick were to make it to a final, they would only be one game away from the final the next year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,565 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    So who goes into the TC instead of them ?

    The lowest placed division 2 side I assume.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,806 ✭✭✭An Ciarraioch


    Yes - after the eight provincial finalists are decided, the eight highest placed League teams who didn't make a final qualify for Sam Maguire - most will be from Divisions 1 and 2, but in the above scenario, Limerick will jump the queue, and knock a D2 team into the Tailteann Cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,923 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    Actually the more i think about it, the more i like this proposal, it ticks a lot of boxes, keeps the prov championships, (which i disagree with but have to be realistic, they aint going anywhere for a while yet), gives every team a shot at the Sam, and a meaningful champions league style competition for the weaker teams along of course with the stronger teams, and gives added incentive to do well in the league. Id really prefer to see three tiers but it can be tweaked in future years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,741 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Probably a bit of anti soccer in that nonsense



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,565 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    So fans of division 2 sides are going to have to keep a keen eye on the league and an eye on all 4 provincial championships to know what tournament they will be in.

    Personally I would be doing that anyway and most on here probably the same but its gonna turn a lot of fans away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,160 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Surely that would make it more interesting and intriguing than less ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,923 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    How go you mean 'turn them away'? Its hardly rocket science in fairness, teams will do as best they can in the league and if they are in the bottom 2 or 3 then they may be sweating a while, its no big deal



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,565 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Most people filling the seats come championship are casual fans who let's say in a place like Limerick or Cork have been following rugby, soccer and hurling all year too. It's a lot to keep track of and convoluted systems turn people off.

    It's similar this year with the Champions cup system in rugby or the awful conference crap they Americans do. You han hear people switch off or get disinterested any time you try talk about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,528 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    It isnt that difficult to follow though. especially this example of a format.

    The champions cup format this season again isnt that difficult to follow. 2 groups of 12. teams seeded in 4 levels and you play home and away against 2 teams at other levels who are not from your league.

    and the US system of conferences isnt awful at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,565 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    If you like the US system Ican see why you dont have a problem with the rest. I think teams in a league who dont pay each other is a load of sht. Champions League is going that way too and the average fan or pundit aint happy. Cup tournaments should be simple formats with small groups and straight knockout. No shte of needing to check over and back all the time across finished leagues and other provinces to see where you are.

    The Championship needed changing but this wasnt it. Cant see it lasting and my suspicion is the implementers know this and further changes await.



Advertisement