This whole cancel culture myth

what about this one?

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/22/arts/design/sfmoma-gary-garrels-resignation.html

Those of a conservative nature, can you stop being outraged at liberals for a second and answer Medhi's question here?

Could start a thread of its own accord as to whether the attempts to prevent CRT type content being taught in schools is cancel culture or not. I'm guessing Greg and others would say definitely not.

What version of reality have you been looking at?

The right literally want to stop access to abortion full stop,, they want to stop more accurate teaching of history, they want to ignore climate change, many of them still would like to restrict access to marriage for same sex couples, they want the market to set the rules for society, they want to give more money to police than they do to social care or mental health or education programs, they think people should go in to debt to access life saving healthcare and they react to requests for a conversation about gun control by telling people they can take the guns from their cold dead hands?

What conversations do those on the left not want to have?

Edited to add. Just saw the posts you just put on another thread in response to someone asking for a specific service. You've some neck on you to talk about the Left having no intention of having a conversation about anything and to come out with posts like that. It's the 'accuse others of that which you are guilty' conservative mantra 101 that we see time and time again isn't it.

It must be exhausting for some folk to be afraid of this mythical “left menace” all the time. Terrified some blue haired enby will jump out from under the bed and force them to kiss a guy.

Probably more afraid they’ll like it.

Who do you think should be given airtime to counter Paul Murphy and PBP in your view? Be specific please.

What constitutes endless coverage of DP stories? Again, be specific, there's certainly occasional stories, but you used the phrase endless.

Frequently on here it is said that RTE are only mouthpieces for the government, if that were the case, don't you think that they would be more than capable of countering any narrative about DP being an unpleasant situation? Even if it wasn't on RTE, the government are still more than capable of putting it out there that such stories are exaggerating if not outright false.

RTE nor anyone outside of the asylum application authorities have any right to judge someone's claim as being false. On what basis do you think they are entitled to do so?

In terms of Paul Murphy's airtime, I think he would argue that he is pushing against the tide in terms of the volume of contributors, commentators, journalists in the media that give tacit agreement to things carrying on as normal. There's no shortage of articles talking about the benefits of corporate investment for example. If he is so impactful, why then is he still talking about the same issues without having seen significant, if indeed any change with respect to them over the years. It would seem to me, that the likes of David Quinn is as frequent a commentator on Irish media as Paul Murphy and he has zero electoral justification for being there.

I'd wager the reason he isn't elected is probably because his views aren't as generally accepted as Murphy's are.

They are as much as anyone else on here.

Or who do you think should be?

So socialist and communists are the same thing are they?

Do you think conservatives and fascists are one and the same?

How about this one lads?

Is this cancel culture?

Whats going on here?

Conservative mouthpieces calling for someone to be fired for something they said?

I've heard there's a word for this type of behaviour, can't think of what it is though. Anyone got any ideas?

I think everyone should be treated ...equally.

...so what's going on here?

Probably because Goldbergs employers believed her apology whereas the others didn't.

Thinks don't always happen exactly the same. There's a lot of variables involved. No doubt they looked at a lot of factors, Kelly was on a massive contract and ratings weren't good and so they probably took an opportunity to escape that. What do you think?

Bear on mind this is the supposed party of Law and Order.

This is how they are going after people who don't tow the line in favour of Trump.

If this isn't cancel culture, what is it? Do any of the conservatives who post here want to explain what exactly it is?

Incredible/worrying/dangerous that while all this is going on, Conservative commentators ignore it and get angry because Minnie Mouse changed her dress or whatever item that has been chosen to distract and enrage their audience.

Neil is of an age where he probably spent a good portion of the last 2 years knowing that if he caught Covid the impact could be the worst. And the same goes for many of the people who have been fans of his throughout his life. He also suffered from polio as a child so is accutely aware of the impact of vaccine development and administration.

Joe Rogan actively told a cohort of his listeners to not get the vaccine without any logical basis for doing so.

Looks to me that the person here who is more consciousness with respect to caring for his fans is most definitely not Joe Rogan.