Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

United Ireland Poll - please vote

1119120122124125132

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Oh great, more buzz words and soundbites. Your go-to card.

    Tell me, do you have any original ideas of your own apart from the idiotic ahistorical version of the truth you keep in your head?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The is one central government in the UK though and that is Westminister who rules at the behest of the head of state, the Queen.

    Ireland never had a central government, indeed the first central government Ireland had was the parliament of Ireland.


    If anyone can point to something similar that existed before this, work away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    You are using the Queen, and British as a standard? Raise the bar.

    You are using a criteria set by others to decide what is and isn't a country. The days of empires plundering regions they feel are up for grabs are over. The world grew a conscience, for the most part.

    It's an island. It's always been a land unto itself. We don't need some arsehole to vet our existence. What the hell is Ulster? Do you recognise Ulster? I don't hear any other British apologists claiming Ulster was never really a province anyway. Can you find the paperwork for Ulster? When was it invented? You are trying pedantry with biased political terminology. Cop on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,318 ✭✭✭✭Ha Long Bay




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    What 'name' did I call you?

    I didnt....

    But I did call out your lack of comprehension on the topic at hand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    So, no... you cannot find me an example of some sort of central government or state or empire or anything that existed before the Parliament of Ireland......

    Its OK to admit you are wrong Bruice, in fact your last few dozen posts on this topic, is an example where you can almost fill a book on the wrongness of the topic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Oh and Britain is an Island.... so I guess there should be only one government for that island?

    The Scots won't be happy with that. ROFL :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,685 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    Speaking of islands. The majority people of Ireland want a UI. The majority of people on the Island of Britain want or don't care if there is a UI. It is the natural progression that there will be a UI. The gerrymandering of the Irish nation into two jurisdictions is going against what the majority of people of these islands want so it is more a question of when rather than if.


    I also think when we talk about a UI we look to much to the politics of Ireland and not what is going on across the water on Britain.


    Scotland leaving the UK would probably see the end of the union. Where would this leave the North? Obviously back to a UI.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The majority of people on the island of Britain want Scotland to remain part of the UK.... just saying. ;)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    @droidman123

    "The united kingdom has 4 governments, so by your logic its not actually the "united" kingdom at all"

    Oh Dear!

    Most people have the intelligence to understand the nature of these "governments" and are educated enough to know the extent of the powers of 3 of the Assemblies

    Westminster, House of Commons and Lords - is the GOVERNMENT OF THE UK and NOT merely the government of England as a lot of morons clearly assume

    Westminster, ultimately have supremacy over the laws and legislative process of Northern Ireland , Scotland and Wales. The later is a talking shop . The judicial system based in England also has final say in matters concerning the the Courts of NI and Scotland and Wales (which is part of the England and Wales jurisdiction)

    Notice how abortion got extended in NI and gay marriage was legalised? Stormont did not vote that in. London's Parliament did !

    The said "governments" outside of London are glorified County Councils, but with extra powers. The Privy Council in London keeps manners on them

    The NI , Welsh and Scottish "governments" have little to no say in the following areas , which are a matter for the UK Parliament

    Go back to cough, school, cough



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭droidman123


    First of all i am not a moron.you have taken my post out of context (partly my fault because the post i was replying to didnt join up) i was replying to blanch who was replying to end of the road,who said there were different kings ruling ireland but the country was united,blanch proceeded to say his post was ridiculous and it admitted that the country wasnt united(that was the general jist of the conversation)



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    @ittakestwo

    "Speaking of islands. The majority people of Ireland want a UI. The majority of people on the Island of Britain want or don't care if there is a UI. It is the natural progression that there will be a UI. The gerrymandering of the Irish nation into two jurisdictions is going against what the majority of people of these islands want so it is more a question of when rather than if.

    I also think when we talk about a UI we look to much to the politics of Ireland and not what is going on across the water on Britain.

    Scotland leaving the UK would probably see the end of the union. Where would this leave the North? Obviously back to a UI."

    I think you shall find , after 200 plus pages that most of the talk is based on , primarily simplistic and inaccurate waffling about historical events (people can not even get the bloody basics right - and yes, it matters! ) before 1916 and events between 1916-early 2000s (covering the Troubles) It is no different with most threads regarding this title on any forum .

    We are as bad as the public and TDs of 1921-1922 who focused on lesser important matters contained in the Treaty (Oath to the Crown, which turned out to be not as bad in the wording)

    We'd do well, in the South, to go up to the North and properly understand the issues up there. It is well accepted that England doesn't really care about the North; but England , Scotland and Wales are stuck with the North so long as Unionists remain a majority in the North - however slight that majority is.

    Gerrymander? (It happened, yes, but your claims are total bullshit when looking at today)

    In the 1918 Elections, in the 9 counties of Ulster, Unionists won 23 out of the 38 seats with Sinn Féin gaining ten and the Irish Parliamentary Party five. Bear in Mind Shinners needed at least 3 individuals to run and win seats despite holding seats in the South . The Entire County of Derry , bar the city, returned Unionists. The Countiesof Tyrone and Fermanagh and Armagh were split into two parts, with a Unionist being returned in Tyrone and Fermanagh and Armagh along with Nationalists and SF . The most popopulous areas of the 6 counties, outside Derry City , were more by Unionists, easily. IPP were the only ones to win a seat in the small enclave in Belfast

    Note so long ago, in 2015, a Unionist won the Westminster seat for Fermanagh - South Tyrone (and lost it to SF 2 years later)

    In recent times, Places like Newry & Armagh (Deep South Armagh Ra boys) and Fermanagh/ South Tryone can still return DUP (Sharelene Foster) AND Ulster Unionist party (Elliott / Mcginnis) lads to the Assembly . Unionists like Foster have even topped the polls! West Tyrone (Omagh and Stabane areas) have seen DUP guys top the polls with ease despite being Nationalist / Catholic areas

    So even in staunch Republican and Nationalist areas, Unionists still have a strong presence . Until the last Westminster election (John Finuance outstanding win in North Belfast ) same couldn't have been said for modern SF and SDLP lads in Unionists heartlands

    By the way, the MAJORITY of the people in Northern Ireland voted to STAY IN THE NI during a referendum in the mid 1970s .

    The current polls also CLEARLY show that Southerners are in no rush to realise a United Ireland !

    The Scots are too cowardly to leave the UK and what NI Unionists do will not be influenced by what the Scots did



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,297 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The majority of people of Ireland don't want a united Ireland, in fact they voted for the GFA in which the people of Ireland accepted the partition of the island. A veto on changing this was given to the North.

    Furthermore, even if we have a majority of this island wanting a united Ireland, it can never be put in place unless a majority of the six counties wants it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    @Brucie Bonus

    "You are using the Queen, and British as a standard? Raise the bar.

    You are using a criteria set by others to decide what is and isn't a country. The days of empires plundering regions they feel are up for grabs are over. The world grew a conscience, for the most part.

    It's an island. It's always been a land unto itself. We don't need some arsehole to vet our existence. What the hell is Ulster? Do you recognise Ulster? I don't hear any other British apologists claiming Ulster was never really a province anyway. Can you find the paperwork for Ulster? When was it invented? You are trying pedantry with biased political terminology. Cop on."

    1. "It's an island. It's always been a land unto itself."

    Has it? Funny, the British, and specifically the English have had control of the place since the days of Strongbow and really made sure that they were the Daddy since Cromwell, despite the odd period of Ireland having a talking shop . Moreover, at NO TIME was the area known as the 6 counties remotely at one with the rest of the island in terms of politics, business, trade, industry, and culture.

    " 2 . The days of empires plundering regions they feel are up for grabs are over. The world grew a conscience, for the most part."

    AND .............stood idly by and did nothing . Actually they joined in . America plundering the Middle East and South America ; Russia acting the bollox around ex Soviet States like Georgia and Ukraine; Europe literally doing **** all in Yugoslavia in the 1990s. Wise up !

    3 "We don't need some arsehole to vet our existence"

    When Ireland looked to Independence and Recognition, Irish TD's went to great lengths to seek International recognition by going to the Paris Peace Conference and touring America. During the Troubles, Irish diplomats camped outside the UN HQ and European Courts of Human Rights in order to get the world to see for itself what was going on in the North .

    We very much need the world to recognise Ireland's rights to the North . While there was precedent from previous Anglo Irish Treaties and Agreements and the good work of John Major, I doubt GFA would have been the success that it was without the help from the US and from the EU

    4 "You are using the Queen, and British as a standard? Raise the bar" .

    The Standard Criteria as to what is or is not a country was used. Try Bunreacht na hÉireann for the source ffs.

    You stupidly implied that Fianna Fail and Fine Gael, political parties that have enjoyed great success at elections, as THE STATE. You then started blabbing on about what differences there were because said parties have enjoyed public support for so long and some horse manure about the Gardaí turning a blind eye to mass graves (They can not do a lot when the public won't come to them about it ) .

    5 What the hell is Ulster?

    Give that question a little bit of thought, surely even you are capable of that?

    It is the name of a historical province in northern territory of the island of Ireland. Known , in the Irish language as  Ulaidh, which itself was once a confederation of dynastic groups in Antrim and Down, on the east coast (Northern Uí Neill ruled area known as Derry , Tyrone , Fermanagh)

    It is a 9 county province, with the majority (62%) of the population based in the Six counties that are now in Northern Ireland. So while it seems inaccurate to refer NI as Ulster, technically, Ulster or Ulaidh was ALWAYS within the 6 counties as they used the term first.

    6 . I don't hear any other British apologists claiming Ulster was never really a province anyway.

    No body has ever made such a claim or implied it. Your comprehension issues are getting rather tiresome .

    7 Can you find the paperwork for Ulster? When was it invented? You are trying pedantry with biased political terminology. Cop on." 

    Did you actually ever go to school? I am certain that your knowledge of the history of Ireland is weak. I wonder do you even understand what you are saying ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,685 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    Not true. In the south 67% favour a UI and just 16% against. 5 million live in the south. So out of the 7 million people in Ireland yes the majority do want UI. Are you going to waste posts arguing with this?


    How can you infer that someone voting for the GFA means they don't want a UI when the GFA implicitly directs how a UI will happen in the future? I was not old enough to vote for the GFA but would have and still would yet I am in favour of a UI.


    You keep saying the GFA gives the North a veto. The North and South both need to want a UI for it to happen. They are in a complete reciprocal relationship regarding a UI regarding the GFA yet you always come out with "The GFA gives NI a veto" or "The GFA means it is only up to the people of NI to decide their destiny" you could switch NI for ROI in these sentences, and it would still have the same meaning.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Didn't look chief. You'd rather be childish than answer my questions about Ulster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,685 ✭✭✭ittakestwo





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    First off, we all attended history class when we were 11 and 12.

    Secondly, you say they 'controlled'. Controlled what?

    Where did the Norman's invade?

    Its a silly debate. End of the day a section of Ulster is occupied.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,297 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    When was that referendum held for the 67%?

    Are you disputing the statement that NI has a veto? It doesn't seem like you are, so I don't understand your point. As is clear to anyone, it doesn't matter how many people in the South want a united Ireland, be that 1% or 100%, if the North votes no. That means NI has a veto.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    And it was always Britain? You can't claim one thing and then switch my friend. The Scots won't be happy. lmao and so on.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,685 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    Opinion polls as you know there has not been a referendum yet.


    I am not disputing that the south or north has a veto in a UI. You seem to think it is just the North?

    Can you confirm that you acknowledge that the GFA treats the south and north exactly the same regarding a UI?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,685 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    So majority of British want Scotland to remain but don't care for the North. Shows how more removed the North is from the British while the majority of Irish want a UI. Shows a UI it is the natural progression given the attitudes of the people of these islands.



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    @ittakestwo

    "Not true. In the south 67% favour a UI and just 16% against. 5 million live in the south. So out of the 7 million people in Ireland yes the majority do want UI. Are you going to waste posts arguing with this?

    How can you infer that someone voting for the GFA means they don't want a UI when the GFA implicitly directs how a UI will happen in the future? I was not old enough to vote for the GFA but would have and still would yet I am in favour of a UI.

    You keep saying the GFA gives the North a veto. The North and South both need to want a UI for it to happen. They are in a complete reciprocal relationship regarding a UI regarding the GFA yet you always come out with "The GFA gives NI a veto" or "The GFA means it is only up to the people of NI to decide their destiny" you could switch NI for ROI in these sentences, and it would still have the same meaning."

    The South can have 10 million, and all of them could want a UI tomorrow, it will mean nothing if the majority in the 6 counties vote to stay in the UK or refuse to hold a referendum. If NI vote, then the South will hold their own referendum. Polls don't make things official. Voting in Referendums do.

    Two of the main elements of GFA were :

    • the acknowledgment that the majority of the people of Northern Ireland wished to remain a part of the United Kingdom; and
    • that an outline of the possibility in the future where a majority of the people of Northern Ireland, and the majority of the people the rest of the island (thus, an overall All island majority) , wished to bring about a united Ireland.

    So, Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom now and in the future , and would remain so until a majority of the people both of Northern Ireland and of the Republic of Ireland wished otherwise

    At this time, there is nothing close to a majority in the 6 counties for a UI .

    "How can you infer that someone voting for the GFA means they don't want a UI when the GFA implicitly directs how a UI will happen in the future?

    Nothing in GFA , in relation to potential unification, is any different to previous Treaties on this matter.

    The Ulster Unionist Party, the bastion of Unionism , historically, were happy to sign up to GFA, knowing damn well that the potential of a UI would be decades away, if it ever happened . They voted for what was already on paper since Sunningdale and Anglo Irish and Downing Street Agreements

    Today, Parliament still acts on the sectarian divide , and not like other parliaments ; It barely sits; Belfast is still physically divided

    The British at the time had an interesting observation of the Republicans and Unionists.

    To them, the Republicans lost their claim of a 32 County Republic and admit that the IRA could never beat the British and to put down their weapons ; yet they spun it to the world that they won the argument - They spun it to say that you can now be an Irish Citizen as of birth (prior to that if you were born in NI , unless your parent was born in the South, Irish Citizenship was not automatic , you had to do a few procedures first. For the first time, Republicans had to official acknowledge that NI was part of the UK.

    To the British, the Unionists won- they defeated the IRA (who failed in their mission). The concessions on citizenship and power sharing were small sacrifices for the fast the NI remained within UK and remained British. Unionist sold GFA as if they lost everything.

    Over the years, many people were happy to say they want a United Ireland. However, when they got asked would they want it now, they often said , "ah in 10 years maybe". When the South recognize the costs and don't buy into the bullshit comparison about Germany, lets see how quick they will be so up for a UI.

    "You keep saying the GFA gives the North a veto. The North and South both need to want a UI for it to happen. "

    True, but the South won't hold an can note really a vote before the North, so............... its effectively a veto . All that is required is for Unionists, you remain the biggest community , to come out and vote NO.

    ""The GFA means it is only up to the people of NI to decide their destiny" you could switch NI for ROI in these sentences, and it would still have the same meaning."

    LOL. You have clearly never had the misfortune of meeting a Unionist. Southerners have to thread carefully when they " interfere" in Northern issues. (Contrary to what Unionists thought about Irish commenting on Brexit and NIP - Ireland has a right under GFA to be consulted by the UK Parliament)

    For obvious practical reasons , NI would have to hold a vote first. Southerners holding a vote first , is a waste of time. NI are the ones less likely to agree to joining. They are the ones that need more convincing . It really would not have the same meaning.

    To Unionists, agreeing to join the Republic, and leaving the UK, it totally removes their identity of being British ie part of Britain. Sure they can keep their British passports but that will mean **** all when their (new) National anthem is not and can never be God Save the Queen and we aren't going to tolerate them burning our "flegs" during the Sectarian Hate weekend in July.



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    @Brucie Bonus

    "First off, we all attended history class when we were 11 and 12.

    Secondly, you say they 'controlled'. Controlled what?

    Where did the Norman's invade?

    Its a silly debate. End of the day a section of Ulster is occupied."

    Being present inside the classroom while history lessons were dished out , just to stay out of the cold, is not the same as attending said classes. ! You evidentially were part of that mob, based on the substantiated and undefendable rubbish that you spouted.

    Secondly, 11 -12 is sixth class Primary School. Unless you had a brilliant Primary School teacher, history lessons were simplistic and barely touch on these complex issues, least not the school texts !

    Re Control - I said

    ", the British, and specifically the English have had control of the place since the days of Strongbow and really made sure that they were the Daddy since Cromwell,"

    Lands and ownership of same ; the laws - creation of the feudal system and the creation of the Common law system and later the Courts of Equity ; taxes, trade, ability to physically ship goods in and out of the land

    Started in towns like Dublin , Waterford and then moved in land and established new towns (eg Roscommon Town , Sligo ,Galway,Carrickfergus ) in the midlands and West and alter Ulster , or expanded already existing towns (Athlone & Rindoon) with town walls and forts and castles etc.

    "Where did the Norman's invade?

    Go back to school!

    "Its a silly debate. End of the day a section of Ulster is occupied." "

    No, there is nothing silly about a debate on a United Ireland. People like YOU make it silly and hijack it with totally retardation and complete disinterest in learning basic facts that you sorely miss. That or you like trolling and have no desire to discuss this

    You throw out a bomb of nonsense, then run away , refusing to address the successful counter claim

    Ulster was always "occupied", the majority of the people in the majority of the counties in Ulster , still prefer to remain British. Let us focus on that and whether this can change

    200 odd pages, about 5 have seriously addressed the island , today and tomorrow. Instead, preferring to have ignorant people expose their ignorance on the history of the island



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,685 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    So yes we agree, from a legal point, the south and north are treated the same regarding the GFA. Both need majority to bring a UI and are both in a reciprocal relationship regarding a UI from the legal position. Agreed?


    BTW what treaty was there before the GFA that dealt with how a UI would happen?



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack



    First, GFA is key because it was the First time that the Irish State, acknowledged its stake in NI and changed the Constitution accordingly. However, the Constitutional interpretation of old Article 2 and 3 can be found in the Supreme Court case of McGimpsey - where it was said that both articles were not a claim of ownership, but aspirational.

    Sunningdale - It brought power share . It followed previous Act of Government Act 1920 with the COuncil of Ireland (Unionists say that as a step to UI) (GFA had that too) Much of Sunningdale is contained in GFA - Hence, Sunningdale for the low learners

    Anglo Irish Agreement 1985 - Gave Ireland some powers to be consulted and confirmed that there would be no change in the constitutional position of Northern Ireland unless a majority of its people agreed to join the Republic. It also set out conditions for the establishment of a devolved consensus government in the region.

    Downing Street Declaration 1993 - This declaration affirmed both the right of the people of Ireland to self-determination, and that Northern Ireland would be transferred to the Republic of Ireland from the United Kingdom only if a majority of its population was in favour of such a move

    Allow agreed that UI could only come about by peaceful means.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    You seem incapable of being calm or civil.

    This level of rabid debate is beneath me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Yes. Before the GFA we'd a claim, but now we've an agreed by both sides path.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭droidman123


    And once again with the insults



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    @Brucie Bonus

    "Yes. Before the GFA we'd a claim, but now we've an agreed by both sides path"


    Wrong AGAIN - Legal Claims are all that matter. Political claims are not strong enough

    It (Article 2 and 3 of Bunreacht na hÉireann ) was aspirational and no more. The Constitution must be read as a whole , with the other articles. See Mc Gimpsey v Ireland Supreme Court 1990 https://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/1990/3.html https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5da027284653d058440f9356



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    Very calm and very civil. Generous and patient. Far more than your are worthy of or deserve.



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    What insults? Facts are not insults , especially proven facts .

    Stop hijacking the thread with stupidity . Come here with informed and relevant views

    People who are out of their depth on these topics and come on here in the tone that they do, have no reason to feel "insulted " if you are made to feel foolish and get owned in a counter argument. That is on them.

    Jesus, lads, people seem too easily insulted no a days . Man up and grow up

    Fail to prepare, prepare to fail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,139 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    i have to agree.

    essentially that poster has had their arguments debunked and are unable to deal with that reality so are being uncivil.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,538 ✭✭✭droidman123


    "Stop hijacking the thread with stupidity" take deep breaths and calm down,you will get your points across more clearly if you leave out the insults 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,139 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    your part facts are not so relevant to the conversation as you think however, and they are separate to the actual reality of the situation, i say part facts because you are changing the facts partly to suit your particular viewpoint which is exclusionary.

    you are out of your depth hence the abuse and aggression from yourself because you have had what you posted counteracted as it's not as major to the discussion as you think.

    not to mention the bit of re-writing of history to suit exclusionary partitionism.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,685 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    And are you also in agreement that the GFA does not treat the north different to the south regarding that they both need a majority for a UI.


    If you interrupt the GFA as giving the north a veto then you would also have to interrupt it as giving the south a veto as both the north and south, by the law of the GFA are in a reciprocal relationship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,297 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    "There has been enormous growth in the number of young people who describe themselves as Northern Irish; young people have grown up with the surge of hope generated by the Good Friday Agreement and tend to identify with this state, while having a secondary identity of being either Irish or British."

    Despite all of the denial on here, the spectre of the third identity in Northern Ireland continues to grow.

    Interesting also to note that the nationalist parties are still stuck on 36% in Northern Ireland. It will be very much a hollow victory if Michelle O'Neill manages to become First Minister with political support only in the mid-20s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    'Despite all the alleged denial, here's a man's opinion that I agree with'.

    Somebody needs to take their own advice and stop associating a UI with a Sinn Fein obsession.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Well at least some of us are not traitors to the Republic of Ireland and denying that the Treaty is null and void because of some fantastical notions in our heads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,139 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    it is not growing at all, that is just a myth.

    it's along the lines of irish people identifying as european, they are irish first, and in northern ireland they are either irish or british first.

    there is no third identity ultimately, the choices on a UI vote will be reunification or the status quo.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Did you even read the article because it literally contradicts your entire post.

    It seems to be a habit of yours in fairness EOTR, weighing in without even realising what you are writing.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,450 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    NI has PR for the MLA elections so you wouldn't be working off FPTP numbers.

    In a United Ireland there would be an extra 65 TD's just going by the numbers. You could start with the existing 18 Westminster constituencies to give you 11 of 4 seats and 7 with 3 seats.

    There's currently 90 MLA's and another 18 MP's so 108 chasing 65 seats. The Senate has 60 members from various panels. So 21/22 new senators. Perhaps a Unionist panel ? The university panel already needs opening up to other third levels. Though half of these seats were from a Protestant Uni for half the history of the state.

    If there is a federal solution then it can't be NI as it exists today as a narrow majority state as that be unfair to the minority. Though the election in May should focus minds on which would be which. And could it even be imagined that the DUP demand a federal system and then lose control of it and not have the calming influence of the 26 other counties because federal system ?


    Given the parish pump nature of our politics and groups from NI being kingmakers may work in practice better than an artificial construct.

    Let's not forget the biggest group in NI are the people that aren't in either tribe and think the economy is more important than some flegs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,297 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Argue with the author, not with me. There has been repeated evidence presented from numerous credible sources concerning the emergence of a third identity. Denying it is becoming increasingly difficult.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,632 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    The truth lies somewhere in the middle of your two positions.

    There is certainly a growing number of people identifying as Northern Irish, though it doesn't correlate with an abandonment of British or Irish identities to anywhere near the extent you like to imply, nor does it correlate in any way with support for any of the 'third solution' proposals you've come up with, the vast majority still support the GFA, there still hasn't been a flicker of support for NI Independence among that cohort.

    That being said, the post you're responding to is quite foolish. I don't recall very many people referring to themselves as Northern Irish twenty years ago.....I know plenty who do now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,297 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I haven't been suggesting that British or Irish identities are being abandoned.

    The way I see it is that this third identity sees Northern Irish as being their primary identity, with their other identities being secondary to a greater or lesser extent. As a result, the current status quo currently suits their particular worldview with autonomy for Northern Ireland within the UK being an acceptable position. Any move towards the elimination of devolution would be viewed with suspicion and resistance, similarly, moves towards a single unitary state on this island would have similar suspicions and resistance, as either of those options lessen the strength of the Northern Irish identity.

    One of the characteristics of this identity is respect for their multi-faceted heritage which means they won't want to offend either side. As such, you are correct that at this point in time it doesn't point towards support for any of the "third solutions". However, in the event that the size of the Northern Irish identity grows and its self-confidence increases, that questions is open and ideas for the third solution will come on the table. Furthermore, events will play a part too. If support for a united Ireland also grows, this section of society will be needed to come on board. They won't want a unitary state, so a majority for that seems ever unlikely, but they could be open to other forms including a federal state.

    That is why I have mentioned a number of possible third solutions. Remember, the current status quo is a third solution, so the next step is unlikely to be a unitary state or integration into the UK, it is likely to be another third solution.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    A load of waffle. The moment 'northern Irish' becomes a vehicle for partitionists' and unionists' desire to prevent this country seeing out its vision then it will be eschewed by those from a nationalist background. Keep going though, every horse you back falls flat on its face.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    The 'third solution' fantasy is the last desperate hope of the partitionist view.

    Its an opinion piece based on another person's opinion. Hardly fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,632 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    But in Blanch's defense, the, 'there's no such thing as a Northern Irish identity' fantasy is just as desperate a hope from the extremes of hardline Republicanism and Loyalism.

    The future is in the hands of the moderates; fortunately for me as a Republican there is very little being offered to moderates by Unionism. Given what has been going on with a supposed liberal Unionist like Doug Beatty the last few days (and I have plenty of time for Doug), one can only imagine the privately expressed views of self-avowedly hardline Loyalist types like the DUP and TUV.


    The future may certainly be changeable, but the Norn Irish identifying middle class woke sympathising crowd sure as sh*t aren't going to suddenly start voting DUP/TUV in their masses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I find its more to do with protectionism than religion or society or allegiances. The hard-core unionists don't want to lose more power by having to deal with more equality. Nationalists IMO are happy to take equality for a UI. Unionists won't even give on recognising the Irish language. Had they treated other communities fairly we'd have had no troubles/conflict.

    As for the south, same thing as the unionists. FG/FF don't want the possibility of losing out in such a changing political landscape. Even the partition inclined can't help joining a UI to SF. Thats the fear, when in reality a UI is bigger than any one party and certainly SF. Be nice if FG and FF got behind a UI instead of having their retiring politicians lament it for cred after doing nothing for it.

    I agree, who ever wins over the moderates will win the day. Same with every election down south.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement