Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Do men need a license to be allowed socialise (MOD NOTE IN OP)

1232426282955

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,566 ✭✭✭zv2


    Bringing in talk about pay equality and wolf whistling is making it seem like all men are murderers; you got more money than her? MURDERER!

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Posts: 10,222 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    **** sake. its misogynistic to think that most women would be happy if george clooney gave them an unsolicited compliment and would be unhappy if an ugly balding tracksuit wearing man did the same?

    That's misogyny?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,928 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    How do you expect everyone to step up?

    Did you read the post by @sekiro a few posts back? The type that are liable to engage in anti social behaviour are the type liable to turn their attention to some interfering busybody as they see it.

    Unless you can, with absolute certainty, incapacitate someone instantaneously you are putting yourself at significant risk. If you do incapacitate someone instantaneously it is likely to be seen as use of excessive force.

    Intervening could could result in your own death, life altering or serious injuries or a criminal or civil case against you. You can't just politely appeal to some people's better nature - they've already shown their willingnes to cause harm - how should someone step up?



  • Posts: 16,208 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Besides the fact that you never really know what's going on. It could be a fight between a boyfriend/girlfriend, with the GF easily siding with the BF when you involve yourself. I've known women who actively defended their abusive boyfriends, even when others were trying to help them.

    Interfering in other peoples affairs/problems always carries a wide range of risks. That needs to be recognised.. rather than this utterly retarded notion that men should always involve themselves to help women.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,454 ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    A friend of mine got a stiletto in the back of the head one night for being a white knight defending a girl who had just been punched in the face by her scummy bf. I would approach these situations with extreme caution.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,557 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No man with any cop on thinks nice tits would be a complement. Even the tone of voice would be demeaning

    Big difference between that and a genuine complement which a man may make in a respect ful way and tone

    Certain people trying to use Ashling RIP to make their arguments. Disgusting the way the media won't give privacy.wouldnt watch any news reports about it.

    Did someone say rthe president was there? Guess his pr dept told him it would look good



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Between lived experience and stories from my former taxi-driver dad I won't be inserting myself into anyone else's ****. Probably mentioned it already on thread but I did it once and it was ok, but that was with drink on board. I'll get out of sight and call the Gardai and hope it's a rare time they do their jobs properly just in case it turns more serious. My first loyalty is to myself and my family, not a random stranger who's as likely (if not more) to attack me rather than thank me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,112 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    If only there were people who could 'police' situations that could get out of hand, fully trained and with the backing of the law, that you could call and they would actually show up.

    Hmm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,928 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    A potentially fatal or life altering injury. I doubt he got any thanks for his concern.

    It's not just the perceived aggressor that has to be contained but the entire situation. If you aren't certain you can contain the entire situation you should think hard about getting involved.

    Even gardaí, better trained, better equipped and more experienced in dealing with situations, would want to be able to contain both when intervening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 984 ✭✭✭Still stihl waters 3


    The sad thing is this day next week aisling will be forgotten about by the media and they'll have moved on to the next big catch, it could be the virus or a premiership manager getting the sack but give it a few days and it'll all be forgotten about, aisling could have been any girl this week and it wouldn't have mattered, she won't matter to anyone next week except her family.

    We hardly got a mention on the news about the woman killed in Wicklow who was a mother to 5 children, the media are a fickle breed yet when they decide to concentrate on a particular subject it's frightening how easily people are swayed and go into an almost hive mindset where nothing else matters, it's all down to social media and the very problematic relationship it has in out lives, its like we can't think for ourselves anymore



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    That about sums it up. Crazy though all the 'issues' being tagged onto this poor young woman's murder. Seems like some think society must be made to run along the lines of Mills & Boon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,831 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    I lived close to where Ian Horgan raped and murdered Rachel Kiely and I don't even remember vigils in Ballincollig. Its absolutely shook the area, awful crime.

    That was 20 years ago, there is nothing new here just mass media and social media hysteria.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,147 ✭✭✭rightmove




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,147 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    Are you making assumptions about the President now as well?

    Weird angle and shows how far people will stretch to make themselves hard done by.

    How do you know what other men would see as a compliment. We've had men here say they assumed women would like to be whistled at and would see it as a compliment and others saying they would be delighted if they were whistled at. Have they no cop on either?



  • Posts: 19,178 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    We are easily manipulated alright and should always remember that. I have no doubt that despite our oft claimed notion of neutrality that should there be a conflict, we would see the public mood whipped up in short order and young men persuaded to go off and fight for some notion or another. There can be a thin veneer between ordinary civilisation and barbarity that is easily stirred up by those in positions to influence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,147 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    Its sexist and generalising.

    Maybe women who dont want unsolicited comments dont want them from ANYONE.

    Maybe consider that.

    Same rubbish as the ones as saying a woman must be a "lesbian" because they don't want to be approached.

    Myths.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,147 ✭✭✭rightmove


    powerful and shows the value of how we use our words and what they are used for.

    I think it would be great if rte was inundated with complaints relating to showing the funeral. They really are sick in their efforts to lick the bottom of the virtue barrel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,033 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    The reality is the courts again and again give men who commit violent crimes a slap on the wrist, either very short prison time, or no time at all. These type of men are allowed to walk the streets until they escalate their behavior and really hurt someone



  • Posts: 19,178 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is the issue. People don't like the way things are in society now, but No one wants to interfere. No one wants to get involved.

    a very small example, one summer evening I'm off to town for the night, dressed up, high heels, the works. As I waited for the Luas at a busy stop, a group of young teenagers came along, messing and spraying people with water, then over to the ticket machine where they hit it, and sprayed fizzy drinks into it, as much as they could. Approx 30 people at the stop. I was the only one that said anything, I told them to **** off for themselves, and they did. Someone said fair play to you.

    A very small little thing that most people just ignored, and the gurriers with their anti social behaviour will just go on and on and get worse.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,147 ✭✭✭rightmove


    maybe replace the word men with ppl as women do really well in the courts in comparison to men

    Justice system is a joke and honestly I feel for the gardai on this one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,169 ✭✭✭The Raging Bile Duct


    I got a headbutt in the face, cheered on by his girlfriend, for my troubles when intervening in a fight between a man and a woman. That was twenty years ago before I had a wife and dependents - I don't think I'd risk it now unless it looked like the woman was at the risk of serious injury.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,831 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Case in point, the perpetrator of this will be able to apply for parole in as little as 12 years into his sentence, certain to be released before serving 20. That's the same if you murder a man, woman or child.

    Ian Horgan got a life sentence in 2002 for rape and murder, he was released in 2013 and is a serial re-offender since. Its an absolute joke



  • Posts: 16,208 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yes, but the dynamic is different between a man trying to stop a group of teens vs a woman doing so. This thread is full of references about the differences when it comes to the genders, and the perceptions people have. A woman telling a group of teens to stop is less likely to lead to a violent reaction (with people around watching), than if a man was to do so. In spite of all the discussions about women being more vulnerable, they're also more protected by social norms.

    I've attempted to tell Irish teens not to vandalise, or hassle other people, and invariably it has led to a direct confrontation. Not because I'm aggressive or physical, but because a man challenging a group of male teens is going to produce that kind of reaction.

    The problem though is what happens when/if things get violent. Adults are very vulnerable to legal responses to violence between an adult and a teen, regardless of how many teens are involved. TBH it's the same for any incident which leads to violence. Either from the Gardai or the legal profession (being sued) the risks are high.

    That needs to be taken into consideration. Nobody wants to interfere because there are serious risks in doing so. Mitigate those risks, and people will be more likely to step in...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,359 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    A friend of mine got his face scratched (there is still a slight scar there even now) by some girl in a pub. She was having a row with some guy and my friend decided to be the white knight. He got set upon by two of yer mans mates and then this girl who he was white knighting for jumped on him and startedclawing at his face. He ended up in hospital with a broken nose a perforated eardrum and stitches in the face. He wont be doing that again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,359 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    No its not because it would look good that he was there. Its because his pr department advised him that if he didnt go (whether out of respect for the families privacy or not) the internet would be out in force destroyinh him for NOT going. So basically he had no choice but to go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 379 ✭✭RubyGlee


    Things like this just do more harm and take away from the issue.

    What happen to that girl was awful truly awful and I think it hits home because she did nothing wrong. Theirs no oh she shouldn’t have been running alone at night, she shouldn’t have been wearing revealing clothes, she shouldn’t have got drunk etc all those things people say to make themselves feel safe.

    Like that poor woman a few years ago who had just got off a bus in the evening still bright out and was kidnapped and murdered.

    This isn’t a men vs women issue. Violence is a problem for everyone but you can’t deny that there is definitely more for a woman to fear and that’s needs to be addressed.

    ive always taken the usual precautions and never really felt too unsafe unless there was gangs of dodgy people around until I got a dog a few years ago and due to my work schedule and the dog being a little reactive walks have to be past 9 at night and the amount of hassle I have got from some men is unreal. I’m close to 40, average and plainer then a rich tea so it’s not cause I’m a supermodel. The worst thing is what if they hurt the dog to get to me, or the dog bites someone who is in my face and then has to be put down?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,222 ✭✭✭Sandor Clegane


    I remember a situation where a fella was pulling his girlfriends hair and and punching her, my aunts husband got out of the car and tried to intervene and ended up getting dogs abuse off of the girlfriend, the boyfriend walked away, but the girlfriend let loose a tirade of abuse and followed him back to the car continuing her tirade.

    It would take a lot for me to get involved in a strangers business, as you say the risk of serious injury would need to be high.

    And just to add to the point of her vulgar tirade, I hear a lot made of men and snapchat groups and whatsapp groups talking down to or being vulgar towards women, well lets not kid ourselves women are far from angels in that regard, I've heard women rip men apart on nights out and in chat rooms so I'd say that is pretty even.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    Could we maybe institute some kind of clothing colour-code or wear badges or something to that effect, to indicate that we are, in fact, okay with being chatted up by strangers as we go about our day? Because it happens to me relatively often in my local area (not in any way blowing my own trumpet with that, honestly I think I just come across as approachable!) and I would be a lot less happy if I didn't have those little random interactions as confidence boosters.

    This is the problem - not everyone wants to live in a world in which the public realm is "muted" in this manner. I suspect that a lot of this has to do with where one sits on the extroverted vs introverted spectrum - I'm an ENFP personality type myself (Extroverted, Intuitive, Feeling, Perceiving) and random moments with random strangers can be the difference between having an absolutely sh!te day and having a nicer one. I'll give you one example - I tend to use far too much conditioner and blowdry my hair so it tends to be very big and floofy, and it happens relatively often that someone (male or female!) will ask if they can feel it 😂 Now, any time someone does this it gives my spirits a lift, but also makes me feel "wow, this person has feckin' balls of steel to say something like this to a total stranger in a world in which that is becoming increasingly demonised as socially unacceptable. Thank Christ for people who are ignoring that, because I have a bounce in my step now that wasn't there before the comment!"

    I'm someone who was bullied a lot as a teenager and therefore grew up genuinely believing myself to be absolutely hideous. I very much opted out of 'the chase' for that reason, initiating a come-on with a woman was always insanely difficult because of that voice in my head saying "don't even try it, she's miles out of your league and you're a total loser anyway". For that reason, more or less every sexual encounter I had before the age of 26 was initiated by the woman - and I mean every encounter from just a random shift in a pub to full-blown relationships. I never had the confidence to initiate until a life-changing event in my family in 2016 gave me an epiphany of nihilism, and I just stopped caring about embarrassing myself because you really do only get one shot at life and wasting it being afraid of doing things you want to do is moronically short sighted.

    Why am I saying all of this? Because for me, growing up with those confidence issues and feeling like I had to watch from the sidelines while the rest of my friends, male and female, played the whole flirting game, being randomly complimented even from across the street is something which always gave my spirits a lift from the dumps into the stratosphere. 

    I'm not posting this to invalidate those who don't like it, I'm posting it to challenge the idea that nobody in their right mind enjoys being called out in this manner by strangers. Personally it can put a smile on my face lasting several days, I'd be lying through my teeth if I tried to claim that it didn't. I guess when you spend your teenage years utterly starved of any kind of physical validation in a world which values appearance so, so much, even the tiniest hint of it gives your brain the kind of dopamine rush that I imagine others get from posting a selfie on Instagram and getting hundreds of comments.

    Interacting with strangers in this manner is such a life-blood for me that the social distancing era completely and totally f*cked with my mental health beyond anything I can even begin to describe. Not being able to mingle in crowds is utterly devastating to someone as extroverted as me. Having to stay two metres from everyone at all times is devastating, losing the random small talk encounters is devastating, certainly knowing that it's off limits to have a random moment of electricity with someone is devastating.

    Hell, my first ever proper relationship would never have happened under the kind of social regime some folks here are trying to push. I was in The Village nightclub (known these days as Opium, Wexford Street in Dublin) and I sat down on one of the long benches they had around the sides of the room after tiring myself out dancing, with a freshly poured pint. The woman sitting next to me introduced herself, decided to use my shoulder as a pillow and fell asleep for twenty minutes or so while I drank my pint and pondered how I could get up without waking her 😂 By the end of the night we'd added eachother on Facebook, had our first date a week or two later and are still very close friends now, ten years later.

    But as she was a total stranger to me, according to many on this thread, her behaviour was unacceptable and I was "sexually harassed", because she was extremely forward with me as a total stranger and couldn't possibly have known beforehand whether or not I would reciprocate.

    If we create a paradigm in which it's assumed that literally nobody in the world ever wants to have a random encounter in the public realm with a bit of unexpected electricity and butterflies in the stomach, which feels like the natural conclusion of some of the commentary here, many, many people like myself will find the resulting world a cold, lonely, boring place devoid of life or colour. That's what the pandemic era did to me, and what I hate about these discussions is that they seem to be led by the kind of people who probably enjoyed that aspect of quarantine life. But there doesn't seem to be any room for voices from those of us who actually want nothing more than to be "bothered" by strangers when we're outside - indeed, those of us for whom going outside itself is often a vehicle for interacting with other humans, after spending a day working alone at home.

    So what could a solution be? Wear certain colours to signal that you're someone who would be happy to be randomly chatted up or flirted with in public? Creating designated "zones" where it's implied and assumed that if you're in such a zone, you know that it's a zone where that kind of thing is considered acceptable? Create some kind of opposing signal to say "I'm in a bubble today and you'd better not intrude on it"? 

    Like it or not, you will simply never bring the majority of the public along if your proposal is that all humans unknown to you be considered off limits for interactions in the public realm. Too many people enjoy such encounters for that to ever be reasonable, and it's monstrously unfair on those people to push this agenda of essentially perma-social distancing. 

    I have every genuine sympathy with those who view interacting with strangers while traversing the public realm as a horrible, unavoidable evil of getting from A to B. What I hate about these conversations, though, is that a thought is never spared for those of us who feel the opposite - that interacting with strangers while traversing the public realm is one of the few things that makes a day worth living in.

    There should be a way to create space for both types of people in the world. Creating a paradigm in which being out in public means everyone is automatically assumed to be in an unpoppable personal bubble of spacetime in which strangers are not welcome, is creating a world which, for extroverts, is genuinely hardly worth living in at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,147 ✭✭✭rightmove




Advertisement