Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cities around the world that are reducing car access

1353638404173

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That’s great to see. Reinforces the fact that, from end Jan, every road junction in the UK is effectively a zebra crossing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,475 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    It's not unrealistic and it's the way things are heading. For the 21st Century pedestrians and cyclists need to be prioritised in cities, and hopefully we can claw back some semblance of normality after the total f**king mess we made of things in the 20th century with the car dominated chaos.

    Having read your previous posts in this discussion I know I may as well be talking to a dead parrot, but thankfully people like you are on their way out.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    In Germany cars can turn right(remembering it is a LHD country) while the pedestrain light is green so long as there are no pedestrians at the section otherwise they must give way.

    These lights aren't always green for pedestrians as otherwise vehicluar traffic would backup and block traffic passing through and going straight ahead.

    These traffic light installations also have dedicated lights for cyclists that operate similarly as for the pedestrians but are intended for cylicts.

    In short, there are better ways to achieve priority for pedestrians than what is proposed here but then again what would I know since I only obey the rules of the road here as a pedestrian, cyclist and motorist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,434 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko



    Yes, absolutely correct to say that max speeds of 15 kmph are unrealistic. 10 kmph would be more realistic.




  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    I would put it to you that you aren't well enough travelled and aren't living in a progressive City which is pedestrian and bike friendly, a city which has adopted more pragmatic approaches than the bruteforce anti-car changes which you propose for implementation. This City is a compact University city with most Students and Workers getting around on public transport, by foot or on bikes but still car friendly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,720 ✭✭✭serfboard




  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    I know the German green traffic light system for pedestrians has been in operation for a very long time yet everyone here seems to be falling over themselves to inconvenience cars with poorly thought out "solutions" from Twitter.


    This is a traffic sign that I need to obey everyday which gives priority to pedestrians and cyclists. It works well.

    I can only imagine how much longer the queues and wait times for vehicular traffic and pedestrians or cyclists would be without this rule.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The German way of doing is one way, the Dutch was is better imho, the Irish way is crap and the American way is just plain bonkers.

    It's all about perspective. From what I wrote its plain to see I put the motor vehicles very low down in the hierarchy, which is per the dept of Transport directives and the way Irish infrastructure is going.

    It's a growing movement around the world, especially in cities where the motor vehicle has made a mess of the place.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    you are the one who must come to terms with your prejudices against cars. Mode of usage is what is important. This city also has a ring of car parks which allow you to plan where you park before setting out and occupancy can be assessed before even jumping in to the car.

    At peak times I never set out without having a confirmed plan as to where I am going to park.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You regularly seem to struggle with "attack the post, not the poster", not sure why that is.

    Incidentally, it's not "my" prejudice, I am just of a different opinion. One that is shared, on a growing level by many elected representatives and those in planning departments around the country and the world



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    An elected representative only tells you what you want to hear. There goes my flock, I must follow.

    This thread revolves around the prejudices of those who contribute trying to demonize cars. the collection of posts is the thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,475 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    but they should be demonised, they've ruined cities



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    They most certainly have not. Thanks for stepping up and putting yourself forward as an example of the type of posters to which I am referring.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    It is not the fault of motorists that the Urban planners have implemented the wrong traffic calming and management solutions from an existing toolbox of solutions to the detriment of motorists, pedestrians, cyclists and other road users. Blaming the Motorist is scapegoating and nothing more.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You're correct, the planners implemented what was directed to be implemented and that direction has now changed.

    Note, there's a difference between motor vehicles and motorists. One has ruined cities and towns around the world, the other is getting from A to B in the mode the planners have designed for.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    A motor vehicle is neither benign nor malignant of itself so you are demonizing the people at the steering wheels of these devices. Thanks for the clarification.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Traffic free Capel Street to go through another round of public consultation before being implemented this summer.

    Previous consultation showed 90% support among respondents for it




  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    1+1=3? These cars aren't empty and require a driver so yes, you are demonizing the drivers and occupants of those vehicles. You are perfectly happy for that inference to be drawn.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭gjim


    It is simply impossible to design cities which can accommodate everyone using a car to get around.

    Where road space is limited, it needs to be rationed.

    In which case, it makes complete sense to prioritise the most efficient, in terms of bodies moved per unit road space, modes in any such rationing. Private cars are the least efficient, so they come last in terms of allocating of road space.

    Why should car users be given an unfairly large share of the available space?



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    It is not rationing. It is prohibition by effectively blocking access. On the days when an inhabitant needs to take their car to deliver/collect bulky items such as shopping or a baby and their acoutrements they will not be able to access the city by car.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Indeed. This fact escapes many. In terms of capacity, the only, long term way to increase it is by making more sustainable modes a viable option to encourage modal shift away from the private car (bus lanes, protected bike lanes, priority crossing points etc). This has been shown to work everywhere its been done.

    Actually, come to think of it, I'm not actually aware of a single instance where this hasn't worked to increase capacity or lead to modal shift. I just spent a while looking and looking but can't find a single study or report that says otherwise. If anyone comes across anything like that please post it, I'd be interested to see.




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    So streets in urban centres should continuing to allow the driver above all others just in case they need to collect something bulky?

    This is a tired old argument which has been shown to be nothing more than nonsense but hey, please do continue with it as you're getting quite good at it now!



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Interesting graphic which completely misses the point that none of these other forms of traffic get me to the locations I want to get to in to the old town or somewhere on the far side of the city in an acceptable time frame. The bike is the next fastest solution but it is 3 degrees and raining.

    This is a city with excellent public transport options available. The situation in Dublin would be much grimmer.

    I picked up two items yesterday in two different suburbs at different times and the alternative to using the car to collect them would have been 800m walk to train station or bus stop then the train or bus, then light rail then a few hundred metres walk on the far side. 15 minute trip by private transport becomes a 2 hour or more round trip or else pay for postage which is less convenient and costly.

    The travel plans of normal people and the great Visions on this sub-forum are often incompatible with each other.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    The roads aren't just for drivers and I'm not aware of any rules which give them priority. Buses and light rail have priority on the streets in most circumstances and there are fines if cyclists aren't given their 1.5 metres of space when passing by. By law you slow down to a walking pace when passing a bus in case there alighting passengers step out unexpectedly in to the roadway.

    Stop equating road behaviour in a Civilsed regimented country to what happens in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    A look back ...

    "In 1900, there were over 11,000 hansom cabs on the streets of London alone. There were also several thousand horse-drawn buses, each needing 12 horses per day, making a staggering total of over 50,000 horses transporting people around the city each day.

    This problem came to a head when in 1894, The Times newspaper predicted… “In 50 years, every street in London will be buried under nine feet of manure.”

    However, necessity is the mother of invention, and the invention in this case was that of motor transport. Henry Ford came up with a process of building motor cars at affordable prices. Electric trams and motor buses appeared on the streets, replacing the horse-drawn buses..."

    And the rest as we say is history ...




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭gjim


    You accept that, given the quantity of road space available, it's not physically possible for everyone who needs to get around the city to use a car, right?

    Please say yes, otherwise you're delusional.

    If you accept that there is a hard limit to the capacity of roads to carry people driving in cars and this limit is less than the number of people who need to commute, what exactly is your proposal?

    I'm just talking about simple basic arithmetic here - it has nothing to do with politics being pro or anti car or public transport or anything else.

    If your proposal allows more people to get around in less time, then I'm all ears.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    No. living in an ancicent City with geographical challenges which do not exist in Dublin I don't accept the need to restrict vehicular access to Dublin City to the extent posters here on this subforum suggest is necessary.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Given the evidence showing the high pollution levels caused directly by traffic in the city centre and the evidence showing that this is having a negative impact on the residents, how do you propose to square that circle in the short to medium future?

    Also, how do you propose to improve and encourage healthy and fast sustainable travel while at the same time allowing for the current number of journeys by car?

    The reality is that the car is the least efficient method of movement within a city centre. Whilst policy to date has been to facilitate movement by car over other forms, this is now changing in all progressive cities. Irish cities are gradually moving that way despite the continual attempts to frustrate the process by those who wrongly think the status quo should remain.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    my car has no exhaust. stickers on windscreens determine which cars are allowed in to the inner city here. Without a green sticker your car needs to be parked in one of the car parks and make your way to your destination via another means of transport or your feet.

    Questions are being asked on this thread which have been answered long ago in the city in which I live.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Hi @[Deleted User], can I put a question to you.

    If the population of Dublin was 1.34 million in 2019 and the roads are at or close to capacity with private cars, how do you ensure the inhabitants can move about freely by 2036 without being stuck in congestion, when its projected to increase by 31% to 1.76 million according to the CSO and how do you envisage that would be done without restricting car access in particular.

    I get that you want to keep your car, lash ahead, just wondering have you thought about how to address the capacity issue as I've outlined it above. I'm aware you are not living in Dublin but I'm using it as a local example



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Dublin City Council could implement many of the practices implemented elsewhere which I have pointed out over many pages without restricting access for cars while at the same time incentivising use of personal mobility solutions.

    Public Transport police would help to increase usage of public transport.

    Intelligent traffic management which I see every day of the week isn't implemented in Ireland.

    There are 3 points for dangerous overtaking of cyclists but that doesn't appear to be enforced. points for dangerous driving which once again does not appear to be applied/enforced.

    Not being able to turn around a corner on a traffic light as I described above creates huge congestion as does the lack of a transition from red to green through amber on traffic lights.

    You spoke previously about carrot and stick but really you yearn to dole out the beatings with a stick through prohibition of entry to the city with cars.

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/118430508/#Comment_118430508



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Whilst I didn't ask about your car, I do note that you didn't attempt to actually answer any of my questions.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    leading questions deserve to be ignored.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    translate that in to English to see how the Germans deal with high polluting cars in urban areas.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭gjim


    How about answering the question?

    For third time; do you accept that, given the quantity of road space available, it's not physically possible for everyone who needs to get around the city to use a car to do so?

    A simple yes or no, please.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    How about reading the last post. That is how reasonable countries deal with a problem in a measured way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,964 ✭✭✭✭Thargor


    So the 90% consultation wasn't good enough for them?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That was based on the trial as it was done. They are now going back out with final options which will be permanent. This was always going to be the case



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 233 ✭✭Heartbreak Hank




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭gjim


    I've read it - it doesn't answer the question - it just evades it.

    I'm not interested in the age of your city, nor what you think "posters on this forum" are suggesting. Nor what you think makes a country reasonable. Or what a "measured way" is. This is just weaselling.

    It's a simple binary yes/no question. Do you believe it would be physically possible for everyone to use a car to get around the city?



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    I do not believe that in 30 years' time everyone will use a car because not everyone uses a car now and not everyone who has access to a car including myself always relies on a car to get where they need to go. For me sometimes it is simply more convenient to cycle in on a rent-a-bike, not even my own bike along the 4km uninteruppted bike lane and leave it at a drop off point than to take my own bike, my own moped, my own car, hired e-scooter, bus or local rail.

    I have no time for this hectoring. Go away Gjim. I don't want to engage with you. You demand that I answer contrived silly questions and present them as being killer blows which would undermine the basis of my position.

    What I have teased out is that the most vocal on this thread haven't got a clue as to what traffic management strategies are in use on the Continent and their research is no more than Twitter links from biased commentators.

    practically every intersection in the city where I live is part of a coordinated Green Wave allowing traffic to flow avoiding stationary traffic. One particular approach to the City has sequenced lights for 5 km and works like poetry in motion, others are grade separated, others are hewn through stone. All required investment but it was done rather than pursuing the lunacy of banning cars from the City.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Sounds like where you are has already implemented the hierarchy of users that Ireland is just now starting to implement, that's great, I look forward to seeing it happen here to.

    Would love to know the city you are in so we could look at what they have done



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    It won't happen in Ireland because all the tinpots here are screaming to ban cars from the City.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Give it a rest with the hysterics, it's getting old and makes you look silly.

    Nobody, not even me, is looking to ban cars outright and there exists, no plans to do so.

    Reduced access to facilitate more sustainable modes, sure, which I don't think is unreasonable given the capacity issues coupled with the population projections.

    This is something which has already been done multiple times across the country on a smaller scale e.g. removal of lanes from O'Connell St, various pedestrian works all over the country, removal of on street parking to facilitate wider footpaths, and so on

    Still love to know what place you refer to in your posts. Feel free to reference another similar city with a similar setup if you want, just looking for a comparison.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Don't talk down to me. My viewpoint is more grounded and realistic than yours.

    Cars that stay on a driveway and never turn a wheel are OK according to the consensus around here. A little nudge here, a little tap there, a slap across the calves with a ruler and soon it will be so inconvenient to use cars that "They" will see things "Our" way and abandon their cars. A Group here are trying to impose their views by stealth on the Public.

    The hysterics are from other posters here and are the problem. Evidence of the anti-car culture is is the cheering here of the undemocratic attempt at closure of Strand road, retention of toll and restriction of access to East Link which is totally counter-productive. "Adjustments" to College Green and the Quays which makes them a no-go area, destruction of downtown Dun Laoighhaire at the expense of the sustainabilithy of the local economy, etc... It is all insidious and shows a bald contempt for cars and those who use them in this forum.

    You, collectively, are a bunch of Zealots who despise cars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,434 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    By stealth? It must be the least stealthy stealth-campaign ever!

    Do we all despise our own cars every time we drive them too?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    The irony of it all is that you see no issue with the likes yourself enforcing a car culture on everyone else that is both unsustainable and detrimental to society.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    You haven't got a clue. My preference is always to go on foot where practical. Cars and their users are not per se detrimental to society. You have been brainwashed if you actually believe that but since this is where the cult members hang out I am not surprised to hear this dogma in this sub-forum.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement