Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

F1 2022 thread - see post 1 for rules

16791112137

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,841 ✭✭✭quokula


    I was just looking up VW group since they seem likely to come on board. I recalled Lamborghini supplying some backmarker teams in the early 90s (kind of wonder what the point of that was for the brand) without ever winning a race, while Porsche have one GP win back in 1962 and Audi have never competed (nor have VW or Skoda etc). So you'd think Audi is a good shout for the next manufacturer to get a first victory somewhere down the line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,406 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Just watching an f1 show special from sky (linked below). I'm only a bit in, but Johnny Herbert has already said that SIR Lewis Hamilton was robbed.

    Makes me wonder how this would have been covered if there wasn't a British driver involved. Basically all of the f1 media I consume is British, and their bias can be pretty strong at times, such as now...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,029 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Yeah supplied Minardi, who were then described as the moving chicanes, and Lola and the less that's said about them the better in that era



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,695 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    I forgot about the Coloni - Subaru relationship in 1990.

    Untitled Image

    The relationship didn't last long and the couple seperated during the season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,041 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah, it's one sensational way to describe the situation. He had a big lead and was crusing to the win and some unusual circumstances robbed him of the lead, the win and the championship.

    Sky are never a company to play down the rhetoric.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    I think Brundell is the most balanced of them all really, Herbert loves the gossip side of things and is a bit of a mouth, remember when Alonso got him after he was talking about Alonso retiring etc, that was glorious.

    As for Sky overall, they are monumentally biased for any British driver, who could blame them? I guess with the last race, they are like a dog with a bone and will bang this drum for a long while to come. I try not to pay attention too much to British coverage, I will read Italian and German publications and just translate them in my browser, they aren't free of bias either but it is way more balanced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,078 ✭✭✭kksaints


    One of the worst F1 cars ever I think. Never even pre-qualified for a race let alone finished one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    The Subaru 1235...a 12 cylinder boxer engine...an absolute lump of a thing.


    Subaru-Motori-Moderni-Flat-12-F1-Engine.png.jpeg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,029 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Not to be a pedant but I think that was a flat V-plane engine rather than a boxer. The boxer uses one crank pin per cylinder, whereas a flat plane V12 uses one crank pin with two cylinders going in opposite direction



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    It's not just Sky, the BBC were always like that. But Murray Walker was likeable so you didn't mind him going on about Mansell / Hill etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,118 ✭✭✭muckwarrior


    And ITV. James Allen in particular was insufferable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,841 ✭✭✭quokula


    Murray supported the British drivers for sure, but he also had honesty and integrity. I remember him once saying that he wanted Hill to win, but he recognised Schumacher was the better driver.

    Sky’s crew are the opposite - they would never admit that they wanted the British driver to win, nor would they ever properly acknowledge the achievements of a foreign driver over a Brit.

    Instead they pretend to be objective while also throwing out wild conspiracy theories and character assassinations, whether against Max last year or guys like Vettel or Rosberg or Alonso previously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,041 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I think sky are pretty liberal with praise of Max and his achievement. I doubt anyone at Sky said Max didn't deserve the title. I remember the overarching message being that both drivers deserved the title and it had been a great battle between 2 great drivers.

    Herbert is a bit of a gob on a stick. Whether by nature or design, his role is to be a bit basic and pro British. But he's more of a commentator than a serious Sky F1 analyst or journalist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,609 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    For those looking for a less British slant on coverage, I've recently discovered the RacingNews365 website and podcast, which is an extension of an existing Dutch site. The podcast is hosted by an Irish lad, and they've also hired Dieter Rencken, a well-connected journalist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,041 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Never heard of it but playing the one about Lewis's future now. Thanks. They're not too long either. Podcasters need to learn that less is more.

    There's a huge difference between podcast with journalists and podcasts with enthusiasts like Missed Apex



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭Lawlesz


    Been a long time listener to Missed Apex but found them tough to listen to at times last year. They fully admit to being Hamilton fans but seem to think that by declaring that, they have free reign to go full bias, I think it really affects the quality of the show. And then when you see the way that clown Philpot behaves on Twitter, and Spanners himself at times... I've kind of gone off them a bit lately. The episodes with Carter and Saward are always worth a listen though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,041 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    That's exactly how I feel. Sometimes I think they go overboard in declaring how Ham-Fossi they are and then the coverage seems extra pro Hamilton when it's actually a fair argument.

    The Carter and Saward ones are very good because of Carter and Seward. I can't stand Wrenches but the tech-time ones are good sometimes - but always too long.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭Lawlesz


    Yes exactly. I get that they are just enthusiasts like the rest of us and there is no requirement to be impartial, but it goes way over board. In the early days they tried to be neutral enough, but since they openly declared their Hamilton allegiance they've gone off the scale. And I also saw they got a lot of negative feedback for Spanners behaviour and comments, given that they ask for donations, patreon etc. He's worse on Twitter, fancies himself as some kind of expert troll but is way too touchy for it, then cries like a kid when someone bites back.

    The tech times are good but again I find trumpets tough to listen to, the deliberate delays and pausing between words get very tiresome.

    Not sure why I listen at all, given all I've done is complain about it. I find The Race podcasts decent enough mostly, their Bring Back V10s series is the best out there imo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭donspeekinglesh


    It was 1997 Trulli led the Austrian GP - it was his last race subbing for Panis. He probably wouldn't have won, even without the engine going bang. Panis had 2 podiums earlier in the year before he broke his legs, and my memory is everyone had expected him to win that year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,695 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    Ferrari launch on the 17th of February.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,695 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    McLaren launch on the 11th of February.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,406 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Do we want a separate thread for new cars? Or fair game here?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,695 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Prost to leave Alpine role, Otmar Szafnauer to join and so are BWT as a sponsor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,178 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    The great early days of the tyre wars in 1997 when at certain tracks the unfancied Bridgestone runners had so much more speed over the Goodyear runners who were all the top teams were with. Panis was lightning quick in the early races of that season before he broke his legs at Montreal, no doubt he was on course to win races that year and finish top 5 in the drivers standings, that Austrian race was the only one I recall that Trulli looked in genuine contention



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt



    "The Subaru 1235 was a motor racing engine designed and built by Motori Moderni for Subaru's Formula One program in 1990. A 3.5-litre boxer-12, it was used by the Coloni team for the first eight races, but proved to be very unsuccessful and the team reverted to using the old Cosworth DFR V8 engineAlba also used it in the World Sportscar Championship in 1990, but were similarly unsuccessful and switched to a 4.5-litre Buick V6 midway through the season."

    " For Subaru, Motori Moderni came up with a 3.5-litre, 60-valve flat-twelve engine in the boxer configuration that the Japanese firm's road cars utilised."

    Nope, it was a boxer-12



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,029 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    In the page it links to

    Unlike most flat-twin, flat-four and flat-six engines, flat-twelve engines typically use the crankshaft configuration of a 180° V engine instead of a boxer engine



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    The engine is referred to as a boxer all over the place

    "Subaru has been dominant in the world of rallying and is still making a decent fist of touring car racing. But back in the late '80s, Formula One was the supreme marketing tool of the automotive industry, and the Japanese outfit decided that it should turn its boxer engine knowledge to the top tier of motorsport."

    "The 3.5-litre boxer unit debuted at the 1990 US Grand Prix, but the engine proved to be an unsuccessful companion, with it also failing at Brazil, San Marino, Canada and Silverstone. Despite ferrari's success with the same layout in the 312T '70s car, the large flat engine got in the way of ground effect venturi tunnels that were dominating the F1 landscape by 1990, thus rendering the engine a little redundant."

    "I met a guy who knew Carlo Chiti via a chain of friends. Chiti ran an engine company called Motori Moderni. They were in a bit of trouble but they used to do Formula 1 engines for Minardi. They had this boxer-12 engine, made in cooperation with Subaru, that had hardly ever raced. They had trouble with the weight and getting the diffusers to work with the layout of the F1 car once the engine was in."

    It's layout is that of a boxer...that is why everyone refers to it as one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,695 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    This is beautiful:

    Untitled Image

    Bigger image.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,522 ✭✭✭Killinator


    Pity they'll have those ugly wheel covers on the cars so it definitely won't look that good!



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement