Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Minimum alcohol pricing is nigh

1217218220222223321

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    Yes and to be fair, I did say it was my opinion. Admittedly 'muck' was a a lot harsher than I actually meant or think. I do believe that the citrus is used to disguise the flavour, but understand it is often used to enhance existing flavours from the hops, citrus fruit being one that often is from the hops. It is done with almost all of the Irish ones I have tried, and there are very few craft breweries that don't, bar many having one or maybe two flavours that don't. That said I agree with you saying that it is good we have more choice (a lot of the same choice imo), and it is definitely a bad thing what MUP may do to some of the smaller breweries, although I think if the cheaper stuff goes up to the same price as those, and they are left alone, then more people may try them at the same or similar price. There seems to be very little unique experimentation with flavours here. Again, imho.

    I do think though that many of the craft beers are okay but much prefer to swap around with the old worldly beers, and they are going to take a big thwack with MUP, It's almost as if they want us to only have Heineken, Guinness and Budweiser available throughout the whole country.

    MUP seems it does a lot more harm than good.



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Honestly I love it. I stopped drinking a good while back but did plenty of blind taste checks with mates over the years to know that wine is wine and beer is beer. The fancy beers are basically the equivalent of people turning vaping into a hobby. And to pay silly money for the premium.

    (Particularly if you're a cold drinker drinker. The 4 quid bottles of wine in Aldi were perfectly serviceable before. As for the beer, Galahad was my go-to. Even just half an hour in the fridge and there were a couple of brands that were hard to tell apart from it. It's a very lager-y lager which I liked)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,396 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Ah c'mon. You need to check your tongue isn't made of plastic or something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,218 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.


    Could be worse and he was recommending Dunnes own brand of lager



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,087 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Each to their own alright

    My Mom liked a sauvignon liked a sauvignon blanc from Aldi more than bottles of Oyster Bay, Casillero del Diablo or McGuigan she was given

    €2.11 increase per bottle now for her

    LIDL had some great German beers for €1.99 a can

    No more now unfortunately



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,532 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Lidl were doing a pils called Oettinger a while back. A decent brand from Germany. Not an own brand either but imported. Beautiful stuff and it didnt come with the dreadful hangover like bids or heinekens etc. It was 99c for a 500ml. Devestated at losing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,292 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Same beer is 39c in Aldi in Germany.

    We don't have a cheap beer problem we have a politician problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,811 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    Citrus flavors occur naturally in some hops, there doesn't need to be an additive for the flavor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    I know, I mentioned that in the post you quoted. I believe some add the citrus or berry flavouring to enhance it, but I also believe many do to disguise it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,438 ✭✭✭embraer170


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.

    Half of them? I would say 80% of wine drinkers couldn't differentiate between a cheap bottle and a moderately expensive one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,292 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    A lot of the wines that you could buy for €5 to €6 euro on special offer in supermarkets before MUP I would consider to be at least the equal of house wines costing €20 to €23 in pubs or restaurants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 955 ✭✭✭The Phantom Jipper


    I agree because we have drinking problems in Ireland.

    She hasn't been in government in a decade so there are plenty of more worthy villains, like perhaps the current government who are implementing it?

    As an aside, if this thread is to be believed, the policy originated in the FG manifesto in 2011.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,292 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    To be fair to RS listening to her over the years I think she really believes in MUP.

    She probably was responsible for delivering two parties to the push for MUP, LAB and SD.

    A lot more of them went along with it without applying any rigour to the arguments in favour of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 955 ✭✭✭The Phantom Jipper


    I agree because we have drinking problems in Ireland.

    I'd say she is a believer alright but the effort to shoehorn her in as the criminal mastermind behind the whole thing struck me as being a bit tenuous. If I end up being disgruntled by the whole thing, FG and FF would be the more obvious candidates for my ire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Well you'd be wrong,try extending your ire across the entire political spectrum and you'd be nearer the reality.

    Bonkers,but that's what happened,expect more like the poster above to bleat on about the FFG angle without the facts.

    SF lap up people like that and this will play out well for them through useful idiots at the polls.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,087 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Yeah and which government was Shorthall a Minister in?

    The FG/Labour one after the 2011 election



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,292 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    One would obviously be inclined to blame the parties currently in power ie. FF FG Greens because they fine tuned the policy and are responsible for the appalling timing.

    On the other hand it is the job of opposition to apply critical thinking to any legislation proposed so LAB SD SF PBP etc. and Independents have to shoulder their share of blame too.

    When you think that a lot of them claim to stand for the interests of the working people and less well off they seem to have dropped the ball altogether on this.

    A couple drinking six cans of beer and a bottle of wine per week between them could with careful purchasing have bought their drinks for €11 before MUP now it will cost them €18.

    That amounts €364 per annum extra just for drinking a modest amount in their own home.

    That's the bottom line for ordinary people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 955 ✭✭✭The Phantom Jipper


    I agree because we have drinking problems in Ireland.

    Apologies for bleating without the facts, my liege. I must check in with with you next time to ensure my ire is directed appropriately.

    Originates in the FG manifesto, 3 FG Ministers for Health in the interim, current FF Minister for Health, FG ministers for drug policy in recent years, and currently being implemented by a government lead by FF and FG... but the real culprits are Roisin Shortall and assorted others who've not been in government in donkeys years?

    I'm not even particularly against the policy, I'll be eager to see how it plays out but the FFG apologists out in force already do make me chuckle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Freddie Mcinerney


    Drug users of 96 may have died in the mid and late 2000s? That is why I asked about the age breakdown per year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 955 ✭✭✭The Phantom Jipper


    I agree because we have drinking problems in Ireland.

    I don't disagree with any of this. To the extent that I have reservations about the legislation, it's been disappointing to me that the obvious issues with it didn't get more of an airing beforehand, but not to labour the point, for better or worse this is FFG's baby despite the desperate efforts by a handful here to distance themselves from it already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    And what about those that pushed it through earlier last year instead of waiting for Northern Ireland? As it must have been deemed a matter of grave importance, it was imperative that this action was taken immediately.

    That is ENTIRELY down to this current Government, and they should be more than happy to let it lie on their doorstep, as they are happy with this decision. So instead of telling people where to place their ire, maybe suggest that the correct people to thank for this health benefit being introduced are in fact the current government, and that anyone that wants to bring it up, they are the people to talk to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,925 ✭✭✭HBC08


    The current bunch are responsible for the timing,that's on them and it'll come back to bite them in the arse.Said a good few times on this thread over the years and here we are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    I'm just after remembering when they were suggesting to go ahead without Northern Ireland, didn't one of the FG ministers say something about no more pocket money alcohol?

    At the same time, trying to actively price it out of reach of a low wage earner. They really are an absolutely clueless bunch of idiots. They also had some crazy high number of deaths attributed to alcohol IIRC, more than double the amount per year.

    I know of two people that have gone up North already to take advantage of the prices they missed, or couldn't get before MUP was introduced. I expect this to be the norm when people start running low.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,990 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w


    A lad in work has already been looking at courier service to collect a few pallets for his shibeen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Freddie Mcinerney




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,476 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Re: buying in the North.


    How much will be allowed before it will be considered smuggling?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,304 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.

    All you can eat :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,524 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    When you think that a lot of them claim to stand for the interests of the working people and less well off they seem to have dropped the ball altogether on this.

    But they are not going to go out and claim that the same working people and less well off are being disadvantages because alcohol is now too expensive.

    Food, fuel, clothes, housing, yes, absolutely they are grounds to make a case when prices go up that working people and less well off people can't afford them.

    But booze, no way, they would have the full wrath of the health sector on top of them for that, and I don't just mean AAI, I mean doctors and professionals who know alcohol and it's effects on health.

    If booze has become too expensive, just drink less.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,610 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    I think everyone in the Dail can take the blame on this one. It was put to a vote and approved by the vast majority.

    Typical NGO led shite



Advertisement