Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Spider-Man: No Way Home *spoilers from post 185*

178101213

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    It is expected to break the billion dollar box office mark tomorrow becoming the second fastest film to break the billion mark.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,503 ✭✭✭brianregan09


    As a long term marvel fan since the late 80s/early 90s


    Green Goblin is a big name undoubtedly but nowhere near Hulk , X-men, Fantastic Four not even in the same stratosphere


    in the early 90's pre comic book movies outside of the early batman ones , the biggest names were X-Men Spiderman and Fantastic Four and Hulk and by proxy the biggest names from those properties (villain wise) was Magneto , Doctor Doom , Galactus and the Silver Surfer and Venom , Goblin was the next rung down , yes in the comics he was revered for killing Gwen Stacey but he didn't pass over into the main stream fully until the Raimi Movies



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,820 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭Optimalprimerib


    But this was just a homage to the evil dead. It was not exactly original in itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,632 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    That is true admittedly, as a kid in the 90s all media seemed to be Marvel mostly bar Batman for DC. I knew who the X-Men, Spiderman, Doom, Captain America etc were before I came to know the rest of the DC catalogue.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,900 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Not a comic reader but certainly a Saturday morning cartoon watcher in the 90s so Spider-man, X-Men and Batman were my exposures to those characters, also a bit of the Bixby/Ferringo Hulk show.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Not really sure why someone is putting so much energy into trying to convince everyone that Green Goblin is some sort of explosive household name in the comic-book adapation world when he absolutely is not.

    Or that Green Goblin somehow was the driving force behind No Way Home being successful.

    If anything the wider audience know him solely FROM the original Raimi film, but there are countless other heroes and villians that had, and have, far more household recognition even long before comic-book movies took hold.

    No Way Home - I thought was pretty decent. It didn't wow me, though I thought the trio of Spider-men was pretty faultless. The script certainly could've been much better and as someone else alluded to above it was very formulaic and really lacking in creative panache.

    Honestly, above all else, while Tom Holland is a good Peter Parker, this movie reminded me of just how great Raimi's first two movies are. Equally, while Andrew Garfield is perfectly fine, those two Amazing Spiderman movies are far less so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 483 ✭✭Fred Astaire


    This was a real mixed bag for me.

    I was expecting Nostalgia Bait the movie and to a large extent it was. However some of that actually landed for me. Once Tobey and Andrew showed up I enjoyed most of what followed - even if the final battle was at times an indecipherable, CG mess. The scene where Andrew saved MJ was brilliant, one of the few scenes in the MCU where they allowed you to feel the emotion and not undercut it with some lame quip. He was honestly the best thing about this - the glimpses into a Spiderman destroyed from grief, the support from the others and the possibility of a happier future for him. I felt like it gave the character some closure at least.

    But getting there was a whole other kettle of fish and there were so many plot holes/contrivances and moments where disbelief had to be completely suspended.

    In the last movie Peter is directly responsible for giving Mysterio so much power which made his actions here all the more unbelievable/idiotic/annoying/stupid.

    The spell and it's execution was so frustrating. How Strange doesn't explain the parameters of the spell, how Peter keeps interrupting him despite Strange saying not to - how the entire movie hinges on this utter stupidity really frustrated me. I think Dr Strange and Peter are stupid beyond their characters in this movie just to make the plot happen.

    I cannot believe that Peter decides to let 5 supervillains/serial killers out of their cages in some random effort to 'save' them. Despite the warnings from Dr.Strange where he stresses how quickly they need to be sent back because they don't know anything about the multiverse and the danger they could be in. For Aunt May to be pushing Peter toward this effort to save them was really stupid to me too. So they bring 5 these supervillains to a huge apartment building - away from their cages towards the population. These supervillains they have known for minutes in some cases. They even leave one of them outside in a lorry when he could easily escape and go on a rampage while the others are upstairs. For them to do this just snapped my immersion in two then and there. This random villain rehabilitation programme with absolutely no failsafes if something went wrong which was incredibly fcuking likely. Honestly it had me feeling like Aunt May deserved to die and Peter deserved to lose her as a lesson for this absolutely ridiculous/dangerous thing they did.

    I don't understand the place of Uncle Ben in this universe as Peter almost acted as if he didn't exist - when in Civil War he hinted at his death in his own power/responsibility speech to Tony. Honestly we have seen this power/responsibility thing play out in 3 movies now and him say it without saying it - and Peter acted like May had said the most profound thing ever when he has been saying it for ages himself.

    The implications of the villains being saved and not dying in their own universes require an almost infinite number of alternate timelines. Goblin being saved alone would make Tobeys trilogy end with the first movie.

    Overall I enjoyed most of what happened after Andrew and Tobey appeared but the terrible writing to get there really dragged this down for me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 345 ✭✭orecir


    7 out of 10 for me and no more or no less.


    A decent nostalgia trip down memory lane.

    Far from home the best of the trilogy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,555 ✭✭✭✭Zero-Cool


    Loved it, absolutely loved it! They should have made Toby number 1, Andrew 2 and Tom 3 (could have made reference to their ages but would have been a nice touch). The chemistry between the 3 was just class and the villains nailed it as well. I thought having GG as the big bad was a great touch purely for Willem's performance. So many great lines and scenes. "I'm something of a scientist myself" line had me "BAH!" out loud. I'm not one for reactions but the silence in the cinema other than me made me feel real old.

    Yeah, lots questions and questionable actions but I haven't moved a Spidey film since Spiderman 2 in 2004.

    Also, perfect ending for me. Before going to see it, i was hoping for a a clean slate with no MCU characters. Wow, can't get more clean slate than that! And that new suit *chefs kiss*. Now i really want to watch it again but also go back to the first 2 Toby films.....maaaaybe the amazing Spider-Man 1.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,486 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Good film but what is Hollywoods obsession with long films?

    Nearly every film I have watched of late could be made better with some decent editing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    I missed Tony's banter and relationship with Peter, Doc Strange didn't cut it for me, loved the 3 Peters and more Happy was needed

    I thought DS might change the pasts so for May, Ben and Gwen to live



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,380 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Saw it today and liked it, but to be entirely honest didn't love it, it dealt with a stuffed cast rather well. But the plot felt a bit basic and predictable. Basically it was no into the spiderverse. I do also agree with other posters it felt a tad long.

    All three "Spidermen" were really good in it, I do think Garfield was a tad underserved with the material in his films. I didnt think Jon Favreau was great oddly and I liked him in any other MCU film he has popped up in, he looked a tad bored. I kind of was expecting some big revelatory cameo but no real shocks, daredevil was kind of flagged up.


    Nice to see Dani Rojas pop up in the post credit scene!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,102 ✭✭✭OU812


    Enjoyed it, but I think they should have brought back MJ (1) & Gwen in some way.


    Also, anyone know if they did the spidermen pointing meme?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    They didn't do the meme exactly but there was a moment when they were pointing at each other on the lab when Ned called Peter and they were asking which one he meant. I think there was a similar moment on the Statue of Liberty when they were discussing who was SM1 etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,775 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    Been a few days since I've seen it, but I came out thinking that was just a couple of hours of pure fun and joy. The nostalgia, the meme, the interactions between the 3 in general being the stand out moments. Personally, I'm not a fan of the bad guy turning good, but I think they did it well in this. I can't remember it all, but I know repeat viewings will show more.

    But it does reinforce my attempt to not watch/read anything to do with films I'm interested in. How mind blowing would it have been to get the Spidey reveals without basically everyone knowing it beforehand. I don't think there was a single (notable) character in it I wasn't previously aware of and I had limited my access to information greatly. Just a lot couldn't be avoided. Hate this modern trend of having to know everything before the film is out.

    Oh, and thank to the trailers, I don't need to go see Uncharted. They showed the whole film, massive end battle scene and all. Just missing some story bits. Wasn't mad interested in it to begin with anyway. Thankfully, the after credit scene didn't appear to ruin too much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,757 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Garfield's "Peter3!" bit was well done, pity he didn't get better material to work with (and be at least half a decade younger).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    I like Garfield more in this than I did in either of his solo films where I thought his Spider-Man/Parker was a bit of a dick tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,881 ✭✭✭FortuneChip


    But Dani Rojas is meant to the Sandman, not Venom 😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,632 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    I thought Garfield and Stone were the highlight of two not greatly conceived films.

    I'd still maintain that his final scene in TASM2 just encapsulates Spiderman perfectly. Just a shame he didn't have the creative behind him to bring it home.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    There's no denying their chemistry was fantastic but the writing around them is awful at times. I've only seen ASM2 once and don't intend to revisit but I never found his Parker likeable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,233 ✭✭✭steve_r


    After watching Garfield in this I have been tempted to go back to his films - has anyone done it? The second in particular was an awful mess.

    Havent watched either of them (or Spider-Man 3) since seeing them in the cinema



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    I watched ASM before No Way Home, couldn't bring myself to watch the sequel. I watched the first 2 Maguire films but I've been burned too many times by SM3, I've rewatched it twice on the past and each time I went in thinking "it can't be as bad as I remember".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,728 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Both of TASM films had good ideas that they just brought 2-3 steps too far.

    Peter's father being involved in Oscorp's genetics and being killed for it? Also has secret underground lab in train station accessed by special coins, and is assassinated in private plane crash.

    Max Dillon feels ignored and becomes jealous of the attention Spider-Man gets? Also carries around a birthday card for himself and talks to himself in the mirror.

    Norman Osborn has genetic illness which could affect Harry? Instantly starts to affect Harry and has secret files that Harry finds by accident.

    So many other things that were just needlessly taken too far.

    Garfield and Stone were by far the highlights of both films, and I'm glad Garfield got a chance in this one to show how good he still can be in the role. His character was a bit of a prick at times in his films but I never thought he went too far with it, as he still had a lot of heart. Scenes like where he stops a kid from being bullied, fixes his science project and starts walking with him and asking him about it were great.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,555 ✭✭✭✭Zero-Cool


    I always thought Andrew was a **** Peter and Spidey but no way home prices he's actually really good at both and actually shows up Tom's Peter/Spidey. Just goes to show the ASM films were just in bad hands and I love how Andrew for some badly needed redemption from this. Can't wait for this to come out on digital just to watch all the bits with Tobey and Andrew again. Saying that, I'm really excited for the next Tom films. Hopefully no more bumbling Sir to everyone.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 31,123 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    Amazing Spider-Man was such an insipid film I never even bothered with the second.

    Spider-Man 3 is such a mess I don’t think I’d defend it. There’s just enough of the Raimi good stuff in there to wrap up some stuff, like the MJ and Peter relationship arc. I also enjoy the infamous goofy scenes, even if they don’t land as well as similar scenes did in the previous two films. But it’s clearly a mess of a film - even visually it’s morbidly fascinating to see how Hollywood went all-in on CG in the mid-00s and made the action and spectacle infinitely more weightless and unconvincing. There’s a world of difference between the small-scale action finales of Spider Man 1 + 2 and the CG excess of 3. And there’s simply too much going on, with the various subplots sucking up time from each other in quite a frustrating way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    I'd completely forgotten about his dad's secret layer, completely undermines the fact that Spider-Man is meant to be an ordinary kid and it could have happened to anyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,728 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Yeah. In those films, it was Parker DNA that was spliced with the spiders, meaning it'd only work on someone with Parker DNA. That's why it ends up making Harry into the Green Goblin rather than healing him.

    Like I said, they had some okay ideas, but took them all way too far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,632 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Could of been much worse if you saw the deleted ending. :D

    I watched both TASMs before NWH and I can't remember many dick moments from Garfield's Peter. His messing around of Gwen at the start of TASM2 is the worst I can recall. Letting that intern get shafted in TASM1 as well. Both are results of awful writing of Peter.

    His portrayal of Spiderman on the other hand was consistently great. His empathy for Dillon and the kid at the end of TASM2 being the best examples.

    They fucked up Peter in those films through no fault of Garfield.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    The scene in the first one where he apprehends the car thief springs to mind, I know Spider-Man is meant to be quippy but he was just being plain mean imo and taunting the thief way beyond what was necessary. It felt especially sour after Uncle Ben had already given him the speech after the Flash incident. I'm not going to comment on ASM2 but even at the end of ASM when he decides to break his promise to Gwen's dad so easily but maybe that's addressed in the messing Gwen around you referred to. Anyway it's just a personal opinion, as I said I enjoyed him in NWH.



Advertisement