Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Brexit discussion thread XIV (Please read OP before posting)

1210211213215216333

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,450 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Frost seems to believe there are negotiations about the NIP ongoing.

    There are no negotiations.

    There are technical implementation talks.

    It looks like the UK regime will simply ignore implementing the protocol and keep "negotiating".

    I think the French and the Germans will lose patience very soon if this is going to carry on like this.

    The EU legal action prepared earlier this year as a reaction to the UK not implementing parts of the protocol in timely manner will be revived pronto...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,153 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    They cannot admit Brexit is an abject failure and that they should never have left the Single Market (as the UK was in no way ready or prepared to do so).

    We're effectively watching a western democracy being hijacked by a rogue regime and a rogue set of voters (anyone who votes Conservative or who voted Leave).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    But the higher death rates in areas of the UK with high rates of elderly residents are not due to elderly residents being unvaccinated - vaccination rates in the UK are high, especially among the elderly. They are due to the elderly being old.

    I think you'll find the pattern is replicated in other countries - districts that have a higher proportion of elderly residents also have a higher Covid death rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    It's worth pointing out that the EU doesn't care about, and certainly doesn't object to, this particular delay. The UK's inability to operate customs controls on goods imported into the UK is a problem for the UK. It's a benefit for countries that export to the UK.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,907 ✭✭✭✭CJhaughey


    I remember figures of 50k Customs officers being required Pre-Brexit to deal with the Post-Brexit bureaucracy and forms.

    As far as I can see there have been no additional recruitment campaigns for this small army of people so presumably until the positions are filled and there are people on the ground that are able to carry out the required checks then the can will continue to be kicked down the road.

    At this stage the smugglers paradise must be extremely attractive to all kinds of criminal as the likelihood of being caught is minimal in the extreme and profits must be immense. So much for taking back control...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,153 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The decision to withdraw from the Single Market after 25 years of core membership for purely political / ideological reasons is a mind boggling one. One explanation is that the regime itself didn't even remotely understand what the Single Market is and how it operates - the UK civil service probably does, but has been overruled at all points by the loons (including Johnson) giving out the orders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,907 ✭✭✭✭CJhaughey


    The UK as a whole (bar some of the CS that were involved in Europe ) has very little understanding of the EU and its systems. That in itself is the crux of the issue, for many years anything bad was simply blamed on "the EU".

    Amongst the wider populace that consume the vitriolic RW press the idea that EU was a giant monster that fed on its children took hold and that is what led to Brexit.

    Look at the Cornwall example, despite being massively supported by the EU it voted to leave, and has since found itself in a financial hole due to Tory mendacity.

    Swindon , Home of the Honda factory again voted to leave despite being an obvious casualty post SM exit.

    It reminds me somewhat of the Black Knight scene from Monty Python. The UK obviously playing the role of the Black Knight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,153 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    One key takeaway from this is that the Brexit leadership are not very intelligent people. A Thatcher or Major or Blair would instinctively understand how important the Single Market is and that leaving it would be a disastrous move. I get the impression the Brexit godfathers, despite all their gusto and bravado, are not very bright and are a really poor calibre of politician. Most of them wouldn't have even got into a Cabinet 20 or 30 years ago.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,542 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I don't think that intelligence is the correct prism through which to view this. I reckon that the Brexiters know exactly what they're at. The mistake is to think that their interests are synonymous with those of the country as a while. The likes of Rees-Mogg waste no time in transferring their financial interests to Dublin while Crispin Odey has made a fortune. The problem is that Brexit was always about their self interest and nothing else.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,153 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I would still argue they are a very poor calibre of politician. The likes of Johnson, Raab, Patel, Hancock, Williamson, Truss etc probably wouldn't have even gotten into a Tory Cabinet thirty years ago - we're talking about utter mediocrities and people who are not especially bright or gifted.

    The genuine talents like Dominic Grieve and Rory Stewart were hounded out of the party for being anti-Brexit.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,542 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Their being poor politicians is inherent in their willingness to put greed and opportunism before country. You are correct in that the party has eschewed talent in favour of loyalty. It looks more like a feudal court than anything else with various individuals jostling for Johnson's favour while the outcasts plot against him.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭fash


    Prior to the brexit referendum, euroscepticism in the major parties was the preserve of the "loser/failure/2nd rate/mediocre" politicians.

    Brexit filtered for political mediocrity.

    Following the brexit victory, only these mediocrities could be selected from to represent "the will of the people".



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,288 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    The Food & Drink Federation have published more bad news for GB exports...

    Without wanting to dump a load of tweets in here (click on the above for more info) but since 2019 trade with Germany is down 44.5%, Italy down 43.3%, Spain down 50.6% and Irl down more than 25% (by nearly £0.75bn)

    Global sales of whiskey and salmon and soft drinks are up but all other major products are down. Exports to non-EU markets (China, Taiwan...) is up but I'm not sure if these were much to statrt with.

    Imports also appear to be down: from NL down by 19%, Irl down by 20.1% and Ger by 33.1%



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,288 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I also spotted this video of Penny Mordaunt who is over in the States trying to drum up trade. Interesting choice of descriptions and language - will the Americans fall for it? I don't think so!




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,753 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    The fact that she even has to say that it isn't an act of self harm tells you that they know that that is how everyone is viewing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,944 ✭✭✭Bigus



    If you’re a van driver or driving a commercial vehicle with a trailer from the uk doing drops to the EU a you’re in for a rude awakening,

    £1100 to operate now for uk drivers in the EU.

    I’ve heard rather expression death by 1000 cuts , but the EU is really biting Brexiteers hard.


    Also I saw two Van life female campers explaining really well and intelligently, how Europe differs from EU and ultimately Schengen area.

    they explained how the 180 / 90 day rule works and how UK people could use the Schengen area to legally circumvent not having to return to the actual UK auto stay legal in Europe and not fall foul of EU rules if you wanted to stay away from the UK for more than a year.

    this was about 3 months ago.

    In fairness they weren’t being , smart, arrogant or smug about this but were demonstrating a genuine way to stay in Europe post Brexit for more than 3 months by using non Schengen areas and Turkey etc.

    However their plan was to stay in Slovenia and Croatia, but now, in December, Slovenia and Croatia are snowed under so instead of ideally being down around the warm med ,Brexit has forced them to be frozen out , and they are on their way home to UK now, and going to spend post Christmas in Scotland .

    Also apart from the cold the native winter time (as against summer holiday makers)reaction to the now mandatory UK and GB sticker has caused them untold hostility from the normally friendly locals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,507 ✭✭✭✭kowloon




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 684 ✭✭✭farmerval


    After the first IRAQ war reading a book about how the US got involved there, one of the fascinating things was a lot of the supporting cast, including the guy that had first used the term shock and awe, were brought into the inner circle specifically because of their views. Several were people that in the states contributed to right wing websites and publications. The controlling element in the Republican party were itching for an opportunity to demonstrate how awesome the US Military were.

    People who parroted that line were promoted into policy decision making areas. I think the same happened with the Tories. Having a solid block of MP's that defined themselves only as opposed to Europe, any aspiring MP seemed to need to bow o the ERG grouping if they wanted to progress their careers. Theresa May was a good example. I wonder if she held such venomous attitudes to immigrants or was it simply the best way of progressing to the top.

    Boris is in an impossible position now, he has emboldened a rump of the party that is now almost drunk on it's own power. They have huge power with little responsibility, I believe they don't want to be ministers, I think they feel their in a perfect position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,907 ✭✭✭✭CJhaughey


    Not alone little responsibility, they are also actively starting to circumvent the law by trying to reduce the power of the courts to rein in their excesses.

    The UK is now heading towards a state where the parliament is answerable to no-one not even the highest courts in the land.

    Its a dangerous situation for any country to find itself in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,026 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    All of this again brings us back to the disaster that is FPTP. In a voting system like PR you would not get anything at the level of ERG or momentum because those MPs would have probably split years ago knowing they could still get elected but as we saw with UKIP any Tory defectors were ousted at the first election as UKIP candidates.

    These lobby groups within lobby groups within parties are a joke



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,788 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Johnson may not be long for No.10, with the Tories having lost the North Shropshire seat of Owen Patterson. To give context, Patterson won the seat with 62% of the vote and a 22 000 vote majority in 2019.


    Sunak is in California now as well and you have to wonder if that is to have as much distance from the stink from Johnson as you can get at the moment. But any leader taking over will have the same problems, unless they are from outside the cabinet. The current cabinet has stood by the messaging from No.10 about rules and parties, but this has had cut through to voters. Will anyone taking over be able to take control of the mess that they stood by for all this time and defended? Or will it just be someone else filling the seat and driving the ship towards disaster? Seeing Morduant speech up thread, my answer would be anyone taking over will just be continuing the same disaster policies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,753 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Johnson took over from TM, having served in her cabinet and voting for her deal, and not only did the voters wipe the slate clean, they gave the very same Tories that had presided over the mess of the previous 3 years, a whopping great majority.

    If Johnson does move on, it will be because the Tories are looking to wipe the slate clean and start anew, as if they hadn't been in power for the last 11 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,026 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    People gave "getting Brexit done" the whopping majority as much as it being about a clean slate. The next election won't be about Brexit in the same way and will probably involve the 4th Tory PM since Brown was voted out so it might take more than a clean slate next time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    She didn't deliver that very well. The whole thing came out sounding very contrived and it kinda seemed like she doesn't really believe a word of it.

    Utter shite.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 866 ✭✭✭timetogo1


    Nick🇬🇧🇪🇺 on Twitter: "+UPDATE+ Britain to accept the role of EU law & judges in Northern Ireland. https://t.co/amBpIfje6P" / Twitter

    A good day to release that news quietly I think.

    One of the comments on that thread sums it up.

    "The white flag of Brexit victory waved again"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    (Short) article commenting on UK move to exempt Ireland from its Customs changes in Jan next year:

    It's interesting what the UK is doing here.

    Maybe I'm getting sour & full of paranoia wrt. actions of this UK govt. but to me looks like their trade policy towards Ireland is following the immigration/citizenship policies they have which post Brexit prevent Ireland ever joining Schengen, and any deeper successor aggreements between Schengen members (because Ireland doesn't wish to lose these "benefits"). It's effectively a roadblock on Ireland getting deeper into that aspect of EU integration, we will need opt outs etc. in future.

    So they are cutting us out of the EU with respect to trade and giving special treatment, maybe in a hope of creating similar barriers over time (on other aspects of our EU membership...we won't wish to disrupt the "special" relationship with the UK). 

    Maybe redirection of Irish trade to the continent has worried them badly. Frost has mentioned our trade shifting (i.e. East-West + vice versa) which he obviously sees as still "their" trade in a sense despite the dispute in the 20s, as a problem for the UK which must be addressed immediately, not just the NI protocol issues.

    They also lose some of their best leverage over the EU (which is mainly through their ability to make Ireland suffer badly) the more we disconnect our economy from them so they are trying to stop or at least slow that down by allowing our exporters a benefit. They might need that leverage in future. Overall it's not really a good thing I think (apart from the short term benefits).



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    I think its more a realisation that the UK buys a substantial proportion of their food from IRL and introducing tariffs on that trade would put the final nail in the tory coffin, or al least Johnson's PM role.

    From an Irish perspective this is great news, IRL remains in the EU and there is less tension with NI with free trade in one direction. There are no wedges placed between IRL and the rest of the EU, and Irish exporters have an advantage over most every other country exporting to the UK. The UK will stretch the patience of the EU but that doesn't affect us in IRL.

    It will be interesting to see if peoples attitudes to Johnson change, he's had such bad press it has to affect him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Yeah it is "good news" on the face of it. As you say it is a problem for the EU though. We may not always be a beneficiary of countries trying to divide the EU on trade like this for whatever reason (e.g. see trade sanctions China is trying to impose on Lithuania only at the moment).

    I don't think there are any tariffs involved here, but their food imports from this country would be made slower/more difficult by new Customs requirements on 1 Jan and of course the Irish exporters may then be further encouraged to shift away from the UK to avoid red tape/problems. The UK has to import alot of food from somewhere in the end.

    As said I may be overly cynical. There's alot of possible reasons for this like the UK Customs not being ready, or not wanting to disrupt/slow food imports from a major supplier country (...but then they also import large amounts of food from other EU members like all the veg. from Spain/Netherlands, so why is Ireland singled out?).



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think that the NI Protocol plays a part in this. If they implement full customs between NI and GB, then that reinforces the need for customs between GB and NI, which undermines the 'bin the paperwork' cry from Johnson.

    If we want to go Schengen, we need NI to be in Schengen - so that is out short of a united Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,863 ✭✭✭RobAMerc


    does this mean we are effectively in the same boat as NI wrt trade to the UK and EU ?

    I assume WTO rules will put the kybosh on this.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,454 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    It is described as the first post-Brexit deal negotiated from scratch and not "rolled over" from trade terms that the UK enjoyed while in the EU.

    Oz is a country that's a close ally and China is boycotting food imports so needs a new market. UK farmers are not impressed as they won't be seeing much of that 0.08% GDP growth by 2035 ( that 0.006% annual growth will offset the negative aspects of Brexit )



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,454 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Looks they are coming around to the acceptance stage ?

    Cambridge professor of EU law Catherine Barnard said the suggestions floating around Whitehall for a solution over the European court of justice had merit and would effectively mean swapping article 12 of the Northern Ireland protocol for articles 169 to 174 of the overall withdrawal agreement.

    So no, they still at the bargaining stage and wanting to EU to compromise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,026 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    Thats true, had to look and IRL is fourth largest country that the UK imports from, but we are not that important over all.

    It is a good question, why Ireland. Do they think by keeping IRL close they might see us leave the EU and keep ties with the UK, are they that deluded ! do they think their actions cause a smoke screen and division within the EU, 'divide and conquer' tactics, or do they feel giving way in NI, having a border in the Irish sea will be unforgiven at the next election. But either way if by then the economic performance in NI is far better than GB since brexit this yr, that will still be a big blow to the tory's, only a land border in IRL would prevent that, which doesn't explain the current course of action by this Govt. It will be interesting to see how this develops.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,026 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    They are doing it to Ireland because they don't have a solution to the corner they backed themselves into. This is essentially a climb down from the trigger art.50 BS



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,863 ✭✭✭RobAMerc


    yes, but when they start imposing rules and tarrifs on other countries ( including EU ), wont we effectively be in the same position as NI, in that we have access to GB and EU ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    I sort of get that, but goods from NI can travel unimpeded from NI direct to GB so that doesn't upset the DUP. The UK has to implement those checks at all ports from the rest of the EU, and I presume that includes NI ports and Airports where NI is importing from the EU (excl IRL). So why exclude IRL from the import checks. Is it only because of NI unique position, imports from ILR to NI would be unchecked so singling out NI from the rest of the UK with added advantages. If so it seems the torys want to pull down a part of the UK that has the prospect to flourish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,026 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Sorry I meant nothing negative as in people don't need to worry about our trade to France or anything like that.

    I just see this as the UK secretly agreeing to the oven ready treaty they wrote and signed in the first place



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,542 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Why would they do this when they're not even inspecting goods coming into the country from the EU at present?

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    My understanding is from January they start to phase in import checks from all EU countries bar IRL.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,542 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I don't really know. I don't see what difference it makes to the EU if they check incoming goods or not in relation to mainland Britain. NI is of course a different matter.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,026 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    What would be the point. If you leave 1 door open the whole system is useless.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,333 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Your mistake is assuming the point is to actually control things rather than pretend they are in control in the same way as their new chemical regulation etc. (relies on companies reporting things in on their own).



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,446 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    Maybe that's the point, they must know they're wholly unprepared and leaving a back door might suit them as it might provide a means for trade to continue. It just feels like everything is closing in on them, the tide has turned, which is a good thing. Not that I wish harm on the UK but a dose of reality is long overdue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,026 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Oh no I fully understand it's a sham. It's all just a crafty way of climbing down from the brinkmanship of a month ago



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    I think it is hard to be certain of the reasons behind policies with this UK govt. I'm very suspicious of the motive of everything they do as regards their relations with Ireland or more particularly the EU. However (somewhat thankfully, given the first point) they are also not very competent, and (as others said) they can be very led by the polls & opinions of their supporters in decisions they make, so will sometimes turn on a dime.

    An example would be the complete about face for now as regards starting more trouble with the EU over the NI protocol. The leaders and the party seem to badly want it to happen but basically fear of the consequences (edit: I mean political result for them at home, not effects on relationships with the EU, Ireland or the US) is staying their hand.

    It's just impossible to really know what they are at half the time.

    Post edited by fly_agaric on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    trumpeting the deal? I get the impression Boris told his team to sign whatever the australians offered so he could plug the constant wave of bad news he's been getting.


    Judging how the australian agriculture reps responded compared to the british I dont think it'll stay good news for long



  • Posts: 533 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I suspect it’s just too much hassle to implement anything within the CTA and NI is a hornets nest they’re realising is very very dangerous to shake.

    They always seem bit shocked that Brexit has actually meant Brexit and isn’t a bit of a lark and a parlour game and that they are taken at their word when they make threats and so on.

    They also grossly miscalculated the US and seemed to think that’s they’d have a friendly Trump administration. Instead they are likely seen as an extension of Trump like politics by the Democrats, who will be treating them as such.

    They also grossly overestimate their own importance in terms of trade with the US. They’re not owed a free lunch and when it comes to serious trade deals they really haven’t made a lot of friends.

    It’s also worth noting that the US-EU relationship is very much a long standing platform or post WWII American foreign policy in Europe. The Trump era was an aberration.

    Australia is currently run by a government that has a lot in common with the Tories. It’s the home of Murdock tabloid press and is the absolute outlier when it came to climate change. It’s very much on the wrong side of history at the moment wirh all of that and frankly didn’t come out very well at COP26.

    I think they’ve potentially walked themselves into trading issues over their environmental policies, even with the US and they’re highly dependent on China, yet are in a diplomatic confrontation with it all the time and the way they handled the submarine thing with France was lacking any kind of diplomatic finesse and probably did them a lot of damage with EU trade in the medium term.

    Overall, I wouldn’t really think Australia’s position is fantastic at the moment, and also it’s very likely the current political picture there will change this year with Labor likely to take the helm again, which could see U.K. Australian relations become a lot more distant.

    Economically, it’s not a great fit with the U.K. Britain is very far away, it doesn’t need Australian raw materials as it has no real use for them and the U.K. financial services and services sectors would likely undermine Australian counterparts by trying to compete for the same Asian business. I can’t see that going down well in Canberra or the Aussie financial districts.

    The U.K. also isn’t a stepping stone into Europe anymore, so is just one mediocre market and Australia is smaller again economically.

    What the U.K. is doing is a bit like someone having a massive row with all the local supermarkets and shopping centres and insisting that they’ll buy all their groceries online from Brazil or something. It’s all great in theory, but in practice it’s a mess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,153 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The Trump point is a good one. They were convinced they could pivot away from the EU and into a trade / political alliance with their far right pal in the White House. The Irish-American Biden getting elected was little short of a disaster for them and has thrown everything up in the air.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 533 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The Trump point could be come extremely negative if there’s ever any connection found between the U.K. and Trump’s election.

    There was already Cambridge Analytica and there’s a lot of crossover between various characters and organisations on the fringes of politics.

    Hell hath no fury like an American public waking up with a hangover… and I think we are only seeing the very early stages of the Trump unravelling. That’s going to get extremely messy as 2022 and 2023 roll on. 🍿



Advertisement