Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

EU Proposal on calf transportation. NO MOVE UNDER 35DAYS

124

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,087 ✭✭✭alps


    They do give them away cheap to someone to rear them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,087 ✭✭✭alps


    I will sell you calves at 5 weeks old for €100, and will deduct €25 from that price for every week earlier you collect the calf..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    First off most BF are only average cattle. Growth rate is too slow and they are three year old before they get into good weight.

    There are many different types of HO. It's an education to join ICBF. Most Friesians you see in marts no matter how square are 70%+ HO.. a lot of the rest of the 30 % could be JE breeding .

    Nothing wrong with a lot of the FR I buy most turn a few pound for me. Biggest issue is that some lads cannot manage to put weight on them. Yes there is definitely an issue with the beef bulls dairy farmers are using. Many are using extremely easy calving bulls that have no growth rate and will not gain more than 500 grams per day LW.

    Had two great HO/AA heifers this year. Big plain heifers both killed 370 kgs at 29 months. No HE or AA bullock could match them. I doubt if they had to be pulled from the cow either.

    Problem is a lot of dairy farmers were sold a pup. No allowance was made for calf value in Teagasc and FJ grassland model. It was assumed that all calves would have a positive value at birth. It would be a lot worse except for the demand for AA beef. The thinking that farmers could dump/sell calves off farm at 10-14 days was flawed.

    Then there was no factoring in of labour costs. Back in 2012-2016/18 the thinking of consultant's was about a mystical eastern European couple that would milk and herd the cows 7 days a week to get over labour laws for a minimum wage. When they learned English they found other work. It probably costing the profit of 50 cows to pay a full time labour unit. So if you go from 100-150 cows it either work like a...... because if you have to pay labour you are at noting

    Add calves or maybe the heifers that are contract reared and one blip and you have a mess on your hands.

    If you milk 100+ cows and have no labour coming trying to manage all them suck calves and then in April manage a breeding program for heifers is an issue.

    Contract rearing was going to cost a euro/day because some lad did not want to stock his farm as there was no money in suckler's or beef and you could even set f@@king achievement targets he had to meet.

    Before that we had the wood chips pads and lined earthen bank slurry tanks. Then the external cubicles. As well you would have access to cheap bale silage at below cost of production. Lorry in the soya hulls or palm kernel if you had a problem.

    Paper never refused ink.

    TBH I cannot understand how some lads are staying digging. As I said from the start about it. It will not be allowed

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭DBK1


    It was the opposite problem we used to have with friesian’s, we couldn’t get them to stop growing! The problem being they’d stay growing tall and long and only start getting fat when they’d be 700kgs plus. Now admittedly it’s probably 20 - 25 years ago since we kept any substantial number of friesian’s so I’m sure the breeding has changed somewhat in that length of time.

    On your second point dairy farmers can’t entirely blame teagasc/FJ for all of the calf problems being seen now. A bit like lads that lost the run of themselves in the Celtic tiger and then decided it wasn’t their fault as the banks shouldn’t have gave them the money in the first place. There has to be an element of common sense and responsibility on the side of the farmer too. Did the farmers ask their calf customers if they would still want their calves when the quality drops through the floor? Did they look at the grading and pricing on the beef side and make an estimate of just how much of a drop in price the poorer carcass would have? Surely it crossed their minds that even as a backup plan they would need more facilities for all these extra calves? Sometimes it’s just too easy to point the finger elsewhere than take your own responsibility.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,344 ✭✭✭Gawddawggonnit




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    No. We’ll be the ones that will bear the cost of 120/130€ a calf to get them to weaning and sell, having an BF cows calf like suggested wont make any difference and you’ll have crap milk yeild

    there will be so much stock in the country Larry and co will pay what ever the hell they like,

    if export of calves go the beef farmer is finished IMO



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,261 ✭✭✭Grueller


    I agree 100% with your last sentence

    The ai companies are working hard on getting ivf off the ground anyhow and implanting easy calved beef crosses into dairy cows. If that works it is definitely game over for suckler beef.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It not a beef farmers problem it's an issue for the dairy side to sort out.

    In theory IVF sounds grand. However the big issue is that it will spread the calving interval on a lot of dairy farms if they try to go down that route. Sexed semen if they can ever get it sorted will reduce the amount of fairy bulls. But a beef mop up bull has too many advantages compared to trying to watch cows for AI especially as labour is scarce on larger farms.

    The way to sort is to get stick bulls genomic tested and to put up that information on the mart board when calves are sold

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,611 ✭✭✭Mooooo


    Whether people wish to admit it or not the dairy and beef industries are one in the same with regard to beef. If live exports stop the extra stock will crash the price processors will pay for stock, fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,110 ✭✭✭minerleague


    How come scientists can't come up with some way of fooling the cows body into thinking she has calved, then dairy farmers need only breed replacements with sexed semen!🤑



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    it is a dairy industry issue but if they stay in the country beef is finished



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,478 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    It'll be a problem for both insustries, ultimately it could mean dairy farmers having to pay for calves to be taken by beef farmers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,983 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    Could be the best thing possible to happen beef. Might drive lads to living in reality...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,016 ✭✭✭cute geoge


    I can't get this ,the country will have surplus calves.weanlings stores and finished cattle ,the reality Larry and co. won't be able to stand they will be laughing so much .The only reality is there will starvation any bad year for cattle!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,983 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    Look at what goes on at present. Too many lads paying silly money for calves, high inputs/investment for very little return.

    Plenty of room for a significant price drop and for lots to be doing at least as well as they are now if they'd cut their cloth to suit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,224 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    And then they'll blame IFA, teagasc or whoever other than themselves. That's what amuses me if it wasn't so sad



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 739 ✭✭✭valtra2


    Beef farming has been finished well before now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭GrasstoMilk


    It hasnt been too bad this year I think but that’s looking from the outside in



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,261 ✭✭✭Grueller




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 599 ✭✭✭dh1985


    Where do lads think these extra calves are going to be fed. The land mass isn't getting any bigger so something will have to give somewhere to feed the additional stock if exports go. Same consequence for beef as dairy as beef calves won't be exported either. There will have to be a reduction somewhere or there will be a lot of hungry cattle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,224 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    Farmers that can't get rid of their calves will just have to cut back, We've had a few hungry years and most farmers have learnt now not to overstock, it'll be a rocky road at the start but it'll work itself out



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,224 ✭✭✭✭wrangler


    It's been a great year, summer grazers had no problem having €500 + between buying and selling cattle with no expenses, lambs making €50 -70 more than last year,, milk is going well and grain is good.

    The crash will come next year with the rise in costs



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,212 ✭✭✭Good loser


    Precisely. The debate above is being conducted without reference to the methane/climate problem.

    This combined with a possible calf export ban generates the dilemma. Plus the fact that the existing dairy herd stays the same size or even grows modestly.

    The measures for reducing methane haven't a hope in hell of working. Unless there is a calf slaughter scheme. It is inevitable and should be faced up to as soon as possible. If 400,000 plus calves could be exported each year there will not be a problem, even if the calves were sold at less than €50 per head. Chickens live 6/7 weeks lambs 4/5 months why not calves?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 599 ✭✭✭dh1985


    Is a calf slaughter scheme inevitable or is it more likely that we have peaked on cow numbers and that between the various stumbling blocks facing agriculture, that a reduction in the national herd is the more likely outcome. In fact irrespective of this calf export issue its looking like there will be a reduction as a result of climate policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,826 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    The 35 day thing is only for export? Calves can still be sold off farm at 10 to 14 days?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,864 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    The proposal as drafted is

    1. No export of unweaned calves (under 8-10 weeks)

    2. Calves can only leave farm after 35 days subject to a journey of 2 hours or less



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,864 ✭✭✭mr.stonewall


    Herd numbers probably have peaked and will only grow if there is a mass exodus from Sucklers.

    If this proposal on exports is happening, the odds of a Bobby calf scheme is slim to none. The market will find a level and it will be that the majority of calves will have a negative value leaving the farm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,087 ✭✭✭alps


    At 2 hours a day, it going to take 2 weeks to get to Holland, and they'll have 14 movements on their card..



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,827 ✭✭✭ginger22


    How about air freight, was proposed last year but nothing happened.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    Greens - anti animal agriculture.

    The sooner people cop onto that instead of going hang on now we'll discuss that for the next six months.

    You stifle animal agriculture you stifle agriculture as a whole.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭LawBoy2018


    Yes, because cattle don't produce enough emissions... Lets start flying them across the globe lol



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭atlantic mist


    teagasc are suppose to be researching the air transport, if they can do it for horses going to australia for breeding or racing im sure a 1.5 hour trip to holland with all of these idel planes can be arranged.....and air transport is not included in carbon calculations so our calves would have an extremly low carbon footprint....

    have they snuck in pregnant animals cant travel if over 6 months pregnant as well in the EU directive



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,827 ✭✭✭ginger22


    here we go again with the smart arse anti farming comment.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 9,041 Mod ✭✭✭✭greysides


    MOD


    @LawBoy2018 You are entitled to post here. Still. However, your comments show a lack of understanding of farming. What is a casual discussion for you, is a serious problem to the livelihood of others. It is being discussed here in a serious fashion. Be aware of that in your posting please.

    The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress. Joseph Joubert

    The ultimate purpose of debate is not to produce consensus. It's to promote critical thinking.

    Adam Grant



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,259 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    Anybody figure the only people that are going to benefit by this



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭LawBoy2018


    You're making assumptions without any foundation, I come from a farming background myself. I'll continue to post here however I like, just like the other posters. Thanks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 599 ✭✭✭dh1985


    He has made a valid point in the post above. On one hand farmers are critical of flying avocado's or whatever the flavour of the day is around the world but see flying calves as ok as it suits their agenda. The same lads would be complaining about air travel been the big contributor to the climate problem but again if it suits there own agenda there happy to be on board.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 9,041 Mod ✭✭✭✭greysides


    No. No, you won't!


    Take a couple days off and go read the charter.

    The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress. Joseph Joubert

    The ultimate purpose of debate is not to produce consensus. It's to promote critical thinking.

    Adam Grant



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 9,041 Mod ✭✭✭✭greysides


    If you wish to discuss moderation, do it by PM. Just this once to answer you quickly, he has made some good points but he is coming across badly. I asked him to be sensitive to the thread matter under discussion.

    The aim of argument, or of discussion, should not be victory, but progress. Joseph Joubert

    The ultimate purpose of debate is not to produce consensus. It's to promote critical thinking.

    Adam Grant



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,983 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    It will be turned into another stick to beat the image of agriculture with whatever way it goes



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,360 ✭✭✭green daries


    Might be very efficient show me the figures says it's not ..........planes don't have emissions don't you know 😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,360 ✭✭✭green daries


    Fing horse's for god's sake 🙄🙄🙄🙄 that is a real polluting industry with no real need to exist at all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,360 ✭✭✭green daries


    Ya it's definitely not right that stuff is flown round the world. especially when it has the highest cost pollution wise on the planet of I think anything else produced.

    Flying is criticised by farmers as they are polluting but have a complete free pass as there emissions aren't calculated or included in the discussion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Flying calves was a brain fart that arose during the last IFA presidential election. A candidate proposed it without any research on the feasibility or costings on it and that is even if either airports would allow it or commercial air transport companies would have any interest. It was similar with upwards only convergence.

    There is a big difference between flying a horse worth 5-20 million to Australia and flying hundred of thousands of 50-60 euro calves to Holland.

    Personally I can never see it happening it a red herring just like upward only convergence proved to be

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,224 ✭✭✭✭wrangler




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,087 ✭✭✭alps


    Aeroplane emissions are not counted, so leave out that argument.

    And if you do want to arguue fair, count in the flight emissions, but also count in the carbon the grass has extracted from the atmosphere (which is more than the cow emits)..

    The climate debate is built around a farcical set of inventory figures. Flights are excluded as are carbon removals by herbage.

    Consequently agriculture, and particularly bovines, have been hung out to dry.

    Calculations actually show cows emitting less carbon( even as a CO2 equivalent) than they consume in their feed, a combination of grass, silage and grain, all which have taken carbon from the atmosphere, of which less than half is emitted through belching (methane) and respiration (CO2).

    Respiration isn't taken into account in the inventories either..ie any respiration, from farm animals, wild animals, pets, humans...

    There seems to be some sort of assumption that animals breath out an amount of carbon, which they took into their bodies as food, which originally was taken out of the atmosphere by plants..all of which is too difficult to count...so it is ignored..

    And subsequently Cows are getting ridden bareback in the discussions..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,953 ✭✭✭farawaygrass


    I don’t believe a Bobby calf situation will ever happen here, and rightly so.

    public perception is everything and there is no way it could be sold to the public.

    even in the uk, aren’t the supermarkets putting emphasis on calf welfare now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,360 ✭✭✭green daries


    I agree with you. Yes the supermarkets are really bothered by animal welfare......as in its consumer driven optics ......... farmers welfare not soooo much and that's also consumer driven.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,125 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    A Bobby calf scenario is even less likely than a State sponsored cull of farmers.


    The need for it can be argued but it's never going to be a runner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,087 ✭✭✭alps




  • Advertisement
Advertisement