Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1141142144146147257

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    There's logic to this madness. Well, the destination naming rather, as it's simply that these schedules show the name of the last stop as per proper continental practice and not loosely related albeit descriptive area names. The problem, one could therefore argue, is that terminus bus stops should be better named.

    As for the variations on the 33A, it's a recurring theme that these print-outs can't get variations right at all. The 33A and 33B are missing them, and then the lone 220A trip carries a variation marker across half of Dublin. The 126 timetables outbound are no more helpful, showing Rathangan as the destination... that's served by only one Mon-Sat trip, the rest only as far as Kildare or Newbridge, not that you'd find out...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    There is no point in using stop names as destinations at the heads of timetables - it’s useless. It is utterly meaningless to the vast majority of people as they are far too specific.

    Anyone with an ounce of common sense looking at those pages when they were printed out would realise that. Clearly there is no one reviewing them.

    They need a separate database of generic destinations for the timetable headers for the timetables and a proper route description on the timetable on the stops as they have on the pdfs.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭dashcamdanny


    Expect complete calamity tomorrow. Lots of canteen talk in Earls Place.

    New fares

    New routes

    People getting the bus from O'Connell street are now getting hoofed out at Townsend If they want to go to Ringsend, Irishtown and Sandymount and waiting for a second bus as the 1 is now cut in half.

    People who want to travel to Rathmines, Terinure, Templeogue and so, from any of the big IT centers in Ringsend, now have to get 2 buses. In Winter.

    And the small issue of 20 plus drivers jumping off the 27/77a to work the new C spine. There is going to be murder I rekon on that route alone. As it is one of the city's busiest routes.

    And alot of spare drivers also getting marked in on the C making them no longer available to cover the vacant dutys and covid sick.


    Driver shortage is getting serious. Nation wide. Euro wide..


    The fuse is lite.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,473 ✭✭✭VG31


    Is there somewhere I can find the anticipated dates for each stage of BusConnects? I spent a while Googling it a few days ago and couldn't find anything. I definitely remember seeing some sort of plan before.



  • Registered Users Posts: 31 ILBondo


    The C Spine is a superior service to the 1, with rush hour frequencies on average every 4 minutes. People travelling from O Connell street can board the C spine at Bachelor's walk for no extra cost. The 15a and 15b users can also switch to the C Spine, for free to continue their journey to Grand Canal Dock. Templeogue village never had a direct route to the docklands as the 15 continues to Clongriffin. The journey of least change doesn't necessarily lead to the quickest journey. That's the reason behind Busconnects.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    Concerning overcrowding already today in Lucan. Huge crowd waiting at Woodies and multiple buses passing by full. It does not bode well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭john boye


    "People getting the bus from O'Connell street are now getting hoofed out at Townsend If they want to go to Ringsend, Irishtown and Sandymount and waiting for a second bus as the 1 is now cut in half.

    People who want to travel to Rathmines, Terinure, Templeogue and so, from any of the big IT centers in Ringsend, now have to get 2 buses. In Winter."

    But now people who want to get to Palmerstown, Lucan and beyond have a direct route to those IT centres? I don't really get this idea that existing routings should be sacrosanct and completely off the table (leaving aside the fact that the 15A/B have only been going to Ringsend for the last few years so it's hardly a route that's been established for decades). I don't know if Bus Connects will be a success but you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,526 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    Now that the C-Spine has been launched from today; what has been people's 1st impressions of the new service? Has the take up of the new 90 minute fare on leap card being launched today been a big success for passengers?

    Also; has there been good demand being seen on the 52?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    It appears the validators haven't been updated for the new €2.30 rate or is that not starting with the launch of the T90 fare? I was charged €2.50 today anyway.

    Fourth time being overcharged in a week as I've discovered from my Leap record just now (2.25 x 3 instead of 1.55), so I'm having a bad run of it at the moment!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,741 ✭✭✭Phil.x





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,644 ✭✭✭Qrt


    I’ve been looking for this as well, I remember seeing it before but I can’t find it now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It was a response to an FOI request, but the planned order is basically:

    2022: Orbitals and G Spine; First up next year will be N4 and N6; Then the G Spine (and I would expect the W Orbitals); Then the rest of the orbitals later in the year

    2023: F Spine; D Spine; E Spine

    2024: A Spine; B Spine; Remaining south city radials along Ranelagh Road

    Obviously alongside each spine, there will be new radials and new locals.

    As it is phased there will also be existing cross-city routes being curtailed temporarily to half the route to maintain the service (like the 1 in this phase).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,859 ✭✭✭Poxyshamrock


    It worked fine for me. Took the C3 from Wellington Quay to Heuston for €1.60 (driver) and then took C1 from Heuston to Ringsend using validator and was only charged €0.70.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    With any network change, there are going to be winners and losers, and people will adjust.

    The real issue is the poor explanations from the NTA of how to adjust behaviour where a direct connection has been lost.

    But being honest, people from Sandymount/Ringsend going to O'Connell Street will adjust to the change in the 1 - they will just have to get on/off the C Spine at Bachelor's Walk or Aston Quay or change on Pearse St/Townsend St. That's not exactly going to be something that will collapse the plan. But, that needs to be explained better to people as I've mentioned before.

    Anyone in GCD using the 15a/b can either walk to Westland Row or get any bus to the inner half of Pearse Street to change.

    In both of these cases the frequencies of the two sets of buses isn't exactly low.

    I'd be more concerned about the areas losing connections along the N4 corridor to be honest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15 Kyriakos


    I'm delighted to see that people are finally realizing what DB drivers have know for many years and that is the NTA don't have a clue, take a moment to think about posters two biggest gripes about DB

    Bad ticketing machines= NTA in charge of that

    No 24 hour service despite DB driver agreement in place for years= NTA decide on frequency of service

    name any issue you have with DB and the NTA will be the hold up bringing forth a solution



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I am struggling a bit with this?

    The C1 and C2 are at the same level as the 25a and 25b were on a Sunday. What's missing at that particular stop are the two buses previously that were on the 25/66a/66b each hour two of the routes were every two hours.

    Tha wouldn't explain multiple buses being full.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    It's probably just some individual buses where it hasn't worked then? It was the C1 from Lucan to city centre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I don't think it as quite as simple as that in regard to those specific items.

    Any increase in operating hours across routes requires more PSO funding and more drivers, and the ticketing project does also need exchequer funding.

    That's dependent on the Dept of Public Expenditure providing the money.

    Many routes saw increases in service in the last two years, most of which have been during the day when they were probably needed more than at night, but we are going to see night time services rolled out.

    My criticism was in relation to the information provided by the NTA about the new fares, routes and timetables and the staggeringly poor rollout of it and poor quality control.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭dashcamdanny


    very true .. My mistake about Templeogue. And I agree with you.

    Definitely breaking a few eggs though.

    Im sure a few weeks down the line it will be normalized . But as I said. Tomorrow and the weeks ahead is going to be crazy. And alot of noses will be put out of joint.

    People in Sandymount . They put the stoppers on alot of plans already regarding cycle lanes and seem to have a bit of influence .

    They will be reliant now on a more frequent C1 and C2 . They dont have as much as a bus shelter at townsends street , along with Garda constantly slowing things up with parking at that stop.


    Shall be an interesting week for sure.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    Well, I went past at about 1.50 and there was a crowd of around 25-30 at Woodies. My bus was full and my friend who was waiting to board there couldn't get on. A C2 passed at around the same time and was also full. C3 and C4 also full. She gave up after 45 minutes and went home. 25a would routinely be full there anyway though. It was last Sunday too, same time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Interesting.

    Was there a big clearout at Liffey Valley out of curiosity?

    You would hope that some of the people who use the C1 and C2 to get from Adamstown and South Lucan will slowly realise that the L53 and the L51 will do that trip for some of them far faster.

    That kind of change in behaviour won't happen overnight though as people take time to adjust their habits.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15 Kyriakos


    The reality is this is the first time the public are seeing first hand the NTA at work and its not good, we drivers have know this for years and fact is have said it but many refuse to believe it, well now you know drivers have not been lying, all the other problems passengers have with DB will also be the NTA's work, you will soon come to realise that as the NTA now are seen to be calling all the shots, all the decisions are removed from DB they now follow the NTA's orders.

    The old adage "be careful what you wish for" springs to mind.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    I would say about 5 or 6 got off at Liffey Valley. Bus was basically full to Bachelor's Walk. As with the 239, I'm sure people will be delighted to use a quicker alternative that gets them closer to the shopping centre... if it shows up. But they're not going to let a C1/2 pass and wait around for the L routes just in case. "Operational Issues" meaning no shows are very common on 25a and 239 so people have been burned already. They'll take what shows up first.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well now let's be honest here. Dublin Bus had to be dragged kicking and screaming out of the dark ages in certain respects, so I would not be painting the company as being completely blameless. But I suspect that doesn't suit your agenda?

    I am happy to criticise the NTA about the information problems, but there are wider issues at play here than simply everything being the NTA's fault.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    DB has been sending several additional buses on the inbound 25a between 6.30 and 8.30 (at least) for months. I sincerely hope the supposed increased frequency on C1 will be up to the task tomorrow with it now serving an extra population of several thousand too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭john boye


    Agree on pretty much everything there but especially the Garda parking behind Pearse St Station. It's outrageous at times.

    Yeah Townsend St stop could do with a shelter alright but the path is very narrow at the moment with the site hoarding so far out. You'd hope there'll be room for one eventually.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    As with anything new it will take time for people to adjust to the new local routes. I wouldn't be judging that aspect on day 1 alone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Got the C3 today at from Maynooth. Seems the terminus in Maynooth is now the first stop. A good start. Skipping Chapelizod is a big win but still going through Lucan where few people from Maynooth, Celbridge and Leixlip have any interest in going. Really should be going down the N4 with stops there.

    Good few people stopping the bus asking where it was going or did the driver know how they could get to some place of other.

    Map attached at bus stop in Maynooth unclear to people where the bus is actually going in the city centre. Spine on the left has no route attached to it.

    (Apologies for photo being sideways, it’s uploaded that way for some reason).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,439 ✭✭✭StreetLight


    That's a combined C3/C5 map. The route on the left is the C3 via Chapelizod bypass, the one on the right is the night-time C5 via Chapelizod Village.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 343 ✭✭TranslatorPS


    On those maps, the strings are always in order of the route numbers at the terminus at the bottom of the string.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The old Lucan Road between Kew Park and Woodies still needs a bus service for the people living there. The C3 and C4 provide that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    I would have instead diverted C3 & C4 via N4, then diverted 52 via Lucan Village instead of the N4 road and made C5 from Adamstown Station via Dodsborough and Lucan Village. 52 and C5 would come to Lucan less crowded as currently C3 & C4 are. Lots of things sadly could have been done better re new routes. I think, it was a mistake splitting 239 too. Some other diversions could have been done, which I don't want to repeat as I've mentioned them earlier a few pages back.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    There should definitely have been a frequent route through Lucan from Shackleton/Dodsboro to town to replace 25 and let the C3/4 stay on N4. It could have stayed going through Chapelizod to give another connection there too. Dropping the 25 and expecting the C2 to eventually divert and serve the massive new population around Dodsboro is a big mistake. I honestly believe that capacity to city centre is just totally inadequate for Lucan in the new services. Posters here don't seem to grasp how full these buses already are even off peak all the way to the quays.

    I'm very happy with Bus Connects overall idea, but Lucan to city centre is not being dealt with properly and all you get is dismissal from those who aren't affected. I mean comments that there's "little difference between C1 and C2 route" show complete lack of knowledge, with several thousand houses on each of the unique sections of the routes, who have a 15 min walk to a combined stop. It's why I read but don't post here often, but I'm very concerned after today's introduction!



  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    For the record I am not dismissing your concerns at all.

    I was trying to understand exactly what was causing the problem today. For example, you reported a C1 and C2 together at Woodies - that simply shouldn't be happening on a Sunday and I would be asking why? They're supposed to be 15 minutes apart there. Bunching causes capacity issues.

    With any set of changes like this there are always going to be issues. The big question is whether the NTA have got the capacity right or not and we won't really know that until probably a week of operations have taken place, to allow everyone to get used to the new network. If it is the case that they've got it wrong, then they need to fix it quickly.

    I have serious reservations that the NTA are not communicating to people how to utilise the connections better and that I suspect is a disaster that may yet blow up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    Did anyone travel today and their previous €2.25 “middle fare” were able to just tag on the validator and get the new €2.30 fare?

    That will make a bit of a difference from my stop as heretofore we had to queue up to the driver and ask for our fare.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    I think there are going to be issues with the reduction in the number of direct buses from Leixlip to the city centre with the new Busconnects. People from Castletown or Confey are now going to have to either get connecting buses or walk down to Leixlip village for a C3, which is only once every half hour, and that's if all buses are operational. No shows on the 66 are very common, and I see no reason the C3 would be any different. If that happens, then it is very likely that the buses could be full once they leave Maynooth. I also imagine that the limited number of direct buses to Leixlip from town will mean the C3 will be oversubscribed, leaving Maynooth/Leixlip people stranded.

    I got on a C3 at Heuston this evening around half eight. The bus was packed, and this is on a cold Sunday night during a pandemic. What would it be like on a Friday or Saturday when things are back to normal? I don't think the current schedule is sufficient for North Kildare. They should have retained the 66A/66B buses, routing them through Lucan village and bypassing Chapelizod. The longer route 66 and 67 buses could bypass both Lucan village and Chapelizod. I think the busconnects plan will really discommode the elderly and infirm, especially people in Confey. Captain's hill is exceptionally steep and is a hard walk if the weather is bad. A direct bus is invaluable for that area.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,526 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    One of the multiple comments underneath that main tweet from the Dublin Commuter Coalition is now saying there that the rollout of the Northern Orbitals may be delayed until Autumn 2022.

    As per the tweet here.


    Can someone here explain why is that phase for the Northern Orbitals is being subject to 7/8 month delay as I cannot really understand it.

    The comment on Twitter implies to me at this point that we have 2 scenarios at play.

    Scenario 1

    The NTA are now going to say that both the Northern & Southern Orbitals could be rolled out together from September 2022.

    Or

    Scenario 2

    Maybe the NTA have done a mad switch around at the last minute to rollout the Southern Orbitals first in January/February & then the Northern Orbitals will be out in September.

    Has that news been made official from the NTA?

    Post edited by dublinman1990 on


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    No, nothing from the NTA. I'll try to find out. With this phase delayed from September to the end of November, I completely forgot about the next phase.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    The remaining phases of the network will be rolled out over an incremental basis in the coming years with the Southwest of the city via the G-Spine (Ballyfermot Road) due to be launched in June 2022.

    Hmm..

    https://www.nationaltransport.ie/phase-two-of-busconencts-c-spine-goes-live/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    I see no problem taking a nearby train or changing a bus. You re forgetting a 52 bus route which will come much less busy than the C3. Peak time will be X31.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    It doesn't say "is now delayed", it says "it may be delayed" - huge difference. One hour later a new comment was added "We’re awaiting updated information on the plan". Currently it's too soon to speculate the information.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    That bus is once an hour. There was a 66a and 66b once every hour, so that is still a reduction in the number of buses going to Leixlip from town. Also that bus as far as I'm aware is not a direct bus from Confey or Castletown which are losing their direct buses. Estates in those areas are roughly forty years old, which means a fairly large population of people in their sixties and seventies who are now losing a direct bus to the city centre. Changing bus is fine if the frequency is there. If not, then it becomes a miserable experience of standing at bus stops in crap weather. I get on at the terminus at Maynooth and there have been times I've been standing for nearly an hour waiting for a bus due to no shows midday. I don't have any faith in connecting buses working at the outer rim of service when frequencies are lower. Bus changes only work on very busy routes with lots of buses, say Nassau street or Leeson street.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Agree that frequency should be better for C spine, and it would make connections more attractive. People in Adamstown/Lucan say the same regarding C1 & C2.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,526 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    Whoops. Sorry for making that error. I'd guess the updated information from the NTA should give us a clearer picture about what happens next with each phase. Although how they give out that information from now on has to be seen with some form of scrutiny when it's being presented right in front of us.

    I will still be interested in seeing the update in how the next phases of this project are meant to be rolled out. If they are going to release an update on each phase. Will they present it in a revised implementation timetable. Would the number of phases in future rollouts that are leftover at this point remain the same or would there be scope for them to be rolled out much quicker?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,644 ✭✭✭Qrt


    Are the C1 and C2 pretty much not the exact same as the 25a/b? Why the capacity worries all of a sudden?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    The C1 is now serving Adamstown whereas the 25a did not so buses will be full early on now. The 25 has been dropped altogether and this will also add pressure to the C1 and C2 at the Shackleton/Dodsboro end. The loss of the 25 and the 66a/b also means fewer buses for Lucan village. There is also significant reduction in frequency on C1 on a Saturday during daytime hours.

    There are more local routes which it is assumed will lighten loads on city routes. But since the old city routes were full even off peak all the way to town, people are concerned that they have overestimated the demand for enhanced short local connections versus those travelling to city.

    I also have concerns about increased loads outbound with people from Sandymount/Ringsend possibly choosing to stay on out to Heuston or Liffey Valley maybe to take advantage of their new connections. Those travelling to Lucan and North Kildare may be facing more difficulties getting on in city centre now too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Thanks for that, but sadly it’s of little use to people standing at the bus stop wondering what it is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,946 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    I guess BC is trying to do what wouldn’t happen in other cities.

    The N4/Chapelizod by-pass would be prefect for sending a Luas into the city with local buses feeding into it all along the way.

    And I’m aware that there’s rail lines “not far” away and that other parts of Dublin need metro/Luas/electrification of rail lines, but that’s the long term failure of FFFG, Labour and the PDs.



Advertisement