Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1140141143145146257

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭rx8


    These same people have no problem going to London or Berlin or Paris and transferring from one bus or train to another, to get around the city. It seems to be just an Irish mentality that everyone wants to travel to their home or office on just one bus. Changing is alien to most commuters, but for bus-connects to succeed and work as intended, people need to realise that sometimes changing is the fastest way to get around.

    The other problem we have is getting staff to operate it. When the C-Spine starts next week, there's going to be news crews all over the place covering it, but the other services out of the garages operating it will suffer badly because of the shortage of drivers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Does this mean that the level of bus service to Maynooth from city centre will actually get worse once W6 is introduced and the C4 stops serving the town?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    No. Because not everyone is heading to town. It will get better due to a new route W6 to Tallaght introduced at a later stage. Will be more directions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    But I wasn't asking about service to Tallaght, I was asking about service from Maynooth to city centre...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well if the C4 is curtailed to Celbridge as per the plan published in 2020, people in Maynooth will be able to connect to/from it in Celbridge using the W6 with no fare penalty, or connect at Hazelhatch for rail services.

    It is of course still possible that they may decide that the C4 may continue to operate to/from Maynooth, but that is not what was in the final plan published last year.

    You seem to be surprised about this?

    Did you not look at the planned final network and frequencies which has been in the public domain since September 2020?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,010 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    There's not a lot of information being provided though. Someone I know working in the same hospital as me was distraught when he saw the bus frequencies on the booklets disseminated on the bus, as it appeared from that that the first bus on the weekend was at eight o clock, which was incompatible with his shifts. He rang Dublin bus, and was passed to numerous people without any clarification. I eventually found it for him, and was able to show him the real timetable. People in their fifties and over are not necessarily tech savvy enough to find out this kind of information, which was actually quite hard to find. The least that could have been done was have the actual timetables for the main routes, and a map of each route specifically included in those booklets. Because as far as actual useful information there was sweet FA in them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Could be that when booklets were approved for printing, timetables weren't ready yet. As most things in Ireland, they are done the last minute ;) I completely agree that the NTA hasn't learnt much from the Phase 1. Communication seems to be a very low priority to them, sadly. I could understand that it's may be a result of a poor funding from the main government. But despite that, there still is, as you say, a poor information managing practise. Whether it's due to lack of skilled people in the NTA or something else, or a few reasons apart already mentioned, I don't know. Sad that the NTA isn't ambitious and enthusiastic enough to make things right. But again, perfectionism isn't one of the the Irish nation's qualities, so...



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,693 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    That will depend on the connection. If you have to wait 20 minutes for the W6 to travel 10 minutes to wait 20 minutes for the C4, it's not going to work. There is a difference between being able to on a map and actually being prepared to do it.

    Everyone in this thread might have read the plan and contributed to it, but there are a lot more who haven't. The communication has been terrible to well read users here, what do you think it is amongst the general public? There shouldn't be surprise or criticism that people haven't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,834 ✭✭✭thomasj


    Well with the new 90 minute ticket system coming , I was looking at the possibility of taking the train from maynooth to Confey and then hopping on one of the new services that run from River Forest to Hazelhatch. That's a combined 15 minute those frequencies will run. Still , would be better if the W6 hadve run from the start



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Yes, it's not ideal, but much better to what we have now (just a few orbitals). There's going to be more options and more buses overall. It is still down to the government to commit for annual funding increase to the public transport as now it's just around 40% (with an exception to last year) while in other European countries it's more above 60% and in some cities it's 97-100% (free for residents or for all).



  • Registered Users Posts: 80 ✭✭Ll31


    Living in n Lucan and got booklet in door this week re the changes



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    I'm so disappointed with the C1 timetable. It's very poor. Other than extension to running a few buses through the night which will benefit a small number of people, there's an overall reduction in service during core hours. Particularly on a Saturday, which is much reduced, but also longer than 30 minutes frequency at times Mon-Fri. Unacceptable. Especially so when adding Adamstown to the route.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    C1 and C2 will have more early morning buses for people going to work to town from 6 and 7 am. There were lots of people left in bus stops before covid at these early hours.

    In the middle of day 30mins frequency is ok and makes sense, especially with added L routes. There's a very little difference between C1 and C2. It still will have a combined midday frequency 15mins. I would expect some adjustments in future, when Adamstown gets bigger.

    Saturday, I agree, it could have been done better (25mins vs new 30mins).



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,289 ✭✭✭Hippodrome Song Owl


    Are you a frequent C1 user? Doesn't sound like you are that familiar with the route tbh. I disagree with your analysis on all points, as someone who relies on it for multiple journeys in each direction per day, including between 6 and 7am where there's an increase of 1 bus. The L routes will not reduce pressure on the C1 in any way either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I suspect that the W6 will be timed to connect with the C4, should it be curtailed to Celbridge, but as I say it's also possible that they may retain the C4 to/from Maynooth. We will have to wait and see next summer.

    I totally agree that the dissemination of information now immediately prior to the launch has been terrible.

    But, the basic information of planned routes and service levels was pretty clear when it went out for consultation in 2019 (I am ignoring the original version as that was beyond disastrous), and also when the final network was published in 2020.

    Here's the frequency guide: https://busconnects.ie/media/1988/a3-frequency-tables-061020-fa.pdf which clearly shows the 30 minute frequency to/from Maynooth on each of the C3 and W6.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer




    In simple terms what are the precise issues that you have, and what were you expecting?

    I will correct you on one point. There are currently five 25a buses departing the terminus at Supervalu between 06:00 and 06:59. Allowing for the additional journey time from Adamstown, there will now be seven C1 departures - that's two extra buses, from Arthur Griffith Park inwards during that period, and not one, which is when the capacity issues arose was it not? During the same time period, there are currently four 25b departures between 06:00 and 06:59, and now there will be seven C2 departures.

    The frequency of the C1 and C2 are precisely what the was said they would be when the plan was published in 2019 and the final version in 2020 - including Saturdays. The Saturday drop on the C1/C2 was clear when the plan was published in 2020 - https://busconnects.ie/media/1988/a3-frequency-tables-061020-fa.pdf

    There are only a few instances of gaps of 33 minutes Mon-Fri and that's just at the terminus. They will close up as the routes are being scheduled to try and give even headways from Woodies inwards between the four C-Spine routes combined, and on the C1/C2 combined from Foxborough inwards.

    I think that you are probably a little off the mark in saying that the L routes will make absolutely no difference to the C1. The L53 was added in the final version of the plan and it will reduce pressure on both the C1 and C2 west of Liffey Valley as people making the local journey to the shopping centre may use that bus instead particularly as it takes a more direct route, thus freeing up seats on both the C1 and C2. I accept that it doesn't mean increased frequency on the unique part of the C1 between Griffeen Road and Arthur Griffith Park, but it should free up some seats on the C1 buses serving those stops.

    It is fair to say that a lot of the Saturday traffic on the 25a/25b is between Lucan and Liffey Valley, rather than it all being to/from the city, and both the L51 and L53 will take up some of that slack in the general area both taking more direct routes.

    I do take your point that frequencies on the routes replacing the 25a/25b or 66 and 67 are not massively increasing, but I suspect that you may have had incorrect expectations, as that was never ever part of the BusConnects plan.

    What BusConnects is about is:

    • Extending operating hours;
    • Increasing frequencies at the margins, especially in the mornings
    • Integrating timetables to deliver consistent headways along the spines (thereby spreading loads out more evenly)
    • Introducing new local and orbital routes which may (my emphasis) reduce the numbers of people needing to travel through the city centre

    In fact the original plan was to reduce the number of buses to/from the city centre across the network, and it took people power to reverse that.

    With any network redesign there are going to be winners and losers - it's never going to be perfect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    Currently I'm just an occasional C user but used to take it every day to work in city centre for a year a few years back. My shifts were from 6am to 3pm, from 7am to 4pm and from 8am to 5pm as well as from 9am to 6pm. The latter was the best to commute due to most of the choice and less crowded buses. For 6am there were just a few buses starting in Lucan between 5 and 6am. While after 7am there are X buses and more frequent all others.

    L will help, but insignificantly. Some people instead of C will take L routes to Liffey Valley or Fonthill Industrial Estate. It will give a better capacity for C routes.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 11,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭devnull




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    So the new flag poles have already begun to be put up, along with the new timetables for the C-Spine routes - potentially going to cause some confusing for the next few days!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    There is now at last a piece on the BusConnects website on the C Spine launch.

    BUT, I am still staggered that there are no simple explainers for places such as River Forest and Castletown that are losing their direct bus to the city as to how people should now make their journey.

    At the very least I’d expect a combined hybrid timetable showing which buses to get and where to change and a clear map.

    Many people don’t use journey planners or have online apps.

    It will probably come as no surprise to many here that having looked at the potential connection locations and the full stop-by-stop timetables that the connections work and don’t work in equal measure.

    I expect a lot of confusion about this, and anger when people have waits of 15-18 minutes for connections when once they had a direct bus!

    Similarly all of the Express routes no longer serve Baggot Street or Waterloo Road, going via Pembroke Street and Leeson Street, but that certainly isn’t clear from any of the literature.

    Plus, T-5 days away and I still have no idea how I’m supposed to know when to ask for the short fare!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Some of the info from a BusConnects briefing to councillors shared by a Councillor in the Lucan area (via a Facebook group): https://www.facebook.com/groups/lucanliving/permalink/940738373194683/?sfnsn=mo&ref=share


    An excerpt of the info shared in relation to the C2 routing not serving Shackleton just yet:

    The 25 route is GONE as of the 28th. But for now C2 cannot go as far as Shackleton/Dodsboro area. The X30 peak route will be available at peaks times but for some weeks anyone living in this part of west Lucan is being asked to get the L51 L52 to the village and get a C3 or C4 during off peak times. Fares will be integrated so no additional cost.


    The issue with the C2 going as far as Lidl is not the road beyond it, it is the LACK OF A SAFE TURNING SPACE. BusConnects has been liaising with the developers to get a turning point near Lidl, however there has been no clarity on this yet.


    In addition, the 51 and 52 cannot use Adamstown Boulevard as of now, but this is expected to be open IN A MATTER OF WEEKS. At this point, if the turning area beside Lidl for the C2 is not sorted, the C2 may be diverted up the Boulevard to do a loop around, but no final decision has been made. It will not go the station until the road past Lidl is completed, which is not on a timeframe at this stage.


    According to BusConnects: "We have plans to run C2 through Shackleton as soon as we can and are Hoping to get the local buses on the Boulevard as soon as possible. We are talking to developers. There is less certainty in relation to Shackleton. We need somewhere for the bus to turn around safely. We have asked for a temporary turning area near Lidl. The possibility of doing something temporary by the Boulevard is being looked at but there are issues in terms of being able to run up and down the same road along the route so we are looking at a single route. We are very eager to get the proper C2 route as early as we can".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭john boye


    A new stop has been installed in Townsend St (behind the Garda Station) which already has C-spine stop-specific timetables and updated times for the 1 and 15A/B. Credit where it's due, I saw a stance man there too explaining the changes to a couple of people who seemed a bit confused looking at the info.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,539 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They've put new poles up at both sets of stops. So they've actually added a new stop within short sight of an existing one - when there was lots of hope that this would actually be reduced!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Thoroughly impressed with the 24hr service offered by the c spine. Would hope the A,B,D,E and F spines offer the same level. If they did I'd dare say Dublin actually had good night time public transport, even in comparison to continental cities.

    Amazed at how quiet the taxi industry is. If the main spines have this service 40% of their trade evaporates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,476 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Most of their trade has evaporated already tbh.

    The taxi industry is dodgy in the extreme and I'll shed no tears for it.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    If they are at the entrance to housing estates, how far could people have to walk to the entrance to the estate in the first place - sometimes stops might seem to be closer on the main road than they ought, but when you look at the potential walking distance from the furthest house in the estate to the entrance then it can be justified.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    I wasn't defending the taxi industry, a demise that is well deserved. A shower of entitled so and sos. Even when there was a few busy nights a few weeks ago they reverted to their good old selves, flag one down and they have the doors locked, want to know where you're going first. I wave them on and wait for a non cheeky one, a small minority. If it was me I'd legislate for letting uber do as they please.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,201 ✭✭✭ongarboy


    Not that I've gone out that late often since pandemic but I've been able to use the year old 39A 24 hr service every time to come home saving up to 30 quid each time. I rarely got the Nitelink previously as your whole night involved timing it to a 2am or 4am departure on Westmoreland St which could be half an hour walk from where you were drinking/clubbing. The 30 minute interval services throughout the night with pick ups all along the city centre and quays really is a game changer and will probably be one of the immediate benefits to many to the new C spine services. (As soon as the current midnight nightlife curfew ends!)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Another useful change on many of the cross-city routes is that the last departure from the terminus now continues cross-city rather than terminating in the city centre, which means a service passing through the city around midnight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,539 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They are, but estates with either surprisingly good internal walkways to reduce distance, or bloody awful ones so it doesn't really help many people. Was absolutely sure the single-sider would go, but obviously not.

    For some people it'll make this stop a bit closer than the previous closest that was actually two stops earlier, due to the route going around a corner. So a shorter trip and a slight extension of where the short fare gets you! Which isn't even Celbridge, though.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 26,403 Mod ✭✭✭✭Peregrine


    There would still be people using late night taxis but this will definitely put a massive dent in the taxi industry.

    Why are they not up in arms? Rolling out the new 24hr routes one by one probably dampened any resistance from the taxi industry. Initially there were just two, then three, now seven (four at a lower frequency) and soon there will be over 10. I'd say if they announced that many night routes at once, we would have seen a reaction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,834 ✭✭✭thomasj


    Don't get me wrong , the nighttime service is amazing and as someone who gets one around 1am (and there does be good numbers on the 39a at that time outbound past blanch centre) it's great and is well used.

    But the stand out thing for me, and ive witnessed it and it's mentioned on the d15 forum by others , is that there are 39as heading into the city close to full at around 5am , 6am on a Saturday and Sunday morning. Mainly construction workers. It's amazing how much a big difference it's made.

    It goes to show that for those areas not 24 hour or changed by busconnects, they're out of date and need updating ASAP . Some of those areas may be waiting years to be switched to bus connects and could do with earlier weekend services now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I don't think that you will see additional 24 hour routes happening outside of the BusConnects rollout.

    Remember that you do need additional drivers to run them, and that they need additional PSO grant funding.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,984 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Obviously the focus for now is to rollout the Busconnects route. But once complete, I wouldn't be surprised if people in other areas see the success of it and demand the same for their areas from their politicians.

    I wouldn't be surprised if we see a future BusConnects 2, just like Luas Cross City.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Do you mean 24 hour routes or what exactly are you referring to?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,984 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    A bit of both. BusConnects won’t be the final word in bus network changes. The city will continue to grow and change and I’m sure there will continue to be tweaks and additions to the network once it is complete.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Oh of course, but I think that will be of a more localised form, in response to:

    • potentially certain elements of the plan not working (I’m thinking where direct links are replaced by poor connections and it potentially just doesn’t work);
    • increased frequency on very low frequency routes where it doesn’t meet demand adequately;
    • new developments arriving (Cherrywood certainly springs to mind);
    • or (hopefully!) DART+ being rolled out.

    I can’t see another fundamental review happening for quite some time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 806 ✭✭✭jams100


    I cant understand why they put bus stops right before traffic lights. (I'm referring to the new outbound bus stop for the C spine on Tara Street). It's about 10 meters before the traffic lights, all that does is delay busses, as they wait for busses at the stop to finish boarding passengers. (Needless delaying imo, I was hopeful that bus connects would eliminate issues like this).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    I really hope that BC is not the final envisioned state of bus services in the city. There needs to be a willingness to adapt to to service demands rather than any ideological commitment to some clockface frequency and a reluctance to adjust services for fear of changes to such frequencies. We're already seeing that with the C-spine there's actually no changes to service frequencies at the busiest times of the day along the core trunk before services split.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Some of the on-street information rollout for the changes tomorrow is now bordering on an absolute farce.

    The NTA clearly have have not got a clue about how to do this properly, and have in my opinion zero quality control.

    The best/worst that I’ve heard of so far is the new style TFI bus stop for southbound Dublin Bus routes on Westland Row being physically installed on the wrong side of the road (i.e. it is on the northbound side).

    A map has been published on the website showing incorrect routings and the interactive map doesn’t work properly.

    I am aware of one bus stop panel that has timetables for one spine route missing.

    Far more importantly, no route descriptions are provided at all on the timetables at bus stops. Some stops have linear maps showing the routes, but the vast majority in the city centre don’t. This becomes all the more relevant by what follows.

    Routes C1 & C2 have timetable panels inbound that very helpfully tell prospective passengers that the buses are heading “Towards St. John’s Church”, but nothing else. There are at least 11 churches that this could be in or around Dublin. Utterly useless info for anyone who isn’t aware that it’s in Sandymount.

    Outbound the C3 is going “Towards Hayfield” on the timetable panels and the X25 “Towards Kingsbury” despite both terminating at the same stop in Maynooth. The X30 outbound timetables tell prospective customers that it goes “Towards The Paddocks Drive”. Useless info again. It’s actually Dodsboro in Lucan.

    There are now two separate bus stops at stops numbered 400 and two numbered 7588 on Pearse Street with bus routes split between them, and similarly two stops numbered 350 on Townsend St.

    There are two stops numbered 317 on Westmoreland St, a small distance apart, both labelled for the 26 and 70N. Which one is to use I don’t know.

    All of the new N4 Express routes serve stop 7587 on Pearse Street, but the stop doesn’t indicate this at all. There is one exception, the X31 which for some unknown reason serves stop 400 instead. This means the X31 and X32 are shown as deviating from one another on the linear map at their terminus on Earslfort Terrace.

    Neither of the stops opposite Pearse St Garda Station tell you where to go now instead to catch the new routes.

    None of the timetable panels have any information about the new fares and I still am not sure when to go to the driver for the short fare. In fact when to go to the driver and when to use the right hand validator isn’t explained anywhere either.

    Some regional/intercity routes have been branded on bus stop flags as being Dublin Bus routes.

    Add to that, the last L59 on Saturdays leaves Hazelhatch at 23:28, two minutes before the last train from Heuston arrives at 23:30. That’s before we even talk about how some of certain connections have, at certain times of the day, either excessively long waits or are far too tightly timed, where people used to have a direct bus.

    You could not make any of this up.

    It is actually almost worse than the drastically poor information rollout of Network Direct phase 1 by DB twelve years ago - DB and GAI have upped their game significantly in this regard and a lot of this good work is now being undone by the NTA in this rollout.

    Ideology has been put before basic practical customer information and there are so many mistakes in the information on street that it is shocking.

    I am beyond angry at the level of incompetence on display here by the NTA. Utterly shambolic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well ideally it would be between Townsend St and Poolbeg Street but the excavation works take out a lane of traffic there.

    There has to be a replacement stop for those two gone from opposite Pearse St. Garda Station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I don’t see any reason why timetables would not be adjusted In the future to meet demand. That’s essential for any public transport network.

    But scheduling on the basis of even headways along the spines is definitely a good idea as it means a consistent bus service rather than the mismatch of services that are there now along most corridors.

    As someone who had the misfortune to have to use the N4 routes inbound from Liffey Valley in a past life I can say that the 66/a/b were timetabled previously inbound so that a 66 and 66a travelled together from Leixlip, and then nothing happened for another 30 minutes before a 66 and 66b did the same. Two buses completely wasted. The 67 was timed closely to them from Lucan inwards. Which meant a shocking service for anyone along the corridor. That had to change.

    I would imagine that Dublin Bus may keep some buses available for auxiliary departures in the mornings if they find they need them where the demand exceeds supply with the scheduled departures.

    In my comments in my earlier post about a further BusConnects 2, I was really referring to further redesigning of routes, as I thought that was what bk was alluding to. I don’t see wholesale network changes across the network happening, but rather more localised route changes or extensions to meet new demands as they arise.

    But I certainly see no reason tImetables will be cast in stone (and routes may have changes too if the rollout doesn’t go to plan).



  • Registered Users Posts: 189 ✭✭Fizzy Duck


    LXFlyer, it's been 3 years since the NTA rolled out the new stops for the 33A. On most outbound stops it says 'towards Peter and Paul Church' (Balbriggan). A few bus stops still have timetables that show all buses heading to Balbriggan even though half stop short in Skerries. Inbound has the opposite problem: All buses to the Airport even though half stop in Swords. When they first launched the 175 most timetables around Tallaght showed secondary locations, ie 27, Towards Templeview Avenue (Clare Hall).

    As you say it's ideology before customer information.

    I brought this up with Go Ahead management many times and NTA representatives I had brief chats with. I was told not to worry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,539 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The NTA stops installed for the 139 in Maynooth ended up with stop flags from Blanchardstown, for weeks after introduction. Whoever does that planning for them has never been very good!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Oh I am well aware of all of those too. The 33A should really be split into two separate routes for clarity.

    The orbitals were never going to have the same impact as the spines sadly - we shall see what people's reactions are tomorrow and in particular on Monday,



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    I couldn't get on the 39a at 1:30 in town a few weeks ago, 2 buses went past full, needs to be increased frequency, obviously very popular.



  • Registered Users Posts: 806 ✭✭✭jams100


    Agree, but if this can't happen rn, then surely they should just leave that stop out (It would only be a five minute walk for people anyway). I can see this becoming a real pinch point if the lights there don't give enough green time from Tara street. (I guess given some of the other issues posters have pointed out this probably wouldn't be the highest priority one).



  • Registered Users Posts: 806 ✭✭✭jams100





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Got the bus to the Leinster match in the RDS this evening and spotted this at the northbound stop outside Donnybrook Garage - turns out they did update the stops which C-Spine express routes serve between CC & UCD. Southbound stop was the same, although only showed the x31.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,834 ✭✭✭thomasj


    I would well believe that . I was on a 39a and there was a large crowd. There was another driver on the bus and he couldn't get over how busy it was.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement