Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Religion and Engaging with the Teacher

1679111224

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    I've had a few sets of friends who emigrated to good jobs, and lived abroad for years, but who moved back to Ireland over the past few years. One factor which was common was the desire to move home before their respective eldest started school. They wanted the kids to be brought up here and avail of the Irish education system.

    So, in my experience, it is not uncommon for parents to leave well paying jobs and great personal lifestyles to uproot and move between continents to benefit their kids. If moving 30km is "no choice" for others then you'd have to question the actual strength of their positions. You have a 5 or 6 year lead in time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,736 ✭✭✭marieholmfan




  • Site Banned Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭Bobtheman


    Religious experience is a part of human life. You might not personally take part in it but it's undeniable it's a huge influence. The search for the transcendent is important.

    I also think religion offers a better alternative than rampant consumerism and that does not mean you must accept an afterlife or buy into 100% of a religious doctrine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,102 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    It's important to you, but is completely irrelevant to a large and growing number of people, and there's no reason or value in making their children undergo religious education if the parents are not active members of that religion.

    Consumerism has got nothing to do with religion or the lack thereof. Churches are notoriously cash-greedy while preaching that money is evil!

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,102 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Suggesting that people should emigrate to find an alternative to catholic education is ridiculous, simply beyond stupid so I'd have to question how honestly this is being put forward, clearly a wind-up.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,055 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    It might the most inconvenient option but its sill an option. People do it for lots of other reasons.

    I'm still interested in suggestions that solve the OPs issue, how to be fully integrated in a faith school while not having any contact with religion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    In the interest of fairness, it might be a good idea to have random allocation of "belief system" for children in primary school, regardless of parents belief. So, say Catholicism, Islam, Hinduism and Atheism and have it taught as fact. It will be interesting to hear the howls from Catholic parents! For those who have no religion it will be the exact same situation as we have currently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭RealJohn


    Or maybe they should all be taught in proportion to their prevalence in the population? That’s fairness.

    It’s ludicrous to suggest that every religion that has any adherents at all should be given equal time. That isn’t what fairness looks like. That’s what pandering to a handful of malcontents looks like.



  • Posts: 19,178 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Surely you should be educating your child on all religions then? If he is to make up his own mind?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,505 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    lol. This comment is so ridiculously stupid I don't know where to start.

    Firstly if you know of a school that teaches all religions as part of its curriculum?

    Secondly I'm an atheist. Why would I teach him about religion if I don't believe in it. Yes I get the point of me sending my child to a catholic school but I'm not being hypocritical about sending him for a few years and then once he's settled in throwing a strop and saying I don't want my son taught religion.

    If he was going to a Buddhist school I'd have no issues with him being taught Buddhism etc etc. But he's going to a catholic school.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    I think there should be freedom of and from religion. We should never have a situation where a child has to sit through Catholic indoctrination if the parents do not want it. The point was that it would not be accepted that a Catholic child has to go to an Islamic school for example. We wouldn't have the excuses like:

    • its only a few prayers
    • Why don't you set up your own school?
    • Emigrate FFS!

    Yet this is the type of thing that non-religious people have to put up with the whole time. The vast majority of the schools in the state are Catholic. There is an increasing number of people with no religion who don't want the indoctrination. The schools are private but almost fully funded by the state. There should at the very least be the possibility to have the kids facilitated elsewhere while the religious instruction is going on.



  • Posts: 19,178 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I don't understand how you can allow him to be taught about the Catholic religion then. you're not allowing him to make up his own mind really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,102 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato



    Firstly if you know of a school that teaches all religions as part of its curriculum?

    Educate Together. Have you been reading the thread at all?

    Secondly I'm an atheist. Why would I teach him about religion if I don't believe in it.

    Why would you have others instruct him in (not teach him about!) a specific religion that you don't believe in?

    There is nothing whatsoever hypocritical about anyone sending their child to a school, which their taxes pay for after all, and exercising their constitutional right to opt their child out of religious instruction. In most cases they have no other option but to send their child to a catholic ethos school.

    Saying you want your child to make up their own mind about religion then having their school instruct them in a specific faith every single day is a complete contradiction.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,763 ✭✭✭Treppen


    Schools have moved on from tokenistic integration. The aim is inclusion.

    But inclusion into what.... Education or indoctrination.

    And again... Telling someone to go elsewhere is denying their primary right to an education.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,505 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    actually I am...they're not beating it into kids these days. Plus instead of having parents who are believers he has 2 that are non-believers.

    I'm quite happy to discuss with him---he's 8 and has Asperger's so is extremely extremely intelligent and has done his own research on this and he doesn't believe in God either. But he's quite happy to attend the class and discuss with the teacher and believe me he really puts it to her.

    He's open minded to a lot of things so why deny him? Let him make his own mind up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭RealJohn


    That’s rubbish though. You’re misrepresenting the situation in various ways, and also ignoring an ongoing situation unrelated to the teaching of any particular subject: the schools are not properly resourced. There are plenty of schools who can’t offer various subjects because only a handful of students want to study them, not because they don’t have teachers to teach them but because they haven’t been allocated the teaching hours to facilitate it, and you want teaching hours allocated to people whose parents want them to not be exposed to views they disagree with? And yes, they would have to be allocated teaching hours because they can’t just be left unsupervised.

    There are plenty of other things wrong with what you’re saying but without resolving that one, the others aren’t very relevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    Yes, that is exactly what I want and I don't think it is unreasonable either. It could be funded with increased parent contributions for example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    With respect to the rest that you dismissed as rubbish, you know very well that there would be absolute outrage here if a Catholic child was going to a school where they were being taught as fact that God isn't real. Yet many don't seem to have a problem with their own religion being imposed on others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,467 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    What has that got to do with primary schools indoctrinating children in one specific religion

    If people want to be spiritual, to abandon consumerism and take a more philosophical attitude towards life, that's great, you're absolutely perfectly welcome to do so. But that's not the same as teaching kids their catechism and preparing them for their sacraments in the RCC

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Posts: 2,732 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I want to know was the op indoctrined in a religion and is that why they are angry?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,467 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    State funded primary schools should not be 'Faith schools'.

    If the church wants kids to be educated in religion, they should provide these course outside of school hours, and let the parents pay for them.

    But even if you allow these schools to still have religious 'patrons' then the schools should still abide by the human rights of the children and parents to have freedom of religion, and they should provide adequate facilities for children of non religious families to spend that time in an educationally beneficial way, other than the current way of abandoning them at the back of the class to twiddle their thumbs while the other kids are doing religion

    My kids were even forbidden from doing their homework during these times on the basis that this would have been 'unfair' to the other kids. Laughable

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,467 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Exactly. Catholic parents would not tolerate their children being treated the same way that children from non religious households are treated in our catholic state funded primary schools

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,467 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Or maybe schools should educate children, and churches can teach them about religion.

    Religion has no place in a primary school.

    All children should be educated equally, and children should not be taught catholic dogma as truth when they're still learning basics like how to read and do maths and way before they know how to think for themselves.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,467 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    You're an atheist, but you think it's a good idea for children to be taught, as truth, by their teacher, who's job it is to prepare them for life, that god and angels and jesus and miracles and heaven and hell etc etc, that all of these things are just as real as the geography and science and maths and music and art that they are being taught by that same teacher for the rest of the day.

    Just because the RC church happen to have come into possession of the vast majority of primary schools in Ireland, does not mean it should be this way

    Just because some vocal catholic parents are insistent on keeping their school's ties to the catholic church, doesn't mean this is in those children's best interest, or that these vocal minority should be pandered to.

    Schools should educate children to the highest standards available. The curriculum should be up to date and relevant, and modern. We don't teach children about homeopathy even if half those kids parents think homeopathy is real and believe in it. We don't teach anti vax conspiracy theories to kids, and we shouldn't teach religious dogma to primary school children as truth in a modern secular democracy.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,467 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Are you one of those 'Atheists' who got their child baptised to avoid rocking the boat, keep the granny happy etc, and are going to have your child baptised, take him first communion, confession, confirmation etc...

    What kind of instruction are you giving to your kid as an atheist parent? Yeah, we lied when you were christened, pretended to believe in public and made a promise we never intended to keep, then we made you lie on your confirmation, by promising to follow the faith even though you don't believe in it...

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,467 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Or the catholic church can fund religious classes and let the teachers teach kids stuff that will benefit them in their education.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    That is about as likely as them contributing towards compensation for survivors of sexual abuse. But, yes it would be a good idea if "owners" of the schools contributed more financially.



  • Posts: 19,178 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They don't have to beat it into them, their whole day at school is surrounded by it, and preparation for sacraments is huge.

    It's not letting him make up his own mind when he is being taught that these things are fact. If he was getting education on all religions, and then he made up his own mind, that would be different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭RealJohn


    Parents want their children taught religion. If they didn’t, more of them would insist on their children being opted out.

    The majority of those parents (in Ireland) want their children taught Catholicism, primarily, because the majority of people in this country are Catholics.

    I have a suspicion that you’d have absolutely no problem if schools were teaching children that God is not real and that all religions are a waste of time. I apologise if I’m wrong on that, but I suspect that I’m not, and if I’m not, you’re just as willing to force your views on others as any religion is, and that goes for anyone else who feels that way too, obviously.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭RealJohn


    So you’re saying that parents should pay extra so that schools can take a minority of students out of religion classes? I suspect that that actually wouldn’t be considered fair.



Advertisement