Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Would you be happy for your children to receive covid-19 vaccine

1394042444560

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 270 ✭✭Pigeon Chaser


    I have 4 children.


    Yes I would vaccinate them if the advice from EMA / HSE / NIAC was that they should be vaccinated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 956 ✭✭✭Poncke


    Oh Covid is not deadly? Tell that to my neighbour whose mom died of Covid and 5 million with her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Was your neighbour's mother a child aged 5-11?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭Multipass


    It’s quite obvious I was talking about children



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭indy_man


    Easy question, why vaccinate kids for something that can not harm them with something that could harm them?

    It would make sense to run some anti-body tests across schools before rolling mRNA out. But NO, there is no debate here only one direction, vaccinate, proper science means debate and discussion not dictates.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,818 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    I think that's fair, but if the vaccine protection against symptomatic disease (the 'common cold') only lasted a few months, would that change your decision?

    Another point is vaccination for children who have had confirmed Covid. Where is the argument for vaccinating this cohort with a vaccine that probably offers only short term immunity, which they already have by virtue of infection?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    The argument WAS to help reach herd immunity a few months ago but now that that's unachieveable its... um... its.. YOU ANTI-VAXXER!!!!*( ARGGHHHH!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 956 ✭✭✭Poncke


    Herd immunity may no longer be possible, doesn't mean we need to stop vaccinating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    If you read this thread from the beginning there were multiple posters who were putting pressure on parents and calling them stupid because 'we HAVE to reach herd immunity'. It was one of the main arguments and justifications.

    Do any of these posters come back and apologise for how fierce and insulting they were? Do they learn lessons about humility and their own limitations and rein in their cartoonish intellectual pride?

    No they either rotate out or they hang around going 'Bla bla you must get your child vaccinated because the statistics show bla bla'

    That is my point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,818 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    No, we certainly don't need to stop vaccinating, but the fact that it seems that HIT can not be met is something that should be taken into account when recommending vaccination.

    In a cohort where personal benefit is minimal, there is less of a reason to recommend it, even for population wide advantages. Sure, for people living in households with clinically vulnerable people, it might sway a decision (and then there's the ethical question if we should be making decisions to vaccinate children for someone else's benefit). But for other children, especially those who already have had a Covid infection, the argument begins to fall down.

    Also to note, NIAC has never recommended vaccination for 12-15 year olds, except for those that are clinically venerable. They have clearly made the distinction between recommending and offering.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    No they either rotate out or they hang around going 'Bla bla you must get your child vaccinated because the statistics show bla bla'

    What, your point is people use facts to prove you wrong? The bastards! How very dare they! 🙄

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭growleaves


    No the point is you seemingly don't even notice when one of the main arguments you've been putting forward has collapsed but just instantly shift to different arguments without any acknowledgement.

    What are people supposed to think about that? You obviously have a commitment to selling people on infant-vaccination by whatever means.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    The **** are you talking about? Herd immunity was one of many reasons why kids should be vaccinated. As can be seen by searching this thread. And yes, my kids were vaccinated as infants against diseases that range from those that are merely inconvenient, temporary, and extremely unlikely to leave them with lasting effects, all the way to ones that could have killed them or left them with life-changing conditions.

    Herd immunity may still be possible, but the highly transmissible nature of the Delta variant makes it much less likely now. If vaccine rollout had been quicker, and we'd properly closed our borders, especially from the UK, who knows what may have been achieved.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,510 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    Thing is, the families I know with kids in primary school are having a hell of a time with covid infections, close contact isolation and so on, whereas my kids' secondary school (where there is almost 100% vaccination) is completely business as usual apart from masks.

    I know there are several important factors other than vaccinations, but it seems like the primary schools are having a much worse time than last year, whereas the secondaries are having a much better time, and the most obvious difference is vaccinations.

    This is in no way an endorsement of age 5-11 vaccinations, I'll leave that to NIAC, but it does make me wonder what the picture would look like if we were vaccinating younger kids.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,070 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Herd immunity is literally the only way out of this — this has not changed. It is clear that Zero Covid is unachievable and transmission will not be halted by the vaccine, so it now seems fairly clear that herd immunity, aided greatly by the protection offered by vaccines, is the only future that doesn’t involve restrictions. It’s just a question now of how quickly people are willing to stomach getting to that stage.

    Had we closed our borders quicker or expedited the vaccine programme, it wouldn’t have changed the fact that Delta would have gotten here eventually and we would still have the same problem. The highly transmissible nature of Delta makes herd immunity more likely, not less — though it certainly does appear to make the journey a more painful one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,818 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    Two issues worth mentioning here.

    First, we are early in the 'post' 12 - 15s vaccination program, so there is no immune waning in that cohort at the moment, so therefore good protection against infection, and therefore less disruption in schools.

    Second, the NPHET decided, in their infinite wisdom, to stop contact tracing, or even informing schools of positive cases. This didn't happen in secondary schools. It's not entirely surprising that COVID has run rampant in primary schools.

    Come next Spring, we may well see increases in infections in the secondary school cohorts, as their immunity wanes. It would seem that the evidence supports vaccination for covid (as a 2 dose regime) is very much a temporary measure (like a single dose Hep A for instance).

    So I suppose if your rationale for vaccinating children is a temporary decrease in disruption to schooling, that might make sense.

    Having said that, I think come late Spring we will have the advantage of seasonality, and heading into better weather and more outdoor activity, and we will see a natural decrease in covid. I'm hoping that by the time we reach next winter, covid will be endemic, and we will only be boosting HCWs, clinically vulnerable and the elderly, and the rest of the population will rely on natural immunity via repeated exposures as is the case for most other respiratory viruses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    The big danger with COVID becoming endemic is that it mutates seasonally, and ends up like influenza, requiring a new "best guess at the likely variant" vaccination for the vulnerable and those most at risk of exposure. And influenza isn't just a bad cold - it kills hundreds here every year.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,921 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Herd immunity is no longer an end goal. We are changing the approach to manage the Covid threat annually with regular vaccine boosters, increased hospital capacity and better anti-viral drugs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,510 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    @Professor Plumb wrote

    Second, the NPHET decided, in their infinite wisdom, to stop contact tracing, or even informing schools of positive cases. This didn't happen in secondary schools. It's not entirely surprising that COVID has run rampant in primary schools.

    My kids' secondary stopped providing lists of close contacts to the HSE at the start of this academic year. This meant in practice that there was little or no contact tracing done. I was told as much by the principal. This was a massive step down from last year where the schools were maintaining accurate records of pupil movements.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭wildeside


    Why not let COVID just spread naturally within this younger cohort?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    🙄 You'd have chicken pox parties too, wouldn't you?

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,169 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Because it doesn't stay in that cohort. It spreads back from not the community from children.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭wildeside


    No, because chicken pox is pretty serious for kids. I'm not aware of any data that says COVID is something to be particularly worried about (in the case of kids). I'm not sure why vaccination of kids is the smart thing to do?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭wildeside


    But vaccination won't stop it spreading, so what's the point in vaccinating them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,818 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    COVID will be endemic, or it will fizzle out. That ship has sailed.

    If you look at other coronaviruses, they tend to become less virulent over time, so Covid probably will too.

    We'll manage it like we manage the flu - protecting the vulnerable with vaccines while it's still a risk. There is no way to eliminate it at this stage, or probably never was at the stage the wider world knew about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,169 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    We have been through this debate many times no point in trying to explain to posters who are either not willing to read through a few previous posts or deliberately spouting miss information.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,818 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    Chickenpox (varicella zoster) vaccine isn't part of the childhood vaccination program in Ireland, and as it's much more dangerous in adults than in children (and much more unpleasant), there's a lot to be said for allowing children to be exposed to it. It's not common in this country for people to be vaccinated against chicken pox, so having a lot of immune naive adults is probably not a very good idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,912 ✭✭✭Danno


    Is there any data that says vaccination of 5-11 year olds stops onward transmission from that age group?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 171 ✭✭wildeside


    I'll do a bit more digging but last I heard vacinnation didn't substantially impact transmission

    but this information could be out of date. I'm fully vaxxed and have thus far mostly just accepted what the medical professionals have said. 2 years in I'm staring to ask more questions about policy.



Advertisement