Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The creeping prominence of the Irish language

1333436383950

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,953 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Whoosh. You're talking about patronage of new schools which is irrelevant to about 95% of parents, who don't live in an area of rapid population growth where new schools are being built. But I'm not one bit surprised, language religion and nationalism remain in a toxic tangle.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,906 ✭✭✭Evade


    Languages aren't magic, they're just skills and like all skills if you don't use it, you lose it. I had no reason to use it for years, have since lost it, and have no intention of regaining it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭Upforthematch


    Well that's grand and I don't see any problem with that.

    And yet you could change your mind in the morning and tap into all those years of learning.

    Say you got with one of the TG4 weather people on a mad night out in Galway... 😄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭Upforthematch


    Calling these loanwords/proper nouns is an interesting attempt to get out of jail on this one.

    Let's take Dun Laoighaire or the word "oireachtas". They are words that have an English and an Irish pronunciation and it's interesting to see people bristle when the Irish pronunciation is used in an English sentence. They are genuine loanwords, I think.

    But the others, no. That's language mixing on a spectrum, a sprinkle of Irish words on one end and at the other Gaeilge Chonamara where you can have English words naturally mixed into a sentence with Irish syntax.

    I don't think we can say that the words of Amhrán na bhFiann are simply a string of loanwords. It's sung in the national language everyone (without exemption) learns at school and rightly so. What sort of country would incentivise its students not to learn the language its anthem is sung in at school?

    And when I think of croissants I certainly think of France.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,953 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Eh, it was composed originally in English you know (and musically it's terrible)

    And calling Irish "the national language" is doubly inaccurate, we have two official languages in this state and most people do not speak Irish.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭Upforthematch


    There's nothing I've said that contradicts this. I know it was written originally in English, but it is sung in Irish.

    Irish is our national language, that doesn't take from there being two official languages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,906 ✭✭✭Evade


    I don't think anyone would say the national anthem is a string of loanwords it's entirely in Irish these days but the rest fit the definition.

    There's a huge gulf between incentivised not to and given a choice. India's national anthem is also in a minority language.

    You may think of France when you think of croissants because that's where you think they originate but most people don't think of them as French (the language) because they're established loanwords. I don't think of places called whatever aras ect as being Irish words, it's just what they're called.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,331 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Irish is our national language,

    As an aspiration for some, a cultural totem for others and lip service by most, yes. As our national language it really isn't. When a language has to be made official through laws and state sponsorship for over a century and still declined massively in that century it's clear it's not our national language as far as day to day reality goes.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭Upforthematch


    A few errors there,

    1 Irish didn't have to be made official, the people wanted it to be

    2 Irish declined massively in the century before it was made official. If this graph is to be believed, the stabilisation and growth of the language coincides with the time it was made official:

    3 The Irish haven't orphaned their language, far from it. You are conflating difficulty with rejection. We do not learn non native languages to fluency in general in Ireland and we are very much like the English speaking world in this respect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,906 ✭✭✭Evade


    Was there a public vote on the 2003 act? I wasn't old enough to vote then and google doesn't show there was.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think of France when I think of croissant (the word or the pastry). I don't think of France when I think of déjà vu, or entrepreneur. I'm not sure why. Irish doesn't (AFAIK) have a word for déjà vu, relying on the loanword instead. On the other hand, Irish does have a word for entrepreneur - fiontraí.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,255 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Speaking to foreigners who have learnt Irish as well as English (as second languages). they explained to me how difficult English is to learn as a second language.

    But they manage it

    The problem is you (I assume) have not tried speaking Irish outside of an academic environment. If you were discussing Dublin GAA/GAA in general 'as Gaeilge' suddenly you would find you are learning a vocabulary around something that interests you. I bet you pick up words of Irish when watching matches on TG4. If the focus is on the spoken word first around day to day life/interests suddenly it opens itself up and is far removed from the learning 'by rote' which many Irish people were subjected to in the Irish education system.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I know someone from abroad who started to play a bit of football some time after he learned a some Irish. He says the first couple of crucial terms he learned were colpaí and síneadh - said more about the shape he was in than his Irish vocabulary, I s'pose. I asked him why calves and not hamstrings, and he said the lads just used "hammy/hammies" in Irish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,906 ✭✭✭Evade


    Insomuch as you never really forget anything you're taught if you continually apply and even if you don't could recover it with some effort. Right now I don't remember anything beyond a smattering of words. And the real issue with Irish is what's the incentive to continue it beyond appeals to "it's nice to have" or heritage? I didn't see any and it seems most other people don't either.



  • Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's not exactly clear what that has to do with my point. My point was that you don't really forget. It's there. You don't have to retrieve it, and you don't have to want to retrieve it, but it's there. It wouldn't at all surprise me if it turned out to be true for a lot of the stuff we did at school, not just languages.

    The real issue with Irish is usually the next one on the list. The person who is hostile raises an issue, someone addresses it, so they jump on and find another issue to complain about. Like I said, there's always a excuse.

    I still say you should get stuck into Japanese.



  • Posts: 172 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If the Irish language has declined in the last century it has declined because English remains an official language here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,171 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Like the John Hinde postcard thatched cottage, nice to see and part of our heritage but hardly any bastard is committed enough to live in one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,073 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    And the reason for that is because that's what people wanted. Your analysis is far too simplistic. You can't force people to speak Irish. There is also even less incentive to speak Irish now than in the 1920s/30s. Want to travel abroad well English is the de facto language of international communication. Again in the region of 75% of English speakers worldwide are not native speakers. If you have ever travelled abroad or worked with people internationally you'll understand how pervasive English is. Want a job in Ireland in any company that has any dealing with a company outside Ireland you need English. Want to watch nearly anything on TV or in the cinema again you need English. Want to use the Internet again it's far easier through English, look at Wikipedia and the amount of articles in English versus any other language. Want to watch Netflix, Youtube, listen to Spotify etc again all through English. Go to college/University you need to know English given how little research is actually published in Irish. If Want to publish any research in any major publication you need to do so in English given how few people speak Irish worldwide. If you do any sort of professional/trade exam again the exam will have to be done through English. On top of that anyone who speaks Irish is also going to be a native speaker of English bar a few rare exceptions. They are all reasons for the decline of Irish not some law that recognised the obvious.

    The decline of Irish didn't start a hundred years ago. Ireland was a solidly English speaking country already by the time of independence. The measures over the last 100 years have probably slowed the decline but that's it. The switch from Irish to English was driven and is being driven by wider societal factors(note how Ireland didn't switch religion to match England, so making something official in law can have minimal effect). Many of which I've listed above.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,906 ✭✭✭Evade


    It has to do with the fact that for all intents and purposes I'm not an Irish speaker now, it doesn't really matter that I could potentially recover it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,400 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    I fully support any parent who wants a non-denominational education for their kids. I'd be interested in a link to the numbers if you can find one, BTW.

    However, as a parent who wanted non-religious education for my children, I found that the only Irish-language education available was in a catholic school.

    When are we going to have non-denominational education through Irish?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,400 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    I think you're a little bit mixed-up here.

    Since around the time the crash happened, there have been few enough Gaelscoileanna set up, but there has been a great deal of encouragement by the Dept of Education to Educate Together. If you look at their website, they have 96 primary schools and 23 secondary schools, mostly set up in the last ten years or so. And fair play to them, I'm all in favour of getting the churches out of education. All but one of these schools teach through English, BTW. Patronage for the one that teaches through Irish is shared with An Foras Pártrúnachta.

    Over the same period, very few Gaelscoileanna have been permitted to open by the Dept of Education, despite huge demand. I wonder why. Some people would be of the opinion that they favour Educate Together because they do not have a vision for changing the country - what Educate Together do is simply acknowledge a change that has already happened: secularisation of the country. People no longer go to church in any great numbers, and as such removing a small number of schools from church control is no big deal, as it is a reactive movement.

    The Gaelscoil movement on the other hand is a proactive movement; they have a vision for a country where as many people as possible can speak Irish. The people who run the country don't want this, as this would represent a major change within society, and could pressage further unwanted and unpredictable change. They don't like change that they do not control; indeed for many years, Educate Together was also stymied, but has come to be seen as no great threat and certainly the far lesser of two evils..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,400 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    And calling Irish "the national language" is doubly inaccurate, we have two official languages in this state

    He's simply using the definition that is in the Constitution, which calls Irish the National Language. It calls English another official language, IIRC.

    As well as this legal definition, it is historically correct.



  • Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    For your intents and purposes, it doesn't matter that you could potentially recover it. That's you exercising an option. But it does really matter that people generally can potentially recover it. They have an option, which the noisy Anglos would deny them. That's why the noisy Anglos are best ignored on this subject.

    You really ought to give Japanese a go, all the same.



  • Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Are there any non-religious Gaelscoileanna? I don't mean those inter-denominational "Catholics plus" schools. I mean Gaelscoileanna that follow the same broadly secularist principles as ET?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    I studied Irish in secondary school I never spoke Irish for 1 minute, I had a few books to read, story's. I know maybe 30 words in Irish, I can see no practical value in knowing Irish in the real world everyone speaks English, if someone wants to spend time learning Irish good luck to them it's like playing the bodhrán for 95 per cent of people it will not get them work most people do not work as teachers or in tg4 its not hiding away or in the depths of my memory I did not like it all the books we read were about farmers rural people no connection to modern life you can't recover something if you never learned it and you had mediocre teachers when you are over 40 you realise time is limited you have a limited amount of time to learn skills

    I think most young people would prefer to learn subjects that will help them to get actually get work maths English science computer studys

    If you lived in the 70s there was a great revival in Irish folk music the chieftains the dubliners Luke Kelly etc and even then most people were not that interested in speaking Irish now we have 100s of TV channels streaming TV Netflix etc YouTube I see no sign of any uptick in Irish language apart from government funded ads in irish

    I don't know what's going on in schools eg how is Irish taught now is it just reading a few books



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 118 ✭✭ahappychappy


    @deirdremf You asked about alternative to catholic education through the Irish language. I am in north Dublin there are two new multi denominational Gael Scoil primaries in the area - both recent enough one just had their first intake of Junior infants in September. So it seems the demand for this model is increasing. I am aware of one family who son started - all good and it suits their family - they are both active users of the Irish language so he will have plenty of immersion both in and outside school.

    The only concern I would have is now there are four Gael scoil primaries there remains only one secondary within easy reach with limited capacity - hopefully capacity will be ramped up to facilitate the learners who want to continue in secondary within Gael scoil education.

    Ideally there would be choice accessible by as many as possible - I am aware how lucky we are to have the option of Educate Together all the way through primary and secondary. Hopefully the development of the multi denomination Gael Scoil model will bring a wider audience to those who prefer this option.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,953 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Actually it's you that's mixed up I'm afraid.

    You're confusing the setting up of new schools with the transfer of religious patron schools to a new patron (divestment).

    Dept of Education are naturally reluctant to allow a new gaelscoil to open in an area if it's going to leave the existing schools with empty places. But for ETs they don't allow a new one to be established under those circumstances at all - only in an area with growing population and enough unmet demand for school places to justify a new school can an ET be established. Even then, they can - with no consultation with parents or any appeal or review process - just decide to expand the existing religious patron school(s) in the area rather than allow a new ET to be established.

    and as such removing a small number of schools from church control is no big deal, as it is a reactive movement.

    This is divestment, and to all intents and purposes it is not happening at all. Only a handful of schools in the entire country have been divested from a religious patron to non-religious, and most of those afaik have been to ETB (Community National Schools) not ET. The CNSs still have religious instruction during the school day and prepare for sacraments, so really are "catholic lite" schools.

    The RCC has been able to stymie any calls for divestment in most areas, e.g. in Malahide a couple of years ago a survey established there was enough demand to divest 2 of the existing 8 primary schools, in the end they managed to block even 1 through a campaign of fear, uncertainty and doubt targeted at the parents of pupils in those schools. Meanwhile the parents of future pupils didn't get any say at all. Allowing the church to run this process is a joke but that suits the Dept of Education down to the ground.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,953 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The only concern I would have is now there are four Gael scoil primaries there remains only one secondary within easy reach with limited capacity - hopefully capacity will be ramped up to facilitate the learners who want to continue in secondary within Gael scoil education.

    Getting teachers who can teach subjects through Irish is a huge problem. Some English-medium schools can't even get vacancies in certain subjects filled.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,255 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I saw this article Mother with child with special needs of secondary school age claimed in court - that she should get an exemption from Irish. As it is effecting the child’s mental well being. The school said she did not satisfy the exemption. And it was noted the child attended Irish classes when at primary level, with no exemption.

    Personally I hated maths would loved to have had ADHD to try and claim an exemption.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



Advertisement