Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Fighter jets for the Air Corps?

17879818384201

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,483 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    After Katie Hannons show today a lack of fighter jets and new ships will be the least of the DF problems. Heads will be rolling



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,433 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Just read a summary there and about to give it a listen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,636 ✭✭✭sparky42


    From some of the articles on the websites at it, I’m not surprised if heads do roll, and by the sounds of it deservedly so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,505 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Disgusting revelations.

    And no Typhoons thanks, absolute money pits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I mentioned on this thread before that spending money on war planes would basically be jobs for millionaires kids that have "nothing to do".

    Air force Pilot gets €29,850 approx P/A (correct me if I'm wrong) and you need seriously high grades to get in. Anyone with those grades will easily get a Job in a Multinational and will be earning near €100k P/A within 8 years, having done 4 years on college. (I know for a fact that Google/Facebook etc will start excellent grands off on €60k P/A)

    My argument was that only people who don't need money and have the best education, could do a job like that. (millionaires kids)

    And I was absolutely "shot down" (no pun intended) for not having a clue and told that the people and/or the recruitment process in the defense forces were of the absolute highest possible standard. And now the Katie Hannon story came out.

    We're a month in now and nothing has happened, 0 accountability.

    Nepotism LOVES zero accountability.

    If it wasn't so wrong, it'd be absolutely hilarious!

    We don't need fighters, if we did we should be buying something like a JAS 39 (new) and not old T1 EF's

    I still think Primary Radar along with a number of MIM-104's (Or similar) is the best most cost effective option.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,065 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    second lieutenants start off on 32K plus a 5.5K allowance. Pay for a 1st lieutenant is up to to 47K plus allowances. captains start at 48K and go up to to 60K plus allowances. No idea where you got 29,850 from. that is closer to a sargeant's pay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I stand corrected (I was looking at an older scale)

    How long to get from entry pay (IE when training starts) to the €60k (roughly), and can everyone get from Captain/Lieutenant -> Commandant/Lt. Cdr

    Just reading that training, takes between 3.5 and 4 years, due to a lack of suitably qualified trainers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,065 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I had a glanced over this earlier. I've read it now

    Stark reading.... Numbers going down over the last 10 years, 34 pilots passed the 12 year contract and can apply to leave at anytime and another 11 pilots between 10 and 12 years service completed.

    Fighter planes are the least of the Air Corps problems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,722 ✭✭✭California Dreamer




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,505 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    in a worse-case scenario, the protection of Irish airspace may not be the priority for another sovereign country

    And that, is the very inconvenient truth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,439 ✭✭✭thomil


    Fighter aircraft may be the least of the Air Corps problems, but they could provide a way to counter the manpower issue somewhat.

    I mean, let's be honest, how many career opportunities are there in the Air Corps today? Flying the PC-9 as an instructor is pretty much the pinnacle of a flying careers as far as I can see. Apart from that, it's mostly transport missions or VIP shuttles in civilian or near civilian aircraft, and many aircraft charter outfits offer better pay and conditions. Flying a PC-12 on the umpteenth test sample run to Munich or to pick up some liaison staff in Brussels is hardly challenging. I have huge respect for the Air Corps and its staff, both enlisted, NCOs and officers, but there's just not much of a challenge.

    Granted, fighter aircraft alone won't solve that issue but a larger, more diverse Air Corps with more challenging flying assignments and more career and leadership opportunities both in flying and non-flying roles could go a long way towards making the organisation a much more attractive employer.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,636 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Good points, getting the AC deployed to any mission outside of the EEZ however is pretty much beyond their capabilities as of now, even if it was just UN/EU operations sadly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,505 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Sod the challenge, its a duty. Don't you think they'd rather be operating in a safe environment than in a conflict zone, on a long tour? Like every job, variety is limited after a while.

    Its not like flying Ryanair 738s back and forth to Beauvais is going to be a thrill a minute.

    As for manpower, well, there may come a time where the needs of the State outweigh the vagaries of the economy and the jobs market and some sort of national service may need to be introduced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,439 ✭✭✭thomil


    "Patriotism" and a "sense of duty" will only get you so far when it comes to attracting new recruits. Like it or not, the Air Corps is effectively just another employer at the moment, and needs to compete against the likes of Ryanair, Aer Lingus and other large airlines when it comes to recruiting flight crews. And right now, apart from the nebulous concept of "serving your country", the Air Corps does not have a unique selling point compared to commercial airlines. Why put yourself through the rigorous of basic military training just to end up serving in a small force that is perpetually starved for funds, with poor pay, antisocial operating hours and subject to military discipline when you can sign up with, say Etihad or Emirates, or even Ryanair, get your entire flight training paid for, have at least a chance of being based close to home, and end up in a well-paid job with lots or transferrable skills should you decide to change employer down the line? When it comes to deciding between serving your country and paying the bills, 90% of people will definitely choose the latter option.

    That is what the Air Corps, but in a more general sense the Defence Forces as a whole need to address. The fact that you're "serving your country" means diddly-squat when you can't even afford a bedsit, pardon me, "studio" anywhere near whatever base you're stationed at. That means: better pay and conditions, and in the long run, more varied career options. Simply drumming on about duty or fantasising about "national service", aka conscription, will do nothing to fix the issue and will likely only exacerbate the current manpower crisis.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    According to documentation mentioned above and various news articles. It's taking up to 4 years to train a pilot. This ia a major problem (we're not even talking about advanced planes here, this is effectively elementary flying school)

    In most air forces it's taking 2-3 years (roughly) to train and that point you report to a squadron. (Note at that point, it will take at least another 2 years flying with that squadron for you to become "dangerous" to the enemy)

    The wages need to be upped, and not just in the Air Corp, across the entire Defense forces.

    The ships we have cannot be crewed to due to lack of medics and Chef's of all things (I know for a fact that most of the ships out at sea atm are being crewed by Army Paramedics not Navy Paramedics).

    It all boils down to money/wages. The problem is so substantial with regard the lack of trainers, that the Defense forces may need to look to the private sector to train pilots.

    I'd just like to go on record saying that, I thought the Helicopter doing the fire fighting in Howth there a few months back did an amazing job. They were working for a very long time to try and get it under control. If they had not have been there, the situation may have gotten way more out of control than it already was.

    We have to pay these people, simple as.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    Ryanair and flying training paid for? in the same line? you really need to do your homework.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,065 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Irish Air Corp pilots take 15 months to get their wings. where are you getting 4 years from?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,456 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    What's the summary.

    Reads like solution to cash starved services is lots of cash. Which almost no wants to give to the service.

    So what's the issue of giving them more money. Well, we don't want to, we'd prefer to spend it on other things.

    Catch 22 in fairness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,722 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    Like putting Karen and her 6 kids in their 'forever home'!!!! 🙄



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,456 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Moral hazard etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,000 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    Interesting ball park figures for for costs.

    Untitled Image

    Croatia buys second hand Rafales from France (France24.com)

    Croatia on Thursday signed a deal to buy 12 French Rafale fighter jets worth nearly 1 billion euros ($1.2 billion) that officials said will considerably strengthen its air force amid lingering tensions in the Balkans.

    The contract for the used combat aircraft was signed during the visit of French President Emmanuel Macron to Croatia. It was the first visit by France’s head of state to Croatia since it split from the former Yugoslav federation in the 1991-95 war.

    “The purchase of the planes strategically is what we see as a game changer for Croatia,” Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic said at a joint press conference with Macron after the signing ceremony.

    “This will not only give us the ability to avert those who have any aspirations toward our territory but also to become the so-called exporters of security … of stability in southeastern Europe,” he said.


    I know Croatia has its own infrastructure already, having operated MiG-21s from the Soviet era, but in terms of getting a modern fast jet force it is a good guide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,483 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    If somehow the CoDF said as part of there recomendations that the state should get in to Air Defence game and the french offered us a Rafale deal. Would the Rafale be to much fire power for what we need?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,636 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Realistically any of the 4.5 gen are "too much firepower for what we need", given that we aren't ever likely to deploy them out of the country offensively. But then we return to the usual "what if we buy a trainer and use it as a fighter" argument.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,636 ✭✭✭sparky42


    To be fair, I think the twin engine issue isn't as relevant as it has been, otherwise we wouldn't see the F35 in service to the scale that is happening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    There is a major push on that SAR gig by a number of indos but I doubt it will happen. Certain Ministers have already taken a good photo opportunity in the S-92. Completely agree though, the level of staffing across the board is horrendously short. Its extremely naïve of the government to over look this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,636 ✭✭✭sparky42


    History repeats itself it seems in how the Government of the day treats the DF...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,505 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    They are very, very expensive nonetheless.

    I know by firepower you mean capability as opposed to actual weapons load, but even at that, the Rafale is excessively complex for what we need, I think.

    In the case of Greece and Croatia, they live cheek by jowl with historic aggressors and there are still active border disputes. Both are also NATO members, so there is an onus on interoperability and capability enhancement.

    Its hard to look past the F-16 and a Gripen lease option, but the more I look at the FA-50, the more I like it. A Mach 1.5 light attack/interceptor that carries all the modern ordnance.

    KAI are courting the Slovak AF as a first EU customer, seeking to ink a deal for 10 units, with a view to shipping 1,000 units to Western countries in the next 20 years. We could do worse than to at least meet them following the CoDF.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    Draken Defense Co just signed up to procure 12 Former Dutch AF F16s with a further 28 thereafter. They have also pre signed an agreement to buy 24 Isreali F16 A/Bs by 2024. How a private company manages this type buying compared to a country is madness.

    Post edited by Sgt. Bilko 09 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 679 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Would they not have fore warning and meet them as they enter irish air space? Don't think it's ever really a straight chase really one would surly use assets in the expected flight path with some to the left and right of said path. They make a intercept model too I think?

    We ever actually need something for a true deterrent and just policing well we a re probably fecked anyway. That's nothing against anyone that's just on a numbers game.



Advertisement