Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why do Landlords feel entitled to rent increases?

  • 06-11-2021 10:41pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 269 ✭✭jo187


    Been reading a lot here and in the media in general. Landlords see no problem raising the rents on people. I'm a renter and my rent went up a few months ago. I try explaining how tough things are at the moment and told tough, your both working, deal with it.

    We heard Leo crying about protecting landlord incomes. So why are Landlords allowed to give themselves a raise? We hear about market rates?

    Well sadly I can't increase wages every year to meet the rent and cost of living expenses.

    I know one person who has a nice landlord and they only pay only 60 per cent of the rate in Dublin city centre. His still making a profit. Only one I've heard of.

    It would lead you to believe that's just a case of greed. But you listen to the Landlords on hear you swear they were a charity.

    I just wonder how they sleep at night choking the average working person you keeps the country running, knowing full well you have the support of the government.

    If any Landlords think they have it tough gladly trade places with ya.



«13456712

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 851 ✭✭✭duffysfarm


    Why do shops increase prices' why do employees seek wage increases, why does the minimum wage increase each year? Landlords are renting out properties to make money, the same as any other business. Its all about supply and demand and at the minute there is a shortage of supply. Inflation is hitting everything at the minute



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,814 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    there are awhile lot of things to be said about costs and returns and future renovation cists. In the end the prices are set by the market, not the individual landlord.

    it’s the same as the labour market. You can’t find an electrician to work for 25 euros an hour even though you might have found one ten years ago. The electrician isn’t entitled to €60/hour or more any more than he was in 2010 but it’s just the way the market is. The resource is scarce so it commands a premium. Complaining that the electrician is greedy won’t make any difference. You still won’t get a sparks for 25 euros/hour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,326 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    It's not because they have it tough it's because they know we are in the middle of a housing crisis so need to capitilise on it as much as they can before the next downturn/emigration crisis. Also cash reducing in value by 5%+

    No different to the housing for purchase or second-hand car market, - they will set the price at whatever people are willing to pay

    What we should be more angry about is that our salaries aren't increasing accordingly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,096 ✭✭✭Tow


    Supply and Demand.

    The real laugh is the least figures from Revenue put the value of over 30% of the countries housing stock at less than or equal to 200k euro.

    When is the money (including lost growth) Michael Noonan took in the Pension Levy going to be paid back?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,968 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Any LL in an RPZ now feels obliged to raise the rent any chance they get. The rules work against you if you do not increase the rent any chance you can. I not in an RPZ....yet. This is a worry as well if you are designated your rent is fixed for at least the next 6-10 years at what could be a low rate.

    That nice LL you post about was probably caught on the wrong part of the cycle when RPZ's were introduced. Not only that if he want to sell his property in the next few years it could cost him 30-50k in the market value of the apartment. So not only is he losing 6-10k/ year in rental he get screwed over on the sale as well. Between lost rent and property value he cod be looking at 100k over 6 years.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 269 ✭✭jo187


    I hear a lot about supply and demand, market value etc. Does it work the other way? Say there is a crash and market vaule goes down, am I entitled to my rent to go down?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 392 ✭✭Rustyman101


    Yeah I'd imagine supply/ choice goes up rent goes down ! If not you have choice to move ? Seems more interference in market by government worse things get for all ? Would not like to be a tenant or a LL these days.



  • Registered Users Posts: 130 ✭✭Thestart


    When the crash comes hopefully the government put in a reverse rent cap to slow the drop in rents to protect the landlords who are now being attacked by the free market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,430 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    It's an investment, everything else is going up in price which feeds in to their expenses so they need to raise the rent or fall behind.



  • Registered Users Posts: 269 ✭✭jo187


    Yeah that seems to be the thing the choice to move.

    I meant if the apartment in my area went down in cost, could I file a letter to the RTB and give notice for my rent to be reduced?

    As far as I know it's not an option. But my Landlord can bring up the prices of places near by, that are bigger then my place, as a reason to increase my rent.

    Seems like it doesn't work both ways.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,353 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Not entitled, but it may do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 392 ✭✭Rustyman101


    Supply is the issue and all these laws and restrictions will for the short-term anyways lead to reduced supply as you would want to be v brave to enter the BTL market now.

    I assume when supply comes on stream 3 to 5 year's? Prices will fall as people will have a choice pay the asking price or move.

    unfortunately that choice isn't there now and the government aren't helping changing the rules every week, my opinion for what it's worth, also next government SF/ ...... are any unknown quantity re market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,096 ✭✭✭Tow


    Yes, very much so. We gave reductions in the recession and when tennants lost jobs etc.

    Now, with the current rules we have to increase the rent each year or be left behind. Previously we would only have done so every few years, and at that never increased to the full current market rate. Before when a tennant left the cost of reletting (painting, carpets, furniture, labor etc) would be covered over time by the increase to the current market rate. That is no longer possible, the rent needs to increase each year to keep up.

    When is the money (including lost growth) Michael Noonan took in the Pension Levy going to be paid back?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,407 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    The RPZ are an issue in so far that you cannot look after a good tenant anymore. When I was a landlord (no longer TG) I would keep rent low for good tenants. But now because of RPZ if you did that and the tenant then left the new tenant no matter how good or bad they are would get the benefit of the previous tenants good behaviour leaving the landlord receiving lower rent but now having all the hassle of a bad tenant aswell. No matter how good the tenant I would be charging the max for rent



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    When we had our last rental crisis, around 2010ish, the rents where collapsing and tenants where bragging about how they got hundreds of Euro off their rent. No one complained and there wasn't stupid legislation introduced which restricted the market. Now we have a bigger crisis and the government is doing everything possible to drive investors out of the rental market.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    Exactly. In 2008 I was paying 1250 for a 1 bed apartment. The following year places in the same block were advertised for 900. So I went to the landlord and said I wanted to pay 900 or I would move out. He didn't have really a choice so agreed to it. He worked in a bank and lost his job but I was hardly going to pay above market rate.

    I suppose if it happened again government would introduce legislation preventing tenants from moving :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,189 ✭✭✭reubenreuben


    Shop around, its mostly the irish ones that are the most expensive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,096 ✭✭✭Tow


    The current situation has come about by government manipulation of the market. It stated with the banning of bed sits, which took the bottom out of the market. We had two buildings of these, too expensive to upgrade in the 90s, so sold off. That was ~20 units no longer available to the market, in Dublin 4. Then adding protections for tennants added more hurdles. It is the exact same reason mortgage rates are so high here, if you cannot get rid of non paying tennant/homeowner it pushes up costs for everyone. The 4% rule now meaning substantial refurbishment when a tennant leaves, then 4% compound increase each year.

    When is the money (including lost growth) Michael Noonan took in the Pension Levy going to be paid back?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭PSFarrell


    Back in 2010 I remember talking a letting agent from €1500 to €1300 for a 3 bed apartment. Letting agent told me the landlord had been getting €1800 in 2007. These things can work both ways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,226 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Mortgage rates are due to non-paying homeowners. Not non-paying tenants. Tenants aren't responsible for paying the mortgage



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,906 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    our approach to housing and accommodation is an absolute train wreck, this is now the case for most renters and an increasing number of landlords. we ve codded ourselves into thinking absolute nonsense ideas and ideologies such as supply and demand etc etc, is how the world works, including in relation to our property needs, and now these ideas and ideologies are starting to fail for nearly everyone.

    landlords have been encouraged into the market, but due to these critical failures, their chosen profession is becoming more and more precarious, hence the exodus, renters are obvious on the sh1t end of stick also, theres not much none sh1tty ends in this game

    funnily enough, globally, you ll actually find, the more state interaction a country has in its property markets, the more stable those markets are, Singapore etc, we ve allowed ourselves to fall foul to this free market nonsense, now everyone is getting screwed, so, go us!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,906 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    we continually keep electing governments whos main ideologies are based in continuously promoting a primarily fire sector lead economy, so yes, it is state manipulation, but its ultimately driven by these sectors....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,968 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    He is on about the removal of bedsits in the early noughties. The rules changed you could not have a single room flat, cooking and bedrooms had to be separate.

    In larger cities and towns there was a lot of larger town houses. LL let these as single rooms with a bed and a small kitchenette in them. A lot were let to order single people.

    At the same time fire regulations changed which took out a lot of flats over commercial premises. These units went out if the market and were never replace. Any that did stay were converted to multi- occupancy units maybe on one floor and the rentals charged doubled per occupant.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Posts: 3,505 [Deleted User]


    You're missing the point by using the word "entitled".

    A person buys an investment property to make money. It only makes sense to rent it out for as much as they can. It's not a public service. They don't owe anyone anything.

    If there's a lot of choice out there, it puts pressure on landlords to attract tenants, by either improving the property or lowering the rent. On the other hand if people are desperate for housing, landlords can charge much higher rents.

    The problem these days isn't what the landlords are charging; it's that the government has turned a blind eye to the fact that there isn't enough housing for everyone. If there were enough properties, people would have choice, and prices would go down. Instead, they just keep making moves that make it less attractive to become a landlord, which encourages property owners to sit on empty properties.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    We've never let "supply and demand" work. We've either provided unneeded tax breaks to encourage supply in the noughties boom or introduced rent controls in the last few years to drive down supply. Then we provide tax incentives for big "professional" landlords to come in , after we've driven out the amateur landlords, who are buying up supply and leaving units empty because of interference in the market by goverment.

    You can't compare a democratic country with an tiny city state ruled by a single party. Look at the problems nearly every other functioning country is having with property and they are all the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,627 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    Devils advocate. Flip it on its head. Why are you entitled to low rents in private rental property.

    What decides the salary you are. Why should that be low or high?



  • Registered Users Posts: 900 ✭✭✭paulieeye


    it most definitely works both ways. From 2010 on I got 3 rent reductions in a row by asking the landlord. Not getting you about contacting the RTB, this is a contract between you and the landlord. If the market was in such a way that there were loads of options available, you would just request the reduction from the LL. If they say no you move out and get a cheaper place. They would probably agree to the reduction as they dont want to go through the hassle of finding another tenant for the lesser rent anyway!

    Its the same the other way around, the landlord is raising the rent because in the current market there are not a high number of places available and so you more or less have to accept the increase if the new rent is in line with the market or you'll be finding a new place for the higher rent anyway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Dont forget revenue take over 50% of what you are paying in rent too.

    They are making more out of it than anyone.

    Of course then you have the REITs who have a sweetheart deal.

    Everyone, ordinary landlords and tenants are being screwed over by the government. But it suits them to pit landlords against tenants so the REITs and the govt can hide in the long grass and collect your money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,906 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    we have to walk away from all of this textbook economic crap, fundamental beliefs of this thinking, such as supply and demand simply doesnt work in this case, its not how the real world works, what you have just described is exactly what occurs when you allow major sectors such as the fire sectors to control your economy, i.e. credit fueled booms, and credit fueled busts, which in turn causes highly reactive policies such as you described.

    yes, we ve all followed each other down this fire sector cul de sac, we have to move back towards more state interactions with these critical sectors, and not allow them to dominate and dictate our economies, as we have now....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,226 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    I was referring to the sentence:

    if you cannot get rid of non paying tennant/homeowner it pushes up costs for everyone.


    I am aware of the rules outlawing bedsits etc. If those were still allowed then there would be more accommodation available. But you could say the same about 10-to-a-room tenements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭spaceHopper


    A rental property is worth between 15 and 20 years annual rent so if you don’t keep the rents high you are lowering the value of your property. Banks probably use closer to 10 years rent. 

    My father had a house in flats, since he passed away I help my mother with it.  Dad had the rents low and it very foolish of us not keep rising them.

    Once the government brought out Rent Pressure Zones we should have been rising the rents to the max every year. Because we didn’t we are now locked in to low rent. The only way to fix that is to kick out every body and do a major renovation so that we can rebase line the rents. Personally I think rents are about 30% or more too high but are all the other costs in Ireland.  

    By getting rid of small timeland lords and bring in RITS we have made things worse. Yes there is stock of good apartment to rent but a lot of them are empty, from what I hear finding somewhere to live is very difficult. I work with a guy from India and he said that people were offering an extra 200 or 300 a month cash to get a place at viewings so he keep missing out. So we are back to a black market economy. Thankfully for him he’s bought a place here now.

    The way I see renting form a private LL is meant to be a convenience while you are young and not a life time thing. Is you’re a student you rent a house with a gang keep the rent down. You’re a 20 something you rent a house or flat with few others and enjoy life then eventually settle down and buy a place of your own or with wife, husband…  You’re in need of social housing, short term rent allowance or HAP, log term you rent form the council at an affordable rent.  

    This craic of using private land lords as social housing is driving up rent and costing the state much more for poorer quality housing or the wrong type. I know people are crying out for apartment but these new 10+ story apartment building are going to end with social problems and massive fire. We don’t deal with antisocial behaviour here and we don’t enforce building regs or have a fire service that can fight those types of fires.

    The blaming all of this on LL’s and RITEs is the government's way of covering their tracks and avoiding blame. As a further LL I shouldn’t say this but if you want to change things don’t vote FF or FG next election vote Labour and SF or for Social/Left  parties. Whatever you do make sure to vote.  



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,906 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    as a citizen and a landlord, you should be allowed say what you will, you shouldnt feel ashamed for speaking your mind, our default political ideologies towards property are clearly failing so badly now, that most, including landlords, are in serious trouble



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,189 ✭✭✭reubenreuben


    Agree on that. Crazy people with all their spare cash since covid putting it into property. Artificially inflating everything. Its a lose lose situation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,906 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    you ll also find the conversation about the money supply of the property markets is regularly down played, when in fact its also causing the bulk of the issues with these markets. the primary source of our money supply for these markets is from the private sector, in the form of credit, this is ultimately why very few realised that our previous bust was in the post, this is the 'finance' element of the fire sector



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 954 ✭✭✭mountai


    Why do some tenants feel entitled , to STOP paying their rent ??



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,553 ✭✭✭✭Varik


    People can't just say it's the governments fault as if they're some indivisible entity.

    All the legislation that's driving smaller LLs away is down to the Dáil, and that's not just FF or FG as it's not like the rest would be against more protections or doing even more to limit rents and vote as such.

    The rest is down to the councils, they're the ones getting handed the cash and then either outbidding individuals themselves or renting it off the reits who did it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,906 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    possibly some psychological issues occurring, possible financial issues, the list is endless really, but its the fact, our property markets are falling most tenents and landlords now, most landlords probably need to continually increase rates, to decrease the risks involved



  • Registered Users Posts: 126 ✭✭ggmat799


    Well not when houses are overpriced and crap quality stuff is sold at HIGHEST RENTALS in EUROPE - (Know of someone who Llved in e rated apartment at about 2K ( EA lied house was BER C). At shops, we can order from other countries via amazon etc. We do not need to give salary certificates etc when buying online? We do not need to stand in queue and wait for highness LAND LORD to select us as a tenant (Read Purchaser). Logics hits both ways.


    Also, shops consider inflation/cost of goods sold when raising prices - Rentals are raised randomly, luckily RTB had set a RPZ. Else rentals would have increased at 10% PA. So OP simply wanted to show WHY THE ENTITLEMENT, when you are already selling substandard (comparitive) apartments at OVERPRICED rates.

    Will you buy a Hyundai and pay BMW Price?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,092 ✭✭✭DubCount


    If you want LOWER RENTALS, you need more rental properties (and more evil landlords).

    RPZ's only help sitting tenants. New tenants pay top dollar in return. RPZ's drive lower cost rentals out of the market. Any LL charging anything less than maximum rent is reducing their income for decades to come as well as the value of their investment - who is going to do that.

    As for entitlement .... I expect if your employer offered you a pay increase, you'd happily take it, but should you be entitled to it? The cost of my electric bill for my home has increased, buy why should my utility company be entitled to charge more? Entitlement is a dangerous concept in a market where identical properties have different limits on how much they can be rented for. Who should get to set the entitlement for any given product or service?

    Finally. If you want quality, having a market where the price you are charged cannot be increased because you are receiving a higher quality product/service, is only going to mean a race to the bottom in standards. Where is the incentive to repaint, replace the old carpet, and fix the drafty window when you can charge the same rent whether you do the work or not?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,564 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    I briefly worked for a pharmaceutical company in a technical capacity. You would be amazed at the absolute b@stards insisting the the price of a drug for cystic fibrosis or multiple sclerosis is far too cheap and we could demand a lot more for it than we're getting. Supply and demand being the oft cited reason for the price increase. They had the power to increase the price so they did. Whether they should or not shouldn't wasn't considered apart from one or two people.

    Now the service supplied by landlords is housing. We have a housing crisis and many people are homeless in the state. The oft repeated phrase here is "supply and demand". This is indeed a reason why you can raise rents but that doesn't mean you should. Raising rents far out of sync with wage inflation increases the risk of homelessness and further decreases supply of affordable housing. We have seen the same thing happening during the Celtic Tiger times. I have worked with UCD's student housing program for vulnerable students (children without parents and victims of abuse ect) and many had to leave accommodation due to price hikes or the landlord pretending to sell and then hiking the price. The reason I mention this is to convey that like healthcare, housing is something that is essential and hiking healthcare or housing has consequences.

    Rises in rent isn't in line with wage inflation. It's that simple. Raising rents dramatically reduce people's ability to afford them because you can deserves no respect. So please do people the favour of being honest and say that you're raising rents because you can. Stop comparing it to taking a pay raise from your boss and this doesn't reduce your bosses' ability to afford a house (or else they wouldn't offer it).

    To quote an oft cited post recession phrase "it's greed, greed and more f-ing greed". This is why some people see some of the landlord class in Ireland as being morally bankrupt.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,407 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    Fairly irrelevant as under the drug payments scheme there is a maximum price you will pay for drugs per month. Currently €114 iirc so they can charge what they want on the basis of supply and demand and it does not affect the end user. Are you suggesting something similar for the rental market whereby the govt should pay anything above a set price or ahould the landlords act like a charity?



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm not a landlord but it isn't a charity!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If it makes you happy:

    Landlords raise rent because they can, it is legal to do so within the related legislation, and it makes business sense to maximise return on what is a considerable investment with quite a lot of associated risk.

    There is nothing new, Earth shattering, nor morally wrong with that, despite what you may think. Rents plummeted during the last recession, there was little sympathy for landlords.

    I do appreciate that working with students you are at the forefront of the rental crisis, but it has never been the responsibility of private landlords to provide homes for everyone, nor to provide rental properties at prices affordable to everyone. Your ire should be directed at those who have made the rental sector so unappealing, that at a time when rents are so high, high numbers of landlords are actually exiting the market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,339 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    It's the law of unintended consequences.

    The RPZ legislation rewarded the LL's who had been pushing rents up and punished, in perpetuity, those LL's who were letting properties at below market rates or not increasing rents for sitting tenants.

    Bad and all as that was, it still allowed LL's who did not raise the rent on a sitting tenant at every possible opportunity, to catch up on the cumulative rent increases when that tenant moves on.

    However the latest update has removed that discretion from the LL, a good tenant counts for nothing anymore, any rent increases not applied at the maximum rate and at the earliest possible opportunity, can never be recovered.

    This latest change will ensure that every tenant gets a rent increase every year at the maximum allowed rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    Your argument is based on one person you know and you assume to know the landlords tax situation.

    Inflation

    Its a business

    Your free to purchase Our own place or move

    Within the law

    High cost /risk


    All of the above and more is why landlords can increase rents.

    No big conspiracy just market factors at play. Constant government interference is guaranteed to make it worse



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,784 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    Of course.

    Rents completely crashed a decade ago.

    Tenants were breaking leases right, left and centre to move somewhere cheaper.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,407 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    I recall also being shafted by the Dept Social Protection at the time whi reneged on agreements all over the place. And they wonder why some LLs are reluctant to deal with them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,508 ✭✭✭Manion


    Propagating the idea being a landlord is a moral failing is a deeply unhelpful attitude tbh. Housing is a right, absolutely, but private citizens aren't charities. It's a business, run like one. You have a right to food, but don't expect a super market to operating not for profit.

    Somehow the years of declaring war on landlords hasn't helped, today's high rents are a direct result of rent controls as was predicted at the time.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There is no right that I’m aware of to either housing nor food, but I catch your drift and agree with most of what you posted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,617 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    If one doesnt like the rent they are paying then they are free to move elsewhere.


    Thats not me being funny, thats just the reality of the renting and the reality of the market is that there is no availability for anyone to move elsewhere so landlords know they can get higher rents because renters dont have a choice.

    If you were a landlord it would be foolish of you not to get the maximium return from your investment.

    If you are a renter your ire should be directed at the government who have the ability to improve supply but have been failing at it for a long time.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement