Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Tesla Model 3 - V3.0

1969799101102497

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91 ✭✭mobyduck


    Yeah range jump from 448 to 491kms is significant and could persuade a few to save some €€€. Thought it was bumping a bit close to LR range but then saw that LR will bump from 580 to 614kms soon.

    B04B3015-7358-495F-94FC-BAF4948AE131.jpeg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 666 ✭✭✭Moreilly


    I think the SR+ has lost the SR and gained a 60kWh battery...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,263 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    60kWh battery with 55kWh usable.

    these should now sell by the bucketload given the price difference to the LR…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 667 ✭✭✭Am I Evil?


    I wonder will the Q4 2021 delivery of SR Model 3 cars have this upgraded battery. Bit disappointed by the acceleration dropping truth be told, hopefully they bring this back down with an update



  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 3,846 Mod ✭✭✭✭eeloe


    It's a bigger battery, surely there has to be a bit of a trade off somewhere.

    Post edited by eeloe on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 667 ✭✭✭Am I Evil?


    Seems not, just off the phone to tesla support. They've confirmed to me that anyone taking delivery in Q4 and ordered before today will gain the additional range and keep the previous 0-100 acceleration (as advertised when ordered) . Anyone taking delivery from Feb 2022 will have the extended range and the slower 0-100 time.



  • Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The acceleration loss is probably due to loss of the larger (performance) motor that was fitted on the LFP cars. It's a good way to differentiate between the SR and LR models which now again share the same rear motors as was the case before the LFP batteries were introduced.

    That's what I think anyway seeing the new spec.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,263 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    They are reducing the acceleration time by .5 seconds so they can sell it back to you via a software upgrade later, similar to what's available on the LR currently.



  • Posts: 1,123 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It remains to be seen. I still think that its cost cutting as Tesla really went to town to mitigate the expected performance hit when they introduced the heavier LFP pack by upgrading the rear motor. That actually made that SR+ variant quicker than the earlier lighter NMC SR+.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 667 ✭✭✭Am I Evil?


    I was planning to push my delivery to Feb but with this range increase, having a trade in potentially devalue and tesla reducing the acceleration on '22 model 3 cars. I'm going to pull the trigger and enjoy my Christmas gift to myself

    As pointed above though, I absolutely see Tesla offering a paid software option on the new models to increase the speed. Customer rep insisted they cant see this occurring but they would say that..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭Le Bruise


    I just asked similar on the chat feature. They confirmed the extended range for Q4 alright, but thought it'd be with the slower acceleration (he wasn't 100% though). Would be delighted if the person you were speaking to is correct!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 498 ✭✭Gile_na_gile


    Aside from the software-limited acceleration, I think there are some nice incremental changes to the Model 3 which may put downward pressure (finally) on pre-MIC NMC SR+ models from 192 to 202 in the second hand market. On the other hand, the miniscule pool of available cars may keep it high, and push people to pay the extra 6-8k for all these incremental improvements and a new warranty and new car. Hard to justify 43/44k for a 20k km 192 SR+ versus a new model for a bit more with heat pump, 'bigger' (LFP) battery, powered tailgate, better insulated, and better fittings and build quality. I am hoping the Model Y from Germany will help decrease the price a touch in 2022/23 when I will look to swap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭reni10


    I got my Model 3 SR+ in Sep and a little bit miffed now I did not wait until Q4 as the extra range would have been very handy for the few longer trips that I do as there are no superchargers along any of the routes I take and I have to rely on the eCars network!

    That extra 40 to 50kms would have made a difference for me on those longer trips and probably would have made the trips possible without a charge at all!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭AmberGold


    Given the current situation you can likely sell it for what you paid and order a new one!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭reni10


    I would do that but I also need a car every day so could not sell now and wait until Feb unfortunately :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 667 ✭✭✭Am I Evil?


    There seems to be some confusion around. On other Tesla forums I look at some people were being told different things. I ended up going onto Tesla online chat earlier and got chatting to a Dublin customer care rep. He rang off the back of this chat to discuss in more detail... They had an internal memo issued out to them earlier today which notified them of the range increase along with the new 0-100 time. The same memo also stated that any existing pending orders due for Delivery in Q4 and without a designated VIN would avail of the higher range and the existing 0-100 time of 5.6secs (not the new 6.1). Anyone with a VIN before today would avail of the SR+ specs as per the order day and anyone ordering beyond this point will recieve the extended range model with the 6.1 0-100 time. He believes Tesla will probably offer a speed boost via paid software sometime next year, like the current Long Range has.


    Anyways, that's all I know for now. The rep mentioned he'd give me a call if anything changes but usually by now If there was an error on the memo it would definitely have been corrected.


    Edit - just to add. The actual change seems to be a new efficient motor. It's not a battery increase. At least, this was his belief but couldn't be 100% sure as the internal memo didn't state the reason for the change



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,918 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Tesla already fast as be jazuz, I'd take the range increase thank you very much

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 667 ✭✭✭Am I Evil?


    Definitely but seems anyone willing to take delivery in Q4 will get a best of both worlds option - extended range and the faster 0-100 time. As with everything Tesla though, pinch of salt until we actually get our hands on the car



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭AmberGold


    You could buy a cheap car (sub 7k was my target) to keep the show on the road for a few months. Sold my own car last week and driving one myself while I wait for a new M3 Feb delivery.

    The trade seen to be offering strong money for Tesla’s which takes the pain out of selling. Picking up a cheap car that won’t let you down and you won’t lose your shirt on is more of a challenge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,263 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Yeah…. For the same price there’s an additional 82km of (WLTP) range from the car I bought vs the car someone is going to get in Q4….


    add to that the refresh features like powered trunk open/close, built in wireless charger, chrome delete etc…… and I’d have a new one in a heartbeat……

    it’s giving me serious thoughts about selling mine privately and ordering a new one with the increased range…… I have a 2nd car in the house so could survive without the Model 3 for a few weeks if needed…… and given how used car prices are currently going, I probably wouldn’t lose a whole lot on my 20 month old SR+……..


    serious food for thought…..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 666 ✭✭✭Moreilly


    looking at changing my ioniq 28 next year, Looking (or dreaming, not sure!) at the Ioniq 5 and the tesla model 3, very hard to decide.

    Have already driven the Ioniq 5,very nice car on the road,and good acceleration - bit floaty on the corners but not bad though.

    Just took the tesla model 3 for a test drive as well on monday, I have to say the model 3 feels great on the road -well planted, just point and accelerate. Very easy car to drive and with the new range upgrade to the basic model, range is not a problem.

    BUT... when i got into the model 3 i felt the car felt a little cheap compared to the ioniq 5, the interior of the Ioniq seemed light years ahead of the tesla, things like the sound of the door closing, door handles, touch points and overall feel of the cabin, the ambient lighting set up, light bar on the front and rear of the outside is a nice design touch as well. Rear space on the ioniq feels more like sitting in a lounge... very spacious

    But....... the features like sentry, netflix, 'autopilot', and general software is quite nice on the tesla......plus it's a tesla... !

    has anybody here test driven both? or any opinion, my head is wrecked !! :)

    IMG_20211101_105321.jpg IMG_20211026_160219.jpg IMG_20211026_154527.jpg IMG_20211101_111349.jpg IMG_20211026_154556.jpg




  • Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I don't believe teh WLTP ranges on any cars these days as it is hard to figure out what real changes are being made under the skin.

    It could be a case they learnt how to drive the pre-defined route better than when first submitted for testing.

    PSA have pushed up WLTP range on their cars with no obvious changes to hardware.

    Some Tesla changes are for the better, some for the worse.

    Youtube range test videos tell you what you need to know.

    Disclaimer: Tesla do appear to be the best with regard to eeking out best real-world range from any particular car/motor/battery combination so I'm not singling them out for criticism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,263 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    I dunno!! the WLTP in my Model 3 SR+ is 409km, and I've easily reached it on a fairly regular drive I'd do down to my mothers house and back.

    Its a 50km round trip from Rush down to Artane Castle shopping centre and back, so its rural, motorway & urban all in one (at least 12-14 km of it at 120km/h), so probably not a million miles away from the WLTP test..... The only time I won't hit the WLTP rating is when the temperature is below about 12 degrees and the wind/rain is up...., but usually for most of the year, I can hit the WLTP on that particular trip, and can exceed it with a light foot (a few times I've done the trip and achieved 10kWh/100km, which is putting me in 500km range territory!!

    Since owning the car, my average consumption over 20 months & 43,000km is 14.6KwH/100km, giving me an average range of 342km. (there's a lot of motorway miles in there)

    summer motorway at 120km/h is about 290-300km, winter is about 230-240km, then local Dublin driving (including plenty of M1/M50) is around the 350-400km mark, depending on weather and where I'm going. So by and large, I'm fairly happy with the range of the car vs what is advertised.

    Having said that I'd still love the 491km WLTP Model 3, as I'd see that as giving an additional 50-60km of range on average compared to my SR+



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,271 ✭✭✭jusmeig


    Untitled Image

    So this happened. They are deep scratches, not just paint the body would be damaged.

    Anyone had anything similar happen/repaired?

    Guessing its not gonna be cheap...



  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 3,846 Mod ✭✭✭✭eeloe


    Not as bad as you'd think!


    Get a couple of quotes and get it done ASAP...i've a scratch on my current car at the moment and the scratch is after making me stop taking as good care of the vehicle than i normally would.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,580 ✭✭✭eagerv


    Had something similar on my last car, except on two panels. Got it done by an excellent fella, cost €250. Get it done and forget about it..🙂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,578 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    Mine came brand new with that sort of damage, I think its a feature, speed lines maybe. Simple enough repair 300 euro ish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,175 ✭✭✭sk8board


    Same. not sure how any of you will notice the 0.5s diff in 0-100 time in an instant-torque ev - in a car that’s already as fast as a hot hatch



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,231 ✭✭✭Kramer


    Since owning the car, my average consumption over 20 months & 43,000km is 14.6KwH/100km, giving me an average range of 342km.

    You've approx. 45kWh usable on your SR+ so your average 100% to 0% range is 300km.

    Regular charging to 100% in the earlier SR+ models isn't recommended & no one ever plans on driving to 0%. I reckon 90% to 10% is a more usable range. At 15kWh/100km, with 36kWhs (90% to 10%), you've a usual, 240km range car.

    At 18-20kWh/100km, winter, motorway etc., you ain't getting even half of the WLTP 🤨.

    Sure, you can hypermile it to 500kms during the summer (I did over 300kms in a 28kWh Ioniq!), but these WLTP figures are farcical.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,231 ✭✭✭Kramer


    has anybody here test driven both? or any opinion, my head is wrecked !! :)

    I've driven both. They are very, very different cars! I wouldn't have thought anyone after a mid size SUV (CUV?) would also be considering a medium sized saloon. They are so, so different.

    OK, the Tesla has a boot. It's not a hatchback. That's a big difference right there & a major drawback with the Model 3.

    It's also significantly more expensive than the entry level Ioniq 5 - close on €13/14k?

    I'd rule out Netflix & other gimmicks to be honest. I usually don't spend long enough sitting in the car to bother with Netflix & I'd say most Tesla owners just show it off to friends but rarely use it too. 15/20 minutes charging - would you really need Netflix?

    Make a pros/cons list & think of what you really need in a car. A Tesla badge is worthless if you can't carry home a table from IKEA or some plants from the garden centre 😀.

    Best of luck with your decision anyway!



Advertisement