Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Heavyweight Boxing

1257258260262263569

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,555 ✭✭✭✭AckwelFoley


    Fury gets hit too much. If wilder hadn't a gas tank the size of a vespa scooter he could probably beat fury. But wilders conditioning is poor. He was hitting fury at the end of the fight and had no impact.


    Prime Tyson hit hard...but he hit fast. His power and speed was what made him. When he got old, he still had the power bit less speed, so he had to rely more on his power and biting technique



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,950 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Fury , AJ & Wilder are all bigger by a inch or 2 here and there and 20lbs here and there, Wilder the closet in weight but he is very lean .

    I think the 80's &90 guys where naturally smaller men just juiced up to there eye balls with extra muscle also why none had gas tank issues, Sure look at Holyfield's transformation its madness

    Ye drugs are still there today but no where near the cocktail of stuff the lads where on in the 80's/90, Jerrell Miller level doping ,

    Impossible exercise because unless you se them fight its impossible to know for sure,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,559 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Lewis and Bowe are bigger than Wilder, as is Foreman.

    taller is not bigger. There is more to it

    Lewis and Bowe, and throw in Golota are pretty much like AJ. Few lbs here and there…

    it’s the 1990s, not the 1920s..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,559 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Ok, let’s here this better training and strategy bit..where’s the better diet bit from the 1990s fighters compared to today? What are today’s fighters eating and drinking that’s making them better boxers/fighters?

    and the three weights I mentioned with the 90s vs today. Who you picking?

    because apart from Fury, none the others are great in the 1990s. And I’d pick several to beat Fury.

    I’d take Bowe Holyfield fight as far more skilled and everything else compared to anything from heavyweights today.

    no idea what some you guys think happened between Bowe/Lewis and Holyfield to give us AJ/Wilder and Fury..

    whatever you are seeing that shows them better is invisible to me..

    Post edited by walshb on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,229 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    I doubt Fury has a better diet than those in the 90's, even the 30's tbh



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,559 ✭✭✭✭walshb




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭iebamm2580


    Just watched back the fight earlier, fury would be an nightmare for anybody in any era, the way he hits then prods the face with the forearm and leans on opponents, it would tire anybody out, not many would beat him in a dog fight and his stamina and recovery powers especially from that first knock down are exceptional. He looked like he could do 15 rounds, amazing considering his shape.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,227 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    His belief in his ability to win somehow, anyhow, is impressive. He was absolutely convinced that he was beating Wilder. I think it’s easier to have the extra push and stamina when you feel like that. He knew he was far superior and having that huge mental edge makes. amassive difference.

    On the battles of the ages, it’s hard to really appreciate the current guys until they retire. In 5 years time we’ll know more about all of them. If Wilder were to fight Joshua who loses against Usyk and ko him then fight Usyk who became undisputed after a Fury meltdown and vacation of the belt and also ko him then both of their legacies would look very different. I’d love Ike to be around now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,559 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Do we have to wait till AJ and Wilder retire to appreciate them? Surely we have enough on them to assess them in an all time sense? Both very likely past their best now anyway..

    Fury probably has 3/4 more fights left. And no real challenges apart from AJ and Usyk. I’d make him quite a warm favorite v Usyk, and a warm favorite against AJ.

    Even if AJ were to beat/KO Fury, avenge Usyk, or Wilder to KO AJ/Usyk, pretty much they are who they are in an all time sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,227 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    Hahaha very good response!

    Well ok, I think we will appreciate them better when the story is a bit more complete. Now here even you are professing Fury to be the HW of this generation 18 months ago you had a very different perception of him. We will be able to say things more fully when we know more or all of the stroy. All three of them (and many more) can still change our minds and a lot can still happen.

    Take say Forman. If he’d retired after the Ali defeat then we’d look at him another way without the Moorer ko or even going 12 rounds with both Morrison and Holyfield (I think, points decisions?). Then he could wellllll have come out on the wrong side of the Ron Lyle scrap which really should have come up in our discussion about great fights gone by.

    And... why would Fury have only 3/4 left? Irrespective of what he says he’s just 33 maybe 34 sure he could have double that amount of fights yet.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,559 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Fury could have 10 fights left. 3/4 fights could take 3/4 years the way these lads operate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,227 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    Yea that is true. He doesn’t seem too interested in fighting lower level lads now as inbetween fights as tune ups but I think that would be a good way for him to keep active and focussed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,554 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    The last five fighters he faced doesn't suggest that.

    He fought Pianeta, Seferi and Schwartz in that time. The serious fights were the Wilder trilogy and we'll give some credit for Wallin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,227 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    Those fights happened 2 during the comeback so I wouldn’t take them so seriously they were more exhibitions than anything. Schwartz the same. Glorified spars. I think Wallin was meant to be similar and then the cut happened so we can judge him later maybe when we see what he does. Those fights got him back up to prime now he’s at that. I think he’s interested in the big ones but you never know. If money talks enough then he’ll run through a few turkeys surely.

    What I like about the likes of Lewis is that he took on really hard opponents like Vitali late on in his career. Lucky enough to escape that one and knew not to take a rematch but he had enough miles on the clock by then to make his own decision. I’d think little of Fury if he left the sport without fighting joshua and Usyk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,559 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    The great Hughie Fury later!!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,893 ✭✭✭✭Mantis Toboggan


    Free Palestine 🇵🇸



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,559 ✭✭✭✭walshb




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,893 ✭✭✭✭Mantis Toboggan


    Free Palestine 🇵🇸



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭badabing106


    When did Mike tyson get old?

    He was only 29 when he knocked out Bruno to win wbc championship

    He was 30 when he knocked out Bruce Sheldon to win the Wba championship. Was he too old then?

    A couple of months later when he was still only 30, he fought Holyfield. Evander was 34!

    Nobody can blame "old age" on Mike tyson not winning those fights . He came up against a better man, fair and square



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,559 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Age wise Tyson wasn’t old in the mid 1990s. But he was clearly past his performance/fighting peak, which was only as far as 1989/1990.

    He went to prison 1992. Was there 3 years or thereabouts.

    He was still quite good post prison, but to anyone who knows boxing and followed him, it was very clear he was not the same fighter in the mid 90s compared to pre 1990s.

    I don’t think the poster meant old in the late 30s early 40s sense. I think the poster meant what I have said here.

    Post edited by walshb on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,110 ✭✭✭✭OmegaGene


    Hammer retired with a torn bicep, the commentators were mentioning Dubois and Chisora for Hughie, don’t fancy his chances with those boys

    The internet isn’t for everyone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,555 ✭✭✭✭AckwelFoley


    Yea. Exactly what I mean. I don't accept his opponents weren't good. He fought very good fighters.


    All heavyweights hit hard. But what made him unique was his explosive speed coupled with his power. 30 isn't old for a cerebral fighter. He just wasn't the same when he fought Evander. He was that touch slower, that in my opinion meant all the difference when you don't have another weapon in your arsenal. His frustration was clear in that fightn and it was his beginning of the end.

    People change. The really really great hall of fame fighters adapted their fighting style over time. When Ali fought Archie Moore in the early 60s he was a completely different athlete to the man that lay on the ropes against Foreman in Zaire 10 years later.


    Ali, was well over the hill by the time he was Tyson Furys age and he's considered the 'greatest" boxer of all time by many (Not me)


    My point is If Ali in his early 30s with all his skills is past his best, tyson at 30 was well past his best



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,559 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    He’s just really basic. Even a washed up Chisora should be too much for him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,559 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Eubank’s joke of an opponent just quit after a few rounds. Wasn’t in the mood, from what it looks!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,110 ✭✭✭✭OmegaGene


    Eubanks opponent was never going to be a match for him unfortunately, the southpaw aspect seemed to trouble Eubank for a while

    The internet isn’t for everyone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭badabing106



    It surprises me that no one ever gives credit to Evander holyfield for his absolutely flawless performance . He was the complete underdog

    Mike tyson was bizarrely 1/25 odds on favourite to beat Evander holyfield

    I think the public and media created an "invincible boxer". So to lose to holyfield was because Mike tyson was well past his prime, not because holyfield was a fantastic boxer/fighter!


    Holyfield would have beaten tyson everytime all the time . All credit has to go to Holyfield for winning those fights.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,559 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    The Holyfield odds were ridiculous. But he was seen at the time as shopworn, jaded and a bit punchy..throw in the heart condition.

    Tyson and Holyfield peak to peak never happened..

    fantasy wise it’s 1986-1988 Tyson vs 1990-1992 Holyfield. I’m backing Tyson.

    Clearly faster, fitter and more ferocious than the 1996 version. Better defense as well. No way Evander stops this version, and if Bert Copper can badly hurt Holyfield, Mike absolutely can..and could finish it..

    funny, the slightly heavier and more bulked up 1996 Holyfield probably does better vs the 1986-1988 Tyson than the 1990-1992 Holyfield. 1996 version was physically stronger.

    Post edited by walshb on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,227 ✭✭✭squinn2912


    Was just thinking that while reading the first part of your comment. I think the bigger Holyfield is a tough proposition for any version of Tyson. Very hard one to call.Holyfield was one durable man.

    I think head on the block I’m going for Tyson. He never fought beast Tyson and from what I remember in the 11 (?) rounds Tyson gave him plenty of trouble in a topsy turvy enough fight. Tyson what nothing like the finisher after he came out of prison. He hadn’t the same believe either and often looked distracted as his career went on. By the end they were queueing up to have his name on their record.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭megadodge


    "My point is If Ali in his early 30s with all his skills is past his best, tyson at 30 was well past his best"


    Tyson was only TWENTY THREE when the very underwhelming Buster Douglas beat the living daylights out of him.

    Of course the Tyson fanboys continuosly ignore that FACT.

    Nobody is past their best at 23.... except 'Prime' Mike Tyson of course!


    There is absolutely no honest reason for ignoring the Douglas fight, but it's like it's been airbrushed out of boxing history. Excuse after excuse after excuse.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,555 ✭✭✭✭AckwelFoley


    Tyson didn't train for that fight

    He was far from perfect. But Mike tyson at his best beats Holyfield



Advertisement