The Great Reset

There are no radical changes. Paranoid people, impervious to basic logic/reason, are playing to their paranoid fantasies by reading into stuff that isn't there

Many posts back you asked for an explanation of why some batshiat blogger was talking nonsense and how whatever it is she was blathering about really worked. I took the time to explain it to you. You ignored it (as I knew you would) and moved onto the next insane nonsense thing to latch onto (as I knew you would)

The "Great Reset" and the WEF have been explained to you countless times on this forum, you aren't interested in facts/reason, you are only interest in your paranoid fantasies being validated. Once nothing comes of this, you'll get bored, create a new account and cling to whatever conspiracy trope comes along next year.

What "Radical changes"?

We are (or were) all wearing masks, because there's a global pandemic. Many people have started working from home, because there's a pandemic.

Since this is a conspiracy theory forum, and people are always suggesting paranoid drivel, are you going to suggest there's something nefarious going on? or are you just pointing out the obvious things we are doing to counteract a global pandemic?

What do you think he means?

You have not been able to say anything other... Maybe something bad is coming... What's coming? Why?

Radical change according to reality: more people working at home instead of at the office

Radical change according to fantasists: a tyrannical "they" are coming to control us, something big and nefarious is just around the corner, etc, etc.

A worldwide communist/nazi/satanic/cyborg dictatorship where everyone in the world will be divested of their property by 2030.

OK. What radical changes. You were previously claiming to be reading his book about the "Great Reset".

You have not pointed to anything in that book that is objectionable to otherwise supports your silly and vague conspiracy theories. So what happened? Was that stuff just not in his book? Where you lying when you were claiming to read it?

How come you're still dodging questions?

Bit hypocritical of you to whinge about "dismissing" when you are actively avoiding 90% of the posts made to you.

Typical really.

He is 83. Most likely dead in a couple of years. Long before he can control any nation. So what does he have to gain?

Some companies are not allowing unvaccinated workers return to the office - there's a pandemic, passing Covid to a colleague can kill them. That's not "tyrannical", it's basic common sense. Many hospitals have had it in place for years.

This is a discussion for conspiracy theories (and associated paranoid views) but many of those who propagate these theories don't like discussion, they just want validation. Many clearly don't like the free speech aspect of posting on a public forum.

What authoritarian overreach in Australia? be specific

Please provide examples of this "very extreme authoritarianism" you are referring to?

I'm not sure how free speech comes into it since it's not like I'm preventing you from posting on boards.

Barring people from employment is very extreme, especially since the risk from covid is both small and hypothetical (not strictly actual, only potential.) The protection from vaccines is only partial so we are comparing a % of risk versus another higher/lower % of risk. Very ambiguous, not at all stark enough to justify broadly taking away people's right to earn a living.

If you don't see that we won't agree on much or anything since our assumptions are too different.

Singapore and Victoria, Australia seem to be planning a wide employment 'lockout' (Dan Andrew's word) of uncompliant citizenry. Details haven't been finalised.

Lol.

If it's one thing that's not allowed on the conspiracy forum, it's questions.

Perhaps if you cats didn't dodge them and whinge about how mean they sound, and answered them instead, they wouldn't pile up as much.

I made a point to you and you did not address it.

My point was that the conspiracy theory being proposed on this thread is very ridiculous and obviously not true.

I asked if you believed in that conspiracy theory, and if not, what version did you believe was reasonable.

Could you answer that point now?

If not, could you explain why you are not answering it?