Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Dominance of Dublin GAA *Mod warning post#1*

1248249251253254323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,383 ✭✭✭olestoepoke


    We should do a poll to try and guess what county Enquiring is from. He has the bitterness of a Mayo fan but also a deep hatred for Dublin like Meath fans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    Dublin GAA received many multiples than every other county. Hence the huge number of titles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,595 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Thats nonsense and the JP money has been for a lot more than primary school children and promotion of hurling to them

    If anyone said money for Dublin was to promote gaelic and hurling to primary children you would say its completely false...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    The money is for primary school children and anyway, didn't Cork spend millions on their stadium and some other counties have a centre of excellence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭ooter


    I wonder how much the schools in limerick got out of this?

    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/hey-big-spender-mcmanus-bails-out-gaa-with-5m-gift-25906245.html



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    Sure Dublin got 300 million for their stadium.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,269 ✭✭✭ClanofLams


    Just go ahead and ignore all the other improvements I pointed out there. A five year old debating would make a more substantive argument.


    Funding has absolutely helped Limerick. Funding works and has been proven to work across every sport. If it didn't work, organisations/individuals wouldn't waste millions doing it. GAA is not immune from this and the notion that it would be is frankly idiotic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,585 ✭✭✭ArielAtom


    Some very poor attempts to be sarcastic by the lad the village is missing. As my granny said many a time, sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. His attempts are making me chuckle, poor lads posts are getting more bizarre by the day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    Banty an innovator Christ on a bike man you've clearly been launching them down on the barstool yourself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    Not to the extent that they fund the largest county with all the other advantages population clubs etc already



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    Dublin playing at home for the All Ireland semi final in both ladies and men's football today. The 2 greatest beneficiaries from the funding in terms of titles. Dublin ladies going for 5 All Ireland's in a row while the Dublin men's are going for 7 in a row. Of course the Dublin men's have won 16 of the last 17 Leinster championships and the Dublin women's were on the way to more than that until they had to end the provincial championships.

    Remember, pre funding, Dublin ladies never won an All Ireland and Dublin men's only won 1 in about 30 years. These 2 are the headline grabbers in terms of what enormous funding can achieve but of course we know the improvements are across the board. It's really made a farce of things and everyone's mind turns to money when Dublin play, most of all Dublin supporters themselves. There's no satisfaction winning like this and for everyone else, seeing our championships degraded by the financial disparity is far from pleasing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    Secretly, some Dubs will be delighted with their defeat today. That's how much of a farce it has all become. When you know the facts, this defeat to Mayo is hugely embarrassing, humiliating. All Dublin's players have come through a multi million euro underage system, with top class coaches, facilities etc. They then go on to a senior set up that also costs millions. A huge backroom team, hiring coaches from basketball, soccer etc. Free meals, cars, they were breaking the rules with training, they play nearly every game at home and they lose to Mayo while putting in one of the most cynical, dirty displays in recent memory. This is a great day for those of us in favour of fair play. Dublin will obviously pump more money into things for next year but it's great to see a county who are competing on a professional basis beaten. Well done Mayo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭Speakerboxx


    Some going for Mayo an amateur team to beat a fully organised and professional Dublin squad today. Wonder what will some of the Dublin players do Monday morning with no jobs to go to?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,894 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It must be sickening for you that Dublin lost in a year when Kerry, Mayo and Tyrone all ended up in the semis again, and it became crystal clear that Dublin aren’t the problem. Amalgamations of the smaller counties are what’s needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,595 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Amalgamations of smaller counties isnt whats needed. a proper tiered competition is. give counties more realistic opportunities to win silverware combined with some games against top sides in provincial competitions and you have a better system

    going against the inter county system with counties joining together isnt going to solve or fix anything



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,855 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    You can’t tier a knockout competition...it’s rigging the draw. What do you tier it on ? Do you scrap the provincial championship ?

    out of the 32 counties only 3 or 4 or maybe 5 will have a realistic possibility of winning an All Ireland in the next 10-12 years. Dublin, Cork, Mayo, Kerry and maybe an Ulster county to join the party, Tyrone say.

    thats life..

    amalgamation of counties ? It won’t be popular, it’s a non runner...

    Longford/Laois, Louth/Leitrim ? I wouldn’t say a county like Meath or Kildare would be salivating at that prospect... both while getting closer to some degree to Dublin they be getting caught by ... nahhh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    It's nothing personal against any Dublin supporters but I was far from sickened seeing Dublin beaten. They're a county who've competed unethically for two decades now. And that's in all inter county competitions. So seeing them beaten in hurling, football, camógie, underage competitions etc can only be welcomed. And I was delighted to see them beaten yesterday.

    But now onto something that keeps getting ignored because Dublin fans keep playing the victim. Dublin started the problem with the huge levels of finance they were given and invested into development and team preparations etc. This has led to other counties trying to replicate it.

    Limerick went to have a look at Dublin's structures over a decade ago. They saw the large number of coaches needed, the strength and conditioning personnel and so on but most of all they became aware of the huge financial resources needed to implement the structures. Limerick found a way of getting their hands on the required level of funding.

    Other counties have done the same. Kerry being one of the main ones. They have pumped huge sums into developing talent and on their senior footballers. Mayo the same, they're regularly near the top of the list on inter county spend. Tyrone have plenty of resources. Do you remember Donegal's investor in the McGuinness years? Tipperary have had an enormous back room team in hurling.

    You get the message? The big problem is finance. To compete at the top level, you have to have the financial backing. So the answer is obvious, it's not amalgamations of counties, it's not tiered competitions, it's establishing a fair and equitable system that provides each county with enough resources to compete. This should involve caps on spending, pooled sponsorship and many more steps.

    Development funding needs to be increased across the board. And it shouldn't be cut in Dublin! Each of the four counties would receive fair funding. This will give opportunity to develop Gaelic Games in disadvantaged areas etc. The same with every county. Promoting our games and increasing participation is what we all want to see. Let's provide counties with the opportunity to do so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,046 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭dunnerc




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭tritium


    You’re hilarious! For months on here you’ve been denying any other county is advantaged, banging that drum that it’s all the dirty dubs. Now when you realise that whatever county you’re from still won’t win an all ireland because of a wide historical inequitiy in the GAA that’s been repeatedly pointed out to you and ignored you start banging another drum


    in reality we began to see in Leinster this year that some counties did look at some of the dublin model and picked the bits that worked for them (in spite of you telling us that wasn’t an option). GAA grassroots development funding is starting to regrow the games in other counties that had slipped back - offalys U20 success shows that it takes time, but we’re beginning to see the benefits of funding for Leinster grassroots development. It’s no coincidence that the rest of Leinster receives significantly more per head of population under 14 than dublin in GDF, as you repeatedly poo-pooed on here. Meanwhile Kildare and Meath will be happy with their progress this year, clearly showing improvement. In spite of ex Westmeath players conspiracy theories were actually seeing progress to develop the game across Leinster, something i do and any fan should applaud.


    you might be better taking that newly enlightened view of the problems in the GAA and asking the likes of the Munster council where their plan for developing weaker counties is? Have they a version of the Leinster council approach. Or are they happy to drone on that Munster is hurling territory for another century while it’s largely a one horse football race. Connacht isn’t much better so maybe ask them the same. At least Ulster has made a shot at development.


    the really interesting thing about dublin this year though is their relative decline largely proved the golden generation theory. In spite of great players like Fenton and Kilkenny they’ve some rebuilding to do based on attrition. To an extent they’ve benefited from that core of a great team landing between a mix of very good players either side, but It’s likely to be a couple of years imho before they lift Sam again, especially if a few more lads walk away



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,714 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    John Delaney and Co. managed to cock up an organisation with huge reserves of cash too. The current Dublin management managed to do the same.

    Just because they humiliatingly cocked it up doesn't fix the core problems for the GAA and spreading the funds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,046 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    There needs to be an ongoing discussion on splitting dublin regardless of their meltdown yesterday. They have such crazy population advantages for one. Before we even mention the financial doping.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    You are completely wrong. I have consistently pointed out the finances available to other counties. Most Dubs are too busy wearing their victim hats to notice. What no other county have had is a GAA/government approved scheme that only they had access to. It was a multi million euro scheme that has led to over 100 titles across the board.

    Dublin fans consistently denied the funding had any influence on elite level results. This was clearly nonsense and it has been backed up by results at underage as I've pointed out. Kildare won an u20 All Ireland, Meath have won a few Leinster minors for the first time in many years. Offaly u20's are in an All Ireland final, even Wicklow beat Dublin at underage level. Additional funding at underage works, this goes against everything the defenders of the financial disparity have stated. It just adds to the list of evidence to show what a disgraceful decision it was to allow only one county access to this scheme for nearly two decades.

    This funding should be spread country wide, something I have repeatedly said. In fact, the only people disagreeing with that have been Dublin supporters who were somehow under the impression that Dublin were the only county who deserved the funding. I noted already that some Dublin supporters would be secretly delighted with their defeat yesterday. We seem to already have found one. As was pointed out on the last page, Limerick have made significant improvements because of their increased level of funding. Some posters pointed out that this doesn't mean Limerick win every game and All Ireland's every year.

    It's the same with Dublin. Yes. it's embarrassing but Dublin haven't won a Leinster hurling title in 8 years, Dublin don't win every underage title but they've won 5 All Ireland's post funding having never won one previously. The Dublin ladies look like they're going for 5 in a row, they didn't win any pre funding. The Dublin senior footballers won 1 All Ireland in around 30 years, they won 8 in the last decade. As you have finally had to admit, funding works. This is why Dublin won nearly 100 titles while they had the one county only scheme. It took you a long time but you got there eventually.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭tritium


    you mean the dublin squad who are all fully amateur and hold down full time jobs in addition to being the best team the game has ever seen?



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Some of the biggest sporting athletes in the world grew up in absolute poverty. They didn’t need top class facilities to become stars. Some grew up playing soccer barefoot in the streets.

    Money can have a big impact in a sport like soccer were teams can use the money to buy players and pay big salaries.

    But there is practically no evidence that having money makes great players or all big soccer clubs would bring through their own players instead of spending huge.

    I know it’s a crazy concept, but could it just be that Dublin achieved what we did by having a golden generation of players and putting in years of hard work?

    Maybe that was more important than having a good facilities? Just a thought…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭tritium


    God you keep spouting the same old guff even though it’s been discredited so many times across the 250+ pages of the thread. Wouldn’t it be easier at this stage to just find the answer to your points using the search function?

    you see you seem to have this block on the idea that grassroots funding buys success. It’s simple- you can’t have success without having people who actively participate, so in that sense I guess grassroots funding does become part of the picture (I’m sure it won’t take you long to twist my words here) but equally getting kids involved doesn’t guarantee success. What it does do, and what Offaly are seeing now, is generate interest where it might not have been- that’s important for areas that don’t have a deep GAA footprint, or where demographics work against them- typically urban areas rather than rural, where clubs are traditionally a tighter part of the social fabric and space isn’t a constraint. And if you’re lucky enough to have talent getting interested that can lead to success, much like this golden generation of dublin players. You’re own argument (belatedly acknowledged) actually validates this since financial imbalance has existed for decades within the GAA and yet we haven’t seen a team achieve what dublin have. And indeed that success isn’t even instantaneous- just as Dublin have taken years to develop those kids, so we’re seeing that the Offaly and Kildares have taken years, in spite of the rest of Leinster receiving more per child in GDF than Dublin

    of course when you finally tell us what county you support we can give a more detailed analysis since we can then look at where the gaps in that counties plans lie, possibly relating it to the years of work that Offaly and Kildare have put in to grow their games that now seem to be going somewhere thanks to talented kids coming through who might have been lost to the sport otherwise. I’ll actually be delighted if your county can develop a grassroots plan to get kids involved and if they have the fortune to see that coincide with a batch of immensely talented young players like dublin did. I’ll be delighted if that leads to success because that’s a great way to get even more kids interested and involved. - certainly seeing the players coming into their schools (in their own time btw) has given my kids great inspiration and role models.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    You call it the same old guff because it consistently destroys your points. For the whole thread and outside of here, the defenders of the financial disparity have tried to claim that the money was just for primary school kids, about participation, that it had no relevance to the huge increase in titles gained across Dublin GAA. Now, you've had to accept that the myth you've been peddling has been busted. Funding makes a huge difference. We can see it with Offaly, we see it with Kildare, Meath, even some of your fellow Dublin funding defenders have accepted it as they see the difference with Limerick post their funding boost. Like I said, it has taken you and others a long time but you've finally had to face up to the fact that funding had a major role in Dublin's 100+ titles post funding. That's why there will always be an asterisk beside them.

    Remember what the funding provided. Every senior club in Dublin had their own professional coach to develop talent. I know you hate me repeating it and you would prefer if it was silenced but look at the difference it has made. Club football and hurling for example. Numerous Leinster and All Ireland titles in men's and women's football and a Dublin club has won 2 All Ireland's, would have been unthinkable pre funding. The frightening thing is that Dublin now spend close to 4 million on development alone. That Dublin haven't amassed far more titles than they have is quite frankly embarrassing for Dublin GAA. Maybe they'll go looking for even more funding?

    But anyway, back to the main point. The scheme was only available to Dublin for nearly two decades, in the last few years it's been made available to certain other counties. It was clearly a disgraceful decision to limit this to one county to begin with but why is the scheme still not spread countrywide?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring


    Trying to claim that development funding has little influence on developing talent has been comprehensively busted. I'll ask you a question that you won't be able to answer. Did Dublin just so happen to have a golden generation in women's football, men's football, men's hurling, underage football and hurling, club football and hurling all at the same time? All these one off golden generations appeared at the same time the huge increase in funding became available but it somehow had nothing to do with that huge increase in funding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭Speakerboxx


    No I said the Dublin team who are fully paid by AIG to perform.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If you’re so obsessed with money from the last 2 decades, show me exactly how that money was used to make Cluxton, the Brogans and Connolly star players. Bear in mind they would have all been teenagers already and the natural talent was already there.

    If the money was really so useful at developing players, Id be expecting to see lots of new young players by now that are far better than Cluxton, Connolly, Brogans etc



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement