Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

RTE Radio 1: Late Debate

1567810

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I'm getting annoyed now, this clown clearly clueless, his part time staff are getting reduced PUP payments not half albeit many getting equivalent of JSA allowance €203 per week.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭touts


    The economy is absolutely bollixed when the business life support systems are shut off. Can't really blame someone for wanting to hang on to the PUP for as long as possible maybe even October or November rather than return to a job that could cease to exist in a few weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    touts wrote: »
    The economy is absolutely bollixed when the business life support systems are shut off. Can't really blame someone for wanting to hang on to the PUP for as long as possible maybe even October or November rather than return to a job that could cease to exist in a few weeks.

    I know the Hospitality sector well Touts, posted a detailed opinion on the relaxing restrictions thread. There is not only very little incentive to return or work in this sector, there's genuine concern by existing and indeed former employees about viability of their employers. The industry is and will continue to be on its knee's, there will not be any sense of normality when it reopens, also rarely mentioned is the fact that by default, any restrictions, curtailment of restaurants, bars etc will equal a reduction of staff needed or being rehired.

    I'm certainly not doubting there are abuses with PUP but it galls me to hear these "concerned Employers" suddenly crying and whinging now when they dropped staff like bad habits at the start of this. If they were so concerned, why didn't they retain staff on wage subsidy schemes??

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭touts


    This Limerick Soviet thing always amuses me. When I first heard of it I imagined a sort of self declared independent communist state where private property was confiscated and run by the people etc. Instead it was a two week general strike where a few trade union gangs looted some shops and homes (mainly to settle scores). But the left wing academia and media have called it a "Soviet" to make it sound like some sort of great socialist uprising.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    touts wrote: »
    This Limerick Soviet thing always amuses me. When I first heard of it I imagined a sort of self declared independent communist state where private property was confiscated and run by the people etc. Instead it was a two week general strike where a few trade union gangs looted some shops and homes (mainly to settle scores). But the left wing academia and media have called it a "Soviet" to make it sound like some sort of great socialist uprising.

    I'd never heard this story, as an aside, excellent program on the Path to Partition on BBC 2 earlier, 2 part documentary, not sure when next episode on, worth a watch

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I see breaking news on the ticker, gov to consider relaxing International travel restrictions from July 19th

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    Here we go, Hotelier moaning about not being able to get staff, we're was their concern when staff were laid off???

    My guess -- in the same pit of nonsense as Tom Parlon's concern for builders' "mental health", at the height of this pandemic. He was urging the government to return them to work 'for their own benefit'.

    The people are not stupid.

    I look forward to all those employers maintaining their mental-health advocacy into the future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Lol Rocket man, Leo's new nick name :)

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I think politicians missing the point re PUP and EWSS. Few if any hospitality workers were even offered EWSS and the majority of Aviation workers on PUP, including pilots. EWSS is propping up businesses that either never closed or are trading, it's debatable whethersome of these business are even viable. Its an open secret that 50% of fixed costs of many businesses were covered by various grants, now it's been suggested lump sum grants upto €30k for businesses reopening shortly. I somewhat baffled given I seriously doubt many of these businesses will last till the end of year.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    G'wan Breathless Katie


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Michael Healy Rae on tonight, this should be incomprehensible :)

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Barry ward needs to ask rural voters who pays for their refuse collection, Not the local councils, house holders do. Property Tax yelds nothing and I mean nothing for rural homeowners.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,794 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    Michael Healy Rae on tonight, this should be incomprehensible :)

    Can he not even take his hat off indoors? Is that not rude?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Can he not even take his hat off indoors? Is that not rude?

    LOL, I'm sure there must have been a draft god bless him, quite a funny back and forth with him and Katie (both from the kingdom) it was good natured tough.

    MHR is a master tactician, never wanting to be seen to agree with anything controversial but at the same time understanding its merits.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,708 ✭✭✭serfboard


    Can he not even take his hat off indoors? Is that not rude?
    MHR's flat cap is his brand. He thinks that if he wears it, ordinary voters will reckon that he's an ordinary man like themselves, instead of the multi-millionaire that he is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭touts


    serfboard wrote: »
    MHR's flat cap is his brand. He thinks that if he wears it, ordinary voters will reckon that he's an ordinary man like themselves, instead of the multi-millionaire that he is.

    Apparently he thinks it makes him look younger because if he took it off people would see he was going bald.

    A flat cap. Younger. Only in Kerry!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    serfboard wrote: »
    MHR's flat cap is his brand. He thinks that if he wears it, ordinary voters will reckon that he's an ordinary man like themselves, instead of the multi-millionaire that he is.

    Except there's few enough ordinary men wear caps anymore. Just makes look like an eejit, even in rural Ireland.


  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    Barry ward needs to ask rural voters who pays for their refuse collection, Not the local councils, house holders do. Property Tax yelds nothing and I mean nothing for rural homeowners.
    Or roads. If you live up a country road, and your house is the only house for half a mile, the Local Authority isn't going to pay for its upkeep. It will cost at least 10k to have any maintenance done privately. That's fine, I understand the rationale. I even agree with it. But lets not pretend that urban and rural dwellers are on an equal footing.

    Rural home-owners are getting next-to-nothing for their taxes.


  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think St. Stephen's Green closes at 8pm from June.

    In all fairness to DCC, I don't think it's wise to keep open the bushes after twilight, as a way of reducing anti-social behaviour.

    There's probably an argument for extending opening for smaller parks like Dartmouth and Belgrave Squares. Much easier to supervise, but there would be local opposition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    FF getting a good kicking over their quite extraordinary stupidity today, making out SF acting subversively collecting voter data only to be caught out doing the very same thing, some of FF deputies and senators really made fools of themselves earlier, Mc Sharry being one, a clown of the highest order.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,424 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Jaysus there’s Fitzmaurice slobbering around the place again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,424 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    FF getting a good kicking over their quite extraordinary stupidity today, making out SF acting subversively collecting voter data only to be caught out doing the very same thing, some of FF deputies and senators really made fools of themselves earlier, Mc Sharry being one, a clown of the highest order.

    Did you get that from the ‘Irish Marketing Institute’.?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Did you get that from the ‘Irish Marketing Institute’.?

    LOL, did you hear about Mc Sharrys newspaper interview this morning, a FF senator also aghast at SF data collection practices, didn't hear her name, a few hours later MM confirms FF did the exact same thing, quite funny all the same.

    Story will die a death now that Leo also confirmed FG were at it :)

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Marc Mc Sharrys absurd interview earlier today, will he now be asking Gardai to investigate FF, just Hillarious :)

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/politics/arid-40309505.html

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I live in the slieve bloom mountains, it a protected environmental area. My own cottage 200+ years old and now renovated.

    I recall a neighbour up higher than me, family site etc, they had to put a flag pole up on their site at a specific length , with a marker flag for 6 months prior to receiving planning, if anyone objected, no planning would be granted. I'm not making this up, it happened and I believe it still does.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Have to say Michael Fitzmaurice (independent) talks a lot of sense

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    Marc Mc Sharrys absurd interview earlier today, will he now be asking Gardai to investigate FF, just Hillarious :)

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/politics/arid-40309505.html

    McSharry might be embarrassed now that his own party is in the frame but he wasn't far wrong at the time.

    All three parties have insulted the electorate by standing on their doorsteps and lying to them to gain a political advantage.

    That is what we learned today.


  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Dempo1 wrote: »
    I live in the slieve bloom mountains, it a protected environmental area. My own cottage 200+ years old and now renovated.

    I recall a neighbour up higher than me, family site etc, they had to put a flag pole up on their site at a specific length , with a marker flag for 6 months prior to receiving planning, if anyone objected, no planning would be granted. I'm not making this up, it happened and I believe it still does.
    That's actually a very clever idea. It can be difficult to calculate the eyesore-quantity of a proposed building of a given height, unless you know its location/ elevation pretty exactly. Flagpole is a common-sense solution, never heard of that before.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,887 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    That's actually a very clever idea. It can be difficult to calculate the eyesore-quantity of a proposed building of a given height, unless you know its location/ elevation pretty exactly. Flagpole is a common-sense solution, never heard of that before.

    I've seen similar initiatives and they can be helpful.

    A planning permission will not be refused just because someone objects.

    Planning refusals have to be based on proper planning grounds ie. legislation, county development plan etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,199 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    elperello wrote: »
    I've seen similar initiatives and they can be helpful.

    A planning permission will not be refused just because someone objects.

    Planning refusals have to be based on proper planning grounds ie. legislation, county development plan etc.

    I thought at the time the oddest thing but then again, I was and still am a blow in 20 years later (Dub) :)

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




Advertisement
Advertisement