Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Green Party disintegration / split

1235

Comments

  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    Is this the beginning of the end of her political career? Will she slip away to be the mouth piece in some well paid NGO position at the end of the current stint as LM or Councillor?

    Surely she has burned her bridges with the Greens?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Well that was inevitable. What a colossally, stupid and pointless vanity project. What was the point?

    She was using the excuse that she wanted to inspire women of colour. That made no sense to me. She had already gotten the highest vote in the country in the 2019 local elections, become the chair of her party and became Lord Mayor of the capital city. I don't think a doomed campaign for the Seanad was going to win over people that were still on the fence. In the meantime, she completely burned her bridges with a lot of people in her own party and probably annoyed a lot of potential future voters.

    She should get out of politics because clearly her judgement is terrible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,304 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Well that was inevitable. What a colossally, stupid and pointless vanity project. What was the point?

    She was using the excuse that she wanted to inspire women of colour. That made no sense to me. She had already gotten the highest vote in the country in the 2019 local elections, become the chair of her party and became Lord Mayor of the capital city. I don't think a doomed campaign for the Seanad was going to win over people that were still on the fence. In the meantime, she completely burned her bridges with a lot of people in her own party and probably annoyed a lot of potential future voters.

    She should get out of politics because clearly her judgement is terrible.

    It certainly makes the subject of this thread less likely. While the Greens will shed members at the fringes, it is clear the solid core of the party backs the current approach.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,805 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    blanch152 wrote: »
    It certainly makes the subject of this thread less likely. While the Greens will shed members at the fringes, it is clear the solid core of the party backs the current approach.
    Maybe the sheer amount of anti-car changes in Dublin city centre is keeping them sweet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    PommieBast wrote: »
    Maybe the sheer amount of anti-car changes in Dublin city centre is keeping them sweet.

    Or even the pro-cycling and pedestrian changes? (It's all a matter of framing)

    The people who gripe about that kind of thing tend not to be potential Green voters so those kinds of policies cost them nothing politically. They're also a lot faster to implement than things like altering the energy supply, retro-fitting houses or larger rail based infrastructure projects. They may be idealists but they seem to have learned that you need to have some quick wins to show your voters come the next election.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,805 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Or even the pro-cycling and pedestrian changes? (It's all a matter of framing)
    True, though I seriously take issue with some such as the coach stop at the top of O'Connell street was turned into bike rack.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/eoghan-murphy-resigns-as-td-for-career-in-international-co-operation-1.4548873

    Eoghan Murphy's surprise resignation triggers a by-election in, wait for it, Hazel Chu's electoral area.

    Will the election bring peace and harmony for our beloved Green Party or will Hazel go rogue and the house of cards come tumbling down?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Chu will run one way or the other. I would bet that this will only cause more internal friction in the party given how she behaved over the Seanad election. She may need to leave the Greens once and for all and go independent or join that purported new party..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,338 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Chu will run one way or the other. I would bet that this will only cause more internal friction in the party given how she behaved over the Seanad election. She may need to leave the Greens once and for all and go independent or join that purported new party..

    That Seanad run in hindsight may not have been the best decision and I can’t see her Green Party colleagues being all that happy to back her given how it was handled just a couple of weeks ago.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,537 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    So the disintegration is back on the cards, should the Greens chose not to run a candidate and Hazel goes for it anyway at least.

    The adage about a week being a long time in politics was never truer!


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,269 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    I don't know. Despite the dire predictions last time around, nobody was expelled, nobody left, and no splinter party emerged.

    I reckon that they'll select Chu, who probably won't win, but will be regarded as a success if she raises her profile further.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,073 ✭✭✭Blut2


    If Chu hadn't gone on that ego-driven solo run for the Seanad she'd be looking reasonably OK odds for a seat here. She must be regretting that now.

    I wouldn't put it past her to run as an IND and split the Green vote.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I presume that the Greens will have to ask their voters to continue their transfers for FF & FG since it's in their best interest to have a stable coalition. I can't imagine Chu going along with that though.


  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    can an by-election be held safely with covid restrictions

    Wouldnt be suprised,if this was let idle until september


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    can an by-election be held safely with covid restrictions

    Wouldnt be suprised,if this was let idle until september

    I think it has to be held within 6 months and governments tend to use most of that time so it'll likely be in the late Autumn. By then hopefully every adult who wants to will be vaccinated.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭Augme


    It's a fascinating situation. If she does go for it I do wonder if she will then replace Eamonn Ryan on the ticket in the next general election. Especially if she got elected. They wouldn't have a chance of electing two candidates in a full election and then the risk of splitting the vote so both miss out would be too big a risk you'd feel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,073 ✭✭✭Blut2


    I think it has to be held within 6 months and governments tend to use most of that time so it'll likely be in the late Autumn. By then hopefully every adult who wants to will be vaccinated.

    The last possible dates for it according to Gavan Reilly on Twitter are Friday Nov 19th/Sat Nov 20th. I'd assume given FG will be favourites to retain the seat they'll hold it before then, though.

    I'd guess August personally - likely the lowest corona prevalence point of the year, and a chunk of students/young people will be away on holiday then after the EU Green Certificate comes in. Which should help reduce the SF and Green votes, the only two likely rivals for taking the seat from FG.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭tabby aspreme


    Ivan's Bacik is looking for the Labour nomination, it would be an interesting debate between herself and Chu, as too which of them deserves the women's, desendents of immigrants etc, vote.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Augme wrote: »
    It's a fascinating situation. If she does go for it I do wonder if she will then replace Eamonn Ryan on the ticket in the next general election. Especially if she got elected. They wouldn't have a chance of electing two candidates in a full election and then the risk of splitting the vote so both miss out would be too big a risk you'd feel.

    Where's Eamon Ryan going? He's only 57!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭tabby aspreme


    Where's Eamon Ryan going? He's only 57!

    He'll be 60 by the time of the next election, he could retire with a nice pension and tend his south facing window boxes


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭joebloggs32


    I think it has to be held within 6 months and governments tend to use most of that time so it'll likely be in the late Autumn. By then hopefully every adult who wants to will be vaccinated.

    If a government party wants to win they should be aiming for late September.
    The vaccination program should have done tge heavy lifting by then and there might be a feelgood factor in tbe country.
    However waiting until a budget is unveiled could be problematic as the money tree is definitely going to shed some of its leaves next year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭Augme


    Where's Eamon Ryan going? He's only 57!


    Off the back of his best results he just scrapped a leadership vote. He's on the down turn and I would the surprised if he takes the chance to get out. Or even is told to get out.

    Strategically, if Chu does get a seat this time around you want her on the ticket next time given her age and ability to cementing as a long term candidate there.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    blanch152 wrote: »
    It certainly makes the subject of this thread less likely. While the Greens will shed members at the fringes, it is clear the solid core of the party backs the current approach.
    i'm sure it's been covered in the thread before, but the green party (to a usually green party voting outsider) seems to be two different parties now. one is the older (probably more battle hardened) cohort, and then there's the new cohort of members, who have a broader focus on social justice than the 'traditional' greens.
    but as is the wont of activist and lefty parties, they focus on their differences, rather than focussing on their common ground, and splitting over them.

    and the funny thing is that despite having an awful habit of washing their dirty linen in public, the greens are delivering a lot of what they campaigned for; but many supporters forget they didn't actually win the election, and cannot do everything they might have wanted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,073 ✭✭✭Blut2


    ^ Chu's run for the Seanad is the perfect example of that. All the focus that week should have been glowing feel good coverage on the Green's achieving a big win on the environment, and implementing part of their election manifesto, with the Climate Action Bill. Instead it was all coverage/focus on Chu's ego-driven solo-run and the bickering between the different wings in the party about it.

    Ask a neutral observer about happenings in the last few months for the Green's and all you'll hear about is drama about Chu, and very little about the Climate Action Bill. Which is a disaster for the party's popularity with the wider public.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    one story, which seems to have been almost universally missed, is this; happened under ryan's tenure, but i'm not 100% if he's responsible.
    it's the 2c per litre levied on fuel to maintain ireland's 90 day stockpile, but any excess over and above what is actually spent is now ringfenced for the climate action fund:

    https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/3718f-nora-levy-legislation-passes-in-the-dail/


  • Administrators Posts: 54,089 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Blut2 wrote: »
    ^ Chu's run for the Seanad is the perfect example of that. All the focus that week should have been glowing feel good coverage on the Green's achieving a big win on the environment, and implementing part of their election manifesto, with the Climate Action Bill. Instead it was all coverage/focus on Chu's ego-driven solo-run and the bickering between the different wings in the party about it.

    Ask a neutral observer about happenings in the last few months for the Green's and all you'll hear about is drama about Chu, and very little about the Climate Action Bill. Which is a disaster for the party's popularity with the wider public.

    It's not just Chu.

    Catherine Martin, Saoirse McHugh and others have all played their part in damaging the GP.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,958 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    i'm sure it's been covered in the thread before, but the green party (to a usually green party voting outsider) seems to be two different parties now. one is the older (probably more battle hardened) cohort, and then there's the new cohort of members, who have a broader focus on social justice than the 'traditional' greens.
    but as is the wont of activist and lefty parties, they focus on their differences, rather than focussing on their common ground, and splitting over them.

    and the funny thing is that despite having an awful habit of washing their dirty linen in public, the greens are delivering a lot of what they campaigned for; but many supporters forget they didn't actually win the election, and cannot do everything they might have wanted.

    But has that not been the problem for all the smaller parties in coalitions. For their supporters it's generally been a case of they haven't done instead of what they have done. Going into coalition means you are limited in what you can achieve because you have a coalition partner you have to compromise with. For smaller parties it's an issue because while they can achieve more in government than in opposition its easier to sit on the sidelines are complain. Also smaller parties are more likely to be more ideological driven enabled by a smaller and less diverse support base.

    It's been the challenge for every small party in Irish coalitions.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    yes, but i think it was exacerbated for the greens by the significant change in the party base in the few years leading to that election.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,073 ✭✭✭Blut2


    awec wrote: »
    It's not just Chu.

    Catherine Martin, Saoirse McHugh and others have all played their part in damaging the GP.

    Thats absolutely true. My point though was more just relating to recent happenings specifically.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Why is Eamonn Ryam not out there announcing and explaining the Metrolink project and how it will revolutionise PT in Dublin, and how he is accelerating its provision? He should be pushing the Limerick to Limerick Junction double tracking and provision of better rail connection from Cork to Limerick, and Limerick to Dublin. He should be committing to the Cork Limerick M20 project.

    Instead he is talking about the likes of the Athenry to Tuam railway.

    The GP now has a definite membership looking for social justice - and he is not part of that cohort.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    i'm sure it's been covered in the thread before, but the green party (to a usually green party voting outsider) seems to be two different parties now. one is the older (probably more battle hardened) cohort, and then there's the new cohort of members, who have a broader focus on social justice than the 'traditional' greens.
    but as is the wont of activist and lefty parties, they focus on their differences, rather than focussing on their common ground, and splitting over them.

    and the funny thing is that despite having an awful habit of washing their dirty linen in public, the greens are delivering a lot of what they campaigned for; but many supporters forget they didn't actually win the election, and cannot do everything they might have wanted.
    As a former GP member, I found three broad divisions within the party


    1) The pre-2007 people who stayed around despite disliking Eamon Ryan, disliking the deal the GPs got when entering government with FF, and especially disliking staying in government so long when Gormley/etc wanted out but Ryan spent all his internal capital on convincing the party to stay in. This effectively killed the party as a force in Irish Politics/a force for Environmentalism in Ireland for a decade, but instead of Eamon Ryan getting oppobrium for his driving role in it - he gets lauded for 'sticking with the Greens'



    2) The Eamon Ryan supporters
    2a) Hardcore supporters who draw no distinction between Ryan and the GP. To them they are the one and the same thing, and yes there is a significant cult of personality within the party where any even milquetoast criticism of Ryan is met with harsh attack.
    2b) Well-meaning but not particularly environmental-policy informed types who like the feelgood feeling of being a member, but don't actually want to learn anything about environmental (or any other kind of) policy. They support Ryan because his narrative also makes them feel good. They always acted like anything a GP politician did was inherently the right choice, and any agreement the GP signed up to was likewise the right choice - because the GP was good so anything it or it's politicians did was also good.



    3) The young social justice types who live and die on twitter. They're just as uninformed as 2b) but with an arrogance and condescension that's pretty breathtaking for a group that mostly used internal whatsapp groups for posting tweets and asking for likes/retweets. I still see some of the names pop up in newspapers articles and I can see that they have a long and successful career in working in NGOs with no clear purpose or mission but that uses all the fashionable buzzwords to tackle its ill-defined social mission.



    Outside that, I also met many individuals who were deeply knowledgeable and incredibly passionate about many aspects of environmentalism and social justice, but they were almost one-and-all only in the party for lack of any other place to be - policy has always been largely ignored by actual Green Party politicians, despite the GP having some really talented and intelligent people who have spent years working on such.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i think i could make a punt as to which group you'd slot into?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    None, I was only a member for just over a year and a portion of that was during covid. I hadn't been involving in politics in any way since the heydays of the recession and I figured I'd dip my toe in anticipation of the the GE scheduled for last year, do a bit of canvassing etc etc etc. Happy to have gotten involved rather than 'hurling from the ditch' but am also happy I left the party when I did (and not because of the PFG or anything like that).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    None, I was only a member for just over a year and a portion of that was during covid. I hadn't been involving in politics in any way since the heydays of the recession and I figured I'd dip my toe in anticipation of the the GE scheduled for last year, do a bit of canvassing etc etc etc. Happy to have gotten involved rather than 'hurling from the ditch' but am also happy I left the party when I did (and not because of the PFG or anything like that).

    From what you saw in your team in the party do you think there will be a split or do how do you think the future will go for the party (I presume you're not too positive about it since you left).


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There's only space for one 'green' party in Ireland, and even if the GP isn't as green as I'd like it to be, it's still the only one we're going to have - I think most people in the party accepted that. Outside of the Just Transition types, the people I know who left, left being involved in politics in general - and I personally don't think the JTG has any future. Politics in Ireland exists outside of twitter/social media, but they don't seem to realise that.

    I'm more worried about another electoral wipeout and not having even a subpar voice for environmental policies in the Irish political sphere - better the GP than no-one and we really lost out in the 2010s having no-one outside of small NGOs to argue for environmental policies and a climate-friendly future.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i don't know if it will make a difference, but the dynamic of the coalition is slightly different this time; they took a lot of flak for the FF coalition, and FF successfully used them as sandbags.
    this time, it may be that FF and FG turn on each other with SF being their main bogeyman, come the next election.

    the greens will suffer, no doubt, but i'm not sure to what extent compared to last time. but if they're clever, they'll try to spin the blame off as an FF vs FG thing.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    the greens will suffer, no doubt, but i'm not sure to what extent compared to last time. but if they're clever, they'll try to spin the blame off as an FF vs FG thing.


    So far, the evidence is they're pretty gormless at playing coalition politics imho. I think that's one area Catherine would be better at than Eamon, though I'm not sure how much (if at all) better she'd be in other areas.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i don't think they're particularly good at politics in general. as in the horse trading, somewhat machiavellian style ireland is used to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I think they've also learned from their past spell in government. Last time around the contribution that most people seem to associate them with is tinkering with car & fuel taxes that were not popular. This time around they're pumping a lot of money into bike lanes and greenways - things that can be created relatively quickly and are seen by most prospective Green voters as a Public Good. Of course they also have the unfortunate in-built advantage that climate breakdown and environmental damage is going to continue to get worse in very visible ways for the foreseeable future.

    The German green party also got wiped out at one point and now they are leading the polls. The English Greens did excellently in the local elections (despite an electoral system that makes it extremely difficult for smaller parties to break through).

    I don't think there is any chance of the Irish Greens being wiped out again in the manner of 2011.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,073 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The Greens should be safer from collapse this time because theres no real middle-class middle of the road left wing party for their voters to move to. Back in 2011 they jumped wholesale to Labour. But Labour are in the doldrums at the moment and the SocDems are far too badly run (and SJW issue obsessed in a lot of people's minds) to capitalize. And SF and PBP etc too hard left.

    They'll lose a few fringe seats, but the core seats like Eamon Ryans in Dublin Bay South, Catherine Martin in Rathdown and a few of the other leafier Dublin ones like Ossian Smyth in Dun Laoghaire should all survive. Worst case scenario they should keep 6ish of their current 12 seats unless something shocking happens.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think they've also learned from their past spell in government. Last time around the contribution that most people seem to associate them with is tinkering with car & fuel taxes that were not popular. This time around they're pumping a lot of money into bike lanes and greenways - things that can be created relatively quickly and are seen by most prospective Green voters as a Public Good. Of course they also have the unfortunate in-built advantage that climate breakdown and environmental damage is going to continue to get worse in very visible ways for the foreseeable future.

    The German green party also got wiped out at one point and now they are leading the polls. The English Greens did excellently in the local elections (despite an electoral system that makes it extremely difficult for smaller parties to break through).

    I don't think there is any chance of the Irish Greens being wiped out again in the manner of 2011.
    The German green party never had an electoral wipeout, unless you mean 31 years ago when their voteshare barely declined but the pecularities of that election resulted in less elected reps?

    I'm not sure bike lanes get votes, quite the opposite if it comes at the expense of vehicles as Busconnects has sadly shown. People actually into green policies would have noticed that the vast majority of GP announced active travel spending and greenway investments were already promised by the last government, and rolled into a new announcement. Less interested individuals are probably not going to vote greens because "hey, bike lanes and greenways" but maybe they will *shrug*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Does anyone know when the selection for the DBS candidate will take place?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,338 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Does anyone know when the selection for the DBS candidate will take place?

    I don’t even think there’s been a date set for the by election, which I know doesn’t have a bearing on when a candidate is selected from a party. Hazel Chu I know said her intention was to put her name forward but that’s all I’ve heard on the Green Party end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,537 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The date hasn't been set but the indication that it would be as late as possible has been swapped to it being in ~6 weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    According to this (paywalled) article in the Independent that new splinter group party is launching today.

    Lorna Bogue and a South Dublin County Councillor, Liam Sinclair, appear to be their only elected representatives.
    There are around 30 members in the party, the vast majority of whom are young people aged under 35. Some have no prior political experience or come from parties like People Before Profit. Ms Bogue and Mr Sinclair are the only two high-profile ex-Greens who are in ARG. Others, despite attending early meetings, have not officially joined, or chose other parties. ARG’s concrete policies are still largely unclear. Ms Bogue said that this is down to the fact that the organisation has not yet held an AGM.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    would be interesting if they planned to run a candidate in DBS.
    though the 'eco-socialist' tag is not going get enough hearts fluttering in that constituency to make much impact i suspect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,477 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    They appear to have a website and twitter account.

    This video looks like it was recorded by a drunken uncle in 1996:

    https://twitter.com/AnRabhartaGlas/status/1401177822975168517


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,450 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Green party has about 2,000 members. New party has 30 including ex-PBP
    Be a while before they can do deals with anyone.


    Because burning bridges is the best way to decarbonise.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    sounds more like a twitter splinter group than an actual political party.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,073 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Aren't PBP already quite environmentally friendly? It seems like madness to attempt to form another party on the hard left to battle over the 5%~ of electoral support that exists there.

    I get leaving the Greens because they're not economically left enough, but ego (or delusion) is the only reason I can see for this group not just joining PBP.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement