Dearth of young farmers

JohnChadwick · 01-06-2021 11:12pm #1

Just find it mildly depressing that in my area there is a real dearth of young farmers. Not only young farmers, but young farmers that would be useful to link up with and bounce ideas off.

I mean farmers in their 20s/30s who are decision makers on their land, have power to make changes and are eager to suss out opportunities. Not like the ones that sort of conform and farm away according to the expectations of their parents, for example.

Actually over the last decade I can't think if I had even one stimulating conversation with a young farmer who was involved in running a beef, sheep or dairy farm.

Something I have been reflecting on.

Dickie10 · 01-06-2021 11:19pm

Very true, same around me. lots of young lads who like to drive machinery alright and most come from places with no land. theres an odd few begining to break through now but 10 years ago , nothing.

kk.man · 02-06-2021 12:26am

JohnChadwick wrote: »

Just find it mildly depressing that in my area there is a real dearth of young farmers. Not only young farmers, but young farmers that would be useful to link up with and bounce ideas off.

I mean farmers in their 20s/30s who are decision makers on their land, have power to make changes and are eager to suss out opportunities. Not like the ones that sort of conform and farm away according to the expectations of their parents, for example.

Actually over the last decade I can't think if I had even one stimulating conversation with a young farmer who was involved in running a beef, sheep or dairy farm.

Something I have been reflecting on.

Very true... N to add if it's not a green shiny tractor or dairy cows they don't want to know.

Dual wheels · 02-06-2021 1:03am

The way it is now young lads want nothing only big machinery and the odd lad that might be interested in milking soon backs off when he realises that also means milking of a Sunday morning

Diarmuid B · 02-06-2021 2:42am

Yeah it’s pretty grim. Out our road I’m about the only one of about 10 farms where there’s a young person(below 25) farming the land and making the decisions. Dad has no interest and rented it out for years. I took the notion to make a go of it and see where it takes me.
Lot of neighbours coming out with the usual “there’s no money in farming” and it’s a waste of time etc etc, yet they’re all pulling in nice grants have excellent tractors, machinery etc. Mind you very few of these man have children that help out at all so god only knows where they’ll end up in years to come.
If you’re not inheriting a farm it’s virtually a waste of time otherwise, the price of land to buy/rent and all the start up costs is just not worth it with the money out of it at the other end

duffysfarm · 02-06-2021 8:43am

youngest full time farmer in our parish is my brother who is 46

Grueller · 02-06-2021 8:48am

kk.man wrote: »

Very true... N to add if it's not a green shiny tractor or dairy cows they don't want to know.

But kk.man, why would any young lad sign up for a life of mixed drystock farming?
The margins are shocking. Also, if there are parents at home still involved it's not easy to be at home all the time with them. I am in my 40s and even though it is handed over a few years,I still have to battle for decisions.
Also, a farm is a business and a high value asset. There are very few other businesses of that value that are helped by under 25s.

French Toast · 02-06-2021 8:52am

Around here it'll be 99.9% part-time suckler farmers in the next generation, some interested in improving/maintaining the farm and others less so.

When you can go and get a job making €500 a week handy enough it's hard to blame lads. Full time farmers will be few and far between.

_Brian · 02-06-2021 9:03am

It’s a great topic folks.

Two problems I see contributing to this.

In marginal areas with small farm sizes there just isn’t sufficient money to be made to perk the interest of many younger folk. I’m not sure what the solution to this is. We farm alongside work but it’s more for the enjoyment of the farming. Not sure how the next generation will see it though.

Land transfer has fallen into a terrible position of being handed over far too late. We need a farm retirement scheme to encourage land transfer.

yosemitesam1 · 02-06-2021 9:31am

The best possible thing to happen would be if the hunger that drives lads to push numbers and intensity died off a bit. It would give a chance to actually pull some sort of a margin out of farming. Far too many busy fools out there

K.G. · 02-06-2021 9:37am

_Brian wrote: »

It’s a great topic folks.

Two problems I see contributing to this.

In marginal areas with small farm sizes there just isn’t sufficient money to be made to perk the interest of many younger folk. I’m not sure what the solution to this is. We farm alongside work but it’s more for the enjoyment of the farming. Not sure how the next generation will see it though.

Land transfer has fallen into a terrible position of being handed over far too late. We need a farm retirement scheme to encourage land transfer.

My own opinion is its the retention of land by the younger generation who want it for its asset value but not as viable farm enterprise. Margin per animal/litre/ton is dropping as it aleays has and always will but land is continuing to be held onto in blocks that are not commercial viable .at the same time i fully belive everyone can do what they like with their property but the result is that land mobility is slower than the pace of margin decline

Biscuitus · 02-06-2021 9:53am

Diarmuid B wrote: »

Mind you very few of these man have children that help out at all so god only knows where they’ll end up in years to come.
If you’re not inheriting a farm it’s virtually a waste of time otherwise, the price of land to buy/rent and all the start up costs is just not worth it with the money out of it at the other end

The only outcome is those 9 farms end up being swallowed up by one mega farm once they retire or pass away with nobody to take over them. People who are out of a job returned home and are praising their family farms with how nice it is to work outside but realistically how many of these lads and lassies will hang around. We are moving towards giant farms with huge feedlots. On the bright side it will mean fixed wages and employment with benefits for the works but the death of the family farm.

delldelivery · 02-06-2021 10:17am

I've always heard the majority of people that post online have a negative mindset.

There are thousands of young farmers, male and female, full and part time, working hard.

I can guarantee you they don't spend any time online moaning about others, or the future of farming. Who knows what the future holds.

GrasstoMilk · 02-06-2021 10:22am

yosemitesam1 wrote: »

The best possible thing to happen would be if the hunger that drives lads to push numbers and intensity died off a bit. It would give a chance to actually pull some sort of a margin out of farming. Far too many busy fools out there

But how then do you make room for a second income?
I don't see the issue with lads having hunger and drive, you need that or else you'll just do what mammy and daddy did

Biscuitus · 02-06-2021 10:57am

delldelivery wrote: »

I've always heard the majority of people that post online have a negative mindset.

There are thousands of young farmers, male and female, full and part time, working hard.

I can guarantee you they don't spend any time online moaning about others, or the future of farming. Who knows what the future holds.

The average age of male farmers in Ireland is 56 and females farmers are 62. 5-6% For every 11 farmers over 55 there is 1 farmer under 35.

You can make snide remarks and moan about people posting all you want but that won't change the fact that farming in Ireland is in a disastrous state and only getting worse.

yosemitesam1 · 02-06-2021 11:00am

GrasstoMilk wrote: »

But how then do you make room for a second income?
I don't see the issue with lads having hunger and drive, you need that or else you'll just do what mammy and daddy did

If enough people don't say f**k that, there's not enough margin in it for me. Margins will only ever get tighter and tighter. If that means someone takes on a job instead of going home to farm, so be it.

Say my name · 02-06-2021 11:32am

Make tax concessions available to under 35 qualified farmers with green cert.

Say no tax payable on land purchases. And then have it able to be wrote off against tax for 10 years if bought pre 35 years of age.
Go the France model and make it obligatory that a neighbouring farmer has first refusal to buy land. After that the nearest pre 35 qualified farmer in the parish. Only then public auction.

Ball is 100% in the governments court on the young farmer issue.
Support (tax structure) seems to be for the company corporate trading farming model over young farmers in recent governments.

yosemitesam1 · 02-06-2021 11:43am

Say my name wrote: »

Make tax concessions available to under 35 qualified farmers with green cert.

Say no tax payable on land purchases. And then have it able to be wrote off against tax for 10 years if bought pre 35 years of age.
Go the France model and make it obligatory that a neighbouring farmer has first refusal to buy land. After that the nearest pre 35 qualified farmer in the parish. Only then public auction.

Ball is 100% in the governments court on the young farmer issue.
Support (tax structure) seems to be for the company corporate trading farming model over young farmers in recent governments.

All that will do is keep lads caught up in fantasyland for another few years. Ultimately if margins are ever tightening, that is the signal to ease off producing not produce more

orchard farm · 02-06-2021 11:52am

As a young full time farmer all i can say is its very tough when your bps is based on historical reference of 20 years ago long before i started farming. 100%convergence would help make farming more attractive to young people

Say my name · 02-06-2021 11:55am

yosemitesam1 wrote: »

All that will do is keep lads caught up in fantasyland for another few years. Ultimately if margins are ever tightening, that is the signal to ease off producing not produce more

It'll incentivise youth in farming.

What have we at present?
65 year olds with multiple companies using those companies tax advantages to increase scale every year.

Mooooo · 02-06-2021 12:07pm

What your talking off say my name is minimal in numbers tbh. The only reason to form a company is to become more tax efficient which by any type of businesses nature would come at later stage in development. Farming also seems to be one of the few areas where if people grow the business it is nearly looked down upon by the vast majority, how many other would give out about people working hard to grow their income?
The reason young farmers are dwindling is that there are easier ways to make a living, and that they can see the vast majority of part time farms are actually drawing money away from the main income by farming, not contributing to the income and they won't have that either.
There will inevitably be a correction as the current crop of farmers retire, those following will only take it on if there is an income to be made from it

Bass Reeves · 02-06-2021 1:10pm

OP, TBH it's virtually impossible to find a decent discussion group in the drystock sector. The whole drystock sector is moribund to a large extent. I was involved in a few beef discussion groups with Teagasc.

Most lads attending were there to collect the money even down to a group of a father and three sons who used to sign each in at times. TBF they held a farm walk and were one of the better farming groups.

Actually I think young farming discussion groups can not be the greatest as dangers are not openly discussed. As well challenges that you will face in life may not be accounted for either.

Biggest challenges facing drystock is the non realisation that efficiency is not necessarily the best. Very little cost benefit analysis.

Too many young farmers get involved because of machinery, very few understand stock and profitability. After 10-15years as a tractor jockey they realize the error of there ways but it's too late then. It amazes me the amount of lads that go to ag college and end up driving a tractor.

Farming and work go well together as long as you understand that. But the farm has to be set up right. I trolled through the farm payments section. What amazed me was the a
Punt of lads on small payments that were not in GLAS and only collected BPS payment

Dinzee Conlee · 02-06-2021 1:12pm

orchard farm wrote: »

As a young full time farmer all i can say is its very tough when your bps is based on historical reference of 20 years ago long before i started farming. 100%convergence would help make farming more attractive to young people

I dont want to get into convergence, but...
- Convergence will only affect those already have access to existing BPS
- Convergence will move those on high BPS down, so maybe making some farms less attractive

I appreciate it will make your farm more profitable and maybe a lot of others, but will also affect other farms negatively...

ABitofsense · 02-06-2021 1:18pm

Small suckler farm here that I do part-time. Around here me and a few of my mates all mid-30s all run our farms now. Father's have kinda stepped away. We all would have very well paid jobs outside farming which means that we don't look for anything off the farms. This means that we've invested in our farms in various ways, be it machinery, high quality heifers, cows etc. Since we don't depend on the farm like our parents would have had to, it's easy for us. I would have got a few snide comments from neighbours around here about some of my purchases but I couldn't care less.
This is what the future is for small farms. Large majority of young people are attending university now so it won't be til people have established their careers before they have any interest in pursuing a farm part-time.

Paul_Mc1988 · 02-06-2021 1:24pm

delldelivery wrote: »

I've always heard the majority of people that post online have a negative mindset.

There are thousands of young farmers, male and female, full and part time, working hard.

I can guarantee you they don't spend any time online moaning about others, or the future of farming. Who knows what the future holds.

Nail on the head. Just a load of old bitter farmers with backwards views.

"Why do the young lads not want to work their backs off for a low return". What a stupid question.

Cop on you backwards weirdos. I'd say a load of them don't want to end up bitter like most of you

jetfiremuck · 02-06-2021 1:26pm

Genuine question. Whats the mininum acreage that someone could make a decent income, assuming its free and clear, good land under grass at present. Stripping away subsidies, set aside etc and forestry options, to get to a base costing. Once thats set its location etc etc.

Albert Johnson · 02-06-2021 1:31pm

Biscuitus wrote: »

The average age of male farmers in Ireland is 56 and females farmers are 62. 5-6% For every 11 farmers over 55 there is 1 farmer under 35.

You can make snide remarks and moan about people posting all you want but that won't change the fact that farming in Ireland is in a disastrous state and only getting worse.

Those figure's are very stark but I don't know if there fully accurate. I'd know of a good few father/son collaborations where the son would be largely running the show but the land and herd number is still registered to the older generation. I'd haul cattle for a lot of them and I'd see who's name was on the blue card's. There's one local man who had everything in his elderly mother's name until very recently, she was still the registered owner despite being in a nursing home for the last 5 year's.

The biggest issue I see in a lot of cases is that ownership (and often decision making) isn't transferred until the death of the previous generation. It's not much use only having a say in how the place is ran when your 50+ because your parents held the reins until there final breath. I've seen plenty of people inheriting run down farms in there 50's and 60's because the previous owner lived to be 90 and left it to nature for the last 20 years of there life rather than let anyone else work it. I've often heard that there's "40 harvests in any man". If you started in your late 20's you'd be finished at retirement age. That's not to say you have to die at 70 but if you treat your successor like a child and give him no say for the first 50 year's he's hardly going to make a go of it when your finally carried off.

Turbohymac · 02-06-2021 1:32pm

I wouldn't agree with having a well paid job which in turn props up the running costs of the farm..
That's the single biggest problem with farming in the 21st century..the farm doesn't return enough income to pay all expenses/machinery.contractors.. feed stuff and the long list goes on..
And then finally theres nothing left to pay the young farmer a proper wage..
Most young people down my way have good jobs in pharmaceutical etc and have seen the light..
They certainly wouldn't go back to farming and even the young lads that worked for agri contractors have mostly moved up to proper paying jobs..
Now the contractors are whining about not being able to get drivers etc..
But this again wouldn't have been an issue if they paid proper wages and stopped treating lads like slaves..
Until theres proper return for produce small farms will just keep getting bought up by huge factory type milk and beef producers..
And unfortunately too many people waiting to see what the future might bring to farming but getting old waiting..

_Brian · 02-06-2021 1:37pm

Paul_Mc1988 wrote: »

Nail on the head. Just a load of old bitter farmers with backwards views.

"Why do the young lads not want to work their backs off for a low return". What a stupid question.

Cop on you backwards weirdos. I'd say a load of them don't want to end up bitter like most of you

Yea, name calling isn’t exactly a pleasant form of conversation.

Bass Reeves · 02-06-2021 1:59pm

jetfiremuck wrote: »

Genuine question. Whats the mininum acreage that someone could make a decent income, assuming its free and clear, good land under grass at present. Stripping away subsidies, set aside etc and forestry options, to get to a base costing. Once thats set its location etc etc.

It s very open question. It depends on what your idea if an income is and what hours you are willing to work. It raining here at present so I sitting in the shed replying to this.

There is income and income. Drawing can be a struggle in a farm as after tax you can end up with a moderate wage. You could run a 200 are drystock farm part time especially now the Mary's are on line.

I be open I have this place nearly twenty years. Store to beef. Will slaughter about 60 cattle net margin is 250/head so about 15k. Old farmhouse on the place is done up and rented 8k gross per year. All payments bring in 13k but GLAS is only 1.8k of that, I intend to try to increase that to above 3k in next scheme ideally 4k but we will see.

If the question is how much land you need for a viable income I think in drystock it about 150-200 acres. On the other hand there is not much more work if you are set up right. I know a lad with that kind of land bank, works for an MNC. Contracts in a lot of stuff even the feeding of cattle.

Paul_Mc1988 · 02-06-2021 3:08pm

_Brian wrote: »

Yea, name calling isn’t exactly a pleasant form of conversation.

Backwards people saying young lads don't want to work hard anymore is condescending.

For years farmers have said there is no money in it and then farmers come on here saying that no lads want to get involved.....

The fact of the matter is its the likes of them which has disensentivised young farmers entering.

Dinzee Conlee · 02-06-2021 3:28pm

Paul_Mc1988 wrote: »

Backwards people saying young lads don't want to work hard anymore is condescending.

For years farmers have said there is no money in it and then farmers come on here saying that no lads want to get involved.....

The fact of the matter is its the likes of them which has disensentivised young farmers entering.

I dont remember seeing anyone saying that young lads dont want to work in this thread?

The theme seems to be more "why farm, when there are easier options?" - which is a fair statement to make I think...

You seem to be coming in with some chip on your shoulder about people saying young people don't want to work?

Finty Lemon · 02-06-2021 3:31pm

A few things on this
1. It should be easy to find like-minded people who are technically progressive, not in your parish but at least in your region. Ireland is a small country and if it meant going 40-50 miles once every month or so for a good on-farm discussion that should be no barrier.
2. Any discussion group that involves a payment incentive to attend is a waste of time. An absolute waste of time. Most of the groups went up in smoke after payments ended which was a mercy for all involved.
3. There is any amount of young lads and girls knocking around agri-events, marts etc. The interest is there but the outlet isn't. Many are from part-time farms where there will simply never be enough meaningful work, or reward for that work, to sustain them. In this situation, lot of these would be better served getting a few hours a week on a progressive dairy or beef farm to learn new things.
4. Convergence will not solve the age issue in farming. Its just moving a few quid around the place. Abolition of entitlements after age 66 would be interesting on the other hand.

Bass Reeves · 02-06-2021 3:42pm

Finty Lemon wrote: »

A few things on this
1. It should be easy to find like-minded people who are technically progressive, not in your parish but at least in your region. Ireland is a small country and if it meant going 40-50 miles once every month or so for a good on-farm discussion that should be no barrier.
2. Any discussion group that involves a payment incentive to attend is a waste of time. An absolute waste of time. Most of the groups went up in smoke after payments ended which was a mercy for all involved.
3. There is any amount of young lads and girls knocking around agri-events, marts etc. The interest is there but the outlet isn't. Many are from part-time farms where there will simply never be enough meaningful work, or reward for that work, to sustain them. In this situation, lot of these would be better served getting a few hours a week on a progressive dairy or beef farm to learn new things.
4. Convergence will not solve the age issue in farming. Its just moving a few quid around the place. Abolition of entitlements after age 66 would be interesting on the other hand.

Why should entitlements be stopped after 66.there is no job you can technically be forced to retire from not at 66. Should a shop keeper or business person be stopped from drawing grants at 66. In my case my farm is part of my pension plan

JohnChadwick · 02-06-2021 4:22pm

orchard farm wrote: »

As a young full time farmer all i can say is its very tough when your bps is based on historical reference of 20 years ago long before i started farming. 100%convergence would help make farming more attractive to young people

Same for me. Why the f*ck are us young farmers being penalised for how the previous farmer farmed. 100% convergence seems unlikely in Ireland and IFAs Tim Cullinan has a lot to f**king answer for if it doesn't happen.

Paul_Mc1988 · 02-06-2021 4:32pm

Bass Reeves wrote: »

Why should entitlements be stopped after 66.there is no job you can technically be forced to retire from not at 66. Should a shop keeper or business person be stopped from drawing grants at 66. In my case my farm is part of my pension plan

That's not correct once a person exceeds the retirement age the employer has the right to let them go if they are no longer fit to do the job without redundancy.

Paul_Mc1988 · 02-06-2021 4:35pm

Dual wheels wrote: »

The way it is now young lads want nothing only big machinery and the odd lad that might be interested in milking soon backs off when he realises that also means milking of a Sunday morning

Dinzee Conlee wrote: »

I dont remember seeing anyone saying that young lads dont want to work in this thread?

The theme seems to be more "why farm, when there are easier options?" - which is a fair statement to make I think...

You seem to be coming in with some chip on your shoulder about people saying young people don't want to work?

So what do you make of dual wheels comment.... picking and choosing what you see in the thread to suit your own narrative?

Finty Lemon · 02-06-2021 4:37pm

Bass Reeves wrote: »

Why should entitlements be stopped after 66.there is no job you can technically be forced to retire from not at 66. Should a shop keeper or business person be stopped from drawing grants at 66. In my case my farm is part of my pension plan

Interesting. I always suspected that BPS payments were really just a pension payment.

_Brian · 02-06-2021 4:40pm

Paul_Mc1988 wrote: »

That's not correct once a person exceeds the retirement age the employer has the right to let them go if they are no longer fit to do the job without redundancy.

Taking away the “if they are no longer fit to do the job” comment as it’s not relevant to the age discussion. No, if your work contract doesn’t specify a retirement age you absolutely cannot be forced to retire.

As for not being fit for the job, literally ANYONE of any age can be let go from their position if they are no longer capable of performing the duties they were hired to do.

Don’t mix up age and ability, plent of us old codgers are well capable.

Dinzee Conlee · 02-06-2021 5:21pm

Paul_Mc1988 wrote: »

So what do you make of dual wheels comment.... picking and choosing what you see in the thread to suit your own narrative?

Ah, I stand corrected Paul...

But its one comment, on 3 pages of a thread. I dont think the theme is "young people dont want to work"
The theme is "why arent young people farming"

I stand by my comment on coming in with a chip on your shoulder, this was your opening post in this thread

Paul_Mc1988 wrote: »

Nail on the head. Just a load of old bitter farmers with backwards views.

"Why do the young lads not want to work their backs off for a low return". What a stupid question.

Cop on you backwards weirdos. I'd say a load of them don't want to end up bitter like most of you

whelan2 · 02-06-2021 5:26pm

Most agricultural courses are over subscribed. Where do they go when they qualify?

yagan · 02-06-2021 5:46pm

Not a farmer or from a farm so I know zero about running one, but have worked on motorway schemes where I had a lot of contact with farm owners and the overall impression I got was that most landowners were in their 50s and up. The common theme I'd hear from them was that they'd be last ones farming as the offspring were generally elsewhere working better paid jobs. Full business handovers seemed the exception to the rule.

I heard some discussion a few weeks ago on TippFM about a retirement scheme to encourage the part timers to give it up which would give more opportunity to consolidation for those younger farmers trying newer methods.

Again I know nothing about farming but I'm surprised that scheme hasn't been mentioned already.

Hard Knocks · 02-06-2021 5:48pm

whelan2 wrote: »

Most agricultural courses are over subscribed. Where do they go when they qualify?

Locally the best farms can only pay 1 wage, if you have a 20 year old with a 50 year old parent full time farming the 20 year old has to get other employment but is hands on on the farm

_Brian · 02-06-2021 6:00pm

There’s no appetite in government to solve this.

At the end of the day farming is no longer seen as essential and about food security. Now it’s about having a steady supply of cheap or below cost raw ingredients to keep multinational food processors happy.

Say my name · 02-06-2021 6:03pm

Hard Knocks wrote: »

Locally the best farms can only pay 1 wage, if you have a 20 year old with a 50 year old parent full time farming the 20 year old has to get other employment but is hands on on the farm

There's a France based expat YouTube maker remarked that the farmers out there expect to have their feet up retired and pension by 60? could have been lower.
Point is their structure seems to be more geared at all costs from the government for youth in farming.
Even they remarked only for they were a fairly young couple with children at the time they would have been prohibited from buying that farm in France.

In the Netherlands the tax structure is so that the heir buys out their parents and that's the retirement plan provided.

timple23 · 02-06-2021 6:37pm

Increased regulation, increased costs, reduced returns. Working harder to stand still.

I'll never forget reading an article during the fodder crisis, something like 10 options to consider, first 9 options were buying feed of some sort, very last option was to sell stock.

I'm sick of listening to people ramming the ideas of growing 20tonne of grass per year and stocking over 3lu.

Not much printspace given to people who want to reduce inputs.

There are very few publications that are not trying to sell you something.

When they take their own advice, it doesn't seem to work well. Greenfields springs to mind.

_Brian · 02-06-2021 6:53pm

timple23 wrote: »

Increased regulation, increased costs, reduced returns. Working harder to stand still.

I'll never forget reading an article during the fodder crisis, something like 10 options to consider, first 9 options were buying feed of some sort, very last option was to sell stock.

I'm sick of listening to people ramming the ideas of growing 20tonne of grass per year and stocking over 3lu.

Not much printspace given to people who want to reduce inputs.

There are very few publications that are not trying to sell you something.

When they take their own advice, it doesn't seem to work well. Greenfields springs to mind.

It’s just generating economic activity around agriculture, remember, the big money is made ON farmers and not BY farmers. Last thing they want is you dropping output and damaging the supply of below cost raw materials for Larry et al.

Gawddawggonnit · 02-06-2021 6:55pm

Say my name wrote: »

There's a France based expat YouTube maker remarked that the farmers out there expect to have their feet up retired and pension by 60? could have been lower.
Point is their structure seems to be more geared at all costs from the government for youth in farming.
Even they remarked only for they were a fairly young couple with children at the time they would have been prohibited from buying that farm in France.

In the Netherlands the tax structure is so that the heir buys out their parents and that's the retirement plan provided.

Firstly there’s no non-contributory pension in France, and the contributory pension pays a massive €1100/mth. Secondly the ‘young’ farmer having priority in land sales only serves to fcuk up pretty much every sale.
There’s heaps of young blood in the tillage sector and they’re leading the charge into organic. Far less young blood in the beef sector, and almost none in dairy.
You couldn’t give away dairy farms.

Poultry, veal and pork fares very well also because you’ve a better chance of more industrial hours. In fairness to them they’ve invested heavily. They’re having a hard time now though.

I’m retirement age and I’ve absolutely no intention of even taking a step back. I do have days when I think about why I’m doing this to myself, especially when I’ve no successor...and when talking to siblings and peers that are retired.
I’ve done my very best to put my child off farming. There’s a waaaay better quality of life to be had working 35hr week with heaps of payed hols with every weekend off, not to mention the juicy pension at the end. It’s a no brainer. I can’t comprehend why anyone would put their child into such a life of drudgery.

Bass Reeves · 02-06-2021 7:12pm

Paul_Mc1988 wrote: »

That's not correct once a person exceeds the retirement age the employer has the right to let them go if they are no longer fit to do the job without redundancy.

No you are incorrect. RTE lost the court case about forcing people to retire at 65. Including a retiremet age is now of no use. People cannot be forced to retire. if you notice now all the RTE presenters that retire are backing doing a ''contracted'' program within 6-12 months. I suspect that this is part of a payment to now get them to retire at 65.
Its becoming a huge issue in state jobs where workers have a large portion of non pensionable pay. Nurses can now retire and return to work part time for he HSE.

The only condition that an employers can use to to force you to leave a job is is not being capable of carrying out the function or if the job is actually now gone and the physical job no longer exists

Finty Lemon wrote: »

Interesting. I always suspected that BPS payments were really just a pension payment.

BPS only make up 30% of my income from this part of my pension plan. People have this idea that at 60 or 65 you finish your job and totally put your feet up. People now are much more active and physically capable that 30-40 years ago. When I was in my teens people at 60+ years of age looked and were old from a lifetime of hardship.

The average male only lived to about 70 and women to 77. Average lifespan has increased and it is 80 for men and 86 for women. But an interesting stastic of this is that the average male who survives to 60 will on average live to 85, that means many will live into there 90's.

In this senario retirement could be lasting 25-30 years if forced at 60. I have a seperate pension that I will start drawing down in a year or two but this is part to keep me going until I am in my seventies.

_Brian wrote: »

Taking away the “if they are no longer fit to do the job” comment as it’s not relevant to the age discussion. No, if your work contract doesn’t specify a retirement age you absolutely cannot be forced to retire.

As for not being fit for the job, literally ANYONE of any age can be let go from their position if they are no longer capable of performing the duties they were hired to do.

Don’t mix up age and ability, plent of us old codgers are well capable.

Even if it specify an retirement age they now have to be able to justify it after the RTE case

_Brian wrote: »

There’s no appetite in government to solve this.

At the end of the day farming is no longer seen as essential and about food security. Now it’s about having a steady supply of cheap or below cost raw ingredients to keep multinational food processors happy.

The government has to solve nothing. Problem is too many people think taht they should be handed things, like a job or a house or a fam. They think the dice should be loaded in there favour. Biggest issue is leasing discourages selling of land as it makes the wealth too transferable.

_Brian · 02-06-2021 9:19pm

Bass Reeves wrote: »

No you are incorrect. RTE lost the court case about forcing people to retire at 65. Including a retiremet age is now of no use. People cannot be forced to retire. if you notice now all the RTE presenters that retire are backing doing a ''contracted'' program within 6-12 months. I suspect that this is part of a payment to now get them to retire at 65.
Its becoming a huge issue in state jobs where workers have a large portion of non pensionable pay. Nurses can now retire and return to work part time for he HSE.

The only condition that an employers can use to to force you to leave a job is is not being capable of carrying out the function or if the job is actually now gone and the physical job no longer exists

BPS only make up 30% of my income from this part of my pension plan. People have this idea that at 60 or 65 you finish your job and totally put your feet up. People now are much more active and physically capable that 30-40 years ago. When I was in my teens people at 60+ years of age looked and were old from a lifetime of hardship.

The average male only lived to about 70 and women to 77. Average lifespan has increased and it is 80 for men and 86 for women. But an interesting stastic of this is that the average male who survives to 60 will on average live to 85, that means many will live into there 90's.

In this senario retirement could be lasting 25-30 years if forced at 60. I have a seperate pension that I will start drawing down in a year or two but this is part to keep me going until I am in my seventies.

Even if it specify an retirement age they now have to be able to justify it after the RTE case

The government has to solve nothing. Problem is too many people think taht they should be handed things, like a job or a house or a fam. They think the dice should be loaded in there favour. Biggest issue is leasing discourages selling of land as it makes the wealth too transferable.

Not many that don’t believe that beef processing is a cartel system loaded against beef prices the government are responsible to ensure and enforce fair trading practices are followed in the market.

green daries · 02-06-2021 9:30pm

Paul_Mc1988 wrote: »

So what do you make of dual wheels comment.... picking and choosing what you see in the thread to suit your own narrative?

Good God man your terrible cross so you are
Look farming is a low margin to very low margin to no margin enterprise its the way it is also farmers are farmers they talk things down (myself included) but that's much the same as older people in nearly every business they also talk it down I think 100% of the cap payments should be gotten rid of completely there's really no need for them just let thee consumer pay the fair price

Dearth of young farmers

Comments