Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Minimum alcohol pricing is nigh

1170171173175176323

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    VinLieger wrote: »
    By not voting at all you indirectly are supporting the winning result of any democratic vote be it a referendum or election. Far too many people do not understand this and think not voting at all is some kind of protest when it actually just shows ignorance of the democratic process.

    The poster has further clarified they just didn't vote for a major party though.

    Yes I'm surprised at the likes of SF supporting this but it unfortunately shows how effective the anti fun brigade have managed to present this as a health issue when it has nothing to do with it.

    Why would you surprised at that ?

    Take a look at SF.

    Their base is very much in the less affluent areas of society, lets put it that way.
    Many people in these area would have suffered the affects of alcohol abuse far more than people from affluent areas.
    That's part of the reason they are less affluent.

    So no SF politician will get anywhere in these areas if they are not seen to be tackling areas such as alcohol abuse.

    You can't imagine a SF politician in front of a room full of mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers etc who have suffused due to alcohol abuse by family members and say they are opposing measures to make alcohol less available ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,089 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Why would you surprised at that ?

    Take a look at SF.

    Their base is very much in the less affluent areas of society, lets put it that way.
    Many people in these area would have suffered the affects of alcohol abuse far more than people from affluent areas.
    That's part of the reason they are less affluent.

    So no SF politician will get anywhere in these areas if they are not seen to be tackling areas such as alcohol abuse.

    You can't imagine a SF politician in front of a room full of mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers etc who have suffused due to alcohol abuse by family members and say they are opposing measures to make alcohol less available.

    Being against this nonsense doesn't equate to supporting alcohol abuse.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    HBC08 wrote: »
    Being against this nonsense doesn't equate to supporting alcohol abuse.
    True, but we all know how the media and spin work.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 96,289 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    it is an amazing coincidence that the extra cost of producing alcohol free beer is almost exactly the same as the duty on alcohol.
    Removing the alcohol can be done in various ways like vacuum distillation or with enzymes. Nowhere near the cost of producing the beer.

    E10 petrol is 10% alcohol so at €1.60 a litre you get 80g ethanol which is 8 units at 20c a unit. To give an idea of how little it costs to produce ethanol.
    Yes you could separate ethanol from fuel by adding water , but there are other additives in fuel which are really nasty so it's not a good idea.



    Technically since alcohol free beer could be considered a food like milk since it doesn't contain sugar or alcohol or added flavourings. Though I doubt the revenue would drop the VAT.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭patrickbrophy18


    VinLieger wrote: »
    Look I hate MUP but your all over the map with your righteous libertarian anger here, it's nothing close to price fixing however what it is is government unfairly supporting one portion of an industry over another.

    First off, how is my "libertarian anger" "all over the map"?
    Second off, MUP is price fixing as it was originally designed to prop up the pubs by preventing the off trade from being more competitive. It was conveniently reworded over the years to be public health related.

    Thankfully, a copy of the 2011 manifesto was kept to preserve the original reason for MUP for public viewing.

    As I mentioned many pages back, I think the only way pubs would be able to reap the fruits of their labours is to flat out abolish the measures from the Intoxicating Liquor Act of 2008 and make it less of a financial risk to publicans or would-be publicans.

    Increased prices of late licenses, reducing the drink driving limit and curtailing opening hours of pubs have also played a huge role in destroying pub feasability.

    Either way, government intervention of the pub and off license has done nothing but create resentment between the two trades.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,749 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    So no SF politician will get anywhere in these areas if they are not seen to be tackling areas such as alcohol abuse.

    Jaysus wept.

    This has nothing at all to do with alcohol abuse, why is off licence alcohol regarded as a massive health risk but pub alcohol not? This is all about kneecapping the offies and supporting the vintners - the ultimate in closed shops.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,347 ✭✭✭GhostyMcGhost


    Finally, someone talking sense

    https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/minimum-unit-pricing-could-see-alcohol-in-ireland-twice-as-dear-as-north-1120894.html
    For example if you look at overall alcohol consumption that's declined siginificantly here, so we had a decline of 6.6 per cent last year and that's the lowest level in 30 years, alcohol consumption now is 30 per cent lower overall than the peak in 2001 so there hasn't been anything that should trigger this reaction from Government


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭Reputable Rog


    The tide is turning, I think there’s zero chance of this anytime soon. Border politicians very nervous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭kenmc



    Tomorrow's headline: Drinks Ireland director Patricia Callan found dead. Gardai told to rule out foul play.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,226 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Meanwhile have a read of this letter supporting MUP in yesterday's Irish Times.

    Pay particular attention to the long list of people who signed it.

    They can't wait for you to pay more for a few drinks in your own house.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/letters/the-price-of-alcohol-1.4552549


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,299 ✭✭✭kenmc


    elperello wrote: »
    Meanwhile have a read of this letter supporting MUP in yesterday's Irish Times.

    Pay particular attention to the long list of people who signed it.

    They can't wait for you to pay more for a few drinks in your own house.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/letters/the-price-of-alcohol-1.4552549

    Paywalled


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,226 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    kenmc wrote: »
    Paywalled

    Works ok for me. Maybe you are over your quota of free access.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,015 ✭✭✭ShamNNspace


    elperello wrote: »
    Meanwhile have a read of this letter supporting MUP in yesterday's Irish Times.

    Pay particular attention to the long list of people who signed it.

    They can't wait for you to pay more for a few drinks in your own house.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/letters/the-price-of-alcohol-1.4552549

    Its no coincidence that all those who put their name to this nonsense are extremely well remunerated and completely disconnected from the lives of the average citizen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,728 ✭✭✭dubrov


    elperello wrote:
    Pay particular attention to the long list of people who signed it.

    Are there any TDs in that list?

    Looks like a short enough list of nobodies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,015 ✭✭✭ShamNNspace


    dubrov wrote: »
    Are there any TDs in that list?

    Looks like a short enough list of nobodies.

    Frances Black for one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭patrickbrophy18


    Its no coincidence that all those who put their name to this nonsense are extremely well remunerated and completely disconnected from the lives of the average citizen

    Many of them probably have a close relative or friend who succumbed to alcohol abuse or had a turbulent upbringing as a direct or indirect result of alcohol abuse. While I do sympathise with such individuals, I don't think the average Joe should be punished for this.

    Many other nations don't have this issue. However, I do think the root cause is far more insideous than alcohol. Factors such as trauma and poor environments growing up can drive people to the gargle. So, we need to stop chains like these from taking root.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,596 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    Frances Black for one


    She gave up drinking in 1989, she has zero relevance in the conversation. A house could be bought by one person on the average industrial wage back then, now that is not possible so people piss it up against the wall instead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,015 ✭✭✭ShamNNspace


    She gave up drinking in 1989, she has zero relevance in the conversation. A house could be bought by one person on the average industrial wage back then, now that is not possible so people piss it up against the wall instead.

    I was aware of her past addiction, a poster asked were there any politicians on the list, I replied that there was..... that is all


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,330 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Disgusted to see the likes of Barnardos and the ISPCC on there, the idea that this will help children whose parents are alcoholics is fvcking absurd, addicts will get their fix no matter the cost meaning these children will be worse off under this idiocy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,104 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    elperello wrote: »
    Meanwhile have a read of this letter supporting MUP in yesterday's Irish Times.

    Pay particular attention to the long list of people who signed it.

    They can't wait for you to pay more for a few drinks in your own house.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/letters/the-price-of-alcohol-1.4552549

    "Minimum-unit pricing increases the price of only the cheapest alcohol"

    This will be proven to be false

    Newho we've the second dearest alcohol in Europe before this travesty comes in

    Cheap alcohol in Ireland doesn't stack up


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,698 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    "Minimum-unit pricing increases the price of only the cheapest alcohol"

    This will be proven to be false

    Newho we've the second dearest alcohol in Europe before this travesty comes in

    Cheap alcohol in Ireland doesn't stack up

    Agreed. I read that and immediately cocked the eyebrow. Because that simply rings so, so, hollow. It sounds like someone who's just completely out of touch with the realities of Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,226 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    VinLieger wrote: »
    Disgusted to see the likes of Barnardos and the ISPCC on there, the idea that this will help children whose parents are alcoholics is fvcking absurd, addicts will get their fix no matter the cost meaning these children will be worse off under this idiocy

    You could add the Children's Rights Alliance and what you have is a classic example of "mission creep".

    These organisations are doing good work trying to improve children's lives but make the mistake of getting involved in campaigns which are not directly related to their objectives.

    They have signed up to support legislation which will increase the price of drink for everyone, even those who have no children.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,355 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Frances Black for one

    She's a Senator not a TD.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,226 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    L1011 wrote: »
    She's a Senator not a TD.

    As a member of the Senate she would be correctly described as a politician.

    Also worth noting that not one TD voted against MUP.


  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.
    Hmm. This thread has been going for about 5 years and we still don't have MUP. I think the idea that doom is "nigh" is starting to sound as credible as the Free Presbyterians.

    I don't think price is the only thing that needs to change, but it's absolutely true that alcohol can be bought very cheaply here. Maybe not as cheaply as in Italy at nominal prices, but we don't have Italian salaries.

    Irish Median household salary: approx €45,000
    Italian Median household salary: approx €20,000


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,387 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Hmm. This thread has been going for about 5 years and we still don't have MUP. I think the idea that doom is "nigh" is starting to sound as credible as the Free Presbyterians.
    I don't think price is the only thing that needs to change, but it's absolutely true that alcohol can be bought very cheaply here. Maybe not as cheaply as in Italy at nominal prices, but we don't have Italian salaries.
    Irish Median household salary: approx €45,000
    Italian Median household salary: approx €20,000

    Alcohol is much cheaper in France and Germany than here and their household salaries are significantly higher.
    So relatively it is much cheaper for them... do they have noticeably larger problems with alcohol?
    So not sure why price 'needs to change'???

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,015 ✭✭✭ShamNNspace


    L1011 wrote: »
    She's a Senator not a TD.

    My mistake, I could have sworn the first comment were "are there any politicians on the list"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 467 ✭✭EddieN75


    Well on the other hand carbon taxes went up again over the weekend.


  • Posts: 14,242 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.
    odyssey06 wrote: »
    Alcohol is much cheaper in France and Germany than here and their household salaries are significantly higher.
    So relatively it is much cheaper for them... do they have noticeably larger problems with alcohol?
    So not sure why price 'needs to change'???
    France and Germany do have a big problem with alcohol, but in Ireland our culture is geared more toward binges. 75% of alcohol consumed here is in a binge, and fewer people consume more of the alcohol.

    Gross median household salaries are not higher in France, and I'm not sure about Germany, but I'm pretty sure they're lower there too.

    Where are you getting that information, that they have significantly higher salaries? I think you might be confusing PPP-adjusted salaries (Eurostat, OECD) with data produced by national statistics agencies. The French statistical agency INSEE gives their 2017 median disposable household income as €21,120.

    I don't know what Germany's is. You'd probably have to speak German to find it. It's almost certainly less than ours, at €43,552.

    France and Germany still have big problems with alcohol mind you. 50,000 alcohol deaths in France per year.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 467 ✭✭EddieN75


    France and Germany do have a big problem with alcohol, but in Ireland our culture is geared more toward binges. 75% of alcohol consumed here is in a binge, and fewer people consume more of the alcohol.

    Gross median household salaries are not higher in France, and I'm not sure about Germany, but I'm pretty sure they're lower there too.

    Where are you getting that information, that they have significantly higher salaries? I think you might be confusing PPP-adjusted salaries (Eurostat, OECD) with data produced by national statistics agencies. The French statistical agency INSEE gives their 2017 median disposable household income as €21,120.

    I don't know what Germany's is. You'd probably have to speak German to find it. It's almost certainly less than ours, at €43,552.

    France and Germany still have big problems with alcohol mind you. 50,000 alcohol deaths in France per year.

    I'm not sure where you figures are coming from

    https://www.finfacts-blog.com/2019/04/irish-median-income-at-13th-in-europe.html?m=1#:~:text=In%202017%2C%20median%20disposable%20income,8.6%25%20above%20the%20EU28%20average.


Advertisement