Fitz's Youtube Channel

Time · 28-04-2021 11:38pm

Fitz II wrote: »

https://www.instagram.com/crownandbridgewatches/

Until this week I had never posted on Instagram, and I still dont get what its actually for. Wife and best friend said its where the cool kids are....but I dont want to be in any club that would have me as a member.

You want both tbh. Insta will get more people to the videos.

unkel · 28-04-2021 11:55pm

I think you have surprised friend & foe here Fitz, you really have a grá for this. I bet quite a lot of work goes into making these videos, but you're making it look easy as if you just sit down with the watch and have a casual chat about it.

Fitz II · 29-04-2021 8:11am

OmegaGene wrote: »

When is the only fans account starting ?

Ah jasus...!!!

banie01 · 29-04-2021 8:24am

OmegaGene wrote: »

When is the only fans account starting ?

You evil, evil bastard/genius!

I have an image of Fitz, nude and having lots of "fun" with a Patek on one wrist and a Root beer on the other!
All for €9.95 a month with new content weekly :pac:

I both shuddered and considered signing up

Seriously tho, as I said elsewhere.
I really like the channel, the flow, the opinions and the pros/cons, honesty and little bit of craic on the reviews really differentiate the channel from others IMO.
It's the only watch channel I actually clicked "subscribe" on!

redlead · 29-04-2021 10:59am

banie01 wrote: »

You evil, evil bastard/genius!

I have an image of Fitz, nude and having lots of "fun" with a Patek on one wrist and a Root beer on the other!
All for €9.95 a month with new content weekly :pac:

Archie would actually do that for a bit of cash. Don't be giving him ideas !

Wibbs · 01-05-2021 1:27pm

Vostok in the latest vid I see.

Fitz II · 02-05-2021 5:16pm

Spent afternoon on a friends collection, will take time to edit. Sneek peek, seamaster is an amazing watch and pure class under the macro.

Fitz II · 03-05-2021 1:09pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TH2aZ-CHVBs

Wibbs · 03-05-2021 2:39pm

Good review again. The Airking is one model I never got the attraction with at all. Unlike the Sub which has a huge heritage in diving, their "heritage" in aviation in the 30's(and after) they reference is up there with Pateks, IE bugger all. They mention designed for "navigational time readings", when pretty much all actual pilot's watches back then(the German B-Uhr's were one of the exceptions) were either chronos, or had a bezel and pointer, the very reason external bezels were invented. The polished bezel itself looks like something's missing in a way. Unlike in the Milgauss which has a very different backstory and purpose. It does look like a Milgauss they figured slap a different dial and a handset from parts to make a "new" line.

You noted(and good advice) in the vid don't buy one if you're actually after a Sub or GMT and just want a "Rolex". I can well understand someone just liking the look and wanting one for that reasons, but they do feel like a stopgap for that other kind of buyer.

That Seamaster is a beauty alright.

The dial is a work of art. I like how Omega could just do a Longines and Rolex and keep firing out internal "homages" to old Seamaster glories(and they do have a heritage line), but they also have very different and brand new designs in their lineup. There's no way that Seamaster could be mistaken for one from the past.

Cyclingtourist · 03-05-2021 3:02pm

What I took from the video was 'it's all about the dial' which was a bit like stating the obvious. I mean if you don't like the dial you're hardly going to buy it unless of course you're so desperate to have Rolex on your wrist that availability/affordability is all that matters.

What about the movement? What about the 'wristshot' where you share your wrist-size?

Apart from the constructive criticism I liked that it was short and to the point without the usual YT waffle.

893bet · 03-05-2021 3:17pm

I am surprised you haven’t bought this one. You have expressed admiration for it a lot of times.

I don’t think it’s been discontinued yet and will have sold in relative smaller numbers (assumption) so is safe money for a play with.

banie01 · 03-05-2021 3:25pm

893bet wrote: »

I don’t think it’s been discontinued yet and will have sold in relative smaller numbers (assumption) so is safe money for a play with.

If memory serves, the last time I was in Keane's in Limerick there was one on Display.
Very nearly pulled the trigger for a rolex at "retail" but its not to my taste at all.

Fitz II · 03-05-2021 3:29pm

Wibbs wrote: »

their "heritage" in aviation in the 30's(and after) they reference is up there with Pateks, IE bugger all......

I dont really get into that stuff cause its all marketing fluff... I do takes with it in and its boring before you get to the meat of why most watch these vids and very far from why most people buy these watches.

Cyclingtourist wrote: »

What I took from the video was 'it's all about the dial' which was a bit like stating the obvious. I mean if you don't like the dial you're hardly going to buy it unless of course you're so desperate to have Rolex on your wrist that availability/affordability is all that matters.

Exactly, some watches are all about the braclet, some the brand, some the complication. This ones main feature is the dial.

Cyclingtourist wrote: »

What about the movement? What about the 'wristshot' where you share your wrist-size?

Did a few takes with that into, but what can you say about a time only 3131 that you cant see. I had limited footage on this one so was really trying to be concise. I do find movement specs in general fairly boring. Might put them up as text in the future just to have them there....good point. Didnt want to share my wrist size on the wrist shots as I understand that is a copyright phrase and also the watch was not sized to me properly.

Cyclingtourist wrote: »

Apart from the constructive criticism I liked that it was short and to the point without the usual YT waffle.

Think I prefer short format too, hard to know unless you stick a whole bunch of vids out there and what to see what people prefer. I find the circa 15-20 minute vid fairly dull, mostly I want to start and the end bit. Appreciate the feedback. Might do various lengths and see what goes down best, easier to do on my own watches where I can reshoot if I miss something. I will improve with practice.

893bet wrote: »

I am surprised you haven’t bought this one. You have expressed admiration for it a lot of times.

Have come close alright, but just didnt when I had the milgauss as they are practically identical. I think the dial is cool, but its one where I can understand detractors views also.

Cyclingtourist · 03-05-2021 4:09pm

Fitz II wrote: »

.

Exactly, some watches are all about the braclet, some the brand, some the complication. This ones main feature is the dial.

Did a few takes with that into, but what can you say about a time only 3131 that you cant see. I had limited footage on this one so was really trying to be concise. I do find movement specs in general fairly boring. Might put them up as text in the future just to have them there....good point. Didnt want to share my wrist size on the wrist shots as I understand that is a copyright phrase and also the watch was not sized to me properly.

Think I prefer short format too, hard to know unless you stick a whole bunch of vids out there and what to see what people prefer. I find the circa 15-20 minute vid fairly dull, mostly I want to start and the end bit. Appreciate the feedback. .

Have come close alright, but just didnt when I had the milgauss as they are practically identical. I think the dial is cool, but its one where I can understand detractors views also.

Think you quoted me a couple of times and attributed them to Wibbs. Doesn't really bother me but it's probably something you might want to fix.

redlead · 03-05-2021 4:48pm

The beauty of the explorer is that it is a very good quality basic watch that does exactly what it says on the tin. No bullsh1t. The strength of the brand dictates its price which is way over what it should be but you can't really blame Rolex for that. The Air King is just a bit meh. Looks like a bit of a lazy mish mash of parts as Fitz alluded to in his presentation of the watch, albeit it that it wasn't necessarily his opinion. Is that really the rolex anyone wants? Really? At least the Millgaus is funky enough to properly differentiate itself. Might not be everyone's cup of tea but at least its unique. The same can be said of the yachtmaster II. Has anyone ever actually bought one of those? Kudos for doing something a bit different though.

They should stop making OPs and Air Kings and make more subs and GMT IIs. The age old complaint.

Fitz II · 03-05-2021 6:08pm

Cyclingtourist wrote: »

Think you quoted me a couple of times and attributed them to Wibbs. Doesn't really bother me but it's probably something you might want to fix.

Everting looks attributed correctly to me?

hitemfrank · 03-05-2021 6:13pm

Possibly a boards error - they definitely showed as quotes by Wibbs earlier.

Wibbs · 03-05-2021 6:19pm

Fitz II wrote: »

I dont really get into that stuff cause its all marketing fluff... I do takes with it in and its boring before you get to the meat of why most watch these vids and very far from why most people buy these watches.

Oh true enough, though the brands seem to think it's pretty important as they're all at the marketing fluff around such things. I suppose the market position of Rolex is much more at the luxury/status transmission end so it's less in play than say Omega's Moonwatch. Plus of all the brand's fans on forums and the like their "own" brand is the best of course, though they're more likely to make corrections about dubious claims whereas Rolex fans tend buy the heritage koolaid far more than others.

Think I prefer short format too, hard to know unless you stick a whole bunch of vids out there and what to see what people prefer. I find the circa 15-20 minute vid fairly dull, mostly I want to start and the end bit.

+ 1. Shorter is generally better. In most cases of youtuber produced vids I prefer ten minutes or under, very much so in reviews, whether that be watches or anything else. Long format is fine if it's a documentary, but not a review. Your vids are hitting the sweet spot there.

Cyclingtourist wrote: »

Think you quoted me a couple of times and attributed them to Wibbs. Doesn't really bother me but it's probably something you might want to fix.

Sorted, by the powah vested in me...

Wibbs · 03-05-2021 6:21pm

hitemfrank wrote: »

Possibly a boards error - they definitely showed as quotes by Wibbs earlier.

Possibly and it wouldn't surprise me, though when editing it showed the wrong name, so I just tweaked them back.

Wibbs · 03-05-2021 6:24pm

OmegaGene wrote: »

If they only made subs and GMT’s the Rolex world would be very boring

Aye, but them and the Daytona are the models of the brand. Not a bad lineup either. Omega are the Speedy and the Seamaster. I do get the feeling that the other Rolex lines, which tend to be cheaper and more available are often bought as a stopgap by some to get the name on the wrist. Less so the Milgauss though. That's got a distinctive following. Cellini are another kettle of fish.

Thirdfox · 03-05-2021 7:57pm

Sub 10 and over 10 minutes apparently has a big impact on monetisation if that's at all important - you see people padding out videos to hit the 10min mark because of that. But I think the duration should fit the content - though I could imagine a Fitz 10 min rant against Vostok easily…

scwazrh · 03-05-2021 9:07pm

Wibbs wrote: »

AI do get the feeling that the other Rolex lines, which tend to be cheaper and more available are often bought as a stopgap by some to get the name on the wrist.

Guilty of that with an 39mm op

Wibbs · 03-05-2021 9:14pm

scwazrh wrote: »

Guilty of that with an 39mm op

Ah I dunno S, the OP is a very nice timepiece.

scwazrh · 03-05-2021 9:18pm

Wibbs wrote: »

Ah I dunno S, the OP is a very nice timepiece.

It is but I certainly wouldn’t have bought it if a sub was available.

Fitz II · 03-05-2021 9:32pm

I have done this settling dozens of times. The odd time I fall in love, but usually the watch doesnt stick. There is such FOMO with Rolex at the moment that people will take anything they are given. I try to be super honest with myself now and a couple of friends are on speed dial and warned to tell me when I am doing it. But it has to be said that at the moment buying any Rolex even as a settle will see you right, shame its not the same with other brands. Would love to try a few depreciation free Zeniths or Breguets.

Wibbs · 03-05-2021 9:43pm

Fitz II wrote: »

But it has to be said that at the moment buying any Rolex even as a settle will see you right,

Very much this. It;s their unique selling point. So even if you grow to hate whatever one it is, you'll get your money back. Can't really go wrong there. That's how the vintage market has always worked, but Rolex are able to pull that off with brand new watches still being made. Major kudos there.

shame its not the same with other brands. Would love to try a few depreciation free Zeniths or Breguets.

On the other hand buying used means some other poor bugger takes the hit and you get a cheaper watch.

Time · 03-05-2021 11:54pm

Have to disagree with ye on the Rolex thing. Maybe on S/S models you’ll be ok. But for PM models I don’t think that’s the case. I’d expect a loss if I sold my YM tomorrow, in saying that I wanted one for years anyway so it doesn’t matter to me because it’s not for selling on.

unkel · 03-05-2021 11:59pm

Time wrote: »

Have to disagree with ye on the Rolex thing. Maybe on S/S models you’ll be ok. But for PM models I don’t think that’s the case. I’d expect a loss if I sold my YM tomorrow

I'm pretty sure the comments were only really about S/S models. PM a different kettle of fish.

Fitz II · 04-05-2021 10:47am

PM does still lag behind on a lot of models with a few exceptions, but they are strengthening all the time, particular Daytonas, GMT's and Subs. In precious metal you are correct you have to judge each watch individually.

Fitz II · 08-05-2021 8:14am

Patek 5205g Annual Calendar Moonphase Review

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kRooiPQ6p4

https://youtu.be/4kRooiPQ6p4

Wibbs · 08-05-2021 8:30am

Nicely done again.

I love the case on it. Those fluted lugs. Niiice. I suppose the massive drop in used values is down to sports watches being the thing now? Dress watches just don't have the current ear of the market at all. Which means of course if that's someone's thing it's the right time to buy.

Cyclingtourist · 08-05-2021 10:13am

Nice review. Not in my 'price bracket' unfortunately but still interesting. I've subscribed.:)

893bet · 08-05-2021 10:48am

I am a little sorry to see this one go, as you are. But like Archie says “it’s got to hurt”. There is no one here that is of unlimited means so we have to sell to buy, and sometimes it means selling one that hurts a little.

Pure class though.

banie01 · 08-05-2021 11:00am

Beautiful watch and another really on point and tight review.

I agree with your point on Deployant clasp too.
Tang buckles at that price point are a disappointment, I can't imagine forking out for a custom strap and then having near immediate heavy wear on it.

The pointer use is a nice addition too, particularly on a complicated dial.
Look forward to seeing what replaces this in your collection.

Fitz II · 08-05-2021 11:04am

893bet wrote: »

I am a little sorry to see this one go, as you are. But like Archie says “it’s got to hurt”. There is no one here that is of unlimited means so we have to sell to buy, and sometimes it means selling one that hurts a little.

Pure class though.

Look its cost me absolutely nothing to try this watch, and a awesome watch it is. What's really lacking is my use for it. It will be nice in the future to be able to look back on the vids I am making, almost like I get to keep a part of the watch.

I hope the sacrifice is worth it for the next one....Working on a good few other reviews, thinking a Seadweller next. One a week is about as much as I can do without it becoming a chore and loosing interest.

banie01 wrote: »

The pointer use is a nice addition too, particularly on a complicated dial.

Oh never though its just the little tool for pressing the pins without scratching the case, must get another that one is gone off to Watchfinder with the watch.

893bet · 08-05-2021 11:05am

banie01 wrote: »

Beautiful watch and another really on point and tight review.

I agree with your point on Deployant clasp too.
Tang buckles at that price point are a disappointment, I can't imagine forking out for a custom strap and then having near immediate heavy wear on it.

The pointer use is a nice addition too, particularly on a complicated dial.
Look forward to seeing what replaces this in your collection.

Traditionally these watches are tang and buckle at this level. It’s def a disappointment. Not to worry. Should you choose you can buy a depolyant......anywhere from 2-5k type money in precious metal.....

I have heard Fitz is bulk buying Vostok.

banie01 · 08-05-2021 11:18am

893bet wrote: »

Traditionally these watches are tang and buckle at this level. It’s def a disappointment. Not to worry. Should you choose you can buy a depolyant......anywhere from 2-5k type money in precious metal.....

I have heard Fitz is bulk buying Vostok.

I heard he is buying the factory and adding a tooth engraving to the crown of every new Fitztok!

Yeah, appreciate that the Deployant particularly in a PM is a fair chunk of expense alright.
I'm on the hunt for a VC stainless one myself at the mo to go with the straps on order.

893bet · 08-05-2021 12:13pm

banie01 wrote: »

I heard he is buying the factory and adding a tooth engraving to the crown of every new Fitztok!

Yeah, appreciate that the Deployant particularly in a PM is a fair chunk of expense alright.
I'm on the hunt for a VC stainless one myself at the mo to go with the straps on order.

I think the stainless one is 600 for the 2nd generation version from the boutique.

banie01 · 08-05-2021 12:15pm

893bet wrote: »

I think the stainless one is 600 for the 2nd generation version from the boutique.

I'll probably end up going with that our trying to hunt down a 2nd hand one once I see how the leather ends up fitting the watch head.

banie01 · 08-05-2021 12:20pm

Fitz II wrote: »

Oh never though its just the little tool for pressing the pins without scratching the case, must get another that one is gone off to Watchfinder with the watch.

I'd guessed it was a pusher alright. It's the 1st review I've watched where the reviewer made use of something, anything

To point out specific details, rather than just rely on hand waving and the viewer making a guess.

Its a small thing, but as someone with not a lot of watch knowledge.
It does make a difference IMO.
Imagine not knowing what a chapter ring, rehaut, guilloche or any other of the terms that quickly become part and parcel of watch watching are?
That little pointer makes so much clear immediately, versus the WF standard of watch the gloves, watch the watch.

Quick and simple clarification as you go, and I liked it.

893bet · 08-05-2021 12:29pm

banie01 wrote: »

I'll probably end up going with that our trying to hunt down a 2nd hand one once I see how the leather ends up fitting the watch head.

They way you are going I am gonna end up regretting that sale.

Fitz II · 08-05-2021 12:31pm

banie01 wrote: »

I'd guessed it was a pusher alright. It's the 1st review I've watched where the reviewer made use of something, anything
To point out specific details, rather than just rely on hand waving and the viewer making a guess.

Its a small thing, but as someone with not a lot of watch knowledge.
It does make a difference IMO.
Imagine not knowing what a chapter ring, rehaut, guilloche or any other of the terms that quickly become part and parcel of watch watching are?
That little pointer makes so much clear immediately, versus the WF standard of watch the gloves, watch the watch.

Quick and simple clarification as you go, and I liked it.

From now on it shall be called the Banieton....its a fair point you make (pun intended). Unfortunately some of the watches I have got footage for already, the voiceover is not recorded yet, and its hard line up the hand movements with the voiceover, I am much more fluent with my own watches, and I suppose I have had a lot of time to consider my likes and dislikes. CT's idea of putting up specs in text is a good one and makes me feel better that I am not letting down people who want specs and not just opinion.

Watches I have in the pipeline are.

Daytona
Vostock Scubadude
Seiko SKX007
James Cameron Deepsea
Panerai Chrono
Omega Speedmaster MOTM
Omega Seamaster 300m on rubber
Longines Heritage
Rolex Rootbeer
Pre ceramic Kermit
AP Royal Oak Chrono
Mystery new aquisition

And I have about 10 - 15 other really nice pieces promised to me by sound friends.

redlead · 08-05-2021 12:37pm

Fitz II wrote: »

Look its cost me absolutely nothing to try this watch, and a awesome watch it is. What's really lacking is my use for it.

.

Thats an interesting point you raised. There are so many dress watches out there that have beautiful detail to be admired etc but you just don't have the opportunity to wear it. You kind of crave it but when you have it you realise you rarely wear it. Its a dilemma when building a collection because so many sports watches are so samey you feel you need something different but everything is so casual these days that sports watches is all you can wear most of the time.

Fitz II · 08-05-2021 12:47pm

redlead wrote: »

but you just don't have the opportunity to wear it. You kind of crave it but when you have it you realise you rarely wear it.

I actually feel genuine guilt not wearing my watches. Its much easier on watches that sit in the safe appreciating they are doing something at least. I am hoping that my next mystery purchase strikes the balance of everyday wear ability and jewellery rattling flashiness.

david · 08-05-2021 4:45pm

Nice video Fitz - can see the fluency develop as you go. I don’t know where you find the time for it all.

You’re welcome to any or all of my pieces when you need cannon fodder.

Would be interested to see your take on a plastic Casio!

Blanchy90 · 08-05-2021 6:38pm

Nice review and that's a great lineup you have planned.

I subbed there

Kintarō Hattori · 13-05-2021 3:02pm

You've gone down the Vostok route..... you know you're going to have to get an Invicta now. You know that, don't you?

Fitz II · 13-05-2021 3:22pm

Kintarō Hattori wrote: »

you're going to have to get an Invicta now.

Lorddrakul · 13-05-2021 3:45pm

Fitz II wrote: »

Love that.
You can't beat a Fast Show meme, they are...

Cyclingtourist · 13-05-2021 4:53pm

There's a lot of watch-snobbery around Invicta.:rolleyes:

Fitz's Youtube Channel

Comments