Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Belfast Disturbances

1474850525360

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,631 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    I'm not disputing that the protocol will stay.I note you've moved from your assertion it won't be 'tweaked' or 'fixed' as you seem to prefer.

    There isn't a difference. All that is happening is accommodation already in the Protocol are being activated.

    There's loads of ways of saying the same thing.

    Which would make Johnson a liar - something you seem to want to deflect from.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    So are the pictures of him with convicted terrorists fake?

    It's Northern Ireland Rob there's convicted and unconvicted terrorists in government on all sides. Boris Johnson himself was supportive of the terrorist soldiers that shot unarmed people on bloody Sunday. That's no difference from someone supporting the Birmingham pub bombings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    There isn't a difference. All that is happening is accommodation already in the Protocol are being activated.

    There's loads of ways of saying the same thing.

    Which would make Johnson a liar - something you seem to want to deflect from.

    Not really,I've already said I don't believe a word Johnson says.His BS is legendary.Who is disputing that?
    Quite why you want to discuss Johnson being a lier(which we are all aware of)rather than an attempted terrorist attack which will probably spook brussels even more in regards to the protocol is a mystery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,631 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    Not really,I've already said I don't believe a word Johnson says.His BS is legendary.Who is disputing that?
    Quite why you want to discuss Johnson being a lier(which we are all aware of)rather than an attempted terrorist attack which will probably spook brussels even more in regards to the protocol is a mystery.

    Because somebody introduced what he said on the Spotlight programme? And tried to make the case that the violence has led to achieving something.

    The topic of the thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    So are the pictures of him with convicted terrorists fake?

    Mind that time Martin McGuinness was pictured with the queen?

    EDIT - Someone beat me to it.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival, Getdown Services, And So I Watch You From Afar



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,173 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    Boris said a border poll is a long,long time away, so in Boris world is that Wednesday week?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,688 ✭✭✭✭downcow




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,305 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    Boris said a border poll is a long,long time away, so in Boris world is that Wednesday week?

    Probably not - he'll be too busy enjoying the end of lockdown and having a jolly holiday in India next week. Double-mutated coronaviruses be damned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,688 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    I'm not disputing that the protocol will stay.I note you've moved from your assertion it won't be 'tweaked' or 'fixed' as you seem to prefer.

    Exactly. He can’t have it both ways.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,688 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    There isn't a difference. All that is happening is accommodation already in the Protocol are being activated.

    There's loads of ways of saying the same thing.

    Which would make Johnson a liar - something you seem to want to deflect from.

    A number of posters here (can’t remember if you were one) said that all the rules eg about soil entering the Eu were not up for negotiation.
    Whether you like it or not the street violence focused minds and I will predict that many rules which apply to the rest of the world will be eased, no matter what posters here say


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,631 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    downcow wrote: »
    A number of posters here (can’t remember if you were one) said that all the rules eg about soil entering the Eu were not up for negotiation.
    Whether you like it or not the street violence focused minds and I will predict that many rules which apply to the rest of the world will be eased, no matter what posters here say

    There were 'easements' within the Protocol already.

    Unionism set it's stall out, that's not what they want, they want the Protocol gone and it is not happening. Boris is lying to you, his delegate is over there in Brussels copperfastening it.
    To keep you quiet he has thrown the 'long long time' bone to you as well. You can decide on how trustworthy you want to find that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    Penfailed wrote: »
    Mind that time Martin McGuinness was pictured with the queen?

    EDIT - Someone beat me to it.

    If you look him up he was only convicted of fairly minor offences,possibly due his status as an alleged British spy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    Probably not - he'll be too busy enjoying the end of lockdown and having a jolly holiday in India next week. Double-mutated coronaviruses be damned.

    He`s not going now due to covid situation in India.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 573 ✭✭✭Speedline


    There were 'easements' within the Protocol already.

    Unionism set it's stall out, that's not what they want, they want the Protocol gone and it is not happening. Boris is lying to you, his delegate is over there in Brussels copperfastening it.
    To keep you quiet he has thrown the 'long long time' bone to you as well. You can decide on how trustworthy you want to find that.

    The 'long, long time' is assuming he will be in power for a long long time. Otherwise he's a spoofer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    downcow wrote: »
    Exactly. He can’t have it both ways.

    I`d wager francie is expecting `changes` to the interpretation of the protocol which is why he`s currently pulled his horns in,trying to divert attention to johnson. :rolleyes:


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,563 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    If you look him up he was only convicted of fairly minor offences,possibly due his status as an alleged British spy.
    Are you referring to the unsubstantiated claims by Martin Ingram? Even the Irish Times reckons it's bull: https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/mcguinness-smear-does-not-hold-up-1.1012550?mode=amp


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,631 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    I`d wager francie is expecting `changes` to the interpretation of the protocol which is why he`s currently pulled his horns in,trying to divert attention to johnson. :rolleyes:

    :):) downcow introduced Johnson to the thread this morning Rob. :):):)

    The Protocol is staying...Unionism wants it gone = fail.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 573 ✭✭✭Speedline


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    I`d wager francie is expecting `changes` to the interpretation of the protocol which is why he`s currently pulled his horns in,trying to divert attention to johnson. :rolleyes:

    Boris will quietly back down, and the protocol will be implemented as previously agreed. Remember, the brexit agreement still has to be ratified by the EU.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,631 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Speedline wrote: »
    Boris will quietly back down, and the protocol will be implemented as previously agreed. Remember, the brexit agreement still has to be ratified by the EU.

    He has even admitted that he knew when he was telling Unionists that there wouldn't be a border that there would be.

    And Unionists are blaming all and sundry and still hanging on his every word. There is loyalty and then there is gullibility.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    :):) downcow introduced Johnson to the thread this morning Rob. :):):)

    The Protocol is staying...Unionism wants it gone = fail.

    That`s fine but the over zealous application which has seen more checks at the NI docks than major ports in France and Holland does seem strange and possibly counter productive.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,563 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Speedline wrote: »
    Boris will quietly back down, and the protocol will be implemented as previously agreed. Remember, the brexit agreement still has to be ratified by the EU.
    Plus there is still the legal action being taken by the EU against the UK for it's unilateral action on the Northern Ireland Protocol. Johnson doesn't want any hassle as that would mean he would have to do some work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    Are you referring to the unsubstantiated claims by Martin Ingram? Even the Irish Times reckons it's bull: https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/mcguinness-smear-does-not-hold-up-1.1012550?mode=amp

    We`ll probably never know the truth,not in our lifetimes anyway.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,563 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    That`s fine but the over zealous application which has seen more checks at the NI docks than major ports in France and Holland does seem strange and possibly counter productive.
    Is that because more UK goods are crossing the Irish sea than the channel?
    Where is your source on this as I hadn't heard It?


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,563 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    We`ll probably never know the truth,not in our lifetimes anyway.
    So you're admitting to spreading unsubstantiated rumours in order to prove a point?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,631 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    That`s fine but the over zealous application which has seen more checks at the NI docks than major ports in France and Holland does seem strange and possibly counter productive.

    Reports are that is being exaggerated for political purposes.

    It's another Never Never ...well maybe' spat Rob and always was from the get go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    Is that because more UK goods are crossing the Irish sea than the channel?
    Where is your source on this as I hadn't heard It?

    I`m still looking for the more up to date article I saw yesterday but this link is the gist of it.

    https://www.itv.com/news/utv/2021-03-04/northern-irelands-chief-vet-warns-he-doesnt-have-enough-staff-to-manage-ni-protocol-checks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    So you're admitting to spreading unsubstantiated rumours in order to prove a point?

    Seth,you must live in a bunker if you`ve never heard that said before!:rolleyes:


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,563 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    I`m still looking for the more up to date article I saw yesterday but this link is the gist of it.

    https://www.itv.com/news/utv/2021-03-04/northern-irelands-chief-vet-warns-he-doesnt-have-enough-staff-to-manage-ni-protocol-checks
    That particular article is just saying that the checks are burdensome but sure we all warned of this in advance. It doesnt make a comparison that says NI has seen more checks than major ports in France and Holland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,721 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    I've said it before, but no matter how many times Unionism gets screwed by the Tories, going right back to the foundation of NI, they just never seem to lose faith. Always so eager to believe that this time it will be different, this time they'll keep their promise. Given that for generations, they've demonstrated that they'll take whatever they're given and come back for more, why would the Tories bother changing?

    Rob's accusations that others are deflecting by discussing Boris (while laughably ignoring that he was brought up by someone from a strongly Unionist viewpoint) is unsurprising, but after several years of his assurances that the British are getting their cake this time, and it is only a matter of time before the EU blinks....well I can see why he's comfortable in that company.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,563 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    Seth,you must live in a bunker if you`ve never heard that said before!:rolleyes:
    You're still making claims that we can only assume are untrue. Doesn't say much for your argument if you need to do that.


Advertisement