Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part X *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

1213214216218219325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,738 ✭✭✭scamalert


    https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/lockdown-ireland-pints-outdoor-dining-23939842

    Great to see that the pressure from Northern Ireland policy's is having an effect. Harris doesn't mention it but we all know they have to start opening now.
    well its a bit hard to ignore fact that we need political intervention to cut trough this, otherwise if not challenged we would be no1 like North Korea as seems only when pointed out how wrong our decisions are that goverment actually backtracks.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    scamalert wrote: »
    well its a bit hard to ignore fact that we need political intervention to cut trough this, otherwise if not challenged we would be no1 like North Korea as seems only when pointed out how wrong our decisions are that goverment actually backtracks.

    That and the fact that case numbers are dropping, hospitalisations are dropping, ICU numbers are dropping, vaccinations are increasing.

    Actually now I see it typed out, it makes so much more sense than some imagined 'political intervention'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,718 ✭✭✭paddyisreal


    Graham wrote: »
    That and the fact that case numbers are dropping, hospitalisations are dropping, ICU numbers are dropping, vaccinations are increasing.

    Actually now I see it typed out, it makes so much more sense than some imagined 'political intervention'.

    If all fairness if it wasn't for Northern Ireland loosing restrictions none of the above would matter to the government, nphet. They are been pushed to make decisions thank God.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    If all fairness if it wasn't for Northern Ireland loosing restrictions none of the above would matter

    That's just not a particularly logical conclusion.

    The point of the restrictions and vaccinations were to get us to a position where restrictions could safely be relaxed.

    Exactly what is happening now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,890 ✭✭✭mightyreds


    https://www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/lockdown-ireland-pints-outdoor-dining-23939842

    Great to see that the pressure from Northern Ireland policy's is having an effect. Harris doesn't mention it but we all know they have to start opening now.
    The north being awash with barber/hairdresser bookings for Friday and hotels/pubs will be the same in a few weeks will have to put some pressure on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,718 ✭✭✭paddyisreal


    Graham wrote: »
    That's just not a particularly logical conclusion.

    The point of the restrictions and vaccinations were to get us to a position where restrictions could safely be relaxed.

    Exactly what is happening now.

    So the relaxation of restrictions in NI has had no effect on the policies here? Of course it has


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,718 ✭✭✭paddyisreal


    mightyreds wrote: »
    The north being awash with barber/hairdresser bookings for Friday and hotels/pubs will be the same in a few weeks will have to put some pressure on

    Of course it will,. There will be cars full with people going to buy jocks in pennies and a few beers afterwards and the government know it. Outdoor dining will be open here by the 2,3rd week of May I would think


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    So the relaxation of restrictions in NI has had no effect on the policies here? Of course it has

    Case number, hospitalisations, ICU numbers and vaccinations are the main drivers.

    I do understand why that's a bitter pill for the anti-nphet brigade. It must really stick in the throat to see their approach is working.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    Graham wrote: »
    That and the fact that case numbers are dropping, hospitalisations are dropping, ICU numbers are dropping, vaccinations are increasing.

    Actually now I see it typed out, it makes so much more sense than some imagined 'political intervention'.

    And yet again, it needs to be pointed out, that many of us were pointing out this months ago...the surge ended at the end of Jan...it wasn't lock downs that ended it, perhaps lock downs prevented a percentage more infections, what percentage is anyone's guess...but the curve flattened itself like it always does.

    You can perhaps understand caution until the end of March, and I mean level 3, but we went full caution and are still in full cautious mode....completely unnecessary and ridiculously expensive decisions that will have huge ramifications for this state.

    12 months into this and the news gets better and better, we know our published death rate is completely misleading and no where near as deadly as we were led to believe, we know that healthy people do not transmit the virus, we know outdoor activity is completely safe....

    We also know, in this country, what time's of the year we are most vulnerable to a surge.

    If a bunch of amateurs on an online forum can be more consistently correct than our political leaders and media you'd have to put our complete lack of strong leaders as one of the most devastating elements of this whole health, economic and social mess we have created for ourselves this will takes us years to emerge from.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    And yet again, it needs to be pointed out, that many of us were pointing out this months ago...the surge ended at the end of Jan...it wasn't lock downs that ended it, perhaps lock downs prevented a percentage more infections, what percentage is anyone's guess...but the curve flattened itself like it always does.


    That might have been a good point but for other EU countries facing increasing restrictions in the face of rising cases.

    Maybe it's because we have better weather :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,718 ✭✭✭paddyisreal


    Graham wrote: »
    Case number, hospitalisations, ICU numbers and vaccinations are the main drivers.

    I do understand why that's a bitter pill for the anti-nphet brigade. It must really stick in the throat to see their approach is working.

    And Northern Ireland opening up, if they were still lockdown there would be no change here and if you think any differently you haven't being paying attention to how nphet, government are amongst the most cautious in Europe over the last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,231 ✭✭✭Del Griffith


    gozunda wrote: »
    Ha a fudge :pac:

    Except of course that's not the case.

    This was the claim being made by the solicitor (coroner) in question who claimed people's "principle cause of death" was being recorded as covid when he claimed "In reality, a lot of people have terminal cancer or multiple other serious co-morbidities"

    That's not as you said "if you test positive" btw.

    This is how cause of death is recorded in Ireland - just in case you're not aware



    So yeah if you're in hospital with covid and you happen to have an existing heart condition - but it is covid-19 which is found to be responsible for your death as determined by a registered medical practitioner - then that's what gets entered in Part 1 (a).

    If there are other co-morbidities and other significant conditions they get recorded on the death certificate as well.

    So its the "principle disease or condition directly leading to death" which is relevant here.

    So it's bs to try and claim that "you can literally die of anything and if you test positive, you're in the numbers".

    And in addition If you so happen to get hit and killed by a bus and you had an earlier positive test for covid and recovered (despite having a dicky heart) your cause of death will not be recorded as Covid-19.

    Load of beside the point bollocks as usual, you can argue about the principal cause of death with the solicitor and coroner (he should find it amusing that you know more about his career profession that him, but let's not digress)

    Here is my actual statement which you called a lie :

    "you can literally die of anything and if you test positive, you're in the numbers".

    As you well know, your chums in NPHET and RTE count all "covid related deaths" in the numbers. It doesn't have to be the PCoD - it all gets scooped up for the daily numbers (tm).

    I've yet to find anything in your lengthy post that qualifies my line as "bs", so feel free to elaborate on that.

    I'll just leave this here too, somewhat pertinent:

    https://twitter.com/LeoVaradkar/status/1278995351169613824


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,519 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Jesus its all unraveling isn't it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    PTH2009 wrote: »
    Jesus its all unraveling isn't it

    It was difficult to see how they could maintain the hysteria for the next few months....only the truly indoctrinated are supportive of these severe restrictions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,317 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    PTH2009 wrote: »
    Jesus its all unraveling isn't it

    What is? Your bleak outlook?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,718 ✭✭✭paddyisreal


    It was difficult to see how they could maintain the hysteria for the next few months....only the truly indoctrinated are supportive of these severe restrictions.

    What about the variants though? we must be wary of the variants and lockdown till the second coming


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    What about the variants though? we must be wary of the variants and lockdown till the second coming

    Remember Micheal warning us all that the variant was essentially a new virus...that was only a little over month ago...how wrong was he!!!!!!

    The started to lose a lot of people when they extended the severe lock down into March, they did that at the beginning of Feb, they warned us about Paddy's day, Mothers Day, Easter....less and less people are listening...you can see that everywhere at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,249 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    arccosh wrote: »
    disgraceful carry on, no moral backbone



    14586937.jpg


  • Posts: 6,049 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    jd1983 wrote: »
    If the pubs stayed open in summer, more people would have got the virus during the summer but the numbers would have still been low,

    Apologies, I missed your response to my post until now.

    Your entire argument seems to hinge on this one point quoted above, which I cannot get my head around. How would the numbers still be low if more people would have contracted the virus? You're contradicting yourself within the same sentence.

    If the pubs were open all last summer, there would have been an explosion in numbers. what logic are you using to say that the numbers would have still been low?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    It was difficult to see how they could maintain the hysteria for the next few months....only the truly indoctrinated are supportive of these severe restrictions.

    Why?

    They appear to have worked as intended to the point where they are now being relaxed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    darconio wrote: »
    A very long hyperbole, but in conclusion, can we agree, as stated in the official document, that the death toll, in Ireland, was inflated in accordance with the WHO directives?
    I'm not looking for the reason behind, can we at least admit it?

    I'm not sure you understand what the word hyperbole means tbh. Everything detailed is simply based on how things are.

    But nope thats not was said at all. Do read the comment again.

    And btw the WHO dont do "directives".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,738 ✭✭✭scamalert


    Graham wrote: »
    Why?

    They appear to have worked as intended to the point where they are now being relaxed.
    but why would they relax it then if it works so good shouldn't we keep it up then for another year or two ? surely we want to save everyone no ?

    not serious btw ^ but seems this is the logic pro lowdown campers are using here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,317 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    scamalert wrote: »
    but why would they relax it then if it works so good shouldn't we keep it up then for another year or two ? surely we want to save everyone no ?

    not serious btw ^ but seems this is the logic pro lowdown campers are using here


    You'll be able to find several posts easy enough to back up that claim then?


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    scamalert wrote: »
    but why would they relax it then if it works so good shouldn't we keep it up then for another year or two ? surely we want to save everyone no ?

    not serious btw ^ but seems this is the logic pro lowdown campers are using here

    Only in the minds of the usual spoofers who assume anyone not demanding immediate relaxation of most restrictions are automatically in support of maintaining and extending existing restrictions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,648 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    darconio wrote: »
    A very long hyperbole, but in conclusion, can we agree, as stated in the official document, that the death toll, in Ireland, was inflated in accordance with the WHO directives?
    I'm not looking for the reason behind, can we at least admit it?


    What is it that you cannot get that there is no official 2020 statistical document for Ireland yet published on the number of deaths ?
    The only official statistical authority for Ireland is the Central Statistics Office. It has been since 1949 and is recognised by Eurostat, a Directorate-General of the European Commission as such.
    Any other figures are not officially recognised.


    Would you agree that when Ireland`s official figures are know, should they be in line with these unofficial figures and guesses being bandied around, then they would show that compared to the official excess death figures of the other E.U. states now that we know their statistics, Ireland would be recognised as having kept deaths from Covid-19 proportionally lower than practically all the rest ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,718 ✭✭✭paddyisreal


    Remember Micheal warning us all that the variant was essentially a new virus...that was only a little over month ago...how wrong was he!!!!!!

    The started to lose a lot of people when they extended the severe lock down into March, they did that at the beginning of Feb, they warned us about Paddy's day, Mothers Day, Easter....less and less people are listening...you can see that everywhere at this stage.

    tbh no one is listening anymore. It has just been one mess after another and most people have had enough from what I have seen anecdotally.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 935 ✭✭✭darconio


    gozunda wrote: »
    I'm not sure you understand what the word hyperbole means tbh. Everything detailed is simply based on how things are.

    But nope thats not was said at all. Do read the comment again.

    And btw the WHO dont do "directives".
    charlie14 wrote: »
    What is it that you cannot get that there is no official 2020 statistical document for Ireland yet published on the number of deaths ?
    The only official statistical authority for Ireland is the Central Statistics Office. It has been since 1949 and is recognised by Eurostat, a Directorate-General of the European Commission as such.
    Any other figures are not officially recognised.


    Would you agree that when Ireland`s official figures are know, should they be in line with these unofficial figures and guesses being bandied around, then they would show that compared to the official excess death figures of the other E.U. states now that we know their statistics, Ireland would be recognised as having kept deaths from Covid-19 proportionally lower than practically all the rest ?

    Well guys if you cannot even read and accept what's said in an official document then I rest my case

    https://www.hiqa.ie/sites/default/fi...epidemic_0.pdf

    As of mid April, in line with World Health Organization (WHO) guidance, death reporting was extended to include deaths both in patients with probable COVID-19 in addition to deaths among confirmed cases.
    By definition, such deaths must result from a clinically compatible illness, in a probable or confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there is a clear alternative cause of death that cannot be related to COVID-19 (for example, trauma).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭moonage


    Remember Micheal warning us all that the variant was essentially a new virus...that was only a little over month ago...how wrong was he!!!!!!

    All variants are currently 99.7% similar to the original Wuhan viral sequence.

    The fearmongering around variants is part of the ruse. Clearly something very sinister is afoot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,996 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Load of beside the point bollocks as usual, you can argue about the principal cause of death with the solicitor and coroner (he should find it amusing that you know more about his career profession that him, but let's not digress)

    Here is my actual statement which you called a lie :

    "you can literally die of anything and if you test positive, you're in the numbers".

    As you well know, your chums in NPHET and RTE count all "covid related deaths" in the numbers. It doesn't have to be the PCoD - it all gets scooped up for the daily numbers (tm).

    I've yet to find anything in your lengthy post that qualifies my line as "bs", so feel free to elaborate on that.

    I'll just leave this here too, somewhat pertinent:

    https://twitter.com/LeoVaradkar/status/1278995351169613824

    We you see del. Thats the thing - it's not a pile of 'bollocsk".

    Just because it doesn't match with your world view does not mean everything else is incorrect. And yes our solicitor friend does not have a medical degree etc. But we'll park that.

    But again you've completely failed to address any of the points made. And you may wish to check - nothing was called a 'lie' btw. But saying I did - is indeed a lie ;)

    And funnily enough I don't have "chums in Nphet" or RTE. I rarely look to either for data or information tbh.

    As for that rather odd tweet you're relying on.

    You may notice its a response an RTE article about a study which assessed the number of deaths that occurred in Ireland from 11 March to 16 June 2020 relative to the expected number of deaths, using data from the death notices website RIP.ie.

    We now know that death notices from RIP etc are not a reliable source of data for deaths. And if you wish to take that rather poor RTE article as proof of something or other by virtue of Leo making a comment on it. On your head be it.

    Interestingly though enough Dr Teljeur Senior statistician / Trinity College Dublin - is contrast to the general tone and quoted in the linked article states that the official figure of 1,700 deaths as a result of the virus is correct and while it may be a slight overestimate it is an accurate estimate and the reality is that those people did die as a result of contracting the virus. 

    And back to your "statement". It remains it's little more than bullstuff.

    For example - If you get hit and killed by a bus - having previously having contracted Covid (but got better despite having a dicky heart) - your death certificate will NOT list Covid as a cause of death.

    You may also appreciate - that Ireland has a fairly low death rate - so if as you claim they're exaggerating deaths. They're not doing a very good job of it are they?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,648 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    darconio wrote: »
    Well guys if you cannot even read and accept what's said in an official document then I rest my case

    https://www.hiqa.ie/sites/default/fi...epidemic_0.pdf

    As of mid April, in line with World Health Organization (WHO) guidance, death reporting was extended to include deaths both in patients with probable COVID-19 in addition to deaths among confirmed cases.
    By definition, such deaths must result from a clinically compatible illness, in a probable or confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there is a clear alternative cause of death that cannot be related to COVID-19 (for example, trauma).

    That link does not work, and even if it did it`s irrelevant.
    Not only is HIQA not the official recognised statistical agency for Ireland, but your whole premise is irrelevant unless you can somehow explain away official statistics for other countries that show high excess deaths that coincide with the various Covid waves.
    WHO "guidance" is completely irrelevant when it comes to excess deaths. Their "guidance" is not going to change those figures.

    So again, when Ireland`s official statistics are know if your premise is correct based on these assumptions and unofficial figures, then would it not show just how successful we have been in dealing with this virus ?
    You cannot have it both ways


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement