Off Topic Chat. (MOD NOTE post# 3949 and post#5279)

tonysopprano · 14-04-2021 2:23pm

"A vaccine is a biological preparation that provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease.[1] A vaccine typically contains an agent that resembles a disease-causing microorganism and is often made from weakened or killed forms of the microbe, its toxins, or one of its surface proteins. The agent stimulates the body's immune system to recognize the agent as a threat, destroy it, and to further recognize and destroy any of the microorganisms associated with that agent that it may encounter in the future."

Show me anywhere, where this experimental drug qualifies as a vaccine, better still show me a biological breakdown of this so called virus

tonysopprano · 14-04-2021 2:24pm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine-preventable_diseases

Mellor · 14-04-2021 3:22pm

otmmyboy2 wrote: »

Than the initial estimation of 4?
Several articles note that with a large variance of preventative measures countries are seeing R0 of between 0.7 and 1.9.
Compared to 4 that is a decent bit lower in my view.

The WHO’s initial estimate of R0 was 2.5, not 4. It was some other study that estimated 4.0 and higher.

But more importantly you are mixing up R0 and R.
Current R numbers may be 0.7 to 1.9 due to preventative measures. Preventative measures don’t affect R0, it’s an estimate of the transmission if people did absolutely nothing at all.

So it makes perfect sense that R numbers, after preventive measures don’t ready the R0 prediction. That’s why the measures are there.
A number of people have tried to say the virus wasn’t as dangerous as feared, so lockdown/measures were unnecessary. When it reality, it was lockdown/measure that to some degree made the virus less successful.

Your use of "I don’t think that number has been shown to be unrealistic for built up areas" leading to my referring to that as urban R0.

R0 would have been base globally . Most of the works is urbanised. Ireland certainly on the lower density side. We should probably track below average R in that regard.

So in the one sentence you are fully against forced vaccines, but the other bolded are you implying they should suffer consequences for their decision?

If so which consequences?

Not entirely sure how you can reconcile the two, either it is optional, mandatory, or some coercive middle ground.

Not sure what part you can’t reconcile. I would like vaccines to be completely voluntary. Anybody should be free to say no to injecting any drug into their body.
That choice is theirs to make. Therefore not mandatory. But that doesn’t imply that there’s no consequences to that choice. Why would it?
Consequences are not coercion, they are the effect of actions.

Eg
People are free to get a drivers license, or a passport. People are free to not get either, or both.
But if people do that, they lose their right to travel internationally, or the right to drive a car.
It would be really silly to say drivers licenses are mandatory or coercive.

Mellor · 14-04-2021 3:27pm

tonysopprano wrote: »

Show me anywhere, where this experimental drug qualifies as a vaccine, better still show me a biological breakdown of this so called virus

Are you referring to a particular drug? Or all the vaccines? Not really clear.

And “so-called-virus”? Not sure what you’re getting at. Are you claiming it doesn’t exist?
Biologically it’s a coronavirus. That’s what it’s classed as, not a made up name.

civdef · 14-04-2021 3:40pm

tonysopprano wrote: »

Show me anywhere, where this experimental drug qualifies as a vaccine, better still show me a biological breakdown of this so called virus

Hope this helps:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/

otmmyboy2 · 14-04-2021 4:14pm

Mellor wrote: »

A number of people have tried to say the virus wasn’t as dangerous as feared, so lockdown/measures were unnecessary. When it reality, it was lockdown/measure that to some degree made the virus less successful.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/03/who-says-coronavirus-death-rate-is-3point4percent-globally-higher-than-previously-thought.html

Even Sweden which never locked down is around 1.5%, going by cases vs deaths, of course that is likely lower because of asymptomatic cases.

I'd say half the mortality rate is less dangerous.

Not sure what part you can’t reconcile. I would like vaccines to be completely voluntary. Anybody should be free to say no to injecting any drug into their body.
That choice is theirs to make. Therefore not mandatory. But that doesn’t imply that there’s no consequences to that choice. Why would it?
Consequences are not coercion, they are the effect of actions.

Eg
People are free to get a drivers license, or a passport. People are free to not get either, or both.
But if people do that, they lose their right to travel internationally, or the right to drive a car.
It would be really silly to say drivers licenses are mandatory or coercive.

Passports were initiated as a temporary measure around WWI, and yet they are still here. I disagree with revoking your freedom to travel internationally and selling it back to you only to be revoked at will by your country.

Eg - people were once free to travel without passports, then that freedom was revoked and sold back to them(passports aren't free) and subject to the whims of the government(see tin pot governments confiscating passports of political dissidents).

Same as the current iteration of income tax was a temporary measure instituted in 1799 in Britain to pay for wars with France.
Still here and now copied the world over.

I equate your "consequences" of choosing not to get vaccinated to coercion because that is what it is, if something is truly optional in the sense of vaccinations then why should people be punished if they refuse?
Denying someone something is still punishment, and if you disagree with the word coercion then duress would fit it nicely:

threats, violence, constraints, or other action used to coerce someone into doing something against their will or better judgement

Fits the bill nicely of denying some equal rights, freedoms, services, etc on the basis of a supposedly discretionary decision.

tonysopprano · 14-04-2021 4:23pm

Great deflection. Firstly we were talking about the "so called vaccine". Tested on animals- all died, not tested further, but released under "emergency authorisation" to human "vaccination",(even though not a vaccine by ANY standard) on the grounds that if EMERGENCY ended within ONE YEAR/365 DAYS, authorisation lapses.

Feisar · 14-04-2021 4:41pm

otmmyboy2 wrote: »

I equate your "consequences" of choosing not to get vaccinated to coercion because that is what it is, if something is truly optional in the sense of vaccinations then why should people be punished if they refuse?
Denying someone something is still punishment, and if you disagree with the word coercion then duress would fit it nicely:

Everyone is always on about their rights, people always forget about their responsibilities to their society.

BattleCorp · 14-04-2021 5:00pm

tonysopprano wrote: »

Great deflection. Firstly we were talking about the "so called vaccine". Tested on animals- all died, not tested further, but released under "emergency authorisation" to human "vaccination",(even though not a vaccine by ANY standard) on the grounds that if EMERGENCY ended within ONE YEAR/365 DAYS, authorisation lapses.

Just for my own benefit, are you saying that the AstraZenica, Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer vaccines aren't actual vaccines?

civdef · 14-04-2021 5:02pm

tonysopprano wrote: »

Great deflection. Firstly we were talking about the "so called vaccine". Tested on animals- all died, not tested further, but released under "emergency authorisation" to human "vaccination",(even though not a vaccine by ANY standard) on the grounds that if EMERGENCY ended within ONE YEAR/365 DAYS, authorisation lapses.

Do you really believe this and think pretty much the whole worldwide body of relevant expertise has either missed something obvious or are cooperating together on what would have to be a unprecedented level of deception?

otmmyboy2 · 14-04-2021 5:03pm

Feisar wrote: »

Everyone is always on about their rights, people always forget about their responsibilities to their society.

Because rights get removed if not defended.

Look at our current extremely "licenced" society for proof.
The same things which could be done in the past without now require licencing, even if that only equates to paying a fee with no competence component, ie selling rights back to us.

And my responsibilities to society end firmly before a mandatory vaccination, and significantly before a two tier society is created.

If anyone else chooses of their own free will to get vaccinated then cool, but not if they were forced into it.

Critical thinking does seem to take a leave of absence here in lieu of mob mentality stoked on by the press and government divide and rule agenda in Ireland though, so I'm not surprised that you are implying it is my responsibility to "society" to get vaccinated.

civdef · 14-04-2021 5:07pm

otmmyboy2 wrote: »

Because rights get removed if not defended.

Look at our current extremely "licenced" society for proof.
The same things which could be done in the past without now require licencing, even if that only equates to paying a fee with no competence component, ie selling rights back to us.

And my responsibilities to society end firmly before a mandatory vaccination, and significantly before a two tier society is created.

If anyone else chooses of their own free will to get vaccinated then cool, but not if they were forced into it.

Critical thinking does seem to take a leave of absence here in lieu of mob mentality stoked on by the press and government divide and rule agenda in Ireland though, so I'm not surprised that you are implying it is my responsibility to "society" to get vaccinated.

Genuine question for ya- where do you see an individual’s responsibilities to society in the context of a pandemic?

I see an awful lot of people who think freedom means do whatever they want and no-one else matters.

civdef · 14-04-2021 5:11pm

Grizzly 45 wrote: »

Seven states in the US have dropped all mandatory State Covid restrictions, and are leaving it to business to enforce if they wish, and their death rates are dropping... The Great Fauci is baffled as to why this is happening,while other states like NYC are still level if not climbing.

Ask the Brazilians how that strategy works out.
The British reckoned that was just the job for the Famine here too.

Is anyone really baffled how somewhere like NYC finds it harder to manage a pandemic than maybe Nebraska?

civdef · 14-04-2021 5:16pm

Anyone following the Caron Nazario story?

I should be surprised at the amount of freedom loving pundits who are blaming the man for having the audacity to peacefully question a blatantly inappropriate policing response. It seems in the land of the free now that the appropriate response to abuse of authority is to meekly comply and bow down? Not how I think of 1776 personally.

Also funny watching Newsmax pundits saying the fact Nazario had a firearm in the car as justifying the police madness. The 2nd amendment must be a thing of the past there?

BattleCorp · 14-04-2021 5:22pm

civdef wrote: »

Anyone following the Caron Nazario story?

I should be surprised at the amount of freedom loving pundits who are blaming the man for having the audacity to peacefully question a blatantly inappropriate policing response. It seems in the land of the free now that the appropriate response to abuse of authority is to meekly comply and bow down? Not how I think of 1776 personally.

Also funny watching Newsmax pundits saying the fact Nazario had a firearm in the car as justifying the police madness. The 2nd amendment must be a thing of the past there?

The cops (well one at least) were d1cks but I'm not quite absolving Caron Nazario of all wrongdoing either.

Why didn't he get out of the car when he was asked? When the cop tried to open the door of the car, Nazario held it shut with his forearm.

Is it not a lawful command for the police to ask him to get out of the car?

otmmyboy2 · 14-04-2021 5:29pm

civdef wrote: »

Genuine question for ya- where do you see an individual’s responsibilities to society in the context of a pandemic?

Same as when we are not in a pandemic, don't do to others what you wouldn't want done to yourself.
If that means not visiting people who are vulnerable, etc then so be it.
If you and friends are happy to then meet and do what you wish, be it outdoors, socially distanced, etc then cool.
If both parties take personal responsibility for any risks that they want to take then fill your boots. I won't be signing up to skydive but I certainly think it's awesome if you want to do it.
I'm not about to go around licking doorknobs but if that's your buzz then fill your boots. :P

I see an awful lot of people who think freedom means do whatever they want and no-one else matters.

Well in the case of there being no victim I would agree with that, otherwise not so much.
IE the guy who smokes weed in their home. Fine, not my cup of tea but why do I care?
The guy who is trying to force me to smoke some weed then that's a hard nope.

Live and let live and all that.

That's about as far as my philosophy on my responsibilities to society at large go, live and let live.

In response I see an awful lot of people who never really question anything they are told to do by the PTB.
And I mean really question, ask yourself why X, really dig down and see why it is being pushed, what is the goal, is the goal compatible with the likely outcome of X, is there a better way of accomplishing the goal, etc.

Critical thinking is a biggie and there seems to be a lot more complicity thinking going on than critical.

TL:DR - live and let live, and always question everything.

otmmyboy2 · 14-04-2021 5:32pm

civdef wrote: »

Anyone following the Caron Nazario story?

I should be surprised at the amount of freedom loving pundits who are blaming the man for having the audacity to peacefully question a blatantly inappropriate policing response. It seems in the land of the free now that the appropriate response to abuse of authority is to meekly comply and bow down? Not how I think of 1776 personally.

Also funny watching Newsmax pundits saying the fact Nazario had a firearm in the car as justifying the police madness. The 2nd amendment must be a thing of the past there?

Only heard about it yesterday but have been keeping an eye on this mounting pile of manure.

Similar happened in 2019, 2015, etc, so not an isolated incident.

tudderone · 14-04-2021 6:27pm

civdef wrote: »

Anyone following the Caron Nazario story?

I should be surprised at the amount of freedom loving pundits who are blaming the man for having the audacity to peacefully question a blatantly inappropriate policing response. It seems in the land of the free now that the appropriate response to abuse of authority is to meekly comply and bow down? Not how I think of 1776 personally.

Also funny watching Newsmax pundits saying the fact Nazario had a firearm in the car as justifying the police madness. The 2nd amendment must be a thing of the past there?

Its Trumps fault.

Grizzly 45 · 14-04-2021 7:10pm

civdef wrote: »

Ask the Brazilians how that strategy works out.
The British reckoned that was just the job for the Famine here too.

Is anyone really baffled how somewhere like NYC finds it harder to manage a pandemic than maybe Nebraska?

You mean maybe ask sections of high population density cities in Brazil like Rio,Sao Paulo,etc? Rather different to living conditions in Dallas,Heuston,San Antonio...?

If you have two muppets like Cumo and Deblasio in charge,who seem to be getting their jollies of letting people die under their watch by GROSS incompetence and mismanagement,by sticking Covid cases in old folks homes, releasing half the criminals from Rykers island because of a fear of contagion spreading in the jail population,and allowing Burn Loot Murder protests and riots to go full strength in the city...Well then ... But I suppose chasing some skirt and making sure no one vandalises the Burn Loot Murder graffitti outside Trump towers is MUCH more important.So you you couldnt have picked a better example for utter incompentence in handling a pandemic.

Grizzly 45 · 14-04-2021 7:27pm

civdef wrote: »

Anyone following the Caron Nazario story?

I should be surprised at the amount of freedom loving pundits who are blaming the man for having the audacity to peacefully question a blatantly inappropriate policing response. It seems in the land of the free now that the appropriate response to abuse of authority is to meekly comply and bow down? Not how I think of 1776 personally.

Also funny watching Newsmax pundits saying the fact Nazario had a firearm in the car as justifying the police madness. The 2nd amendment must be a thing of the past there?

"Routine" traffic stops are the most dangerous day to day activity a US LEO will face. So lets take this as a factor.He drives a mile to get to a well-lit area,as advised to do, but no doubt setting ff all sorts of Spidey senses in the cops. Why are they pulling him? No Lic plate, bar a hard enough to see temp lic tag. A bit of paper 5in by4ins not really visible in the dark tint of the back window.

The guy is an army Lt and carrying a handgun in his footwell. Interesting as US army bases have very strict rules about personal firearms on base inc vehicles.So was he cleared to carry such by the base commander is another interesting point in this
As a Lt he should know a thing about obeying orders and giving such.When you have guys pointing guns at you maybe its best to comply and save explanations and questions until they are happy you aren't a threat.
Police response to this incident, utterly a shambles and unprofessional.Issuing contradictory commands to the man then macse ing him for not exiting the car, and then trying to make a deal of this "all going away" if he doen't make an issue of it!"
Both parties do have some blame in this case,but more towards the cops in this case.

Still at least they didn't get their Glocks mixed up with their Tasers as like the stupid bint in Minnesota.:rolleyes:

Feisar · 14-04-2021 9:51pm

otmmyboy2 wrote: »

Because rights get removed if not defended.

Look at our current extremely "licenced" society for proof.
The same things which could be done in the past without now require licencing, even if that only equates to paying a fee with no competence component, ie selling rights back to us.

And my responsibilities to society end firmly before a mandatory vaccination, and significantly before a two tier society is created.

If anyone else chooses of their own free will to get vaccinated then cool, but not if they were forced into it.

Critical thinking does seem to take a leave of absence here in lieu of mob mentality stoked on by the press and government divide and rule agenda in Ireland though, so I'm not surprised that you are implying it is my responsibility to "society" to get vaccinated.

You are right about rights, that stuff needs to be defended.

As regards the bit I bolded in your reply, people seem to think they are special, they/we are not. Its about the group/tribe/herd/whatever tag you want to put on the collective. You put society in inverted commas as if it's a notional thing, that society delivers food to the play you get your groceries, fills your tank with oil, provides your electricity, etc, etc, etc. So yea you owe it to everyone else in this ecosystem to get vaccinated.

Now to add a caveat, I'm skeptical of this particular vaccine but that's not what I'm primarily talking about. There are talks about refusing kids places in schools that haven't had the MMR for example due to outbreaks.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/jun/04/should-only-mmr-vaccinated-children-be-allowed-a-school-place

otmmyboy2 · 14-04-2021 10:50pm

Feisar wrote: »

So yea you owe it to everyone else in this ecosystem to get vaccinated.

Yeah gonna wholeheartedly disagree with this.

Society is in quotation marks because of your reference "to their society".
Society as you just described it provides nothing unless I pay for it.

Relatively few people do something for nothing, particularly something as invasive as getting a shot or pair of shots.

I have stated before I am not anti vaccinations, I am however completely against mandatory vaccinations.

You should not be able to force, coerce, or compel someone to take a vaccination they choose not to.

If you want to improve update and reduce skepticism then other things need to be looked at, including messaging(not propaganda a la Jacinda Ardern), trustworthy reporting, independent analysis, really answering people's fears and questions about the various vaccines rather than brushing them off, etc to try and educate people on why it might be a good idea that they should get it.

This is regardless of vaccine, not just the covid ones in the limelight now.

"Good ideas don't require force" and all that :P

Now to add a caveat, I'm skeptical of this particular vaccine but that's not what I'm primarily talking about. There are talks about refusing kids places in schools that haven't had the MMR for example due to outbreaks.

Fair enough.
My comments have been solely about the prospect of mandatory or coerced vaccinations, not covid in particular but simply this one has been the first to raise the issue of mandatory vaccination in my lifetime.

I'd be rather curious as to the reasoning why people aren't getting their kids vaccinated against MMR though.
If it is the autism thing which I believe was discredited long ago then get people talking about it, have talks with parents whose kids aren't vaccinated to see are there areas they could be reassured about, fears/concerns they may have around the vaccine, etc.

I just had to add, looked at that guardian article you linked and christ I couldn't agree with the first chap more, he said it a lot better than I:

No, the MMR shouldn’t be compulsory. That would only be counterproductive. People will react against it and think they are being bullied and not being listened to. The right way to increase the vaccination rate is to engage respectfully with people, listen to their point of view and provide accurate and reliable information. Trying to compel people to vaccinate would probably be ineffective and could produce a negative reaction that would make matters even worse. We should try to persuade parents it is the right thing to do and a safe thing to do, which will protect all children.

Should be applied to most things honestly, covid vaccinations for sure.

civdef · 14-04-2021 11:00pm

BattleCorp wrote: »

The cops (well one at least) were d1cks but I'm not quite absolving Caron Nazario of all wrongdoing either.

Why didn't he get out of the car when he was asked? When the cop tried to open the door of the car, Nazario held it shut with his forearm.

Is it not a lawful command for the police to ask him to get out of the car?

The man was stopped for something he hadn't done (non-display of plates), wasn't speeding etc - so I don't see why he couldn't ask for some explanation. He was also being given contradictory orders abut keeping hands up and getting out of the vehicle) and I think rightly felt that if he went to open his seatbelt he was potentially in real danger.

I really don't see probable cause for what they decided to treat as a felony stop.

otmmyboy2 · 14-04-2021 11:10pm

civdef wrote: »

The man was stopped for something he hadn't done (non-display of plates), wasn't speeding etc - so I don't see why he couldn't ask for some explanation. He was also being given contradictory orders abut keeping hands up and getting out of the vehicle) and I think rightly felt that if he went to open his seatbelt he was potentially in real danger.

I really don't see probable cause for what they decided to treat as a felony stop.

Philando Castile's family would agree with that.

civdef · 14-04-2021 11:14pm

Grizzly 45 wrote: »

"Routine" traffic stops are the most dangerous day to day activity a US LEO will face. So lets take this as a factor.He drives a mile to get to a well-lit area,as advised to do, but no doubt setting ff all sorts of Spidey senses in the cops. Why are they pulling him? No Lic plate, bar a hard enough to see temp lic tag. A bit of paper 5in by4ins not really visible in the dark tint of the back window.

Traffic stops are bloody dangerous, mostly from other traffic though as borne out by stats for officer deaths. It must totally suck to have to police in a place where the chance of perp with gun is so high though.

I don't credit these two morons with functioning spidey senses though.

The guy is an army Lt and carrying a handgun in his footwell. Interesting as US army bases have very strict rules about personal firearms on base inc vehicles.So was he cleared to carry such by the base commander is another interesting point in this

Interesting but not relevant to the case in hand, and at the end of the day he was exercising his rights - think he had a CCW too?

As a Lt he should know a thing about obeying orders and giving such.When you have guys pointing guns at you maybe its best to comply and save explanations and questions until they are happy you aren't a threat.

Lawful orders, of course. I didn't see a whole lot of lawful. It definitely is more sensible to keep mouth shut and sue later - but in a free society, someone brave enough to protest injustice shouldn't be criticised for that.

Police response to this incident, utterly a shambles and unprofessional.Issuing contradictory commands to the man then macse ing him for not exiting the car, and then trying to make a deal of this "all going away" if he doen't make an issue of it!"

No argument there at all- doing some further reading, it seems towns in this area are known for poor policing standards. Amazing how a small town here that might justify a couple of guards here is able to run its own independent force there with very little oversight and fairly dodgy hiring / training practices.

Still at least they didn't get their Glocks mixed up with their Tasers as like the stupid bint in Minnesota.:rolleyes:

If it wasn't so tragic it'd be funny.

civdef · 14-04-2021 11:20pm

On the other hand, the man is probably going to own the town lock, stock and barrel by the time the lawsuits are over.

Mellor · 15-04-2021 1:40am

otmmyboy2 wrote: »

Even Sweden which never locked down is around 1.5%, going by cases vs deaths, of course that is likely lower because of asymptomatic cases.

I'd say half the mortality rate is less dangerous.

That's mortality rate, unrelated to R0 number.

And I agree that that non symptomatic cases might mean the mortality rate is lower, but by the same token it means that the transmission rate is higher. THe net effect is the same number people die.

Passports were initiated as a temporary measure around WWI, and yet they are still here. I disagree with revoking your freedom to travel internationally and selling it back to you only to be revoked at will by your country.

Eg - people were once free to travel without passports, then that freedom was revoked and sold back to them(passports aren't free) and subject to the whims of the government(see tin pot governments confiscating passports of political dissidents).

Passports have existed since medieval times are earlier. In parliament law since the 1500s. They served to help you prove who you were overseas. But mass migration wasn't an issue until the 20th century, people complained about war time restriction. But it's absolutely necessary in the 21st century.

Or are you saying that passports should be abolished, and all immigration borders dropped? As I really can't you supporting that in the other direction.

I equate your "consequences" of choosing not to get vaccinated to coercion because that is what it is, if something is truly optional in the sense of vaccinations then why should people be punished if they refuse?
Denying someone something is still punishment, and if you disagree with the word coercion then duress would fit it nicely:

But it doesn't fit the definition of coercion. Coercion implies that the restriction is attempt to get people to do something in and of itself.
Which doesn't apply here. Restrictions would not to force/encourage people to get vaccinated. There are there to increased safety for society.
As I said, I'm perfectly ok with people choosing not to be vaccinated. And they should be aware that that decision affects their risk profile.

Optional, in no way implies without consequence.
Driver Licenses are optional. Not being licensed had consequence.

otmmyboy2 wrote: »

Y
I'd be rather curious as to the reasoning why people aren't getting their kids vaccinated against MMR though.
If it is the autism thing which I believe was discredited long ago then get people talking about it, have talks with parents whose kids aren't vaccinated to see are there areas they could be reassured about, fears/concerns they may have around the vaccine, etc.

It is almost certainly routed in the autism thing. One man did society a lot of harm with that fake "study". People believe these nonsense stories because it's fearmongering. Talking to them does not help, they dig their heels and decided it's a matter of opinion not fact.
People are entitled to their opinions, the problem is that people think their uneducated and ill-formed opinions are equal to others. Obvious not the case.
But it's a human condition, and as a result we have people who believe the earth is flat, and others who believe dinosaurs are a hoax (or a test from God). :rolleyes:

Mellor · 15-04-2021 2:03am

Grizzly 45 wrote: »

"Routine" traffic stops are the most dangerous day to day activity a US LEO will face. So lets take this as a factor.He drives a mile to get to a well-lit area,as advised to do, but no doubt setting ff all sorts of Spidey senses in the cops. Why are they pulling him? No Lic plate, bar a hard enough to see temp lic tag. A bit of paper 5in by4ins not really visible in the dark tint of the back window.

Pulling over in a well lit and safe place is pretty standard. Traffic police should be used to that.
Was the paper tag issued by the state? If so then it's not the drivers fault that it's the system. Even if hard to see, the very first thing the officer should have done was check for a tag. He didn't. He first action was to pull a gun and give confusing orders, then pepper spray the guy.
He's been fired. And rightfully so. Hope he gets nailed in civil court too.

yubabill · 15-04-2021 7:58am

This whole thing with vaccines and clots is a cluster funk. It's being handled abysmally all over and it will undermine public confidence in the rollout.

This is what happens when politicians get involved with people who have a God complex (some in the medical community).

At least they have not tried to make vaccination mandatory. That would be a serious violation of human rights IMHO and the choice should be with the individual.

The only consolation is that the public will pay less attention to experts in the future (hopefully climate change experts, because I believe a lot of them are charlatans).

There are a few genuine scientists and medical professionals left, they have always won in the long run and let's hope they get their day.

civdef · 15-04-2021 9:34am

yubabill wrote: »

This whole thing with vaccines and clots is a cluster funk. It's being handled abysmally all over and it will undermine public confidence in the rollout.

This is what happens when politicians get involved with people who have a God complex (some in the medical community).

At least they have not tried to make vaccination mandatory. That would be a serious violation of human rights IMHO and the choice should be with the individual.

The only consolation is that the public will pay less attention to experts in the future (hopefully climate change experts, because I believe a lot of them are charlatans).

There are a few genuine scientists and medical professionals left, they have always won in the long run and let's hope they get their day.

If you start off believing all but a “few” scientists and medical professionals are genuine- you will be very hard to satisfy about anything in the modern world I fear.

Are you basing this assessment of millions of trained professionals off any training of your own?

Shooting Forum - Firearms licencing information

Off Topic Chat. (MOD NOTE post# 3949 and post#5279)

Comments